Article published In: Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 9:2 (2019) ► pp.107–162
Compassion-Cultivating Pedagogy
Advancing social justice by improving social cognition through literary study
Published online: 30 June 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.19007.bra
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.19007.bra
Abstract
Previous studies suggest that narrative fiction promotes social justice by increasing empathy, but critics have
argued that the partiality of empathy severely limits its effectiveness as an engine of social justice, and that what needs to be
developed is universal compassion rather than empathy. We created Compassion-Cultivating Pedagogy (CCP) to target the development
of two social-cognition capabilities that entail compassion: (1) recognition of self-other overlap and (2) cognizance of the
situational, uncontrollable causes of bad character, bad behavior, and bad life-outcomes. Employing a pre/post within- and
between-subjects design, we found that students in the CCP classes, but not students in conventionally taught classes, improved in
these two areas of social cognition and also exhibited increased preference for compassionate social policies for stigmatized
groups. This finding suggests that pedagogy can play a significant role in literature’s contribution to social justice, and that
further efforts to develop and test pedagogies for improving social cognition are warranted.
Keywords: social cognition, social justice, compassion, empathy, literature, pedagogy
Article outline
- Theoretical and empirical background
- Problems with the empathy-altruism hypothesis
- Cognitive determinants of compassion
- How narrative fiction might cultivate compassion
- Study #1
- Hypotheses
- Method
- Compassion-Cultivating Pedagogy (CCP)
- Non-treatment classes
- Measures
- Moral luck
- Universal human solidarity
- Compassionate versus retributive social action
- Study #1 results
- Changes in external, situational attributions
- External attributions for poverty
- External attributions for crime
- External attributions for negative character traits
- External attributions for other behaviors and life outcomes
- Changes in internal, dispositional attributions
- Internal attributions for poverty
- Internal attributions for crime
- Internal attributions for negative character traits
- Internal attributions for other behaviors and life outcomes
- Changes in recognition of solidarity with others
- Universalist orientation
- Similarity
- Changes in responses to vignettes of negative characters, actions, and life outcomes
- Change toward more compassionate social treatment of stigmatized people
- Changes in attribution for murder
- Attribution of Robert’s action to present circumstances
- Attribution of Robert’s action to genetic endowment
- Attribution of Robert’s action to formative environment
- Correlations
- Correlations between changes in attribution and compassion
- Correlations between changes in perceived overlap and compassion
- Correlations between changes in vignette responses
- Changes in external, situational attributions
- Discussion of study #1 results
- Changes in recognition of moral luck (external and internal attributions)
- Changes in perceived solidarity (similarity and universalist orientation scales)
- Changes in recommended social policies: The vignettes
- Limitations of study #1
- Study #2
- Method
- Measures
- Participants
- Study #2 results
- Moral luck/blame mitigation
- Perceived self-other overlap/solidarity
- Sympathy
- Social policies
- Analysis of individual classes
- Path analyses
- Discussion of study #2
- Limitations of study #2
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
References
References (87)
Atkins, P. W. B., & Parker, S. K. (2012). Understanding individual compassion in organizations: The role of appraisals and psychological flexibility. Academy of Management Review, 3071, 524–546.
Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H. J., Mitchener, E. C., Bednar, L. L., Klein, T. R., & Heiberger, L. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 721, 105–118.
Batson, C. D., Chang, J., Orr, R., & Rowland, J. (2002). Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 281, 1656–1666.
Batson, C. D., Eklund, J. H., Cermok, V. L., Hoyt, J. L., & Ortiz, B. G. (2007). An additional antecedent of empathic concern: Valuing the welfare of the person in need. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 931, 65–74.
Batson, C. D. (2017). The empathy-altruism hypothesis: What and so what? In E. M. Seppälä, E. Simon-Thomas, S. L. Brown, M. G. Worline, C. D. Camerion, & J. R. Doty (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compassion Science (pp. 27–40). New York: Oxford University Press.
Bergen, B. K., & Wheeler, K. (2005). Sentence understanding engages motor processes. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. New York: Psychology Press.
Betancourt, H. (1990). An attribution-empathy model of helping behavior: Behavioral intentions and judgments of help-giving. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 161, 573–591.
Blair, I. V., Ma, J. E., & Lenton, A. P. (2001). Imagining stereotypes away: The moderation of implicit stereotypes through mental imagery. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 811, 828–841.
Bracher, M. (2013). Literature and social justice: Protest novels, cognitive politics, and schema criticism. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Camerer, C. F. et al. (2018). Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behavior, 21, 637–644.
Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S. L., Lewis, B. P., Luce, C., & Neuberg, S. L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 731, 481–494.
Crocker, J., & Canevello, A. (2012). Consequences of self-image and compassionate goals. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 451, 229–277.
(2017). Egosystem and ecosystem: Motivational orientations of the self in relation to others. In K. W. Brown & M. R. Leary (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Hypo-Egoic Phenomena (pp. 271–284). New York: Oxford University Press.
Dasgupta, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 811, 800–814.
Davis, M. H., Conklin, L., Smith, A., & and Luce, C. (1996). Effect of perspective taking on the cognitive representation of persons: A merging of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 701, 713–726.
Decety, J., Echols, S., & Correl, J. (2009). The blame game: The effect of responsibility and social stigma on empathy for pain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 221, 985–997.
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Moldoveanu, M. C. (2013). Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy. Scientific Study of Literature, 31, 28–47.
Feagin, J. (1972). Poverty: We still believe that god helps those who help themselves. Psychology Today, 61, 101–129.
Fein, S., & and Steven Spencer, S. (1997). Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 731, 31–44.
Galinsky, A. D. and Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 781, 708–724.
Gerrig, R. J., & Rapp, D. N. (2004). Psychological processes underlying literary impact. Poetics Today, 251, 265–281.
Gill, M. J., Andreychik, M. R., & Getty, P. D. (2013). More than a lack of control: External explanations can evoke compassion for outgroups by increasing perceptions of suffering (independent of perceived control) Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 73–87.
Gill, M. J., & Cerce, S. C. (2017). He never willed to have the will he has: Historicist narratives, “civilized” blame, and the need to distinguish two notions of free will. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1121, 361–382.
Goetz, J. L., Keltner, D., & Simon-Thomas, E. (2010). Compassion: An evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 1361, 351–374.
Greene, J., & Cohen, J. (2004). For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 3591, 1775–1785.
Guerin, S., Begin, G., & Palmer, D. L. (1989). Education and causal attributions: The development of “person-blame” and “system-blame” ideology. Social Psychology Quarterly, 521, 126–140.
Hakemulder, F., Fialho, O., & Bal, P. M. (2016). Learning from Literature: Empirical research on readers in schools and at the workplace. In M. Burke, O. Fialho, & S. Zyngier (Eds.), Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments (19–37). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Henry, P. J., Reyna, C., & Weiner, B. (2004). Hate welfare but help the poor: How the attributional content of stereotypes explains the paradox of reactions to the destitute in America. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 341, 34–58.
Jinpa, T. (2015). A fearless heart: How the courage to be compassionate can transform our lives. New York: Penguin Random House.
Johnson, D. R. (2012). Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 521, 150–155.
(2013). Reading narrative fiction reduces Arab-Muslim prejudice and offers a safe haven from intergroup anxiety. Social Cognition, 311, 578–598.
Johnson, D. R., Cushman, G. K., Borden, L. A., & McCune, M. S. (2013). Potentiating empathic growth: Generating imagery while reading fiction increases empathy and prosocial behavior. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 71, 306–312.
Johnson, M. (2015). Morality for humans: Ethical understanding from the standpoint of cognitive science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Karcher, C. L. (2004). Stowe and the literature of social change. In C. Weinstein (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Harriet Beecher Stowe (pp. 203–218). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Kaufman, G. F., & Libby, L. K. (2012). Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1031, 1–19.
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Sciencexpress 3 October.
Kidd, D., Ongis, M., & and Castano, E. (2016). On literary fiction and its effects on theory of mind. Scientific Study of Literature, 61, 42–58.
Kidd, D., & Castano, E. (2017). Commentary: Panero et al. (2016): Failure to replicate methods caused the failure to replicate results. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1121, e1–e4.
Kuiken, D., Miall, D. S., & Sikora, S. (2004). Forms of self-implication in literary reading. Poetics Today, 251, 171–203.
Lindhé, A. (2016). The paradox of narrative empathy and the form of the novel, or what George Eliot knew. Studies in the Novel, 481, 19–42.
Lopez, G. E., Gurin, P., & Nagda, B. A. (1998). Education and understanding structural causes for group inequalities. Political Psychology, 191, 308–329.
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B. (2009). Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 341, 407–428.
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. B. (2006). Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 401, 694–712.
Miller, M. J., Woehr, D. J., & Hudspeth, N. (2001). The meaning and measurement of work ethic: Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional inventory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 591, 1–39.
Mumper, M. L., & Gerrig, R. J. (2017). Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 111, 109–120.
Nussbaum, M. (1997). Cultivating humanity: A classical defense of reform in liberal education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
O’Donnell, C. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 781, 33–84.
Oveis, C., Horberg, E. J., & Keltner, D. (2010). Compassion, pride, and social intuitions of self-other similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 981, 618–630.
Panero, M. E., Black, J., Barnes, J. L., Weisberg, D. S., Goldstein, T. R., Brownell, H., & Winner, E. (2016). Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1111, e46–e54.
(2017). No support for the claim that literary fiction uniquely and immediately improves theory of mind: A reply to Kidd and Castano’s Commentary on Panero et al. (2016). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1121, e5–e8.
Phillips, S. T., & Ziller, R. C. (1997). Toward a theory and measure of the nature of nonprejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 721, 420–434.
Reyna, C., Henry, P. J., Korfmacher, W., & Tucker, A. (2005). Examining the principles of principled conservatism: The role of responsibility stereotypes as cues for deservingness in racial policy decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 901, 109–128.
Rorty, R. (1999). Human rights, rationality and sentimentality.” In Obrad Savic (Ed.). The politics of human rights (pp. 67–83). New York, NY: Verso.
Rudolph, U., Roesch, S. C., Greitemeyer, T., & Weiner, B. (2004). A meta-analytic review of help giving and aggression from an attributional perspective: Contributions to a general theory of motivation. Cognition and Emotion, 181, 815–848.
Samur, D., Tops, M., & Koole, S. L. (2018). Does a single session of reading literary fiction prime enhanced mentalising performance? Four replication experiments of Kidd and Castano (2013). Cognition and Emotion, 321, 130–144.
Schrijvers, M., Janssen, T., Fialho, O., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2019a). Gaining insight into human nature: A review of literature classroom intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 891, 3–45.
Schrijvers, M., Janssen, T., Fialho, O., De Maeyer, S., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2019b). Transformative Dialogic Teaching fosters adolescents’ insight into human nature and motivation. Learning and Instruction, 631, 1–15.
Sims, B. (2003). The impact of causal attribution on correctional ideology: A national study. Criminal Justice Review, 281, 1–25.
Singer, T., & Bolz, M., Eds. (2013). Compassion: Bridging Practice and Science. Munich: Max Planck Society.
Smith, E. R., & Jamie DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 41, 108–131.
Solomon, R. (1997). In defense of sentimentality. In Mette Hjort and Sue Laver (Ed.), Emotion and the Arts (225–241). New York: Oxford University Press.
Spears, R. (2002). Four degrees of stereotype formation: differentiation by any means necessary. In C. McGarty, V. Y. Yzerbyt, & R. Spears (ed.). Stereotypes as explanations: The formation of meaningful beliefs about social groups (127–156). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sripada, C. (2016). Imaginative guidance: A mind forever wandering. In M. E. P. Seligman, P. Railton, R. F. Baumeister, & C. Sripada (Eds.), Homo prospectus (103–131). New York: Oxford University Press.
Todd, A. R., & Galinsky, A. D. (2014). Perspective-taking as a strategy for improving intergroup relations: Evidence, mechanisms, and qualifications. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 81, 374–387.
Vescio, T. K., Sechrist, G. B., & Paolucci, M. P. (2003). Perspective-taking and prejudice reduction: The mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 331, 455–472.
Wheatley, T. (2015). Neuroscience versus phenomenology and the implications for justice. In J. Decety & T. Wheatley (Eds.), The moral brain: An interdisciplinary perspective (267–278). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Jankowski, Peter J, Steven J Sandage, Daniel J Hauge, Choi Hee An & David C Wang
Alber, Jan
2021. Review of Małecki, Sorokowski, Pawłowski & Cieński (2019): Human minds and animal stories: How narratives make us care about other species. Scientific Study of Literature 11:1 ► pp. 142 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
