Cover not available

Article published In: Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 11:1 (2021) ► pp.108–141

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

An investigation into the relationship between fiction and nonfiction reading exposure, and factors of critical thinking

ORCiD logo with link | University College London
Published online: 17 December 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.20014.hol
Abstract
Reading fiction has been associated with improved social and imaginative reasoning that could lead to improved critical thinking. This observational study investigated the relationship between fiction and nonfiction exposure, narrative transportation, and factors of critical thinking (critical thinking disposition, and epistemological orientation). Self-selecting participants (N = 335) completed an online survey including an author recognition test and self-report scales. Fiction scores were significantly associated with higher critical thinking disposition, while nonfiction had an inverse effect correlating with lower disposition. Fiction reading was associated with decreased absolutism, and nonfiction score conversely with higher absolutism. Total and nonfiction print exposure were associated with lower multiplism, with no significant association for fiction. Total and fiction print exposure were associated with higher evaluativism, with no significant association for nonfiction. Narrative transportation mediated some of these relationships. These findings provide a basis for further research into reading fiction and nonfiction, and critical thinking.
Article outline
  • Reading and critical thinking
  • Narrative transportation and critical thinking
  • Critical thinking disposition
  • Epistemological orientation
  • Correlating fiction and nonfiction reading with CT disposition and EO
  • Method
    • Participants
    • Measures
    • Procedure
  • Results
    • Descriptive statistics
    • Modelling CT disposition
      • CT disposition model selection
      • CT disposition model results
    • Mediation by NT upon CT disposition
    • Modelling EO
      • EO model selection
      • EO model results
        • Absolutism
        • Multiplism
        • Evaluativism
        • Mediation by NT upon EO
        • Mediation upon absolutism
        • Mediation upon multiplism
        • Mediation upon evaluativism
  • Discussion
    • Wider issues and limitations
  • Conclusions
  • References
References (91)
References
Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Surkes, M. A., Tamim, R., & Zhang, D. (2008). Instructional Interventions Affecting Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions: A Stage 1 Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1102–1134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aloqaili, A. S. (2012). The relationship between reading comprehension and critical thinking: A theoretical study. Journal of King Saud University – Languages and Translation, 24(1), 35–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Appel, M., & Richter, T. (2007). Persuasive effects of fictional narratives increase over time. Media Psychology, 10(1), 113–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arslan, S., & Demirtas, Z. (2016). Social emotional learning and critical thinking disposition. Studia Psychologica, 58(4), 276–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Avin, S. (2019). Exploring artificial intelligence futures. Journal of AI Humanities, 21, 171–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bal, M. P., & Veltkamp, M. (2013). How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e55341. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Batchelor, O. (2017). Getting out the truth: The role of libraries in the fight against fake news. Reference Services Review, 45(2), 143–148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Black, J. E., Capps, S. C., & Barnes, J. L. (2017). Fiction, genre exposure, and moral reality. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blanca, M. J., Alarcón, R., & Arnau, J. (2017). Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option? Psicothema, 29.41, 552–557. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloom, P. (2016). Against empathy: The case for rational compassion. HarperCollins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A Model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18(2), 255–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byrne, R. M. J. (2016). Counterfactual thought. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 135–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byrnes, J. P., & Dunbar, K. N. (2014). The nature and development of critical-analytic thinking. Educational Psychology Review, 26(4), 477–493. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1984). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In T. E. Kinnear (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 111, pp. 673–675). Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chan, C. (2019). Using digital storytelling to facilitate critical thinking disposition in youth civic engagement: A randomized control trial. Children and Youth Services Review, 1071, 104522. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colucciello, M. L. (1997). Critical thinking skills and dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students – A conceptual model for evaluation. Journal of Professional Nursing, 13(4), 236–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corballis, M. C. (2009). Mental time travel and the shaping of language. Experimental Brain Research, 192(3), 553–560. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuff, B. M. P., Brown, S. J., Taylor, L., & Howat, D. J. (2014). Empathy: A Review of the Concept. Emotion Review, 8(2), 144–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dal Cin, S., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2004). Narrative persuasion and overcoming resistance. In E. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion. (pp. 175–191). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DioGuardi, S. (2016). Critical thinking in criminal justice ethics: Using the affective domain to discover gray matters. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 27(4), 535–548. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Moldoveanu, M. C. (2013). Opening the closed mind: The effect of exposure to literature on the need for closure. Creativity Research Journal, 25(2), 149–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., Zoeterman, S., & Peterson, J. B. (2009). Defenseless against art? Impact of reading fiction on emotion in avoidantly attached individuals. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(1), 14–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dugdale, J. (2019, December 31). Bestselling books of 2019. The Guardian. [URL]
Dumitru, D. (2019). Creating meaning: The importance of arts, humanities and culture for critical thinking development. Studies in Higher Education, 44(5), 870–879. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekinci, Ö., & Aybek, B. (2010). Analysis of the empathy and the critical thinking disposition of the teacher candidates. Ilkogretim Online, 9(2), 816–816.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elvik, S. (2018). The orbits of Seveneves: A book review with a touch of orbital dynamics. Principium, 201(February), 16–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ennis, R. H. (2016). Definition: A three-dimensional analysis with bearing on key concepts. OSSA Conference Archive, 1151. [URL]
Escalas, J. E. (2004). Imagine yourself in the product: Mental simulation, narrative transportation, and persuasion. Journal of Advertising, 33(2), 37–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Research findings and recommendations. [URL]
Fong, K., Mullin, J. B., & Mar, R. A. (2015). How exposure to literary genres relates to attitudes toward gender roles and sexual behavior. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 91, 274–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friend, S. (2008). Imagining fact and fiction. In K. Stock & K. Thomson-Jones (Eds.), New waves in aesthetics (pp. 150–169). Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. Yale University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greco, J. (2000). Two kinds of intellectual virtue. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 60(1), 179–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2013). In the mind’s eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 287–313). Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hakemulder, J. (2001). How to make alle menschen bruder: Literature in a multicultural and multiform society. In G. Steen, D. H. Schram, & E. Ibsch (Eds.), The psychology and sociology of literature: In honor of Elrud Ibsch (pp. 225–242). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Imagining what could happen: Effects of taking on the role of a character on social cognition. In S. Zyngier, M. Bortolussi, A. Chesnokova, & J. Auracher (Eds.), Directions in empirical literary studies: In honor of Willie van Peer (pp. 139–153). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamby, A., Brinberg, D., & Daniloski, K. (2017). Reflecting on the journey: Mechanisms in narrative persuasion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 11–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hampson Lundh, A., Dolatkhah, M., & Limberg, L. (2018). From informational reading to information literacy. Journal of Documentation, 74(5), 1042–1052. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, K. (2012). Thinking and reading among college undergraduates: An examination of the relationship between critical thinking skills and voluntary reading [Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee]. [URL]
Heyne, E. (1987). Toward a theory of literary nonfiction. MFS Modern Fiction Studies, 33(3), 479–490. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoeken, H., & Fikkers, K. M. (2014). Issue-relevant thinking and identification as mechanisms of narrative persuasion. Poetics, 441, 84–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holma, K. (2015). The critical spirit: Emotional and moral dimensions of critical thinking. Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi, 4(1), 17–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyytinen, H., Holma, K., Toom, A., Shavelson, R. J., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2014). The complex relationship between students’ critical thinking and epistemological beliefs in the context of problem solving. Frontline Learning Research, 2(5), 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jeong, H. S. (2015). Critical thinking disposition, problem solving process, and empathy among nursing students. Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 1031, 44–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, D. R. (2012). Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 150–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (2004). Reflective judgment: Theory and research on the development of epistemic assumptions through adulthood. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 5–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koek, M., Janssen, T., Hakemulder, F., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2016). Literary reading and critical thinking: Measuring students’ critical literary understanding in secondary education. Scientific Study of Literature, 6(2), 243–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Critical thinking as discourse. Human Development, 62(3), 146–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15(3), 309–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, S.-Y., Lin, C.-S., & Tsai, C.-C. (2011). College students’ scientific epistemological views and thinking patterns in socioscientific decision making. Science Education, 95(3), 497–517. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lutzke, L., Drummond, C., Slovic, P., & Árvai, J. (2019). Priming critical thinking: Simple interventions limit the influence of fake news about climate change on Facebook. Global Environmental Change, 581, 101964. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. B. (2006). Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 401, 694–712. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B. (2009). Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 34(4), 407–428. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mar, R. A., & Rain, M. (2015). Narrative fiction and expository nonfiction differentially predict verbal ability. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(6), 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mason, L., Krutka, D., & Stoddard, J. (2018). Media literacy, democracy, and the challenge of fake news. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 10(2), 1–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazzocco, P. J., Green, M. C., Sasota, J. A., & Jones, N. W. (2010). This story is not for everyone: Transportability and narrative persuasion. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(4), 361–368. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGinnis, D. (2016). Epistemological orientations and evidence evaluation in undergraduates. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 191, 279–289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Hanich, J., Wassiliwizky, E., Jacobsen, T., & Koelsch, S. (2017). The Distancing-Embracing model of the enjoyment of negative emotions in art reception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 401, e347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(2), 57–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mulnix, J. W. (2012). Thinking critically about critical thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(5), 464–479. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mumper, M. L., & Gerrig, R. J. (2017). Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 111, 109–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oatley, K. (2011). Such stuff as dreams: The psychology of fiction. Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Özyürek, A., & Trabasso, T. (1997). Evaluation during the understanding of narratives. Discourse Processes, 23(3), 305–335. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pardede, P. (2019). Using fiction to promote students’ critical thinking. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 5(3), 166–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paul, R. (1987). Dialogical thinking: Critical thought essential to the acquisition of rational knowledge and passions. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 127–148). W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pu, D., Ni, J., Song, D., Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Wu, L., Wang, X., & Wang, Y. (2019). Influence of critical thinking disposition on the learning efficiency of problem-based learning in undergraduate medical students. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 1. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richmond, S. (2004). Being in others: Empathy from a psychoanalytical perspective. European Journal of Philosophy, 12(2), 244–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1975). The logical status of fictional discourse. New Literary History, 6(2), 319–332. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Serpell, C. N. (2010). Repetition and the ethics of suspended reading in American Psycho. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 51(1), 47–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shihab, I. A. (2011). Reading as critical thinking. Asian Social Science, 7(8), 209–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sosu, E. M. (2013). The development and psychometric validation of a Critical Thinking Disposition Scale. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 91, 107–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sparkles, A. (2019, December 9). Bestselling books of 2019. Booknet Canada. [URL]
Stansfield, J., & Bunce, L. (2014). The relationship between empathy and reading fiction: Separate roles for cognitive and affective components. Journal of European Psychology Students, 51, 9–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2008). Dimensions of topic-specific epistemological beliefs as predictors of multiple text understanding. Learning and Instruction, 18(6), 513–527. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tabačková, Z. (2015). Outside the classroom thinking inside the classroom walls: Enhancing students’ critical thinking through reading literary texts. The Proceedings of 5th World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Educational Leadership, 1861, 726–731. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tabak, I., & Weinstock, M. (2008). A sociocultural exploration of epistemological beliefs. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Knowing, Knowledge and Beliefs: Epistemological Studies across Diverse Cultures (pp. 177–195). Springer Netherlands. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tamir, D. I., Bricker, A. B., Dodell-Feder, D., & Mitchell, J. P. (2016). Reading fiction and reading minds: The role of simulation in the default network. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(2), 215–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thayer-Bacon, B. J. (1992). A feminine reconceptualization of critical thinking theory. Journal of Thought, 27(1/2), 4–17.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Transforming critical thinking: Thinking constructively. Teachers College Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tingley, D., Yamamoto, T., Hirose, K., Keele, L., & Imai, K. (2014). mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 59(5). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsui, L. (2000). Effects of campus culture on students’ critical thinking. The Review of Higher Education, 23(4), 421–441. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Laer, T., de Ruyter, K., Visconti, L. M., & Wetzels, M. (2013). The extended transportation-imagery model: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of consumers’ narrative transportation. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 797–817. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinstock, M., Kienhues, D., Feucht, F. C., & Ryan, M. (2017). Informed reflexivity: Enacting epistemic virtue. Educational Psychologist, 52(4), 284–298. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., Ruzek, M., Linder, A., & Lin, S.-S. (2013). Cross-cultural epistemological orientations to socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 251–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zunshine, L. (2006). Why we read fiction: Theory of mind and the novel. Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Bråten, Ivar, Oscar Skovdahl, Øistein Anmarkrud & Helge I. Strømsø
2025. Does reading still make you smarter? It depends. Reading and Writing DOI logo
Soto-Sanfiel, María T., Ariadna Angulo-Brunet & Sanjay Saha
2025. Deepfakes as narratives: Psychological processes explaining their reception. Computers in Human Behavior 165 ► pp. 108518 ff. DOI logo
Fabregat-Barrios, Santiago, Xavier Fontich & Carmen González-González-de-Mesa
2023. The eclectic landscape: examining Spanish secondary school teachers’ beliefs on literary education. Frontiers in Education 8 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue