Cover not available

Article published In: Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 10:2 (2020) ► pp.214–227

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Reader reactions to psychological perspective

Effects of narratorial stance

 | University of Alberta
 | University of Alberta
 | University of Alberta
Published online: 19 March 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.20005.dix
Abstract
In this study, we used latent variable analysis to distinguish two components of reader reactions to narrative fiction: Evaluative reaction is the extent to which a character is seen as reasonable and rational, and experiential reaction is the extent to which the reader feels similar to and identifies with the character. We found that evaluative reaction was more negative when mental access to the character was provided, while experiential reaction was decreased by the use of a first-person (as opposed to third-person) narrator. These results were explained in terms of the additional cognitive processing engendered by the these narrative techniques. In particular, we hypothesized that a paucity of mental access leads readers to make their own inferences about the character’s mental state, while the use of third-person narration leads readers to draw on their personal experience in order to appreciate the circumstances of the character.
Article outline
  • Method
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Note
  • References
References (39)
References
Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. N. Petrov & F. Csaki (pp. 267–281). Budapest, Hungary: Akademia Kiado.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. R., Augustyn, J. S., & Taylor, H. A. (2009). When you and I share perspectives pronouns modulate perspective taking during narrative comprehension. Psychological Science, 20(1), 27–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caracciolo, M. (2014). The experientiality of narrative: An enactivist approach. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Child, S., Oakhill, J., & Garnham, A. (2018). You’re the emotional one: The role of perspective for emotion processing in reading comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(7), 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohn, D. (1978). Transparent minds: Narrative modes for presenting consciousness in fiction. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Creer, S. D., Cook, A. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (2019). Can readers fully adopt the perspective of the protagonist? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(5), 1–12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Graaf, A., Hoeken, H., Sanders, J., & Beentjes, J. W. J. (2012). Identification as a mechanism of narrative persuasion. Communication Research, 39(6), 802–823. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Vega, M. (1994). Characters and their perspectives in narratives describing spatial environments. Psychological Research, 56(2), 116–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, P., & Bortolussi, M. (2019). Readers’ processing of perceptual perspective and stance. Discourse Processes, 56(7), 513–529. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fletcher, A., & Monterosso, J. (2016). The science of free-indirect discourse: An alternate cognitive effect. Narrative, 24(1), 82–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Franklin, N., & Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119(1), 63–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Franklin, N., Tversky, B., & Coon, V. (1992). Switching points-of-view in spatial mental models. Memory & Cognition, 20(5), 507–518. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glover, S., & Dixon, P. (2004). Likelihood ratios: A simple and flexible statistic for empirical psychologists. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 111, 791–806. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hakala, C. M. (1999). Accessibility of spatial information in a situation model. Discourse Processes, 27(3), 261–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartung, F., Burke, M., Hagoort, P., & Willems, R. M. (2016). Taking perspective: Personal pronouns affect experiential aspects of literary reading. PLoS One, 11(5), e0154732. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoeken, H., Kolthoff, M., & Sanders, J. (2016). Story perspective and character similarity as drivers of identification and narrative persuasion. Human Communication Research, 42(2), 292–311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horton, W. S., & Rapp, D. N. (2003). Out of sight, out of mind: Occlusion and the accessibility of information in narrative comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(1), 104–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaufman, G. F., & Libby, L. K. (2012). Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kotovych, M., Dixon, P., Bortolussi, M., & Holden, M. (2011). Textual determinants of a component of literary identification. Scientific Study of Literature, 1(2), 260–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuzmičová, A., & Bálint, K. (2019). Personal relevance in story reading: A research review. Poetics Today, 40(3), 429–451. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lanser, S. (1981). The narrative act. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G. N., & Short, M. (2007). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to english fictional prose. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matute, A. M. (1989). Sin of omission (M. S. Doyle, Trans.). In The Heliotrope Wall and Other Stories (pp. 68–71). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., & Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26(2), 165–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oatley, K. (1999). Meeting of minds: Dialogue, sympathy, and identification in reading fiction. Poetics, 261, 439–454. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peskin, J., & Astington, J. W. (2004). The effects of adding metacognitive language to story texts. Cognitive Development, 19(2), 253–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, G. (1987). Dictionary of narratology. Lincoln, NE and London, UK: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raney, A. A. (2004). Expanding disposition theory: Reconsidering character likeing, moral evaluations, and enjoyment. Communication Theory, 14(4), 348–369. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rimmon-Kenan, S. (1983). Narrative fiction: Contemporary poetics. London, UK: Methuen. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salem, S., Weskott, T., & Holler, A. (2017). Does narrative perspective influence readers’ perspective-taking? An empirical study on free indirect discourse, psycho-narration and first-person narration. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 2(1), 61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stanzel, F. K. (1984). A theory of narrative (C. Goedsche, Trans.). Bloomington: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tal-Or, N., & Cohen, J. (2010). Understanding audience involvement: Conceptualizing and manipulating identification and transportation. Poetics, 38(4), 402–418. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Krieken, K., Hoeken, H., & Sanders, J. (2017). Evoking and measuring identification with narrative characters – a linguistic cues framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 81, 1190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Lissa, C. J., & Duuren, T. V. (2016). Difficult empathy: The effect of narrative perspective on readers’ engagement with a first-person narrator. Diegesis, 5(1), 42–63.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Peer, W., & Vander Maat, H. (1996). Perspectivation and sympathy: Effects of narrative point of view. In R. J. Kreuz & M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical Approaches to Literature and Aesthetics (pp. 143–154). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Kosch, Lukas, Günther Stocker, Annika Ahrens-Schwabe & Hajo Boomgaarden
2025. Media, modality, and motivation in literary-aesthetic experience: exploring auditory and visual reception of literature. Poetics 111 ► pp. 102021 ff. DOI logo
Kosch, Lukas, Annika Schwabe, Hajo Boomgaarden & Günther Stocker
2024. Experiencing Literary Audiobooks: A Framework for Theoretical and Empirical Investigations of the Auditory Reception of Literature. Journal of Literary Theory 18:1 ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue