Cover not available

Article published In: Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 9:2 (2019) ► pp.240–249

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

On the crucial role of “Arousal” and “Saliency” in affective iconicity

Comment on “Methodological Issues in the Study of Phonetic Symbolism” by Tsur and Gafni

 | Freie Universität Berlin
Published online: 30 June 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.19011.ary
Abstract
Tsur and Gafni (T&G) claim that individual sounds can suggest “elementary percepts,” which, depending on the context, can evoke “specific emotions.” However, their proposal suffers from a lack of a theoretical framework and embedding of the theory in the broader scholarly literature. In terms of existing emotion theories and in line with the results of our previous neurocognitive studies on the topic, the proposed differentiation between these two levels of processing can be best represented by two affective dimensions of arousal and valence, respectively. In addition, our statistical measure for assessing the basic affective tone of texts suggests that the use of mere or rational frequencies of occurrence of all phonemes in a poem – instead of a focus on foregrounded and salient phonemes – may be a further reason for discrepancies of results of previous studies.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • On the role of arousal in affective iconicity
  • On the role of foregrounding and salience in affective iconicity
  • Conclusion and outlook
  • References
References (50)
References
Albers, S. (2008). Lautsymbolik in ägyptischen Texten. Mainz: Philipp Von Zabern Verlag Gmbh.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aryani, A. (2018). Affective iconicity in language and poerty: A neurocognitive approach. Freien Universität Berlin, doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aryani, A., Conrad, M., Schmidtke, D., & Jacobs, A. (2018a). Why’piss’ is ruder than’pee’? The role of sound in affective meaning making. PloS One, 13(6), e0198430. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aryani, A., Hsu, C.-T., & Jacobs, A. M. (2018b). The Sound of Words Evokes Affective Brain Responses. Brain Sciences, 8(6). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aryani, A., Hsu, C. T., & Jacobs, A. M. (2019). Affective iconic words benefit from additional sound-meaning integration in the left amygdala. Human brain mapping, 40(18), 5289–5300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aryani, A., & Jacobs, A. M. (2018c). Affective Congruence between Sound and Meaning of Words Facilitates Semantic Decision. Behavioral Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 8(6).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aryani, A., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M. (2013). Extracting salient sublexical units from written texts: “Emophon,” a corpus-based approach to phonological iconicity. Frontiers in Psychology, 41(OCT), 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aryani, A., Kraxenberger, M., Ullrich, S., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M. (2016). Measuring the Basic Affective Tone of Poems via Phonological Saliency and Iconicity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Vol 10(2), 191–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aryani, A., Isbilen, E., Christiansen, M. (in press) Affective Arousal Links Sound to Meaning, Psychological Science,
Bachorowski, J.-A. (1999). Vocal expression and perception of emotion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(2), 53–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Banse, R., & Scherer, K. R. (1996). Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 614. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bänziger, T., Hosoya, G., & Scherer, K. R. (2015). Path models of vocal emotion communication. PLoS ONE, 10(9), 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bänziger, T., & Scherer, K. R. (2005). The role of intonation in emotional expressions. Speech Communication, 46(3–4), 252–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F. (2006). Are Emotions Natural Kinds? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(1), 28–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bohrn, I. C., Altmann, U., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012). Old proverbs in new skins-an fMRI study on defamiliarization. Frontiers in Psychology, 31(JUL), 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Briesemeister, B. B., Kuchinke, L., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Emotion word recognition: Discrete information effects first, continuous later? Brain Research, 15641, 62–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Briesemeister, B. B., Kuchinke, L., Jacobs, A. M., & Braun, M. (2015). Emotions in reading: Dissociation of happiness and positivity. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(2), 287–298. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Citron, F. M. M. (2012). Neural correlates of written emotion word processing: a review of recent electrophysiological and hemodynamic neuroimaging studies. Brain and Language, 122(3), 211–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ethofer, T., Van De Ville, D., Scherer, K., & Vuilleumier, P. (2009). Decoding of emotional information in voice-sensitive cortices. Current Biology, 19(12), 1028–1033. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fónagy, I. ((1961). Communication in poetry. Word, 171, 194–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hakemulder, J. F. (2004). Foregrounding and its effect on readers’ perception. Discourse Processes, 381, 193–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hsu, C. T., Jacobs, A. M., Altmann, U., & Conrad, M. (2015). The magical activation of left amygdala when reading Harry Potter: An fMRI study on how descriptions of supra-natural events entertain and enchant. PLoS ONE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M. (2015a). Neurocognitive poetics: methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 91(April), 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015b). Towards a eurocognitive poetics model of literary reading. In Cognitive Neuroscience of Natural Language Use. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Quantifying the Beauty of Words: A Neurocognitive Poetics Perspective. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 111(December), 1–7. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M., Hofmann, M. J., & Kinder, A. (2016). On elementary affective decisions: To like or not to like, that is the question. Frontiers in Psychology, 71(NOV), 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M., & Kinder, A. (2018). What makes a metaphor literary? Answers from two computational studies. Metaphor and Symbol. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M., Lüdtke, J., Aryani, A., Meyer-Sickendieck, B., & Conrad, M. (2016). Mood-empathic and aesthetic responses in poetry reception. Scientific Study of Literature. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in Language, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp. 350–377.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Juslin, P. N., & Laukka, P. (2003). Communication of Emotions in Vocal Expression and Music Performance: Different Channels, Same Code? Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 770–814. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuhlmann, M., Hofmann, M. J., Briesemeister, B. B., & Jacobs, A. M. (2016). Mixing positive and negative valence: Affective-semantic integration of bivalent words. Scientific Reports, 61, 1–7. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lüdtke, J., Meyer-Sickendieck, B., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Immersing in the stillness of an early morning: Testing the mood empathy hypothesis of poetry reception. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(3), 363–377. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Menninghaus, W., Bohrn, I. C., Knoop, C. A., Kotz, S. A., Schlotz, W., & Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Rhetorical features facilitate prosodic processing while handicapping ease of semantic comprehension. Cognition. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect response to literary stories. Poetics 221, 389–407. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mukarovsky, J. (1964). “Standard language and poetic language”. In A Prague School Reader on Esthetics, Literary Structures and Style, ed P. Garvin (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press), 17–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Osgood, C. E. (1952). The nature and measurement of meaning. Psychological Bulletin, 49(3), 197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. Affective Science. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Recio, G., Conrad, M., Hansen, L. B., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014). On pleasure and thrill: The interplay between arousal and valence during visual word recognition. Brain and Language, 1341, 34–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell, J. A. (2003). Core Affect and the Psychological Construction of Emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sauter, D. A., Eisner, F., Calder, A. J., & Scott, S. K. (2010). Perceptual cues in nonverbal vocal expressions of emotion. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(11), 2251–2272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scherer, K. R. (2003). Vocal communication of emotion: A review of research paradigms. Speech Communication, 40(1–2), 227–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scherer, K. R., Clark-Polner, E., & Mortillaro, M. (2011). In the eye of the beholder? Universality and cultural specificity in the expression and perception of emotion. International Journal of Psychology, 46(6), 401–435. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmidtke, D. S., & Aryani, A. (2015). Bridges from affect to language Comment on “The quartet theory of human emotions: An integrative and neurofunctional model” by S. Koelsch et al. Physics of Life Reviews, 131, 83–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schrott, R., & Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren. Hanser.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shklovsky, V. (1990). Theory of Prose. Trans. Benjamin Sher. Elmwood Park: Dalkey Archive, 1990.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive poetics: An Introduction. Cognitive Stylistics: Language and cognition in text analysis. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsur, R. (1992). What makes sound patterns expressive?: the poetic mode of speech perception. Duke University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ullrich, S., Aryani, A., Kraxenberger, M., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M. (2017). On the relation between the general affective meaning and the basic sublexical, lexical, and inter-lexical features of poetic texts-a case study using 57 Poems of H. M. Enzensberger. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(JAN), 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ullrich, S., Kotz, S. A., Schmidtke, D. S., Aryani, A., & Conrad, M. (2016). Phonological iconicity electrifies: An ERP study on affective sound-to-meaning correspondences in German. Frontiers in psychology, 71, 1200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whissell, C. (1999). Phonosymbolism and the emotional nature of sounds: evidence of the preferential use of particular phonemes in texts of differing emotional tone. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89(1), 19–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Auracher, Jan
2021. Sound-meaning relations in Japanese Tanka. Scientific Study of Literature 11:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue