Cover not available

Article published In: Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 10:1 (2020) ► pp.4–34

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

An experimental study of the effect of close reading versus casual reading of social drama on the stimulation of the cognitive capacity of empathy

ORCiD logo with link | Suez University
 | Alexandria University
Published online: 9 December 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.19016.kar
Abstract
The current study investigates whether the mode of reading practice has an effect on the degree of readers’ empathic response to social drama, using Enda Walsh’s Chatroom (Walsh, E. (2015). Enda Walsh Plays: One. New York: Nick Hern Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar), tackling contemporary adolescents’ problems, as an experimental example. The experiment conducted in this paper hypothesizes that in contrast with casual reading, the conscious techniques of close reading are more effective in promoting participants’ empathic engagement with the dramatic text and improving their capacity of problem discovery and solution. Accordingly, the close reading of social drama can reinforce social integration and work as an antidote to the ostracism of one social group from their community. Moreover, the L2 students’ stimulated empathic response is translated into a written output which is richer in quantity and quality.
Article outline
  • Close reading and casual reading
  • Empathy, fiction and drama
  • Empathy and Walsh’s effective dramatic techniques in Chatroom
    • Empathy and multimedia in the last scene
  • Research design
    • Purpose
    • Measures
    • Hypotheses
  • Method
    • Participants
    • Material
    • Procedures
      • Tasks
      • Data collection
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References
References (63)
References
Akbari, E., Naderi, A., Simons, R., & Pilot, A. (2016). Student engagement and foreign language learning through online social networks. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(4). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baars, B., & Gage, N. (2010). Cognition, Brain and Consciousness. 2nd ed. China: Academic Press Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benedek, M., & Jauk, E. (2018). Spontaneous and controlled processes in creative cognition. In K. Christoff & K. Fox (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of spontaneous Thought (pp. 285–296). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Best, S., & Marcus, S. (2009). Surface Reading: An Introduction. Representations, 108 (1), 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bilandzic, H., & Busselle, R. (2017). Beyond metaphors and traditions: Exploring the conceptual boundaries of narrative engagement. In F. Hakemulder, M. Kuijpers, E. Tan, K. Bálint & M. Doicaru (Eds.), Narrative Absorption (pp. 11–27). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bilandzic, H., Sukalla, F., Schnell, C., Hastall, M., & Busselle, R. (2019). The Narrative Engageability Scale. International Journal of Communication, 131, 801–832. [URL]
Brummett, B. (2010). Techniques of Close Reading. USA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cleaver, S. (2015). Every Reader a Close Reader. USA: Rowman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cummings, L. (2016). Empathy as Dialogue in Theatre and Performance. USA: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (2010). Self Comes to Mind. USA: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dascalu, M. (2014). Analyzing Discourse and Text Complexity for Learning and Collaborating. New York: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2012). Close Reading in Elementary Schools. The Reading Teacher, 66 (3), 179–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, L. (2010). ENDA WALSH. In M. Middeke & P. Schnierer (Eds.), The Methuen Drama Guide to Contemporary Irish Playwrights (pp. 439–452).UK: Methuen Drama. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freedman, J. (2015). After Close Reading. New Rambler Review. [URL]
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, R. (1993). Writing Science. USA: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd edition. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanauer, D. (2012). Meaningful literacy: Writing poetry in the language classroom. Language Teaching, 45 (1), 105–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harper, G. (2010). On Creative Writing. Bristol: MLM. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hathaway, J. (2015). Connect to Text: Strategies for Close Reading and Writing. Canada: Shell Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hogan, P. (2011). What Literature Teaches Us about Emotions. USA: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iacoboni, M. (2009). Mirroring People: The Science of Empathy. USA: Picador.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jarvis, S. (2012). Lexical Challenges in the Intersection of Applied Linguistics and ANLP. In C. Boonthum-Denecke, P. McCarthy & T. Lamkin (Eds.), Cross-Disciplinary Advances in Applied Natural Language Processing (pp. 50–72). USA: Information Science Reference. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jockers, M. (2013). Macroanalysis. USA: University of Illinois. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Juanggo, W. (2018). Investigating lexical diversity and lexical sophistication of productive vocabulary in the written discourse of Indonesian EFL learners. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 38–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karam, K. M. (2020). Conscious application of creativity dynamics as an approach to the formation and appreciation of literary creativity. Neohelicon. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keen, S. (2007). Empathy and the Novel. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading Literary Fiction Improves Theory of Mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Failure to replicate methods caused the failure to replicate results. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1121, e1–e4. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Reading Literary Fiction Can Improve Theory of Mind. Nature Human Behaviour 21, 604. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koopman, E. M., & Hakemulder, F. (2015). Effects of Literature on Empathy and Self-Reflection: A Theoretical-Empirical Framework. Journal of Literary Theory, 91, 79–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuijpers, M., Hakemulder, F., Tan, E., & Doicarub, M. (2014). Exploring absorbing reading experiences. Scientific Study of Literature 4(1), 89–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kyle, K., Crossley, S., & Berger, C. (2018). The tool for the automatic analysis of lexical sophistication (TAALES): version 2.0. Behav Res 501, 1030–1046. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehman, C., & Roberts, K. (2014). Falling in Love with Close Reading. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leverage, P., Mancing, H., Schweickert, R., & William, J. (Eds.). (2011). Introduction. Theory of mind and literature. (pp. 1–11). West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lu, X. (2012). The Relationship of Lexical Richness to the Quality of ESL Learners’ Oral Narratives. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 190–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mar, A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, B. (2009). Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy. Communications, 34 (4), 407–428. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCaw, N. (2011). Close Reading, Writing and Culture. New Writing, 8(1), 25–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McConachie, B. (2008). Engaging Audience: A Cognitive Approach to Spectating in the Theatre. USA: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McConachie, B., & Hart, F. (eds.). (2006). Introduction. Performance and Cognition: (pp. 1–25). USA: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2014). Forward. Falling in Love with Close reading (pp. vii–xi). USA: Heinemann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moss, B., Lapp, D., Grant, M., & Johnson, K. (2015). A Close Look at Close reading. USA: ASCD.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moretti, F. (2013). Distant Reading. UK: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mumper, L., & Gerrig, J. (2017). Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 109–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neuman, S., & Gambrell, L. (2013). Challenges and Opportunities in the Implementation of Common Core State Standards. In S. Newman & L. Gambrell (Eds.), Quality Reading Instruction in the Age of Common Core State Standards (pp. 1–12). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palfreyman, D., & Karaki, S. (2019). Lexical sophistication across languages: a preliminary study of undergraduate writing in Arabic (L1) and English (L2). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(8), 992–1015, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panero, M. E., Weisberg, D. S., Black, J., Goldstein, T. R., Barnes, J. L., Brownell, H., & Winner, E. (2016). Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1111, e46–e54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 361. 50–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Phillips, N. (2015). Literary Neuroscience and History of Mind: An interdisciplinary fMRI Study of Attention and Jane Austen. In L. Zunshine (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Literary Studies (pp. 55–81). USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pino, M. C., & Mazza, M. (2016). The use of “literary fiction” to promote mentalizing ability. PLoS One, 111, e0160254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richard, I. (1929). Practical Criticism: A Study of Literary Judgment. Great Britain: The Edinburgh Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Runco, M., Turkman, B., Acar, S., & Nural, M. (2017). The Idea Density and Creativity of Written Works. Journal of Genius and Eminence, 2(1), 26–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snow, C., & O’Connor, C. (2016). Close Reading and Far-Reaching Classroom Discussion. The Journal of Education, 196(1), 1–8. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sofia, G. (2013). The Effect of Theatre Training on Cognitive Functions. In N. Shaughnessy (Ed.), Affective Performance and Cognitive Science (pp. 171–180). India: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stebbins, R. (2012). The Committed Reader: Reading for Utility, Pleasure, and Fulfillment in the Twenty-First Century. UK: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tabbi, J. (2010). Cognitive Science. In B. Clarck & M. Rossini (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Literature and Science (pp. 77–87). USA: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tausczik, Y., & Pennebaker, J. (2010). The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1):24–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Kuijk, I., Verkoeijen, P., Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. A. (2018). The Effect of Reading a Short Passage of Literary Fiction on Theory of Mind: A Replication of Kidd and Castano (2013). Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 7. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walsh, E. (2015). Enda Walsh Plays: One. New York: Nick Hern Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weare, K. (2000). Promoting Mental, Emotional and Social Health: A Whole School Approach. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Widdowson, G. (1998). Context, community and authentic language. TESOL Quarterly, 32 (4), 705–716. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolfreys, J. (2000). Readings: Acts of Close Reading in Literary Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Dahy, Faten Abdelaziz & Khaled Mostafa Karam
2021. Potentials of Empathetic Stimuli in Creative Nonfiction: Zimbardo’sThe Lucifer Effectand Danner’sTorture and Truth. English Studies 102:4 ► pp. 468 ff. DOI logo
Karam, Khaled Mostafa & Helmy Elfiel
2021. An Experimental Appraisal of the Acquisition of Creative Literary Compression versus Descriptive Texts. Creativity Research Journal 33:2 ► pp. 106 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue