Cover not available

In:Grammar in Action: Building comprehensive grammars of talk-in-interaction
Edited by Jakob Steensig, Maria Jørgensen, Jan Lindström, Nicholas Mikkelsen, Karita Suomalainen and Søren Sandager Sørensen
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 37] 2025
► pp. 392–420

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 13
Other-extensions in Italian

A case of and for Collaborative Grammar

 | Durham University
Published online: 3 June 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.37.13cal
Abstract
This chapter focuses on the practice of other-extending a prior speaker’s complete turn in Italian. By drawing on the grammatical formatting and/or reusing elements in prior turns to extend them, speakers deploy Collaborative Grammar (Calabria 2022), a set of grammatical formats and resources available in a language to design turns to be heard as grammatically integrated. Using Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics, three actions are identified that speakers achieve by other-extending in Italian multiperson interactions: providing additional information, verifying while demonstrating understanding, and reframing prior talk as laughable. This chapter argues that practices implemented with Collaborative Grammar between multiple speakers should constitute a dedicated section in a comprehensive grammar that aims at describing the competing temporalities of multiperson interactions.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Incrementing talk with other-extensions
  • 3.Data and methods
  • 4.Analyses
    • 4.1Other-incrementing and providing additional information
    • 4.2Verifying while demonstrating understanding
    • 4.3Reframing prior talk as laughable
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (63)
References
Auer, Peter. 1996. “On the Prosody and Syntax of Turn-Continuations”. In Prosody in Conversation, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Margret Selting, 57–100. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar”. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 25 (1): 7–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Why Are Increments Such Elusive Objects? An Afterthought”. Pragmatics 17 (4): 647–658.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “On-Line Syntax: Thoughts on the Temporality of Spoken Language”. Language Sciences 31 (1): 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Syntactic Structures and Their Symbiotic Guests: Notes on Analepsis from the Perspective of Online Syntax”. Pragmatics 24 (3): 533–560.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “The temporality of language in interaction”. In Temporality in interaction, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Susanne Günthner, 27–56. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla. 1990. “Phatic Connectives as Interactional Cues in Contemporary Spoken Italian”. Journal of Pragmatics 14 (4): 629–647. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calabria, Virginia. 2022. “Collaborative Grammar: The Temporality and Emergence of Clause Combination in Italian Talk-in-Interaction”. PhD Thesis, KU Leuven/ Université de Neuchâtel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2023. “Co-Constructing and Other-Extending Collaborative Reported Speech in Italian”. Journal of Pragmatics 214: 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calabria, Virginia, and Elwys De Stefani. 2020. “Per una grammatica situata: Aspetti temporali e multimodali dell’incrementazione sintattica”. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica ed Applicata 49 (3): 571–601.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Eve V. 2015. “Common ground”. In The Handbook of Language Emergence, ed. by Brian MacWhinney, and William O’Grady, 328–353. London: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 2015. “From the Leipzig Glossing Rules to the GE and RX lines.” In Corpus-based Studies of Lesser-described Languages, ed. by Amina Mettouchi, Dominique Caubet, and Martine Vanhove, 207–219. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2014. “What Does Grammar Tell Us about Action?”. Pragmatics 24 (3): 623–647.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting. 2018. Interactional linguistics: Studying language in social interaction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2015. “Retrospection and understanding in interaction”. In Temporality in interaction, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Susanne Günthner, 57–95, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson. 1996. “Practices in the Construction of Turns: The “TCU” Revisited”. Pragmatics 6 (3): 427–454.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “Constituency and the grammar of turn increments”. In The Language of Turn and Sequence, ed. by Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson, 14–38. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1996. “Interactional Units in Conversation: Syntactic, Intonational, and Pragmatic Resources for the Management of Turns”. In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, and Sandra A. Thompson, 134–184. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1996. “Transparent Vision”. In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, and Sandra A. Thompson, 370–404. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Co-operative Action. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Harness Goodwin. 1987. “Concurrent Operations on Talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments”. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics 1 (1): 1–54.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2004. “Shared Syntax: The Grammar of Co-Constructions”. Journal of Pragmatics 36 (8): 1315–1336. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 2011. “Territories of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic Moments in Interaction”. In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 159–183. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 2011. “Emergent Grammar and Temporality in Interactional Linguistics”. In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, ed. by Peter Auer, and Stefan Pfänder, 22–44. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction”. In Conversation Analysis. Studies from the first generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene H. 1991. “On the Syntax of Sentences-in-Progress”. Language in Society 20 (3): 441–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996. “On the “Semi-Permeable” Character of Grammatical Units in Conversation: Conditional Entry into the Turn Space of Another Speaker”. In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, and Sandra A. Thompson, 238–276. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002. “Turn-Sharing: The Choral Co-Production of Talk-in-Interaction”. In The Language of Turn and Sequence, ed. by Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson, 225–256. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. “On the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: Grammar as Action in Prompting a Speaker to Elaborate”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 37 (2): 151–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linell, Per. 2005. The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins and transformations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luke, Kang-Kwong. 2021. “Parties and Voices: On the Joint Construction of Conversational Turns”. Chinese Language and Discourse 12 (1): 6–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luke, Kang-Kwong, and Wei Zhang. 2007. “Retrospective Turn Continuations in Mandarin Chinese Conversation”. Pragmatics 17 (4): 605–635.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazeland, Harrie. 2019. “Position Expansion in Meeting Talk: An Interaction-Re-Organizing Type of and-Prefaced Other-Continuation”. In Embodied Activities in Face-to-Face and Mediated Settings: Social Encounters in Time and Space, ed. by Elisabeth Reber, and Cornelia Gerhardt, 397–433. New York: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2018. “Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: challenges for transcribing multimodality”. Research on language and social interaction 51 (1): 85–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Monzoni, Chiara. 2005. “The Use of Marked Syntactic Constructions in Italian Multi-Party Conversation”. In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation, ed. by Auli Hakulinen, and Margret Selting, 129–157. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Obana, Yasuko, and Michael Haugh. 2015. “Co-Authorship of Joint Utterances in Japanese”. Dialogue & Discourse 6 (1): 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2007. “Increments in Cross-Linguistic Perspective”. Pragmatics 17 (4): 505–512. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Orletti, Franca. 2008. “Enunciati a più voci: la conversazione fra grammatica ed interazione”. In La comunicazione parlata. Atti del congresso internazionale (Napoli, 23–25 febbraio 2006), ed. by Massimo Pettorino et al., Napoli: Liguori: 1190–1204.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, Leelo Keevallik, and Xiaoting Li. 2022. “The Grammar-Body Interface in Social Interaction”. Frontiers in Psychology 13: 875696. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rönnqvist, Sara, and Jan Lindström. 2021. “Turn Continuations and Gesture: “And Then”-Prefacing in Multi-Party Conversations”. Frontiers in Communication 6: 670173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni. 2018. “Composite Social Actions: The Case of Factual Declaratives in Everyday Interaction”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (4): 379–397. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation”. Language 50 (4): 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salzmann, Katharina. 2017. Expansionen in der deutschen und italienischen Wissenschaftssprache. Kontrastive Korpusanalyse und sprachdidaktische Überlegungen. Berlin: Erich Schmidt. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1979. “The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation”. In Syntax and semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax, ed. by Talmy Givón, 261–286. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996. “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction”. In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, and Sandra A. Thompson, 52–133. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016. “Increments”. In Accountability in social interaction, ed. by Jeffrey D. Robinson, 239–263. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selting, Margret. 2000. “The Construction of Units in Conversational Talk”. Language in Society 29 (4): 477–517. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Serianni, Luca, Valeria Della Valle, and Giuseppe Patota. 2021. La grammatica italiana. Comunicazione. Milano: Edizioni Scolastiche Bruno Mondadori.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack. 2012. “Turn-Continuation by Self and by Other”. Discourse Processes 49 (3–4): 314–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack, and Tanya Stivers (eds). 2012. The handbook of conversation analysis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steensig, Jakob, Maria Jørgensen, Nicholas Mikkelsen, Karita Suomalainen, and Søren Sandager Sørensen. 2023. “Toward a Grammar of Danish Talk-in-Interaction: From Action Formation to Grammatical Description”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 56 (2): 116–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2021. “Is Conversation Built for Two? The Partitioning of Social Interaction”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 54 (1): 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stoenică, Ioana-Maria. 2020. Actions et conduites mimo-gestuelles dans l’usage conversationnel des relatives en Français. Bern: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stoenica, Ioana-Maria, and Simona Pekarek Doehler. 2020. “Relative-Clause Increments and the Management of Reference: A Multimodal Analysis of French Talk-in-Interaction”. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation: Clausal patterns and the organization of action, ed. by Yael Maschler, Simona Pekarek Doehler, Jan Lindström, and Leelo Keevallik, 303–330. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2005. “The Clause as a Locus of Grammar and Interaction”. Discourse Studies 7 (4–5): 481–505. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Voghera, Miriam. 2017. Dal parlato alla grammatica. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vorreiter, Susanne. 2003. Turn continuations: Towards a cross-linguistic classification. InLiSt, Interaction and Linguistic Structures 39: 1–25.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker, Gareth. 2004. “On Some Interactional and Phonetic Properties of Increments to Turns in Talk-in-Interaction”. In Sound Patterns in Interaction, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Cecilia E. Ford, 147–169. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue