In:New Perspectives in Interactional Linguistic Research
Edited by Margret Selting and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 36] 2024
► pp. 132–160
Get fulltext
Introducing the “Parallel European Corpus of Informal Interaction” (PECII)
A novel resource for exploring cross-situational and cross-linguistic variability in social interaction
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 26 August 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.36.05kut
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.36.05kut
Abstract
This article introduces the Parallel European Corpus of Informal Interaction
(PECII), a multi-language video-corpus of social interactions in a range of informal settings and activity-contexts.
After describing the basic motivation for its compilation, the design principles that underlie its composition and the
data it contains, we illustrate PECII’s usefulness for comparative Interactional Linguistic (IL) and Conversation
Analytic (CA) research. We do this by offering an analytic sketch of the practices people use to initiate turns that
interfere with and seek to rectify another’s (problematic) behavior, focusing on their variability across languages
and settings/activity-contexts. By maximizing the comparability of interactional data, PECII not only promotes the enhancement of cross-linguistic research in IL, it also opens up new avenues for
exploring “cross-situational” variability (so-called “situation design”).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The Parallel European Corpus of Informal Interaction (PECII): Conceptual origins, design principles, and composition
- 3.Using PECII: An exemplifying analytic sketch
- 3.1Sketching the analytic domain and locating a target phenomenon: Interventions and intervention-initiation techniques
- 3.2Cross-situational comparison in a given language
- 3.3Cross-linguistic comparison
- 4.Summary
Notes References
References (73)
Arminen, Ilkka. 2009. “On
Comparative Methodology in Studies of Social
Interaction.” In Talk in Interaction: Comparative
Dimensions, ed. by Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, and Jan Lindström, 48–69. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society (SKS).
Austin, John L. 1957. “I. – A Plea for
Excuses: The Presidential Address.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian
Society 57 (1): 1–30.
Baranova, Julija, and Mark Dingemanse. 2016. “Reasons
for Requests.” Discourse
Studies 18 (6): 641–675.
Betz, Emma. 2015. “Indexing
Epistemic Access through Different Confirmation Formats: Uses of Responsive (das) stimmt in
German Interaction.” Journal of
Pragmatics 87: 251–266.
Betz, Emma, Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm, and Peter Golato. 2020. “Mobilizing
Others: An Introduction.” In Mobilizing Others:
Grammar and Lexis within Larger Activities, ed. by Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm, Emma Betz, and Peter Golato, 1–18.
Clark, Eve V. 2009. First Language
Acquisition. 2nd ed. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Clayman, Steven E. 2013. “Agency in
Response: The Role of Prefatory Address Terms.” Journal of
Pragmatics 57: 290–302.
Clift, Rebecca, and Chase Wesley Raymond. 2018. “Actions
in Practice: On Details in Collections.” Discourse
Studies 20 (1): 90–119.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten. 2011. “A
System for Transcribing Talk-in-Interaction: GAT 2 (Translated and Adapted for
English).” Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen
Interaktion 12: 1–51.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting. 2001. “Introducing
Interactional Linguistics.” In Studies in
Interactional Linguistics, ed. by Margret Selting and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 1–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Marget Selting. 2018. Interactional
Linguistics: Studying Language in Social
Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Craven, Alexandra, and Jonathan Potter. 2010. “Directives:
Entitlement and Contingency in Action.” Discourse
Studies 12 (4): 419–42.
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2021. “Social
Actions.” In The Cambridge Handbook of
Sociopragmatics, ed. by Michael Haugh, Dániel Z. Kádár, and Marina Terkourafi, 1st
ed., 69–94. Cambridge University Press.
Dingemanse, Mark, Seán G. Roberts, Julija Baranova, Joe Blythe, Paul Drew, Simeon Floyd, Rosa S. Gisladottir, et al. 2015. “Universal
Principles in the Repair of Communication Problems.” PLOS
ONE 10 (9): e0136100.
Droste, Pepe. 2020. “Alternativen
namentlicher Anrede als Ressourcen sozialen Handelns: Ein Fall für die Interaktionale
Onomastik.” Namenkundliche
Informationen 112: 143–171.
Egbert, Maria. 1997. “Schisming:
The Collaborative Transformation From a Single Conversation to Multiple
Conversations.” Research on Language & Social
Interaction 30 (1): 1–51.
Emerson, Robert M., and Sheldon L. Messinger. 1977. “The
Micro-Politics of Trouble.” Social
Problems 25 (2): 121–134.
Floyd, Simeon, Giovanni Rossi, and Nick J. Enfield. 2020. Getting
Others to Do Things: A Pragmatic Typology of
Recruitments. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Goodwin, Marjorie H., and Charles Goodwin. 2012. “Car
Talk: Integrating Texts, Bodies, and Changing
Landscapes.” Semiotica 191: 257–286.
Goodwin, Marjorie H., and Asta Cekaite. 2013. “Calibration
in Directive/Response Sequences in Family Interaction.” Journal of
Pragmatics 46 (1): 122–138.
Goodwin, Marjorie H., and Heather Loyd. 2020. “The
Face of Noncompliance in Family Interaction.” Text &
Talk 40 (5): 573–598.
Hepburn, Alexa, and Jonathan Potter. 2011. “Threats:
Power, Family Mealtimes, and Social Influence.” British Journal of Social
Psychology 50 (1): 99–120.
Heritage, John. 2013. “Turn-Initial
Position and Some of Its Occupants.” Journal of
Pragmatics 57: 331–337.
Heritage, John, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen (eds.). 2018. Between
Turn and Sequence: Turn-Initial Particles across
Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hoey, Elliott M., and Chase Wesley Raymond. 2022. “Managing
Conversation Analysis Data.” In The Open Handbook of
Linguistic Data Management, ed. by Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker, Bradley McDonnell, Eve Koller, and Lauren B. Collister, 257–266. The MIT Press.
Hofstetter, Emily. 2021. “Achieving
Preallocation: Turn Transition Practices in Board Games.” Discourse
Processes 58 (2): 113–133.
Jefferson, Gail. 1972. “Side
Sequences.” In Studies in Social
Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow, 294–338. New York: Free Press.
. 1979. “A
Technique for Inviting Laughter and Its Subsequent
Acceptance/Declination.” In Everyday Language:
Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 79–96. New York, London: Irvington.
Keel, Sara. 2016. Socialization:
Parent-Child Interaction in Everyday Life. Directions in Ethnomethodology and Conversation
Analysis. London / New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Kendrick, Kobin H., and Paul Drew. 2016. “Recruitment:
Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction.” Research
on Language and Social
Interaction 49 (1): 1–19.
Kent, Alexandra. 2012. “Compliance,
Resistance and Incipient Compliance When Responding to Directives.” Discourse
Studies 14 (6): 711–730.
Kent, Alexandra, and Kobin H. Kendrick. 2016. “Imperative
Directives: Orientations to Accountability.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 49 (3): 272–88.
Kidwell, Mardi. 2013. “Availability
as a Trouble Source in Directive-Response
Sequences.” In Conversational Repair and Human
Understanding, ed. by Geoffrey Raymond, Makoto Hayashi, and Jack Sidnell, 234–60. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Kornfeld, Laurenz, and Giovanni Rossi. 2023. “Enforcing
Rules During Play: Knowledge, Agency, and the Design of Instructions and
Reminders.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 56 (1): 42–64.
Küttner, Uwe-A., Anna Vatanen, and Jörg Zinken. 2022. “Invoking
Rules in Everyday Family Interactions: A Method for Appealing to Practical
Reason.” Human
Studies 45: 793–823.
Lerner, Gene H. 2003. “Selecting next
Speaker: The Context-Sensitive Operation of a Context-Free
Organization.” Language in
Society 32 (2): 177–201.
Lerner, Gene H., and Tomoyo Takagi. 1999. “On
the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: A Co-Investigation of English
and Japanese Grammatical Practices.” Journal of
Pragmatics 31 (1): 49–75.
Liberman, Kenneth. 2013. More
Studies in Ethnomethodology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary
Anthropology. “Leipzig Glossing Rules,” last
modified May 31,
2015. [URL]
Maynard, Douglas W., and Steven E. Clayman. 2003. “Ethnomethodology
and Conversation Analysis.” In Handbook of Symbolic
Interactionism, ed. by Larry T. Reynolds and Nancy J. Herman-Kinney, 173–202. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
Mondada, Lorenza. 2009. “The
Methodical Organization of Talking and Eating: Assessments in Dinner
Conversations.” Food Quality and
Preference 20 (8): 558–571.
. 2018. “The
Multimodal Interactional Organization of Tasting: Practices of Tasting Cheese in Gourmet
Shops.” Discourse
Studies 20 (6): 743–769.
. 2019. “Multimodal
Transcription,” last modified November 2019. [URL]
Ninio, Anat, and Catherine E. Snow. 1999. “The
Development of Pragmatics: Learning to Use Language
Appropriately.” In Handbook of Child Language
Acquisition, ed. by William C. Ritchie and Tej K. Bhatia, 347–383. New York: Academic Press.
Potter, Jonathan, and Alexa Hepburn. 2020. “Shaming
Interrogatives: Admonishments, the Social Psychology of Emotion, and Discursive Practices of Behaviour
Modification in Family Mealtimes.” British Journal of Social
Psychology 59 (2): 347–364.
Raymond, Chase Wesley. 2022. “Suffixation
and Sequentiality: Notes on the Study of Morphology in Interaction.” Interactional
Linguistics 2 (1): 1–41.
Rossi, Giovanni. 2020. “Other-Repetition
in Conversation across Languages: Bringing Prosody into Pragmatic
Typology.” Language in
Society 49 (4): 495–520.
Rossi, Giovanni, Simeon Floyd, and Nick J. Enfield. 2020. “Recruitments
and Pragmatic Typology.” In Getting Others to Do
Things: A Pragmatic Typology of Recruitments, ed. by Simeon Floyd, Giovanni Rossi, Nick J. Enfield, Kobin H. Kendrick, Joe Blythe, Jörg Zinken, Julija Baranova, and Mark Dingemanse, 1–23. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A
Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for
Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1968. “Sequencing in
Conversational Openings.” American
Anthropologist 70 (6): 1075–1095.
1989. “Reflections on
Language, Development, and the Interactional Character of
Talk-in-Interaction.” In Interaction in Human
Development, ed. by Marc H. Bornstein and Jerome S. Bruner, 139–153. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
1996. “Confirming
Allusions: Toward an Empirical Account of Action.” American Journal of
Sociology 102 (1): 161–216.
2007. Sequence Organization
in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Volume
1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2009. “One Perspective
on Conversation Analysis: Comparative
Perspectives.” In Conversation Analysis:
Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Jack Sidnell, 357–406. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks. 1977. “The
Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in
Conversation.” Language 53 (2): 361–82.
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Irene Koshik, Sally Jacoby, and David Olsher. 2002. “Conversation
Analysis and Applied Linguistics.” Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics 22 (March): 3–31.
Schmidt, Marco F. H., Hannes Rakoczy, and Michael Tomasello. 2019. “Eighteen-Month-Old
Infants Correct Non-Conforming Actions by
Others.” Infancy 24 (4): 613–35.
Sidnell, Jack. 2007. “Comparative
Studies in Conversation Analysis.” Annual Review of
Anthropology 36 (1): 229–44.
Sterponi, Laura. 2003. “Account
Episodes in Family Discourse: The Making of Morality in Everyday
Interaction.” Discourse
Studies 5 (1): 79–100.
Stivers, Tanya, Nick J. Enfield, Penelope Brown, Christina Englert, Makoto Hayashi, Trine Heinemann, Gertie Hoymann, et al.. 2009. “Universals
and Cultural Variation in Turn-Taking in Conversation.” Proceedings of the
National Academy of
Sciences 106 (26): 10587–10592.
Vatanen, Anna. 2014. “Responding
in Overlap: Agency, Epistemicity and Social Action in
Conversation.” University of Helsinki. [URL]
Walker, Gareth. 2013. “Young
Children’s Use of Laughter after Transgressions.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 46 (4): 363–382.
Watson, Rodney D. 2008. “Comparative
Sociology, Laic and Analytic: Some Critical Remarks on Comparison in Conversation
Analysis.” Cahiers de
Praxématique 50: 197–238.
Wiggins, Sally. 2002. “Talking
with Your Mouth Full: Gustatory Mmms and the Embodiment of
Pleasure.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 35 (3): 311–336.
Wootton, Anthony J. 1997. Interaction and the
Development of Mind. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Chalfoun, Andrew, Giovanni Rossi & Tanya Stivers
König, Katharina, Martin Pfeiffer & Kathrin Weber
Ogden, Richard, Marina N. Cantarutti & Jürgen Trouvain
Steensig, Jakob, Maria Jørgensen, Jan Lindström, Karita Suomalainen & Søren Sandager Sørensen
2025. Discussion. In Grammar in Action [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 37], ► pp. 421 ff.
Stivers, Tanya & Arnulf Deppermann
Küttner, Uwe-A.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
