Article published In: Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 1:2 (2011) ► pp.260–291
Textual determinants of a component of literary identification
Published online: 10 January 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.1.2.05kot
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.1.2.05kot
Three experiments were conducted on how properties of the text control one aspect of the process of identifying with the central character in a story. In particular, we were concerned with textual determinants of character transparency, that is, the extent to which the character’s actions and attitudes are clear and understandable. In Experiment 1, we hypothesized that the narrator in first-person narratives is transparent because narratorial implicatures (analogous to Grice’s (1975) notion of conversational implicatures) lead readers to attribute their own knowledge and experience to the narrator. Consistent with our predictions, the results indicated that stating the inferred information explicitly leads readers to rate the narrator’s thoughts and actions as more difficult to understand. In Experiment 2, we assessed whether this effect could be explained by differences in style between the original and modified versions of the text. The results demonstrated that there was no effect of adding text when the material was unrelated to narratorial implicatures. In Experiment 3, we hypothesized that transparency of the central character in a third-person narrative can be produced when the consistent use of free-indirect speech produces a close association between the narrator and the character; in this case, readers may attribute knowledge and experience to the character as well as the narrator. As predicted, the central character’s thoughts and actions were rated as more difficult to understand when the markers for free-indirect speech were removed. We argue that transparency may be produced through the use of what are essential conversational processes invoked in service of understanding the narrator as a conversational participant.
Keywords: communication, identification, free-indirect speech, narrator
Cited by (28)
Cited by 28 other publications
Schneider, Ralf
Oatley, Keith & Si Jia Wu
Ozbay, Yagmur, Suzanne Oosterwijk, Eftychia Stamkou & Maja Vukadinovic
Wimmer, Lena, Layla El-Salahi, Hon W. J. Lee & Heather J. Ferguson
Lawrence, Clare, Celia *, Edward Collyer & Melissa Poulson
Oatley, Keith & Jennifer M. Jenkins
Troscianko, Emily T. & James Carney
Wallace, Cynthia R.
Wimmer, Lena, Stacie Friend, Gregory Currie & Heather J. Ferguson
Zdunkiewicz, Lech
Dixon, Peter, Sara Saadat & Marisa Bortolussi
2020. Reader reactions to psychological perspective*
. Scientific Study of Literature 10:2 ► pp. 214 ff.
Langkau, Julia
Quinlan, Joshua A. & Raymond A. Mar
Gibbs, Raymond W. & Herbert L. Colston
2019. What psycholinguistic studies ignore about literary
experience. Scientific Study of Literature 9:1 ► pp. 72 ff.
Holler, Anke
Bortolussi, Marisa, Peter Dixon & Christopher Linden
Consoli, Gianluca
Koopman, Eva Maria (Emy)
Oatley, Keith & Maja Djikic
Salem, Susanna, Thomas Weskott & Anke Holler
2018. On the processing of Free Indirect Discourse. In Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 247], ► pp. 143 ff.
Kuiken, Don & Shawn Douglas
2017. Forms of absorption that facilitate the aesthetic and explanatory effects of literary reading. In Narrative Absorption [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 27], ► pp. 217 ff.
Sherman, Aleksandra & Clair Morrissey
van Krieken, Kobie, Hans Hoeken & José Sanders
Auracher, Jan & Hildegard Bosch
Oatley, Keith
Oatley, Keith
Oatley, Keith
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
