Cover not available

Article published In: Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 9:2 (2019) ► pp.195–229

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Methodological issues in the study of phonetic symbolism

 | Tel-Aviv University
 | University of Haifa
Published online: 30 June 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.19001.tsu
Abstract
There is a growing research literature on phonetic symbolism in poetry, sometimes with incongruent results. Through a theoretical structural analysis we show that, (a) individual speech sounds have (sometimes conflicting) potentials to suggest elementary percepts, such as abruptness, hardness, smoothness; and (b) from these elementary percepts some general psychological atmosphere may be abstracted that may be individuated in specific emotions as ‘love,’ ‘joy,’ or ‘anger,’ by semantic feature-addition. This proposal can reconcile incongruous research results. Sound-symbolic lexical entries are governed by similar principles, but fossilized. Large-scale statistical investigation may reveal significant sound-symbolic effects only when the same phonemes repeat throughout the poem. They may, however, miss conspicuous local sound effects, revealed only by local analysis. Some sceptical conclusions in the research literature may be due to this phenomenon. The proposed method may account not only for statistical correlations, but also for the perception of a pervasive emotional atmosphere in a poem.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • A welter of conflicting findings
  • A structural theory of phonetic symbolism
    • Organization of the mental database
    • The structure of emotions
    • The structure of phonemes
    • Principles of sound symbolism
  • The case of onomatopoeia
  • Accommodating conflicting findings
  • Objection to the present proposal
  • Non-reductive statistical investigation
  • Case studies
  • Theory adequacy and empirical results
  • Sound-symbolism and the lexicon
  • Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (55)
References
Alcock, T. (1963). The Rorschach in Practice. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arnheim, R. (1967). Art and Visual Perception. London: Faber.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arnold, M. B., & Gasson, J. A. (1968). Feelings and Emotions as Dynamic Factors in Personality Integration. In M. B. Arnold (Ed.), The Nature of Emotion (pp. 203–221). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aryani, A., Conrad, M., Schmidtke, D., & Jacobs, A. (2018). Why “piss” is ruder than “pee”? The role of sound in affective meaning making. Plos One, 13(6). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aryani, A., Kraxenberger, M., Ullrich, S., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M. (2016). Measuring the basic affective tone of poems via phonological saliency and iconicity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(2), 191–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auracher, J., Albers, S., Zhai, Y., Gareeva, G., & Stavniychuk, T. (2011). P is for happiness, N Is for sadness: Universals in sound iconicity to detect emotions in poetry. Discourse Processes, 48(1), 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burnshaw, S. (1964). The Poem Itself. Harmondsworth: Pelican.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crowder, R. G. (1982a). A common basis for auditory sensory storage in perception and immediate memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 31(5), 477–483. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1982b). Disinhibition of masking in auditory sensory memory. Memory & Cognition, 10(5), 424–433. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Andrade, R. G. (1981). The cultural part of cognition. Cognitive Science, 5(3), 179–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Saussure, F. (1916). Course in General Linguistics. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dewey, G. (1923). Relativ frequency of English speech sounds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from [URL].
Ehrenzweig, A. (1965). The Psychoanalysis of Artistic Vision and Hearing. New York: Braziller.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1970). The Hidden Order of Art. London: Paladin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, E. (2008). Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam. Retrieved December 19, 2018, from [URL]
Fodor, J. A., & Bever, T. G. (1965). The psychological reality of linguistic segments. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 41, 414–420. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fónagy, I. (1961). Communication in poetry. Word – Journal of the International Linguistic Association, 17(2), 194–218.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fónagy, I., & Magdics, K. (1960). Speed of utterance in phrases of different lengths. Language and Speech, 3(4), 179–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gafni, C. (2015). Child Phonology Analyzer: processing and analyzing transcribed speech. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. (pp. 1–5, paper number 531). Glasgow, UK: the University of Glasgow. ISBN 978-0-85261-941-4Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gafni, Chen and Reuven Tsur. (2019). Some Experimental Evidence for Sound-Emotion Interaction. Scientific Study of Literature 9:1. 53–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granville-Barker, H. (1957). Preface to Hamlet. New York: Hill and Wang Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hrushovski, B. (1980). The Meaning of Sound Patterns in Poetry: An Interaction Theory. Poetics Today, 2(1a), 39–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, R., & Waugh, L. R. (2002). The sound shape of language. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Oatley, K. (1989). The language of emotions: An analysis of a semantic field. Cognition & Emotion, 3(2), 81–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kraxenberger, M. (2017). On Sound-Emotion Associations in Poetry. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kraxenberger, M., & Menninghaus, W. (2016). Mimological reveries? Disconfirming the hypothesis of phono-emotional iconicity in poetry. Frontiers in Psychology, 71, 1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1977). A function for thought experiments. In T. S. Kuhn, The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change (pp. 240–265). Chicago: The University of Chicago press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S. (1968). Emotion as Coping Process. In M. B. Arnold (Ed.), The Nature of Emotion (pp. 249–260). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lockwood, G., & Dingemanse, M. (2015). Iconicity in the lab: A review of behavioral, developmental, and neuroimaging research into sound-symbolism. Frontiers in Psychology, 61, 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meier, H. H. (1999). Imagination by ideophones. In M. Nänny & O. Fischer (Eds.), Form Miming Meaning: Iconicity in Language and Literature (pp. 135–154). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, L. B. (1956). Emotion and Meaning in Music. Chicago, Illinois, USA: The University of Chicago press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miall, D. S. (2001). Sounds of contrast: An empirical approach to phonemic iconicity. Poetics, 29(1), 55–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. (1994). The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols, & J. J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound symbolism (pp. 325–347). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rorschach, H. (1951). Psychodiagnostics. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8(3), 382–439. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, C. A. (2016). Tracking semantic change in fl- monomorphemes in the OED. Journal of Historical Linguistics, 6(2), 165–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tartakovsky, R. (2014). Towards a theory of sporadic rhyming. Language and Literature, 23(2), 101–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsur, R. (1972). Articulateness and Requiredness in Iambic Verse. Style, 61, 123–148.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1987). On Metaphoring. Jerusalem: Israel Science Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1992). What Makes Sound Patterns Expressive: The Poetic Mode of Speech-Perception. Durham, UK: Duke University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). On The Shore of Nothingness: Space, Rhythm, and Semantic Structure in Religious Poetry and its Mystic-Secular Counterpart – A Study in Cognitive Poetics. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Size-sound symbolism revisited. Journal of Pragmatics, 381, 905–924. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Toward a Theory of Cognitive Poetics (Second). Brighton and Portland: Sussex Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017a). Metre, rhythm and emotion in poetry A cognitive Approach. Studia Metrica et Poetica, 41, 7–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017b). Poetic Conventions as Cognitive Fossils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). The Numinous as Aesthetic Quality. Style, 52(4), 361–384.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ullrich, S., Aryani, A., Kraxenberger, M., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M. (2017). On the relation between the general affective meaning and the basic sublexical, lexical, and inter-lexical features of poetic texts-a case study using 57 Poems of H. M. Enzensberger. Frontiers in Psychology, 71, 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1966). Explorations in Semantic Theory. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Current Trends in Linguistics III. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weitz, M. (1956). The Role of Theory in Aesthetics. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 15(1), 27–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whissell, C. (1999). Phonosymbolism and the Emotional Nature of Sounds: Evidence of the Preferential Use of Particular Phonemes in Texts of Differing Emotional Tone. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89(5), 19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). “The sound must seem an echo to the sense”: Pope’s use of sound to convey meaning in his Translation of Homer’s Iliad. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 981, 859–864. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiseman, M., & van Peer, W. (2002). The sound of meaning: An empirical study. In S. Csábi & J. Zerkowitz (Eds.), Textual secrets: The message of the medium (pp. 379–383). Budapest, Hungary: Akadémiai Nyomda Martonvásár.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1976). Philosophical Investigations. (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Auracher, Jan
2021. Sound-meaning relations in Japanese Tanka. Scientific Study of Literature 11:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Gafni, Chen & Reuven Tsur
2021. Studying Emotive Effects in Poetry by Quantifying Open-Ended Impressions. Empirical Studies of the Arts 39:2 ► pp. 216 ff. DOI logo
Auracher, Jan, Winfried Menninghaus & Mathias Scharinger
2020. Sound Predicts Meaning: Cross‐Modal Associations Between Formant Frequency and Emotional Tone in Stanzas. Cognitive Science 44:10 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Sound–Emotion Interaction in Poetry [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 39], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. A Life with Poetry [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 41], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue