Article published In: Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 4:1 (2014) ► pp.3–24
Look before you leap
How enjambment affects the processing of poetry
Published online: 22 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.4.1.01jag
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.4.1.01jag
This study describes two eye tracking experiments investigating the processing of poetry with and without enjambments. In Experiment 1, poetic fragments with authentic prospective (syntactically incomplete) or retrospective (syntactically complete) enjambments were investigated; in Experiment 2, enjambments were created — for the purpose of the experiment — from poetry that did not originally contain enjambments. We hypothesized that the layout of the text in poetic fragments would affect the degree to which integrative processes take place: in case of prospective enjambments, the syntactic incompleteness may preclude integration at the end of the line (before going to the next line), whereas retrospective enjambments may cause considerable re-interpretation at the next line. We indeed found significant differences in reading patterns between prose and poetry, poetry with and without enjambment, and poetry with prospective and retrospective enjambment. We interpret these results as favoring a dynamic model of language processing, where the amount and type of integration is determined by syntactic (in)completeness, semantic (in)completeness, but also the physical layout of the text.
Keywords: reading, eye tracking, enjambment, poetry, prose
References (20)
Brouwer, H., Fitz, H., & Hoeks, J.C.J. (2012). Getting Real about Semantic Illusions: Rethinking the Functional Role of the P600 in Language Comprehension. Brain Research, 14461, 127–43.
Fisher, M.H., Carminati, M.N., Stabler, J., & Roberts, A. (2003). Eye movements during poetry and prose reading. 13th European Conference on Eye Movements (Dundee, Scotland; 20-24 August).
Golomb, H. (1979). Enjambment in poetry: Language and verse in interaction. Tel Aviv: The Porter Institue for Poetics and Semiotics.
Hanauer, D. (1996). Integration of phonetic and graphic features in poetic text categorization judgments. Poetics, 231, 363–380.
. (1998). Reading poetry: An empirical investigation of Formalist, Stylistic and Conventionalist claims. Poetics Today, 191, 565–580.
. (2001). What we know about reading poetry. Theoretical positions and empirical research. In D. Schram & G. Steen (Eds.), The psychology and sociology of literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 107–128.
Hoeks, J.C.J., & Brouwer, H. (2014). Electrophysiological Research on Conversation and Discourse Processing. In: Holtgraves, T. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Language and Social Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. 365–386.
Hoeks, J.C.J., Hendriks, P., Vonk, W., Brown, C.M., & Hagoort, P. (2006). Processing the NP- versus S-coordination ambiguity. Thematic information does not completely eliminate processing difficulty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59 (9), 1581–1599.
Hoffstaedter, P. (1987). Poetic Text Processing and its empirical investigation. Poetics, 161, 75–91.
Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 871, 329–354.
Koops van ’t Jagt, R. (2011). Een lege plek om te blijven. Een eyetrackingonderzoek naar de online verwerking van regelverdeling en enjambement in poëzie [An empty place to stay. An eye tracking investigation into the on-line processing of lineation and enjambment in poetry]. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of Groningen.
Peer, W. van (1986). Stylistics and psychology: Investigations of foregrounding. London: Croom Helm.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124 (3), 372–422.
Reuven, T. (1998). Poetic rhythm: structure and performance; an empirical study in cognitive poetics. Berne: Lang.
Cited by (16)
Cited by 16 other publications
Knoop, Christine A. & Stefan Blohm
Rathcke, Tamara V. & Eline A. Smit
Tsoukala, Andromachi, Margreet Vogelzang & Ianthi Maria Tsimpli
Rathcke, Tamara, Simone Falk & Simone Dalla Bella
Blohm, Stefan, Stefano Versace, Sanja Methner, Valentin Wagner, Matthias Schlesewsky & Winfried Menninghaus
Bruhn, Mark J.
Klimek-Jankowska, Dorota, Anna Czypionka, Wojciech Witkowski & Joanna Błaszczak
Castiglione, Davide
Castiglione, Davide
Hilberink-Schulpen, Béryl, Ulrike Nederstigt, Frank van Meurs & Emmie van Alem
Nishihara, Takayuki
2016. Chapter 8. Of learning and poetics. In Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 24], ► pp. 151 ff.
Carrol, Gareth, Kathy Conklin, Josephine Guy & Rebekah Scott
2015. Processing punctuation and word changes in different editions of prose fiction. Scientific Study of Literature 5:2 ► pp. 200 ff.
Montoro, Rocío
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.