Article published In: Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 4:2 (2014) ► pp.211–232
In the eye of the recipient
Pupillary responses to suspense in literary classics
Published online: 30 March 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.4.2.05rie
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.4.2.05rie
Plot suspense is one of the most important components of narrative fiction that motivate recipients to follow fictional characters
through their worlds. The present study investigates the dynamic development of narrative suspense in excerpts of literary
classics from the 19th century in a multi-methodological approach. For two texts, differing in suspense as judged by a large
independent sample, we collected (a) data from questionnaires, indicating different affective and cognitive dimensions of
receptive engagement, (b) continuous ratings of suspense during text reception from both experts and lay recipients, and (c)
registration of pupil diameter as a physiological indicator of changes in emotional arousal and attention during reception. Data
analyses confirmed differences between the two texts at different dimensions of receptive engagement and, importantly, revealed
significant correlations of pupil diameter and the course of suspense over time. Our findings demonstrate that changes of the
pupil diameter provide a reliable ‘online’ indicator of suspense.
References (61)
Anz, T. (2003). Spannung. In K. Weimar, H. Fricke, & Müller Jan Dirk (Eds.), Reallexikon der deutschen Literaturwissenschaft (pp. 464–467). Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
Altmann, U., Bohrn, I.C., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A.M. (2012). Fact vs fiction-how paratextual information shapes our reading processes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 22–29.
Appel, M., Koch, E., Schreier, M., & Groeben, N. (2002). Aspekte des Leseerlebens: Skalenentwicklung. [Aspects of reading engagement. Scale development]. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 14(4), 149–154.
Auracher, J. (2007). “… wie auf den allmächtigen Schlag einer magischen Rute.”: Psychophysiologische Messungen zur Textwirkung. [Psychophysiological measurements of textual effects]. Baden-Baden: Deutscher Wissenschaftsverlag (DWV).
Bar-Haim, Y., Fox, N.A., VanMeenen, K.M., & Marshall, P.J. (2004). Children’s narratives and patterns of cardiac reactivity. Developmental Psychobiology, 44(4), 238–249.
Bayer, M. & Schacht, A. (2014). Event-related brain responses to emotional words, pictures and faces — A cross-domain comparison. Frontiers in Psychology, 51, 1106.
Bayer, M., Sommer, W., & Schacht, A. (2011). Emotional words impact the mind but not the body: Evidence from pupillary responses. Psychophysiology, 48(11), 1554–1562.
. (2012). Font Size Matters — Emotion and Attention in Cortical Responses to Written Words. PLoS ONE, 7(5), e36042.
Berridge, C.W. & Waterhouse, B.D. (2003). The locus coeruleus–noradrenergic system: modulation of behavioral state and state-dependent cognitive processes. Brain Research Reviews, 42(1), 33–84.
Bradley, M.M., Miccoli, L., Escrig, M.A., & Lang, P.J. (2008). The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology, 45(4), 602–607.
Costa, V.D., Lang, P.J., Sabatinelli, D., Versace, F., & Bradley, M.M. (2010). Emotional imagery: Assessing pleasure and arousal in the brain’s reward circuitry. Human Brain Mapping, 311, 1446–1457.
Cupchik, G.C., Oatley, K., & Vorderer, P. (1998). Emotional effects of reading excerpts from short stories by James Joyce. Poetics, 25(6), 363–377.
De Wied, M.A. (1991). The Role of Time Structures in the Experience of Film Suspense and Duration: A Study on the Effects of Anticipation Time Upon Suspense and Temporal Variations on Duration Experience and Suspense. Amsterdam: U. van Amsterdam.
Dixon, P. & Bortolussi, M. (2011). The scientific study of literature: What can, has, and should be done. Scientific Study of Literature, 1(1), 59–71.
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Moldoveanu, M.C. (2013). Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 28–47.
Einhäuser, W., Stout, J., Koch, C., & Carter, O. (2008) Pupil dilation reflects perceptual selection and predicts subsequent stability in perceptual rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 1051, 1704–1709.
Frijda, N.H. (1986). The emotions. Studies in emotion and social interaction. Cambridge, New York, Paris: Cambridge University Press.
Gerrig, R.J. (1996). The Resiliency of Suspense. In P. Vorderer, H.J. Wulff, & M. Friedrichsen (Eds.), Suspense. Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp. 93–105). New York, NY: Routledge.
Gilzenrat, M.S., Nieuwenhuis, S., Jepma, M., & Cohen, J.D. (2010). Pupil diameter tracks changes in control state predicted by the adaptive gain theory of locus coeruleus function. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10(2), 252–269.
Grandjean, D. & Scherer, K.R. (2008). Unpacking the cognitive architecture of emotion processes. Emotion, 8(3), 341–351.
Green, M.C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 247–266.
Green, M.C. & Brock, T.C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721.
Green, M.C., Brock, T.C., & Kaufman, G.F. (2004). Understanding Media Enjoyment: The Role of Transportation Into Narrative Worlds. Communication Theory, 14(4), 311–327.
Hess, E.H. & Polt, J.M. (1960). Pupil Size as Related to Interest Value of Visual Stimuli. Science, 132(3423), 349–350.
. (1964). Pupil Size in Relation to Mental Activity during Simple Problem-Solving. Science, 143(3611), 1190–1192.
Hoeks, B. & Ellenbroek, B.A. (1993). A neural basis for a quantitative pupillary model. Journal of Psychophysiology, 71, 315–324.
Hsu, C.-T., Jacobs, A.M., & Conrad, M. (2015). Can Harry Potter still put a spell on us in a second language? An fMRI study on reading emotion-laden literature in late bilinguals. Cortex, 631, 282–295.
Kang, O.E., Huffer, K.E., & Wheatley, T.P. (2014). Pupil Dilation Dynamics Track Attention to High-Level Information. PLoS ONE, 9(8), e102463.
Klimmt, C., Rizzo, A., Vorderer, P., Koch, J., & Fischer, T. (2009). Experimental Evidence for Suspense as Determinant of Video Game Enjoyment. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(1), 29–31.
Knobloch, S. (2003). Suspense and Mystery. In J. Bryant, D. Roskos-Ewoldsen, & J. Cantor (eds.). Communication and Emotion (pp. 379–396). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lang, P.J. (1984). Cognition in emotion: Concepts and action. In C.E. Izard, J. Kagan, & R.B. Zajonc (Eds.), Emotions, cognition, and behavior (pp. 192–226). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lauer, G. & Schacht, A. (2014). Why should we feel suspense by the fate of Hauke Haien? Paper presented at
the IGEL conference 2014
in Torino.
Lehne, M. & Koelsch, S. (in press). Tension-resolution patterns as a key element of aesthetic experience: Psychological principles and underlying brain mechanisms. In M. Nadal, J.P. Huston, L. Agnati, F. Mora, C.J. Cela-Conde (Eds.), Art, Aesthetics, and the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mar, R.A., Oatley, K., Djikic, M., & Mullin, J. (2011). Emotion and narrative fiction: Interactive influences before, during, and after reading. Cognition & Emotion, 25(5), 818–833.
McTeague, L.M., Lang, P.J., Laplante, M.-C., Cuthbert, B.N., Strauss, C.C., & Bradley, M.M. (2009). Fearful Imagery in Social Phobia: Generalization, Comorbidity, and Physiological Reactivity. Biological Psychiatry, 65(5), 374–382.
Mellmann, K. (2007). Vorschlag zu einer emotionspsychologischen Bestimmung von ‘Spannung’. [Proposition of a definition of ‚suspense’ in emotion psychology.] In K. Eibl, K. Mellmann, & R. Zymner (Eds.), Im Rücken der Kulturen (pp. 241–268). Paderborn: Mentis.
. (2010). Objects of ‘empathy’: Characters (and other such things) as psycho-poetic effects. In J. Eder, F. Jannidis, & R. Schneider (Eds.), Characters in fictional worlds. Understanding imaginary beings in literature, film, and other media (pp. 416–441). Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
Nell, V. (1988). Lost in a book: The psychology of reading for pleasure. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Nuthmann, A. & van der Meer, E. (2005). Time’s arrow and pupillary response. Psychophysiology, 42(3), 306–317.
Oatley, K. (1995). A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics, 23(1–2), 53–74.
Odağ, Ö. (2011). Reading engagement. Scientific Study of Literature, 1(2), 292–325.
Oldfield, R.C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.
Partala, T. & Surakka, V. (2003). Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(1–2), 185–198.
Radford, C. (1975). How can we be moved by the fate of Anna Karenina? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplement Vol. 491, pp. 67–90.
Schacht, A., Pollmann, K., & Bayer, M. (2013). Lese-Erleben im Labor?: Zu Potential und Limitationen psycho(physio)logischer Methoden in der empirischen Literaturwissenschaft. [Reading engagement in the lab? Potential and limitations of psycho(physio)logical methods in the empirical study of literature.] In P. Ajouri, K. Mellmann, & C. Rauen (Eds.), Empirie in der Literaturwissenschaft (pp. 431–444). Paderborn: Mentis.
Schacht, A. & Sommer, W. (2009a). Time course and task dependence of emotion effects in word processing. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 91, 28–43.
. (2009b). Emotions in word and face processing: Early and late cortical responses. Brain and Cognition, 69(3), 538–550.
Scherer, K.R. (2001). Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. In K.R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 92–120). New York: Oxford University Press.
Smallwood, J., Brown, K.S., Tipper, C., Giesbrecht, B., Franklin, M.S., Mrazek, M.D., Schooler, J.W. (2011). Pupillometric Evidence for the Decoupling of Attention from Perceptual Input during Offline Thought. PLoS ONE, 6(3), e18298.
Stanners, R.F., Coulter, M., Sweet, A.W., & Murphy, P. (1979). The pupillary response as an indicator of arousal and cognition. Motivation and Emotion, 3(4), 319–340.
Steinhauer, S.R., Boller, F., Zubin, J., & Pearlman, S. (1983). Pupillary dilation to emotional visual stimuli revisited. Psychophysiology, 201, 472–472.
Van der Meer, E., Beyer, R., Horn, J., Foth, M., Bornemann, B., Ries, J., Wartenburger, I. (2010). Resource allocation and fluid intelligence: Insights from pupillometry. Psychophysiology, 47(1), 158–169.
Verney, S.P., Granholm, E., & Dionisio, D.P. (2001). Pupillary responses and processing resources on the visual backward masking task. Psychophysiology, 38(1), 76–83.
Võ, M.L.-H., Jacobs, A.M., Kuchinke, L., Hofmann, M., Conrad, M., Schacht, A., & Hutzler, F. (2008). The coupling of emotion and cognition in the eye: Introducing the pupil old/new effect. Psychophysiology, 45(1), 130–140.
Vorderer, P. (1996). Toward a psychological theory of suspense. In P. Vorderer, H.J. Wulff, & M. Friedrichsen (Eds.), Suspense. Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp. 233–253). New York: Routledge.
Vrana, S.R., Cuthbert, B.N., & Lang, P.J. (1986). Fear Imagery and Text Processing. Psychophysiology, 23(3), 247–253.
Wallentin, M., Nielsen, A.H., Vuust, P., Dohn, A., Roepstorff, A., & Lund, T.E. (2011). Amygdala and heart rate variability responses from listening to emotionally intense parts of a story. NeuroImage, 58(3), 963–973.
Wallentin, M., Simonsen, A., & Nielsen, A.H. (2013). Action speaks louder than words: Empathy mainly modulates emotions from theory of mind-laden parts of a story. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 137–153.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Bentz, Maria, Maya Cortez Espinoza, Vesela Simeonova, Tilmann Köppe & Edgar Onea
Grassi, Francesco, Louisa Kulke, Alex Lepauvre & Anne Schacht
Jürgens, Rebecca, Julia Fischer & Annekathrin Schacht
Jacobs, Arthur M., Jana Lüdtke, Arash Aryani, Burkhard Meyer-Sickendieck & Markus Conrad
2016. Mood-empathic and aesthetic responses in poetry reception. Scientific Study of Literature 6:1 ► pp. 87 ff.
Carrol, Gareth, Kathy Conklin, Josephine Guy & Rebekah Scott
2015. Processing punctuation and word changes in different editions of prose fiction. Scientific Study of Literature 5:2 ► pp. 200 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
