Article published In: Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 11:1 (2021) ► pp.3–34
Sound-meaning relations in Japanese Tanka
Formant dispersion of vowels is associated with dominance and activity
Published online: 17 December 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.21006.aur
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.21006.aur
Abstract
This study aimed to test sound-meaning relations in Japanese poetry. To this end, participants assessed the sentiments expressed in a random selection of Tanka (a specific form of Japanese poetry) on six bipolar scales comprising Evaluation (emotional valence), Potency (dominance), and Activity (arousal). The selected Tanka differed with regard to their average formant-dispersion (i.e., the distance between the first and second formant). Corroborating results of a previous study that tested the relation between formant dispersion and emotional tone in German poetry, results suggest that poems with an extremely low average formant dispersion have a significantly higher likelihood of expressing dominance and activity than poems with an extremely high formant dispersion. No significant differences regarding the Evaluation dimension were found.
Keywords: sound iconicity, sound symbolism, formant dispersion, emotion, dominance, activity, arousal
Article outline
- Sound-Meaning relations in Japanese Tanka: Formant dispersion of vowels is associated with dominance and activity
- Objectives and hypothesis
- Method
- Participants
- Materials
- Tanka
- Procedure
- Data analysis
- Results
- Analysis of variance: Effect of Tankas’ category on readers’ assessment
- Tukey test for multiple comparisons between categories
- Comparison between ratings per item
- Linear-Mixed-Model regression: Individual differences between participants
- Discussion
- Supplementary materials
- Authors of selected Tankas
- Japanese
- Invitation
- Instructions
References
References (143)
Adams, F. M., & Osgood, C. E. (1973). A cross-cultural study of the affective meanings of color. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 4(2), 135–156.
Adelman, J. S., Estes, Z., & Cossu, M. (2018). Emotional sound symbolism: Languages rapidly signal valence via phonemes. Cognition, 1751, 122–130.
Albers, S. (2008). Lautsymbolik in ägyptischen Texten [Sound symbolism in Egyptian texts]. Mainz, Germany: WBG Zabern.
Arnheim, R. (1986). New essays on the psychology of art. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
Aryani, A. (2019). On the crucial role of “Arousal” and “Saliency” in affective iconicity. Comment on “Methodological Issues in the Study of Phonetic Symbolism” by Tsur and Gafni. Scientific studies of literature, 9(2), 240–249.
Aryani, A., Conrad, M., Schmidtke, D., & Jacobs, A. (2018). Why ‘piss’ is ruder than ‘pee’? The role of sound in affective meaning making. PloS One, 13(6): e0198430.
Aryani, A., Isbilen, E. S., & Christiansen, M. H. (2020). Affective arousal links sound to meaning. Psychological science, 31(8), 978–986.
Aryani, A., & Jacobs, A. M. (2018). Affective congruence between sound and meaning of words facilitates semantic decision. Behavioral sciences, 8(6): 56.
Aryani, A., Kraxenberger, M., Ullrich, S., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M. (2016). Measuring the basic affective tone of poems via phonological saliency and iconicity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(2), 191–204.
Auracher, J. (2017). Sound iconicity of abstract concepts: Place of articulation is implicitly associated with abstract concepts of size and social dominance. PloS One, 12(11): e0187196.
Auracher, J., Albers, S., Zhai, Y., Gareeva, G., & Stavniychuk, T. (2011). P is for happiness, N is for sadness: Universals in sound iconicity to detect emotions in poetry. Discourse Processes, 48(1), 1–25.
Auracher, J., Menninghaus, W., & Scharinger, M. (2020). Sound predicts meaning: Cross-modal associations between formant frequency and emotional tone in stanzas. Cognitive Science, 44(10): e12906.
Auracher, J., Scharinger, M., & Menninghaus, W. (2019). Contiguity-based sound iconicity: The meaning of words resonates with phonetic properties of their immediate verbal contexts. PloS One, 14(5): e0216930.
Bakker, I., van der Voordt, T., Vink, P., & de Boon, J. (2014). Pleasure, arousal, dominance: Mehrabian and Russell revisited. Current Psychology, 33(3), 405–421.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
Becker, J. A., & Fisher, S. K. (1988). Comparison of associations to vowel speech sounds by English and Spanish speakers. The American Journal of Psychology, 101(1), 51–57.
Bentley, M., & Varon, E. J. (1933). An accessory study of “Phonetic Symbolism.” The American Journal of Psychology, 45(1), 76–86.
