In:Grammar in Action: Building comprehensive grammars of talk-in-interaction
Edited by Jakob Steensig, Maria Jørgensen, Jan Lindström, Nicholas Mikkelsen, Karita Suomalainen and Søren Sandager Sørensen
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 37] 2025
► pp. 47–77
Chapter 3‘Idea-Suggestions’ in an interactional grammar
Sequential organization and grammatical formats
Published online: 3 June 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.37.03cur
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.37.03cur
Abstract
In this chapter, we explore the grammar of ‘Suggestions’ and the sequences they engender. ‘Suggestion’ is
used here as a technical term to refer to a speaker forwarding an action to be performed by the recipient that will
benefit the recipient. The data suggest several sub-types of Suggestion, the focus here being on the sub-type in which
a speaker initiates a sequence by volunteering an idea for something that the other might do to their benefit, which
we call ‘Idea-Suggestion’, or ‘I-Suggestion’. We discuss the formats that speakers of American English use to put
forth these kinds of Suggestions, and argue that the tentativeness built into the work that I-Suggestions do reveals
what participants orient to in the trajectory of the ensuing sequence. A final section explores how our findings might
be captured in an interactional grammar of American English.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data and procedure
- 3.Features of Idea-Suggestion sequences
- 3.1Preliminaries to I-Suggestions
- 3.2Formats for I-Suggestions
- 3.2.1‘Why don’t you’ (WDY) formats
- 3.2.2Formats with obligation and necessity modals
- 3.2.3Hypothetical conditional formats
- 3.2.4Formats with ability and possibility modals
- 3.2.5Formats with ‘you want to’
- 3.3Responses to I-Suggestions
- 4.Idea-Suggestions vs. Advice-Suggestions
- 5.Idea-Suggestions in an interactional grammar
- 5.1Idea-Suggestions: From action to grammar
- 5.2Idea-Suggestions: From grammar to action
- 6.Discussion
- 7.Conclusion
Notes References
References (46)
Bybee, Joan 1998. “The
Emergent Lexicon.” CLS 34: The
Panels, 421–435. University of Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Clayman, Steven E. 2013. “Agency in
Response: The Role of Prefatory Address Terms.” Journal of
Pragmatics 57:290–302.
Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage. 2014. “Benefactors
and Beneficiaries: Benefactive Status and Stance in the Management of Offers and
Requests.” In Requesting in Social
Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 55–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2014. “What
does Grammar Tell us about
Action?” Pragmatics 24 (3):623–647.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Sandra A. Thompson. 2022. “Action
Ascription and Deonticity in Everyday Advice-giving
Sequences.” In Action Ascription in
Interaction, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Michael Haugh, 183–207. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Curl, Traci S. 2006. “Offers of
Assistance: Constraints on Syntactic Design.” Journal of
Pragmatics 38:1257–1280.
Curl, Traci S., and Paul Drew. 2008. “Contingency
and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting.” Research on Language and
Social
Interaction 41 (2):129–153.
Deppermann, Arnulf, and Michael Haugh. 2022. “Action
Ascription: Interaction in Context.” In Action
Ascription in Interaction, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Michael Haugh, 1–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Drew, Paul. 1984. “Speakers’
Reportings in Invitation Sequences.” In Structures of
Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 129–151. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds). 2014. Requesting
in Social Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Enfield, Nick J. 2013. Relationship Thinking.
Agency, Enchrony and Human Sociality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Enfield, Nick J., and Jack Sidnell. 2017a. “On
the Concept of Action in the Study of Interaction.” Discourse
Studies 19 (5):515–535.
Ervin-Tripp, Susan. 1976. “’Is
Sybil there?’ The Structure of Some American English Directives.” Language in
Society 5 (1):25–66.
Ewing, Michael C. 2018. “Investigating
Indonesian conversation: Approach and
rationale.” Wacana 19 (2):342–374.
Ford, Cecilia E. 1997. “Speaking
Conditionally: Some Contexts for If-clauses in
Conversation.” In On Conditionals
Again, ed. by Angeliki Athanasiadou, and René Dirven, 387–413. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson. 2013. “Units
and/or action trajectories? The language of grammatical categories and the language of social
action.” In Units of Talk – Units of
Action, ed. by Beatrice Szczepek Reed, and Geoffrey Raymond, 13–56. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Fox, Barbara A. 2007. “Principles
Shaping Grammatical Practices: An Exploration.” Discourse
Studies 9 (3):299–318.
Günthner, Susanne. 2000. “From
Concessive Connector to Discourse Marker: The Use of ‘obwohl’ in Everyday German
Interaction.” In Cause – Condition – Concession —
Contrast, ed. by Bernd Kortmann, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 439–468. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hatsuda, Ayana. 2024. “Japanese
tara doo desu ka: A Canonical Advice Form. Or is
it?” Paper presented at
IIEMCA, Seoul.
Heritage, John, and Steven E. Clayman. 2024. “Making
Arrangements: A Sketch of a ‘Big Package’.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 57 (3):279–300.
Heritage, John, and Sue Sefi. 1992. “Dilemmas
of Advice: Aspects of the Delivery and Reception of Advice in Interactions between Health Visitors and
First-time Mothers.” In Talk at work. Interaction in
institutional settings, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 359–417. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. “Glossary
of Transcript Symbols with an
Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from
the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jefferson, Gail, and John R. E. Lee. 1981. “The
rejection of Advice: Managing the Problematic Convergence of a ‘Troubles-telling’ and a ‘Service
Encounter’.” Journal of
Pragmatics 5:399–422.
Kendrick, Kobin H., and Paul Drew. 2014. “The
Putative Preference for Offers over
Requests.” In Requesting in Social
Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 87–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Laury, Ritva. 2012. “Syntactically
Non-integrated Finnish jos ‘if’ Conditional Clauses as
Directives.” Discourse
Processes 49:213–242.
Lindström, Jan, Camilla Lindholm, and Ritva Laury. 2016. “The
Interactional Emergence of Conditional Clauses as Directives: Constructions, Trajectories and Sequences of
Action.” Language
Sciences 58:8–21.
Maschler, Yael, Simona Pekarek Doehler, Jan Lindström, and Leelo Keevallik (eds). 2020. Emergent
Syntax for Conversation: Clausal Patterns and the Organization of
Action. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A
Comprehensive Grammar of the English
Language. London: Longman.
Raymond, Chase W., Jeffrey D. Robinson, Barbara A. Fox, Sandra A. Thompson, and Kristella Montiegal. 2021. “Modulating
Action through Minimization: Syntax in the Service of Offering and
Requesting.” Language in
Society 50 (1):53–91.
Robinson, Jeffrey D., and Heidi Kevoe-Feldman. 2016. “The
Accountability of Proposing (vs. Soliciting Proposals of)
Arrangements.” In Accountability in Social
Interaction, ed by Jeffrey D. Robinson, 264–293. New York: Oxford University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1980. “Preliminaries
to Preliminaries: ‘Can I Ask You a Question?’”. Sociological
Inquiry 50:104–152.
2007. Sequence Organization
in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation
Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sidnell, Jack. 2017. “Action
in interaction is conduct under a description”. Language in
Society 46 (3):313–337.
Sidnell, Jack, and Nick J. Enfield. 2012. “Language
Diversity and Social Action: A Third Locus of Linguistic Relativity.” Current
Anthropology 53(3):302–333.
. 2014. “The
Ontology of Action, in Interaction.” In The Cambridge
Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Nick J. Enfield, Paul Kockelman, and Jack Sidnell, 423–446. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steensig, Jakob, Maria Jørgensen, Nikolas Mikkelsen, Karita Suomalainen, and Søren Sandager Sørensen. 2023. “Towards
a Grammar of Danish Talk-in-interaction: From Action Formation to Grammatical
Description.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 56(2):116–140.
Stivers, Tanya, and Makoto Hayashi. 2010. “Transformative
Answers: One Way to Resist a Question’s Constraints.” Language in
Society 39:1–25.
Stivers, Tanya, John Heritage, Rebecca K. Barnes, Rose McCabe, Laura Thompson, and Merran Toerien. 2017. “Treatment
Recommendations as Actions.” Health
Communication 33(11):1335–1344.
Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano. 2010. “Mobilizing
Response.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 43(1):3–31.
Stivers, Tanya, and Jack Sidnell. 2016. “Proposals
for Activity Collaboration.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 49(2):148–166.
Terasaki, Alene K. 2004. “Pre-announcement
Sequences in Conversation.” In Conversation Analysis:
Studies from the First Generation, ed. by G. H. Lerner, 171–223. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Thompson, Sandra A., and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2020. “English
‘why don’t you X’ as a Formulaic
Expression.” In Fixed Expressions. Building Language
Structure and Social Action, ed. by Ritva Laury, and Tsuyoshi Ono, 99–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen.
(2015). Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building Responsive
Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox, and Chase W. Raymond. 2021. “The
Grammar of Proposals for Joint Activities.” Interactional
Linguistics 1(1):123–151.
