Article published In: The Future of Scientific Studies in Literature
[Scientific Study of Literature 1:1] 2011
► pp. 59–71
The scientific study of literature
What can, has, and should be done
Published online: 24 May 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.1.1.06dix
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.1.1.06dix
In the present editorial, we briefly describe some aspects of the domain of the scientific study of literature, the methods that have been used, and the nature of the theories that have been developed. We discuss some of the prior work that has been done on cognitive processing of and affective reactions to literary texts and how this interacts with the nature of the reader. We note that there is a need for further work on how the literary reactions vary with the reading context. We also describe some of the methods that have commonly been used, such as reading time, questionnaire responses, and protocol analysis. The potential for applying methods from cognitive neuroscience, such as the measurement of event-related potentials and brain imaging, is an exciting opportunity in the future. Finally, we identify some of the types of explanations that have been developed in the scientific study of literature, including variable relations and processing accounts. Other kinds of theoretical approaches, such as those based on complexity theory, might be needed in the future. Our conclusion is that although a great amount of further work needs to be done in understanding literature, there are a wide range of exciting possibilities.
Cited by (15)
Cited by 15 other publications
R. Avramova, Yana, Patrick De Pelsmacker & Nathalie Dens
Nishihara, Takayuki
Tucan, Gabriela
Laffer, Alexander
Even-Zohar, Itamar, Elias J. Torres Feijó & Antonio Monegal
Nenadić, Filip, Dušan Vejnović & Slobodan Marković
Yan, Ming & Werner Sommer
Gavaler, Chris & Dan Johnson
Gavaler, Chris & Dan Johnson
Allington, Daniel & Stephen Pihlaja
McCarthy, Kathryn S.
Inohara, Keisuke, Ryoko Honma, Takayuki Goto, Takashi Kusumi & Akira Utsumi
2014. The relationship between reading literary novels and predictive inference generation. Scientific Study of Literature 4:1 ► pp. 46 ff.
Riese, Katrin, Mareike Bayer, Gerhard Lauer & Annekathrin Schacht
McIntyre, Dan
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