Birch, D., & Erickson, M. (1957). Phonetic symbolism with respect to three dimensions from the semantic differential. The Journal of General Psychology, 58(2), 291–297.
Blasi, D. E., Wichmann, S., Hammarström, H., Stadler, P. F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2016). Sound–meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(39), 10818–10823.
Bremner, A. J., Caparos, S., Davidoff, J., Fockert, J. D., Linnell, K. J., & Spence, C. (2013). “Bouba” and “Kiki” in Namibia? A remote culture makes similar shape–sound matches, but different shape–taste matches to Westerners. Cognition, 126(2), 165–172.
Charlton, B. D., Ellis, W. A. H., Brumm, J., Nilsson, K., & Fitch, W. T. (2012). Female koalas prefer bellows in which lower formants indicate larger males. Animal Behaviour, 841, 1565–1571.
Charlton, B. D., Ellis, W. A. H., McKinnon, A. J., Cowin, G. J., Brumm, J., Nilsson, K., & Fitch, W. T. (2011). Cues to body size in the formant spacing of male koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) bellows: honesty in an exaggerated trait. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 214(20), 3414–3422.
Charlton, B. D., & Reby, D. (2016). The evolution of acoustic size exaggeration in terrestrial mammals. Nature Communications, 71: 12739.
Coulter, K. S. (2009). The effects of phonetic symbolism on comparative price perceptions. In A. L. McGill & S. Shavitt (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 361, pp. 986–987). Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research.
Coulter, K. S., & Coulter, R. A. (2010). Small sounds, big deals: Phonetic symbolism effects in pricing. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 315–328.
Cuskley, C., Dingemanse, M., Kirby, S., & van Leeuwen, T. M. (2019). Cross-modal associations and synesthesia: Categorical perception and structure in vowel–color mappings in a large online sample. Behavior Research Methods, 51 (4), 1651–1675.
Cuskley, C., Simner, J., & Kirby, S. (2017). Phonological and orthographic influences in the bouba–kiki effect. Psychological Research, 81(1), 119–130.
de Saussure, F. (1959). Course in general linguistics. New York, NY: Philosophical Library. Online available at [URL]
Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H., Monaghan, P. (2015). Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(10), 603–615.
Dingemanse, M., Perlman, M., & Perniss, P. (2020). Construals of iconicity: Experimental approaches to form–meaning resemblances in language. Language and Cognition, 12(1), 1–14.
Dinnissen, K., & Louwerse, M. M. (2015). The sound of valence: Phonological features predict word meaning. In: Noelle, D. C., Dale, R., Warlaumont, A. S., Yoshimi, J., Matlock, T., Jennings, C. D., & Maglio, P. P. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. Retrieved January 6, 2021, from [URL]
Duduciuc, A. C. (2015). Advertising brands by means of sound symbolism: The influence of vowels on perceived brand characteristics. Studies and Scientific Researches: Economics, 211, 112–119.
Eldridge, R. (1985). Form and content: An aesthetic theory of art. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 25(4), 303–316.
Erben Johansson, N., Anikin, A., Carling, G., & Holmer, A. (2020). The typology of sound symbolism: Defining macro-concepts via their semantic and phonetic features. Linguistic Typology, 24(2), 253–310.
Evans, S., Neave, N., & Wakelin, D. (2006). Relationships between vocal characteristics and body size and shape in human males: An evolutionary explanation for a deep male voice. Biological Psychology, 72(2), 160–163.
Fischer-Jørgensen, E. (1968). Perceptual dimensions of vowels. Language Typology and Universals, 21(1–6), 94–98.
(1978). On the universal character of phonetic symbolism with special reference to vowels. Studia Linguistica, 32(1–2): 80–90.
Fitch, W. T. (1997). Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102(2), 1213–1222.
Fitch, W. T., & Giedd, J. (1999). Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: a study using magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(3), 1511–1522.
Folkins, C., & Lenrow, P. B. (1966). An investigation of the expressive values of graphemes. Psychological Record, 161, 193–200.
Gallace, A., & Spence, C. (2006). Multisensory synesthetic interactions in the speeded classification of visual size. Perception & Psychophysics, 681, 1191–1203.
Gasser, M. (2004). The origins of arbitrariness in language. In K. D. Forbus, D. S. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 434–439). [URL]
Greenberg, J. H., & Jenkins, J. J. (1966). Studies in the psychological correlates of the sound system of American English. Word, 22(1–3), 207–242.
Haynie, H., Bowern, C., & LaPalombara, H. (2014). Sound Symbolism in the languages of Australia. PLoS ONE, 9(4): e92852.
Hevner, K. (1937). An experimental study of the affective value of sounds in poetry. The American Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 419–434.
Hinton, L., Nichols, J., & Ohala, J. (1994). Introduction: Sound-symbolic processes. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols, & J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound Symbolism (pp. 1–12). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hockett, C. F. (1959). Animal “languages” and human language. Human Biology, 31(1), 32–39. [URL]
Hornbostel, E. M. v. (1927/1938). The unity of the senses. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.), A source book of Gestalt psychology (p. 210–216). Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Company. (Original work published 1927).
Hoshi, H., Kwon, N., Akita, K., & Auracher, J. (2019). Semantic associations dominate over perceptual associations in vowel–size iconicity. I-Perception, 10(4), 2041669519861981.
Imai, M., & Kita, S. (2014). The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651), 20130298.
Imai, M., Kita, S., Nagumo, M., & Okada, H. (2008). Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning. Cognition, 109(1), 54–65.
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. Sebeok (Ed.) Style in Language, (pp. 350–377). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Jakobson, R., & Waugh, L. R. (1979). The sound shape of language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Kantartzis, K., Imai, M., & Kita, S. (2011). Japanese sound-symbolism facilitates word learning in English-speaking children. Cognitive Science, 35 (3), 575–586.
Klink, R. R. (2000). Creating brand names with meaning: The use of sound symbolism. Marketing Letters, 11(1), 5–20.
Klink, R. R., & Wu, L. (2014). The role of position, type, and combination of sound symbolism imbeds in brand names. Marketing Letters, 25(1), 13–24.
Knöferle, K., Li, J., Maggioni, E., & Spence, C. (2017). What drives sound symbolism? Different acoustic cues underlie sound-size and sound-shape mappings. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 5562.
Knöferle, K., & Spence, C. (2012). Crossmodal correspondences between sounds and tastes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 191, 992–1006.
Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt psychology, an introduction to new concepts in modern psychology. New York: Liveright
Kovic, V., Plunkett, K., & Westermann, G. (2010). The shape of words in the brain. Cognition, 114(1): 19–28.
Kraxenberger, M., & Menninghaus, W. (2016). Mimological reveries? Disconfirming the hypothesis of phono-emotional iconicity in poetry. Frontiers in Psychology, 71:1779.
Locke, J. (1690). An essay concerning human understanding. Book III: Words. Available at: [URL].
Lockwood, G., & Dingemanse, M. (2015). Iconicity in the lab: a review of behavioral, developmental, and neuroimaging research into sound-symbolism. Frontiers in Psychology, 61:1246.
Lockwood, G., Dingemanse, M., & Hagoort, P. (2016). Sound-symbolism boosts novel word learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(8), 1274–1281.
Lockwood, G., Hagoort, P., & Dingemanse, M. (2016). Synthesized size-sound symbolism. In A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman, & J. Trueswell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2016) (pp. 1823–1828). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society
Louwerse, M., & Qu, Z. (2017). Estimating valence from the sound of a word: Computational, experimental, and cross-linguistic evidence. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 241, 849–855.
Lowrey, T. M., & Shrum, L. J. (2007). Phonetic symbolism and brand name preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(3), 406–414.
Lupyan, G., & Winter, B. (2018). Language is more abstract than you think, or, why aren’t languages more iconic? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 3731: 20170137.
Markel, N. N., & Hamp, E. P. (1960). Connotative meanings of certain phoneme sequences. Studies in Linguistics, 14(3–4), 47–61.
Marks, L. E. (1974). On associations of light and sound: the mediation of brightness, pitch, and loudness. American Journal of Psychology, 87(1–2), 173–88.
(1989). On cross-modal similarity: the perceptual structure of pitch, loudness, and brightness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(3), 586–602.
Maurer, D., Pathman, T., & Mondloch, C. J. (2006). The shape of boubas: sound-shape correspondences in toddlers and adults. Developmental Science, 9(3):316–322.
Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Meier, B. P., Robinson, M. D., Crawford, L. E., & Ahlvers, W. J. (2007). When “light” and “dark” thoughts become light and dark responses: Affect biases brightness judgments. Emotion, 7(2), 366–376.
Miall, D. S. (2001). Sounds of contrast: An empirical approach to phonetic iconicity. Poetics, 29(1), 55–70.
Miron, M. S. (1961). A crosslinguistic investigation of phonetic symbolism. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(3), 623–630.
Monaghan, P., & Fletcher, M. (2019). Do sound symbolism effects for written words relate to individual phonemes or to phoneme features? Language and Cognition, 11(2), 235–255.
Monaghan, P., Shillcock, R. C., Christiansen, M. H., & Kirby, S. (2014). How arbitrary is language? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651): 20130299.
Moos, A., Smith, R., Miller, S. R., & Simmons, D. R. (2014). Cross-modal associations in synaesthesia: Vowel colours in the ear of the beholder. i-Perception, 5(2), 132–142.
Morris, C. (1939). Esthetics and the theory of signs. The Journal of Unified Science, 8(1/3), 131–150. Retrieved January 6, 2021, from [URL].
Morris, C., & Hamilton, D. (1965). Aesthetics, signs, and icons. Philosophy and phenomenological research, 25(3), 356–364.
Müller, M. (1869). Lectures on The Science of Language, vol. 21. New York: Charles Scribner and Company.
Nastase, V., Sokolova, M., & Shirabad, J. S. (2007). Do happy words sound happy? A study of the relation between form and meaning for English words expressing emotions. In G. Angelova, K. Bontcheva, R. Mitkov, N. Nicolov, & N. Nicolov (Eds.), Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP 2007). Conference in Borovets, Bulgaria (pp. 406–410). Retrieved January 7, 2021, from [URL]
Newman, S. S. (1933). Further experiments in phonetic symbolism. The American Journal of Psychology, 45(1), 53–75.
Nielsen, A. K. S., & Rendall, D. (2011). The sound of round: Evaluating the sound-symbolic role of consonants in the classic Takete-Maluma phenomenon. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(2), 115–124.
(2013). Parsing the role of consonants versus vowels in the classic Takete-Maluma phenomenon. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(2), 153–163.
Nuckolls, J. B. (1999). The case for sound symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28(1), 225–252.
Nygaard, L. C., Cook, A. E., & Namy, L. L. (2009). Sound to meaning correspondences facilitate word learning. Cognition, 112(1), 181–186.
Ohala, J. (1997). Sound Symbolism. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.) Proceedings of the 4th Seoul International Conference on Linguistics [SICOL] (pp. 98–103). Seoul: Linguistic Society of Korea.
Ohtake, Y., & Haryu, E. (2013). Investigation of the process underpinning vowel–size correspondence. Japanese Psychological Research, 55(4), 390–399.
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Ozturk, O., Krehm, M., & Vouloumanos, A. (2013). Sound symbolism in infancy: evidence for sound-shape cross-modal correspondences in 4-month-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114(2), 173–186.
Parise, C. V., & Spence, C. (2012). Audiovisual cross-modal correspondences and sound symbolism: A study using the implicit association test. Experimental Brain Research, 2201, 319–333.
(2013). Audiovisual cross-modal correspondences in the general population. In Simner, J. & Hubbard, E. M. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Synesthesia (pp. 790–815). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Park, J. W., & Osera, S. (2008). The effect of brand sound on consumers’ brand evaluation in Japan. In C. R. Acevedo, J. M. C. Hernandez, & T. M. Lowrey (Eds.), Latin American Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 21, pp. 188–189). Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research.
Peña, M., Mehler, J., & Nespor, M. (2011). The role of audiovisual processing in early conceptual development. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1419–1421.
Perniss, P., Thompson, R. L., & Vigliocco, G. (2010). Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 11: 227.
Perry, L. K., Perlman, M., & Lupyan, G. (2015). Iconicity in English and Spanish and its relation to lexical category and age of acquisition. PloS One, 10(9): e0137147.
Perry, L. K., Perlman, M., Winter, B., Massaro, D. W., & Lupyan, G. (2018). Iconicity in the speech of children and adults. Developmental Science, 21(3): e12572.
Pisanski, K., Mora, E., Pisanski, A., Reby, D., Sorokowski, P., Frackowiak, T., & Feinberg, D. R. (2016). Volitional exaggeration of body size through fundamental and formant frequency modulation in humans. Scientific Reports, 61: 34389.
Pogacar, R., Plant, E., Rosulek, L. F., & Kouril, M. (2015). Sounds good: Phonetic sound patterns in top brand names. Marketing Letters, 26(4), 549–563.
Pope, A. (1711). An essay on criticism. Retrieved January 6, 2021, from [URL]
Preziosi, M. A., & Coane, J. H. (2017). Remembering that big things sound big: Sound symbolism and associative memory. Cognitive Research, 21:10.
Puts, D. A., Hodges, C. R., Cárdenas, R. A., & Gaulin, S. J. C. (2007). Men’s voices as dominance signals: Vocal fundamental and formant frequencies influence dominance attributions among men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(5), 340–344.
R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved January 12, 2021, from [URL]
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M. (2001). Synaesthesia--a window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(12), 3–34.
Reay, I. E. (1994). Sound symbolism. In R. E. Asher (Ed.), The encyclopaedia of language and linguistics (1st ed., pp. 4064–4070). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
Reber, S. A., Janisch, J., Torregrosa, K. et al. (2017). Formants provide honest acoustic cues to body size in American alligators. Scientific Reports, 71: 1816.
Roblee, L., & Washburn, M. (1912). The affective values of articulate sounds. The American Journal of Psychology, 23(4), 579–583.
Rummer, R., Schweppe, J., Schlegelmilch, R., & Grice, M. (2014). Mood is linked to vowel type: The role of articulatory movements. Emotion, 14(2), 246–250.
Sapir, E. (1929). A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 225–239.
Schmidtke, D. S., Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Phonological iconicity. Frontiers in Psychology, 51, 801.
Seabold, S., & Perktold, J. (2010). Statsmodels: Econometric and statistical modeling with python. In van der Walt, S., & Jarrod Millman (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, Austin, Texas (pp. 92–96). Retrieved January 12, 2021, from [URL].
Shinohara, K., & Kawahara, S. (2010). A cross-linguistic study of sound symbolism: The images of size. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Berkley Linguistic Society (pp. 396–410), Berkley, CA.
Shrum, L. J., Lowrey, T. M., Luna, D., Lerman, D. B., & Liu, M. (2012). Sound symbolism effects across languages: Implications for global brand names. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(3), 275–279.
Sidhu, D. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2018). Five mechanisms of sound symbolic association. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(5), 1619–1643.
Spence, C. (2011). Crossmodal correspondences: a tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(4), 971–995.
Svantesson, J.-O. (2017). Sound symbolism: the role of word sound in meaning. WIREs Cognitive Science, 8(5): e1441.
Tarte, R. D. (1974). Phonetic symbolism in adult native speakers of Czech. Language and Speech, 17(1), 87–94.
(1982). The relationship between monosyllables and pure tones: An investigation of phonetic symbolism. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21(3), 352–360.
Thompson, P. D., Estes, Z. (2011). Sound symbolic naming of novel objects is a graded function. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(12), 2392–2404.
Tsur, R. (1997). Sound affects of poetry: Critical impressionism, reductionism and cognitive poetics. Pragmatics and Cognition, 5(2), 283–304.
Tsur, R., & Gafni, C. (2019). Methodological issues in the study of phonetic symbolism. Scientific Study of Literature, 9(2), 195–229.
Ultan, R. (1978). Size-sound symbolism. In J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson, and E. A. Moravesik (Eds.), Universals of human language – vol. 2: Phonology (pp. 525–568). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Vannoni, E., & McElligott, A. G. (2008). Low frequency groans indicate larger and more dominant fallow deer (Dama dama) males. PLoS One, 31: e3113.
Watkins, C. D., & Pisanski, K. (2016). Vocal indicators of dominance. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science (pp. 1–6). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.
Whissell, C. (1999). Phonosymbolism and the emotional nature of sounds: Evidence of the preferential use of particular phonemes in texts of differing emotional tone. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89(1), 19–48.
Whitney, W. D. (1867). Language, and the study of language: Twelve lectures on the principles of linguistic science. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Winter, B. (2019). Sensory linguistics: Language, perception and metaphor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wiseman, M. & van Peer, W. (2002). The sound of meaning. A study in phonetic iconicity. In J. Zerkowitz & S. Csabi (eds.). Textual Secrets (pp. 379–383). Budapest: Eötvös Lórand University Press.
Wrembel, M. (2010). Sound symbolism in foreign language phonological acquisition. Research in Language, 81(2010), 1–14.
Wrembel, M., & Rataj, K. (2008). “Sounds like a rainbow”: Sound–colour mappings in vowel perception. In A. Botinis (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd ISCA Workshop on Experimental Linguistics: ExLing 2 (pp. 237–240). Athens, Greece: University of Athens.
Yazawa, K. & Kondo, M. (2019). Acoustic characteristics of Japanese short and long vowels: Formant displacement effect revisited. In S. Calhoun, P. Escudero, M. Tabain, & P. Warren (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia (pp. 671–675). Canberra, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association. Retrieved on May 6, 2020, from [URL]
