Article published In: Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 11:2 (2021) ► pp.196–222
Reading fiction with an e-book or in print
Purposes, pragmatics and practices. A focus group study
Published online: 2 March 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.21012.kos
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.21012.kos
Abstract
Empirical research on the differences between digital and print reading has recently increased, mainly concentrating on informational texts while disregarding literary texts. Concerning narrative fiction, the existing quantitative studies have found no or very few differences between reading printed books and e-books. In our focus group study, we amplify the perspective on digital and print book reading through a largely explorative approach. The results gained by interviewing 34 habitual readers of e-books in six groups show that e-books complement rather than replace printed books. Crucial differences can be found in the dimensions of the reading situation, genre selection, purpose of reading, as well as literary quality and status of the text. Furthermore, our results shed new light on the importance of the printed book as an individual material object, with its own specific iconicity and with notable consequences for intellectual possession, memory, and remembrance of read books and lived reading experiences.
Article outline
- Theory and recent research
- Preparation for reading
- The act of reading
- Effects of reading
- Methodology
- Focus group interviews
- Participants
- Questionnaire
- Procedure
- Coding
- Focus group interviews
- Analysis and findings
- Preparation for reading
- Resources: Access to material and price
- Selection: Genres and reading medium
- Purpose: Leisure or study
- Print reading for study and digital reading for leisure
- Digital reading for study and print reading for leisure
- Circumstances: Travelling and public transport
- The act of reading
- Reading practices and reading situations
- Ease of use: Comfort and readability
- Immersion and reading experience
- Effects of reading
- Physical presence and intellectual possession
- Memory and retention
- Preparation for reading
- Discussion
- Acknowledgements
References
References (52)
Andersen, T. R., Kjerkegaard, S., & Pedersen, B. S. (2021). Introduction: Modes of reading. Poetics Today, 42 (2), 131–147.
Bäcker, I. (2014). Der Akt des Lesens – neu gelesen. Zur Bestimmung des Wirkungspotenzials von Literatur. München: Wilhelm Fink.
Ballatore, A., & Natale, S. (2016). E-readers and the death of the book: Or, new media and the myth of the disappearing medium. New Media & Society, 18(10), 2379–2394.
Balling, G., Begnum, A. C., Kuzmicova, A., & Schilhab, T. (2019). The young read in new places, the older read on new devices: A survey of digital reading practices among librarians and Information Science students in Denmark. Participations. Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 16(1), 197–236.
Baron, N. S., Calixte, R. M., & Havewala, M. (2017). The persistence of print among university students: An exploratory study. Telematics and Informatics, 34(5), 590–604.
Benedetto, S., Drai-Zerbib, V., Pedrotti, M., Tissier, G., & Baccino, T. (2013). E-readers and visual fatigue. PloS one, 8(12).
Bloor, M., Frankland, J., Thomas, M., & Robson, K. (2001). Focus Groups in Social Research. London [u.a.]: Sage.
Boelmann, J. (2009). Leseforschung. In J. Schneider, & R. Grundmann (Eds.), Methodengeschichte der Germanistik (pp. 309–321). de Gruyter.
Burke, M. (2010). Literary Reading, Cognition and Emotion: An Exploration of the Oceanic Mind (1st ed.). Routledge.
Cavallo, G., & Chartier, R. (1999). A History of Reading in the West. University of Massachusetts Press.
Chartier, R. (1995). Forms and Meanings. Texts, Performances, and Audiences from Codex to Computer. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288–325.
D’Ambra, J., Wilson, C. S., & Akter, S. (2019). Affordance theory and e-books: evaluating the e-reading experience using netnography. Pers Ubiquit Comput 231, 873–892.
Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 251, 23–38.
Dittmar, N. (2002). Transkription: Ein Leitfaden mit Aufgaben für Studenten, Forscher und Laien (Qualitative Sozialforschung, 10). Opladen: Leske Budrich.
Foy, J. E., & Gerrig, R. J. (2014). Flying to Neverland: How readers tacitly judge norms during comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 42(8), 1250–1259.
Graf, W. (2004). Der Sinn des Lesens. Modi der literarischen Rezeptionskompetenz. Münster: Lit Verlag.
Hilpert, J., Benighaus, L., & Scheel, O. (2012). Auswertung von Fokusgruppen mit MAXQDA am Beispiel des Projektes „Wahrnehmung der Fusionsenergie bei ausgewählten Bevölkerungsteilen“. In M. Schulz, B. Mack, & O. Renn (Eds.), Fokusgruppen in der empirischen Sozialwissenschaft (pp. 170–194). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Hupfeld, A., Sellen, A., O’hara, K., & Rodden, T. (2013). Leisure-based reading and the place of e-books in everyday life. In P. Kotzé, G. Marsden, G. Lindgaard, J. Wesson, & M. Winckler (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2013 (pp. 1–18). Springer.
Kaufman, G., & Flanagan, M. (2016). High-low split: Divergent cognitive construal levels triggered by digital and non-digital platforms. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2773–2777.
Kong, Y., Seo, Y. S., & Zhai, L. (2018). Comparison of reading performance on screen and on paper: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 1231, 138–149.
Kuhn, A., & Hagenhoff, S. (2015). Digitale Lesemedien. In U. Rautenberg, & U. Schneider (Eds.), Lesen. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch (pp. 361–380). de Gruyter.
Kuzmičová, A., Schilhab, T., & Burke, M. (2020). m-Reading: Fiction reading from mobile phones. Convergence, 26(2), 333–349.
Mangen, A. (2008). Hypertext fiction reading: haptics and immersion. Journal of Research in Reading, 311, 404–419.
Mangen, A., & Kuiken, D. (2014). Lost in an iPad: Narrative engagement on paper and tablet. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(2), 150–177.
Mangen, A., & van der Weel, A. (2016). The evolution of reading in the age of digitisation: An integrative framework for reading research. Literacy, 501, 116–124.
Mangen, A., Olivier, G., & Velay, J-L. (2019). Comparing comprehension of a long text read in print book and on Kindle: Where in the text and when in the story? Frontiers in Psychology, 10(38).
Philipp, M. (2020). Multiple Dokumente verstehen. Theoretische und empirische Perspektiven auf Prozesse und Produkte des Lesens mehrerer Dokumente. Beltz.
Rautenberg, U. (2005). Das Buch in der Alltagskultur: Eine Annäherung an zeichenhaften Buchgebrauch und die Medialität des Buches. Studien der Erlanger Buchwissenschaft, 151.
Rosebrock, C. (2020). Netzlektüre und Deep Reading: Entmischungen der Lesekultur. Leseforum Schweiz, 21, 1–16.
Schneider, U. (2018). The social dimension of the printed book as a medium. TXT – The Book Issue: Social Symbolism, 41, 119–126.
Schilhab, T., Balling, G., & Kuzmičová, A. (2018). Decreasing materiality from print to screen reading. First Monday, 23(10).
Schwabe, A., Brandl, L., Boomgaarden, H. G., & Stocker, G. (2020). Literatur am Bildschirm – Zum Stand der empirischen Leseforschung. Orbis Litterarum, 75(5), 213–229.
(2021). Experiencing literature on the e-reader: The effects of narrative texts on screen. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(2), 319–338.
Spence, C. (2020). The multisensory experience of handling and reading books. Multisensory Research, 33(8), 902–928.
Stocker, G. (2015). Aufgewacht aus tiefem Lesen. Überlegungen zur Medialität des Bücherlesens im digitalen Zeitalter. In H.-C. von Herrmann, J. Moser (Eds.): Lesen. Ein Handapparat (pp. 33–48). Vittorio Klostermann.
Olave, M. A. T. (2020). Book love. A cultural sociological interpretation of the attachment to books. Poetics, 811.
Zwaan, R. A. (1993). Aspects of literary comprehension. A cognitive Approach. John Benjamins.
Cited by (12)
Cited by 12 other publications
Kosch, Lukas
Kosch, Lukas, Günther Stocker, Annika Ahrens-Schwabe & Hajo Boomgaarden
Molito, Violy
Pertiwi, I. E. & P. Purnawarman
Schirmer, Werner, Anina Vercruyssen, Nelly Geerts & Ignace Glorieux
Antonini, Alessio, Sam Brooker & Lovro Škopljanac
Hakemulder, Frank & Anne Mangen
Vuorinen, Pauliina Tea Eleonoora, Benjamin W. Tatler & Frank Keller
Kosch, Lukas, Günther Stocker, Annika Schwabe & Hajo G. Boomgaarden
Schwabe, Annika, Lukas Kosch, Hajo G. Boomgaarden & Günther Stocker
van de Ven, Inge, Frank Hakemulder & Anne Mangen
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
