Article published In: The Future of Scientific Studies in Literature
[Scientific Study of Literature 1:1] 2011
► pp. 123–135
Vivifications of literary investigation
Published online: 24 May 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.1.1.13rap
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.1.1.13rap
A rich base of research has investigated the types of responses that literature engenders in readers. In the current contribution, we consider other aspects of the reading experience that have, to date, gone relatively ignored in empirical study. We explore issues including authors’ decisions about literary constructions, readers’ responses to real-world texts, affective evocations (and their neural underpinnings), and how we know what people have learned from the novels they read. With each issue we recommend potential approaches and methods that might usefully support scientific investigations of readers’ engagements with classic and contemporary literature.
Keywords: reading, literature, memory, learning, affect
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Breithaupt, Fritz, Binyan Li, Torrin M. Liddell, Eleanor B. Schille-Hudson & Sarah Whaley
Clinton, James A., Stephen W. Briner, Andrew M. Sherrill, Thomas Ackerman & Joseph P. Magliano
2017. The role of cinematic techniques in understanding character affect. Scientific Study of Literature 7:2 ► pp. 177 ff.
Komeda, Hidetsugu, Tomohiro Taira, Kohei Tsunemi, Takashi Kusumi & David N. Rapp
Burkett, Candice & Susan R. Goldman
Vélez, Jorge Iván & Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos
McCarthy, Kathryn S.
McCarthy, Kathryn S. & Susan R. Goldman
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
