In:OKAY across Languages: Toward a comparative approach to its use in talk-in-interaction
Edited by Emma Betz, Arnulf Deppermann, Lorenza Mondada and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 34] 2021
► pp. 401–432
Bibliography
Published online: 17 March 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.34.bib
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.34.bib
Adegbija, Efurosibina, and Janet Bello. 2001. “The
Semantics of ‘Okay’ (OK) in Nigerian
English.” World
Englishes 20 (1): 89–98.
Ainsworth-Vaughn, Nancy. 1992. “Topic
Transitions in Physician-Patient Interviews: Power, Gender, and Discourse
Change.” Language in
Society 21: 409–426.
Al-Khalil, Talal. 2005. “Discourse
Markers in Syrian Arabic: A Study of Halla’, Ya’ni, Tayyeb,
and Lakan
.” PhD
diss., Essex University, Essex, UK.
Al Makoshi, Manal A. 2014. “Discourse
Markers and Code-Switching: Academic Medical Lectures in Saudi Arabia Using
English as the Medium of Instruction.” PhD
diss., Department of English Language and Applied Linguistics, University of Birmingham.
Anderson, Richard J., John A. Hughes, and Wes W. Sharrock. 1989. Working
for Profit: The Social Organisation of Calculation in an Entrepreneurial
Firm. Aldershot: Avebury.
Antaki, Charles, Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, and Mark Rapley. 2000. “‘Brilliant.
Next Question…’: High-Grade Assessment Sequences in the Completion of
Interactional Units.” Research on Language
and Social
Interaction 33 (3): 235–262.
Antaki, Charles, and Alexandra Kent. 2012. “Telling
People What to Do (and, Sometimes, Why): Contingency, Entitlement and
Explanation in Staff Requests to Adults with Intellectual
Impairments.” Journal of
Pragmatics 44 (6–7): 876–889.
Argyle, Michael, and Mark Cook. 1976. Gaze
and Mutual Gaze. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Arminen, Ilkka. 2006. “Social
Functions of Location in Mobile
Telephony.” Personal and Ubiquitous
Computing 1 (5): 319–323.
. 2010. “On
Comparative Methodology in Studies of Social
Interaction.” In Talk
in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions, ed.
by Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso and Jan Lindström, 48–69. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
Atkinson, J. Maxwell. 1984. “Public
Speaking and Audience Responses: Some Techniques for Inviting
Applause.” In Structures
of Social Action: Studies in Conversation
Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 346–369. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Atkinson, J. Maxwell, and John Heritage. 1984. “Aspects
of Response.” Introduction to the
section. In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 297–298. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Auer, Peter, and Yael Maschler (eds). 2016. NU/NÅ:
A Family of Discourse Markers Across the Languages of Europe and
Beyond. Berlin: De Gryuter.
Ayash, Maha Ghaleb. 2016. Pragmaticalization
of Discourse Markers in Lebanese Conversational
Arabic. Master’s
thesis, American University of Beirut.
Baker, Carolyn, Michael Emmison, and Alan Firth (eds). 2005. Calling
for Help: Language and Social Interaction in Telephone
Helplines. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bangerter, Adrian, and Herbert H. Clark. 2003. “Navigating
Joint Projects with Dialogue.” Cognitive
Science 27 (2): 195–223.
Bangerter, Adrian, Herbert H. Clark, and Anna R. Katz. 2004. “Navigating
Joint Projects in Telephone
Conversations.” Discourse
Processes 37 (1): 1–23.
Bańko, Mirosław. 2008, January 4. “Re:
Chwila! [Little Moment!]” (Online discussion
group). Accessed May 7, 2019. [URL]
Barske, Tobias. 2006. “Co-Constructing
Social Roles in German Business Meetings: A Conversation Analytic
Study.” PhD
diss., German Applied Linguistics, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
. 2009. “Same
Token, Different Actions: A Conversation Analytic Study of Social Roles,
Embodied Actions, and ok in German Business
Meetings.” Special
issue, Journal for Business
Communication 46 (1): 120–149.
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar. 2002. “Weil die Hälfte eben erst die Hälfte ist – zur prosodischen
Gestaltung als Projektionsmittel bei konzessiven Konstruktionen im
Englischen [Because half
is simply only half – prosodic make-up as means of projecting in concessive
constructions in English].” Zeitschrift für
Angewandte
Linguistik 37: 77–105.
. 2009. “Contrasting
and Turn Transition: Prosodic Projection with Parallel-Opposition
Constructions.” Journal of
Pragmatics 41 (11): 2271–2294.
. 2011a. “Double
Sayings of German JA – More Observations on Their
Prosodic-Phonetic Make-up and Alignment
Function.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 44 (2): 157–185.
. 2011b. “Response
Tokens in Interaction – Prosody, Phonetics and a Visual Aspect of German
JAJA
.” Gesprächsforschung 12: 301–370.
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Arnulf Deppermann. 2020. “Konstruktionsgrammatik und Prosodie: OH in englischer
Alltagsinteraktion [Construction Grammar and prosody: OH in English
everyday interaction].” In Prosodie
und Konstruktionsgrammatik, ed.
by Wolfgang Imo, and Jens Lanwer, 35–73. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Bavelas, Janet Beavin, Linda Coates, and Trudy Johnson. 2002. “Listener
Responses as a Collaborative Process: The Role of
Gaze.” Journal of
Communication 52 (3): 566–580.
Beach, Wayne A. 1990a. “Language
as and in Technology: Facilitating Topic Organization in a Videotex Focus
Group
Meeting.” In Communication
and the Culture of Technology, ed.
by Martin J. Medhurst, Alberto Gonzalez, and Tarla Ray Peterson, 197–220. Pullman, WA: Washington State University Press.
1990b. “Orienting
to the
Phenomenon.” In Communication
Yearbook 13, ed. by James A. Anderson, 216–244. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
1993. “Transitional
Regularities for ’Casual’ ”Okay”
Usages.” Journal of
Pragmatics 19 (4): 325–352.
1995a. “Conversation
Analysis: ‘Okay’ as a Clue for Understanding
Consequentiality.” In The
Consequentiality of Communication, ed.
by Stuart J. Sigman, 121–161. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
1995b. “Preserving
and Constraining Options: ”Okays” and ’Official’ Priorities in Medical
Interviews.” In The
Talk of the Clinic: Explorations in the Analysis of Medical and Therapeutic
Discourse, ed. by G. H. Morris, and Ronald J. Chenail, 259–289. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2020. “Using prosodically marked ‘Okays’ to display epistemic stances and incongruous actions.” Journal of Pragmatics 169: 15–164.
Benjamin, Trevor. 2013. “Signaling
Trouble: On the Linguistic Design of Other-Initiation of Repair in English
Conversation.” PhD
diss., University of Groningen.
Best, Katie, and Jon Hindmarsh. 2019. “Embodied
Spatial Practices and Everyday Organization: The Work of Tour Guides and
Their Audiences.” Human
Relations 72 (2): 248–271.
Betz, Emma. 2015. “Recipient
Design in Reference Choice: Negotiating Knowledge, Access, and Sequential
Trajectories.” Gesprächsforschung 16: 137–173.
Betz, Emma, and Andrea Golato. 2008. “Remembering
Relevant Information and Withholding Relevant Next Actions: The German Token
Achja
.” Research on
Language and Social
Interaction 41 (1): 58–98.
Betz, Emma, Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm, Veronika Drake, and Andrea Golato. 2013. “Third-Position
Repeats in German: The Case of Repair- and Request-for-Information
Sequences.” Gesprächsforschung 14: 133–166.
Bertils, Klara. 2016. “Amning, kunskap och självbestämmande: Språkliga och
interaktionella perspektiv på
amningsrådgivning [Breastfeeding, Knowledge and Empowerment: A Conversation Analytic Study of
a Breastfeeding Helpline].” Master’s
thesis, Department of Scandinavian Languages, Uppsala University. [URL]
Bickel, Balthasar, Bernard Comrie, and Martin Haspelmath. 2008. “The
Leipzig glossing rules: Conventions for interlinear morpheme-by-morpheme
glosses.” [URL]
Birkner, Karin. 2001. Bewerbungsgespräche mit Ost- und Westdeutschen: Eine
kommunikative Gattung in Zeiten gesellschaftlichen
Wandels [Job interviews with
East and West Germans: A communicative genre in times of societal
change]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper (eds). 1989. Cross-Cultural
Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, and Elite Olshtain. 1984. “Requests
and Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns
(CCSARP).” Applied
Linguistics 5 (3): 196–213.
Boersma, Paul, and David Weenink. 2018. “Praat:
Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer program].” [URL]
Bolden, Galina B. 2006. “Little
Words that Matter: Discourse Markers ’So’ and ’Oh’ and the Doing of
Other-Attentiveness in Social
Interaction.” Journal of
Communication 56 (4): 661–688.
Bolden, Galina B. 2008. “’So
What’s Up?’: Using the Discourse Marker So to Launch
Conversational Business.” Research on
Language and Social
Interaction 41 (3): 302–337.
2009. “Implementing
Incipient Actions: The Discourse Marker ‘So’ in English
Conversation.” Journal of
Pragmatics 41 (5): 974–998.
2017. “Opening
up Closings in
Russian.” In Enabling
Human Conduct: Studies of Talk-in-Interaction in Honor of Emanuel A.
Schegloff, ed. by Geoffrey Raymond, Gene H. Lerner, and John Heritage, 231–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bolinger, Dwight Le Merton. 1957. Interrogative
Structures of American English: The Direct
Question. Alabama: University of Alabama Press.
Bowker, David. 2012. “
Okay?
Yeah? Right?: Negotiating Understanding and Agreement in
Master’s Supervision Meetings with International
Students.” PhD
diss., Stirling School of Education, University of Stirling.
Broderick, Julie E., and John P. Broderick. 2003. “Okay
as a Discourse Marker in the Speech of Bilingual Elementary School Teachers
in New York
City.” In Actas I
del VIII Simposio Internacionale de Comunicación
Social. Santiago, Chile: Centro de Linguistica Applicada.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1978. Politeness:
Some Universals of Language Use. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bruxelles, Sylvie, Luca Greco, and Lorenza Mondada. 2009. “Pratiques de transition: ressources multimodales pour la
structuration de l’activité [Practices of transition: multimodal resources for structuring
the
activity].” In Méthodologies
d’analyse de situations coopératives de conception: Corpus
Mosaic, ed. by Françoise Détienne, and Véronique Traverso, 221–302. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.
Button, Graham. 1987. “Moving
out of
Closings.” In Talk
and Social Organisation, ed.
by Graham Button, and John R. E. Lee, 101–151. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
. 1990. “On
Varieties of
Closings.” In Interaction
Competence, ed. by George Psathas, 93–148. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
Cekaite, Asta. 2007. “A
Child’s Development of Interactional Competence in a Swedish L2
Classroom.” The Modern Language
Journal 91 (1): 45–62.
Chaudron, Craig, and Jack C. Richards. 1986. “The
Effect of Discourse Markers on the Comprehension of
Lectures.” Applied
Linguistics 7 (2): 113–127.
Clark, Herbert H., and Susan E. Brennan. 1991. “Grounding
in
Communication.” In Perspectives
on Socially Shared Cognition, ed.
by Lauren B. Resnick, John M. Levine, and Stephanie D. Teasley, 222–233. Washington, DC: APA.
Clark White, Anne Elizabeth. 2020. “Authority
and Camaraderie: The Delivery of Directives Amongst the Ice
Floes.” Language in
Society 49 (2): 207–230.
Clayman, Steven E., Marc N. Elliott, John Heritage, and Laurie L. McDonald. 2006. “Historical
Trends in Questioning Presidents,
1953–2000.” Presidential Studies
Quarterly, 36 (4): 561–583.
Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language
Universals and Linguistic Typology. Syntax and
Morphology, 2nd
ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2001. “Discourse
Ok Revisited: Default Organization in Verbal
Interaction.” Journal of
Pragmatics 33 (4): 491–513.
Condon, Sharon L., and Claude G. Cech. 2007. “OK,
Next One: Discourse Markers of Common
Ground.” In Lexical
Markers of Common Ground, ed.
by Anita Fetzer, and Kerstin Fischer, 17–45. New York: Elsevier.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2001. “Interactional
Prosody: High Onsets in Reason-for-the-Call
Turns.” Language in
Society 30 (1): 29–53.
. 2004a. “Prosodische
Stilisierungen im Gespräch [Prosodic stylizations in
conversation].” In Zwischen
Literatur und Anthropologie: Diskurse, Medien,
Performanzen, ed. by Aleida Assmann, Ulrich Gaier, and Gisela Trommsdorff, 315–337. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
. 2004b. “Prosody
and Sequence Organization in English Conversation: The Case of New
Beginnings.” In Sound
Patterns in Interaction: Cross-Linguistic Studies from
Conversation, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Cecilia E. Ford, 335–376. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2009. “A
Sequential Approach to Affect: The Case of
‘Disappointment’.” In Talk
in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions, ed.
by Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, and Jan Lindström, 94–123. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
. 2012a. “Exploring
Affiliation in the Reception of Conversational Complaint
Stories.” In Emotion
in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 113–146. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2012b. “Some
Truths and Untruths about Final Intonation in Conversational
Questions.” In Questions:
Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed.
by Jan P. de Ruiter, 123–45. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
. 2014. “Prosody
as Dialogic
Interaction.” In Prosodie
und Phonetik in der Interaktion. Prosody and Phonetics in
Interaction, ed. by Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, and Beatrice Szczepek Reed, 221–251. Radolfzell: Verlag Gesprächsforschung.
. 2019a. “American
English OKAY Over Time: Challenge and Chance for Interactional
Linguistics.” Paper presented at
the 9th annual meeting of the Language
and Social Interaction Working Group
(LANSI), New
York.
. 2019b. “Comparing
Language Use in Social
Interaction.” In Studies
in Comparative Pragmatics, ed.
by Hartmut E. H. Lenk, Juhani Härmä, Begoña Sanromán Vilas, and Elina Suomela-Härmä, 3–18. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Marja Etelämäki. 2015. “Nominated
Actions and Their Targeted Agents in Finnish Conversational
Directives.” Journal of
Pragmatics 78: 7–24.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting. 2018. Interactional
Linguistics: Studying Language in Social
Interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Sandra A. Thompson. 2000. “Concessive
Patterns in
Conversation.” In Cause,
Condition, Concession, and Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse
Perspectives, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Bernd Kortmann, 381–410. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Craven, Alexandra, and Jonathan Potter. 2010. “Directives:
Entitlement and Contingency in
Action.” Discourse
Studies 12 (4): 419–442.
Curl, Traci S., and Paul Drew. 2008. “Contingency
and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of
Requesting.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 41 (2): 129–153.
Davidson, Judy. 1984. “Subsequent
Versions of Invitations, Offers, Requests, and Proposals Dealing with
Potential or Actual
Rejection.” In Structures
of Social Action: Studies in Conversation
Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 102–128. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
. 1990. “Modifications
of Invitations, Offers, and
Rejections.” In Interaction
Competence, ed. by George Psathas, 149–179. Lanham: University Press of America.
DeCarlo, Doug, Matthew Stone, Corey Revilla, and Jennifer J. Venditti. 2004. “Specifying
and Animating Facial Signals for Discourse in Embodied Conversational
Agents.” Computer Animation and Virtual
Worlds 15 (1): 27–38.
Del Corona, Marcia, and Ana Cristina Ostermann. 2012. “Formulação de lugar, intersubjetividade e categorias de
pertença em chamadas de emergência para o
190 [Place formulation,
intersubjectivity, and membership categorization in calls to a Brazilian
police emergency service
helpline].” Veredas 16 (1): 112–119.
Den Danske Ordbog
(DDO) [The Danish Dictionary]. n.d.
s.v. okay. Accessed June 16, 2018. [URL]
. 2015. “Retrospection
and Understanding in
Interaction.” In Temporality
in Interaction, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Susanne Günthner, 57–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Deppermann, Arnulf, and Elwys De Stefani. 2019. “Defining
in Talk-in-Interaction: Recipient-Design through Negative Definitional
Components.” Journal of
Pragmatics 140: 140–155.
Deppermann, Arnulf, and Henrike Helmer. 2013. “Zur Grammatik des Verstehens im Gespräch: Inferenzen anzeigen
und Handlungskonsequenzen ziehen mit also und
dann
[On the grammar of understanding in conversation: Displaying inferences and
formulating next actions with the connectives also and
dann
].” Zeitschrift für
Sprachwissenschaft 32 (1): 1–40.
Deppermann, Arnulf, and Jürgen Streeck. 2018. “The
Body in Interaction: Its Multiple Modalities and
Temporalities.” In Time
in Embodied Interaction: Synchronicity and Sequentiality of Multimodal
Resources, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Jürgen Streeck, 1–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Deppermann, Arnulf, Reinhold Schmitt, and Lorenza Mondada. 2010. “Agenda
and Emergence: Contingent and Planned Activities in a
Meeting.” Journal of
Pragmatics 42 (6): 1700–1718.
De Stefani, Elwys. 2011. ‘Ah petta ecco, io prendo questi che mi piacciono’. Agire come
coppia al supermercato: Un approccio conversazionale e multimodale allo
studio dei processi decisionali [‘Oh wait, I take these coz I like them’. Doing being a couple
in supermarkets: A conversational and multimodal approach to the study of
decision
making]. Rome: Aracne.
. 2013. “The
Collaborative Organisation of Next Actions in a Semiotically Rich
Environment: Shopping as a
Couple.” In Interaction
and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion, ed.
by. Pentti Haddington, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 123–151. Berlin: De Gruyter.
. 2018. “Institutional
Invitations to a Meeting: Cold Calls to Bank
Clients.” Journal of
Pragmatics 125: 180–199.
De Stefani, Elwys, and Anne-Sylvie Horlacher. 2018. “Mundane
Talk at Work: Multiactivity in Interactions between Professionals and Their
Clientele.” Discourse
Studies 20 (2): 221–245.
De Stefani, Elwys, and Lorenza Mondada. 2017. “Who’s
the Expert? Negotiating Competence and Authority in Guided
Tours.” In Identity
Struggles: Evidence from Workplaces Around the
World, ed. by Dorien Van De Mieroop, and Stephanie Schnurr, 95–123. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
DeSouza, Darcey K., Emma Betz, Mary Clinkenbeard, Emi Morita, Natasha Shrikant, and William A. Tuccio. 2021. “Taking a detour before answering the question: Turn-initial okay in second position in English interaction.” Language & Communication 76, 47–57.
Dingemanse, Mark, Joe Blythe, and Tyko Dirksmeyer. 2018. “Formats
for Other-Initiation of Repair Across Languages: An Exercise in Pragmatic
Typology.” Linguistic Typology: Critical
Concepts in
Linguistics, vol. 4, ed.
by Irina Nikolaeva, 322–357. London: Routledge.
Dingemanse, Mark, Seán G. Roberts, Julija Baranova, Joe Blythe, Paul Drew, Simeon Floyd, Rosa S. Gisladottir, Kobin H. Kendrick, Stephen C. Levinson, Elizabeth Manrique, Giovanni Rossi, and N. J. Enfield. 2015. “Universal
Principles in the Repair of Communication
Problems.” PLOS
ONE 10 (9): e0136100.
Dingemanse, Mark, Francisco Torreira, and Nick J. Enfield. 2013. “Is
‘Huh?’ a Universal Word? Conversational Infrastructure and the Convergent
Evolution of Linguistic Items.” PLoS
One 8 (11): e78273.
Dittmann, Allen T., and Lynn G. Llewellyn. 1968. “Relationship
between Vocalizations and Head Nods as Listener
Responses.” Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology 9 (1): 79–84.
Drew, Paul. 1997. “‘Open’
Class Repair Initiators in Response to Sequential Sources of Troubles in
Conversation.” Journal of
Pragmatics 28 (1): 69–101.
. 2003. “Comparative
Analysis of Talk-in-Interaction in Different Institutional Settings: A
Sketch.” In Studies
in Language and Social Interaction: In Honor of Robert
Hopper, ed. by Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, and Jenny Mandelbaum, 293–308. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
. 2013. “Turn
Design.” In The
Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed.
by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 131–149. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2014a. “Requesting –
from Speech Act to
Recruitment.” In Requesting
in Social Interaction, ed.
by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 1–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(eds). 2014b. Requesting
in Social
Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage. 1992. Talk
at Work: Interaction in Institutional
Settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dudenredaktion (ed.). 1954. Duden Rechtschreibung mit Berücksichtigung der häufigsten
Fremdwörter [Duden Spelling
(Dictionary), Reflecting the most Frequent Foreign
Words]. 14th ed., first Duden West (Germany)
edition. Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut AG.
Duranti, Alessandro. 1988. “Intentions,
Language, and Social Action in a Samoan
Context.” Journal of
Pragmatics 12 (1): 13–33.
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, Irenäus. 1979. “Human
Ethology: Concepts and Implications for the Sciences of
Man.” Behavioral and Brain
Sciences 2 (1): 1–57.
Ekberg, Katie, Joanne McDermott, Claire Moynihan, Lucy Brindle, Paul Little, and Geraldine M. Leydon. 2014. “The
Role of Helplines in Cancer Care: Intertwining Emotional Support with
Information or Advice-Seeking Needs.” Journal
of Psychosocial
Oncology 32 (3): 359–381.
Enfield, N. J. 2011. “Sources
of Asymmetry in Human Interaction: Enchrony, Status, Knowledge and
Agency.” In The
Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed.
by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 285–312. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Enfield, N. J., and Tanya Stivers (eds). 2007. Person
Reference in Interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Enfield, N. J., Tanya Stivers, Penelope Brown, Christina Englert, Katariina Harjunpää, Makoto Hayashi, Trine Heinemann et al. 2018. “Polar
answers.” Journal of
Linguistics 55 (2): 277–304.
Enfield, N. J., Tanya Stivers, Stephen C. Levinson. 2010. “Question–Response
Sequences in Conversation Across Ten Languages: An
Introduction.” Journal of
Pragmatics 42 (10): 2615–2619.
Ervin-Tripp, Susan. 1976. “‘Is
Sybil There?’ The Structure of Some American English
Directives.” Language in
Society 5 (1): 25–67.
European Union
(EU). 2016. “Regulation
(EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016
on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of
Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and Repealing Directive
95/46/EC (General Data Protection
Regulation).” Accessed June 17, 2018. [URL]
Fagan, Drew S. 2012. “
Okay
as a Multifunctional Resource for Giving Feedback in
Classrooms.” Language & Information
Society 16: 9–41.
Filipi, Anna, and Roger Wales. 2003. “Differential
Uses of Okay, Right, and Alright, and
Their Function in Signaling Perspective Shift or Maintenance in a Map
Task.” Semiotica 147: 429–455.
Fischer, Kerstin. 2006. “Frames,
Constructions and Invariant Meanings. The Functional Polysemy of Discourse
Particles.” In Approaches
to Discourse Particles, ed.
by Kerstin Fischer, 427–447. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Flores-Ferrán, Nydia. 2014. “So
pues entonces: An Examination of Bilingual Discourse
Markers in Spanish Oral Narratives of Personal Experience of New York
City-Born Puerto Ricans.” Sociolinguistic
Studies 8 (1): 57–83.
Floyd, Simeon, Giovanni Rossi, and N. J. Enfield. 2020. Getting Others to Do Things: A Pragmatic
Typology of
Recruitments. Berlin: Language Sciences Press.
Ford, Cecilia E. 2008. Women
Speaking Up: Getting and Using Turns in Workplace
Meetings. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ford, Cecilia E., and Barbara Fox. 2010. “Multiple
Practices for Constructing
Laughables.” In Prosody
in Interaction, ed. by Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, and Margret Selting, 339–368. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ford, Cecilia E., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1996. “Interactional
Units in Conversation. Syntactic, Interactional, and Pragmatic Resources for
the Management of
Turns.” In Interaction
and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 134–184. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Forsberg, Julia, and Åsa Abelin. 2018. “Intonation
and Levels of Agreement in Interactions between Swedish
Adolescents.” Proceedings of the 9th
International Conference on Speech
Prosody, 55–59. Poznań, Poland.
Fox, Barbara, Makoto Hayashi, and Robert Jasperson. 1996. “Resources
and Repair: A Cross-Linguistic Study of the Syntactic Organization of
Repair.” In Interaction
and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 185–237. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Fox, Barbara, and Sandra A. Thompson. 2010. “Responses
to Wh-Questions in English
Conversation.” Research on Language and
Social
Interaction 43 (2): 133–156.
Fox, Barbara, Fay Wouk, Makoto Hayashi, Steven Fincke, Liang Tao, Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Minna Laakso, and Wilfridio Flores Hernandez. 2009. “A
Cross-Linguistic Investigation of the Site of Initiation in Same-Turn
Self-Repair.” In Conversation
Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, ed.
by Jack Sidnell, 60–103. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Frake, Charles O. 1964. “How
to Ask for a Drink in Subanun.” American
Anthropologist 66 (6, pt.
2): 127–132.
Fung, Loretta, and Ronald Carter. 2007. “Discourse
Markers and Spoken English: Native and Learner Use in Pedagogic
Settings.” Applied
Linguistics 28 (3): 185–208.
Gaines, Philip. 2011. “The
Multifunctionality of Discourse Operator Okay: Evidence
from a Police Interview.” Journal of
Pragmatics 43 (14): 3291–3315.
Gardner, Rod. 1997. “The
Listener and Minimal Responses in Conversational
Interaction.” Prospect 12 (2): 12–32.
. 1998. “Between
Speaking and Listening: The Vocalisation of
Understandings.” Applied
Linguistics 19 (2): 204–24.
. 2001. “When
Listeners Talk: Response Tokens and Listener
Stance.” Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2007. “The
Right Connections: Acknowledging Epistemic Progression
in Talk.” Language in
Society 36 (3): 319–341.
Garfinkel, Harold. 2002. Ethnomethodology’s
Program: Working Out Durkheim’s
Aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
. [1976]
1981. “Replies and
Responses.” In Forms
of Talk, by Erving Goffman, 5–77. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Citations refer to
the University of Pennsylvania version. Previously published in
Language in
Society
5 (3): 257–313, 1976.
Golato, Andrea. 2010. “Marking
Understanding Versus Receipting Information in Talk: Achso.
and Ach in German
Interaction.” Discourse
Studies 12 (2): 147–176.
. 2012. “Impersonal
Quotatives and Hypothetical
Discourse.” In Quotatives:
Cross-linguistic and Cross-Disciplinary
Perspectives, ed. by Isabelle Buchstaller, and Ingrid van Alphen, 3–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Golato, Andrea, and Emma Betz. 2008. “German
Ach and Achso in Repair Uptake:
Resources to Sustain or Remove Epistemic
Asymmetry.” Zeitschrift für
Sprachwissenschaft 27 (1): 7–37.
Golato, Andrea, and Zsuzsanna Fagyal. 2008. “Comparing
Single and Double Sayings of the German Response Token Ja
and the Role of Prosody: A Conversation Analytic
Perspective.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 41 (3): 241–270.
Goodwin, Charles. 1980. “Restarts,
Pauses, and the Achievement of a State of Mutual Gaze at
Turn-Beginning.” Sociological
Inquiry 50 (3–4): 272–302.
. 1986. “Between
and Within: Alternative Sequential Treatments of Continuers and
Assessments.” Human
Studies 9 (2–3): 205–217.
. 2000. “Action
and Embodiment within Situated Human
Interaction.” Journal of
Pragmatics 32 (10): 1489–1522.
Goodwin, Marjorie H. 1990. He-Said-She-Said:
Talk as Social Organization among Black
Children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
2006. “Participation,
Affect, and Trajectory in Family Directive/Response
Sequences.” Text &
Talk 26 (4–5): 515–543.
Goodwin, Marjorie H., and Charles Goodwin. 1986. “Gesture
and Coparticipation in the Activity of Searching for a
Word.” Semiotica 62 (1–2): 51–75.
Gravano, Agustín, Štefan Beňuš, Julia Hirschberg, Shira Mitchell, and Ilia Vovsha. 2007. “Classification
of Discourse Functions of Affirmative Words in Spoken
Dialogue.” In Proceedings
of Interspeech
2007, 1613–1616. Antwerp, Belgium.
Gravano, Agustín, Julia Hirschberg, and Štefan Beňuš. 2012. “Affirmative
Cue Words in Task-Oriented
Dialogue.” Computational
Linguistics 38 (1): 1–39.
Greco, Frank A., and Mary Degges. 1975. “The
Etymology of OK Again.” American
Speech 50 (3/4): 333–335.
Grosz, Barbara J. 1977. “The
Representation and Use of Focus in Dialogue
Understanding.” Technical Note
151, Artificial Intelligence Center, SRI International.
1982. “Discourse
Analysis.” In Sublanguage:
Studies of Language in Restricted Semantic
Domains, ed. by Richard Kittredge, and John Lehrberger, 138–174. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Günthner, Susanne. 2016. “Praktiken erhöhter Dialogizität: onymische Anredeformen als
Gesten personifizierter Zuwendung [Practices of Increased Dialogism: Onymic Forms of Address as
Gestures of Personified
Other-Orientation].” ZGL 44 (3): 406–436.
Guthrie, Anna M. 1997. On
the Systematic Deployment of Okay and
Mmhmm in Academic Advising
Sessions. Pragmatics 7: 397–415.
Haddington, Pentti. 2006. “The
Organization of Gaze and Assessments as Resources for Stance
Taking.” Text &
Talk 26 (3): 281–328.
Hadar, Uri, Timothy Steiner, and Frank Clifford Rose. 1985. “Head
Movement during Listening Turns in
Conversation.” Journal of Nonverbal
Behavior 9 (4): 214–228.
Haiman, John. 1980. “The
Iconicity of Grammar: Isomorphism and
Motivation.” Language 56 (3): 515–540.
Hakulinen, Auli, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 2012. “Being
Equivocal: Affective Responses Left
Unspecified.” In Emotion
in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 147–173. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hamann, Magnus. 2018. Memory
in Interaction: A Case Study of Memory, Engagement and Interaction after
Traumatic Brain Injury. PhD
diss., Aarhus University.
Handke, Kwiryna. 2011. “Polszczyzna codzienna geneza i czynniki
stabilizujące [The
language of everyday Polish communication: Genesis and the control
factors].” In Rozprawy
Komisji Językowej, Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
LVII, 57–67. Łódź: Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe.
Harren, Inga, and Mia Raitaniemi. 2008. “The
Sequential Structure of Closings in Private German Phone
Calls.” Gesprächsforschung 9: 198–223.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. “Comparative
Concepts and Descriptive Categories in Crosslinguistic
Studies.” Language 86 (3): 663–687.
Hayashi, Makoto, and Kyung-eun Yoon. 2009. “Negotiating
Boundaries in
Talk.” In Conversation
Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, ed.
by Jack Sidnell, 250–278. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Heath, Christian, and Lorenza Mondada. 2019. “Transparency
and Embodied Action: Turn Organisation and Fairness in Complex Institutional
Environments.” Social Psychology
Quarterly 82 (3): 274–302.
Heinemann, Trine. 2005. “Where
Grammar and Interaction Meet: The Preference for Matched Polarity in
Responsive Turns in
Danish.” In Syntax
and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in
Talk-in-Interaction, ed.
by Auli Hakulinen, and Margret Selting, 375–402. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2006. “‘Will
You or Can’t You?’ Displaying Entitlement in Interrogative
Requests.” Journal of
Pragmatics 38 (7): 1081–1104.
. 2009. “Two
Answers to Inapposite
Inquiries.” In Conversation
Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, ed.
by Jack Sidnell, 159–186. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
. 2016a. “From
‘Looking’ to ‘Seeing’: Indexing Delayed Intelligibility of an Object with
the Danish Change-of-State Token
n↑å↓:
.” Journal of
Pragmatics 104: 108–132.
. 2016b. “Registering
Revision: The Reduplicated Danish Change-of-state Token
Nå
.” Discourse
Studies 18 (1): 44–63.
. 2017a. “Receipting
Answers That Are Counter to Expectations: The Polar
Question-Answer-Nå Sequence in
Danish.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 50 (3): 249–267.
. 2017b. “Transitioning
Between Activities with the Danish Change-of-State Token
Nå
.” Journal of
Pragmatics 118: 1–21.
Heinemann, Trine, and Aino Koivisto. 2016a. “Indicating
a Change-of-State in Interaction: Cross-Linguistic
Explorations.” Editorial, Journal of
Pragmatics 104: 83–88.
(eds). 2016b. “Indicating
a Change-of-State in Interaction: Cross-Linguistic
Explorations.” Special
section, Journal of
Pragmatics 104: 83–210.
Heinemann, Trine, and Jakob Steensig. 2017. “Three
Imperative Action Formats in Danish
Talk-in-Interaction”. In Imperative
Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed.
by Liisa Raevaara, Marja-Leena Sorjonen, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 139–173. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heisler, Troy. 1996. “OK –
a Dynamic Marker in Montréal
French.” In Sociolinguistic
Variation: Data, Theory, and Analysis, ed.
by Jennifer Arnold, Renée Blake, Brad Davidson, Scott Schwenter, and Julie Solomon, 293–312. Stanford: CSLI.
Hellermann, John. 2005. “Syntactic
and Prosodic Practices for Cohesion in Series of Three-Part Sequences in
Classroom Talk.” Research on Language and
Social
Interaction 38 (1): 105–130.
Helmer, Henrike, and Jörg Zinken. 2019. “
Das
Heißt (‘That Means’) for Formulations and Du
Meinst (‘You Mean’) for Repair? Interpretations of Prior
Speakers’ Turns in German.” Research on
Language and Social
Interaction 52 (2): 159–176.
Hennoste, Tiit. 2000. “Sissejuhatus
suulisesse eesti keelde IV. Suulise kõne erisõnavara 3. Partiklid
[Introduction to spoken Estonian IV. Special vocabulary 3.
Particles].” Akadeemia 8: 1773–1806.
Hepburn, Alexa, and Galina B. Bolden. 2013. “The
Conversation Analytic Approach to
Transcription.” In The
Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed.
by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 57–76. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hepburn, Alexa, and Jonathan Potter. 2011. “Threats:
Power, Family Mealtimes and Social
Influence.” British Journal of Social
Psychology 50 (1): 99–120.
Heritage, John. 1984a. “A
Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential
Placement.” In Structures
of Social Action: Studies in Conversation
Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
. 1985. “Analyzing
News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for an Overhearing
Audience.” In Handbook
of Discourse Analysis, vol. 3: Discourse and
Dialogue, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 95–119. London: Academic Press.
. 2002. “Oh-Prefaced
Responses to Assessments: A Method of Modifying
Agreement/Disagreement.” In The
Language of Turn and Sequence, ed.
by Cecilia Ford, Barbara Fox and Sandra Thompson, 196–224. New York: Oxford University Press.
. 2006. “Cognition
in
Discourse.” In Conversation
and Cognition, ed. by Hedwig Te Molder, and Jonathan Potter, 184–202. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
. 2010. “Conversation
Analysis: Practices and
Methods.” In Qualitative
Sociology, 3rd ed., ed.
by David Silverman, 208–230. London: Sage.
. 2011. “Territories
of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic Moments in
Interaction.” In Morality
of Knowledge in Conversation, ed.
by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 159–183. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
. 2012a. “The
Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of
Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 45 (1): 30–52.
. 2012b. “Epistemics
in Action: Action Formation and Territories of
Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 45 (1): 1–29.
. 2013. “Epistemics
in
Conversation.” In The
Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed.
by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 370–394. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
. 2015. “
Well-Prefaced
Turns in English Conversation: A Conversation Analytic
Perspective.” Journal of
Pragmatics 88: 89–104.
. 2018a. “Turn-Initial
Particles in English: The Cases of Oh and
Well
.” In Between
Turn and Sequence: Turn-Initial Particles Across
Languages, ed. by John Heritage, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 155–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2018b. “The
Ubiquity of Epistemics: A Rebuttal to the ‘Epistemics of Epistemics’
Group.” Discourse
Studies 20 (1): 14–56.
Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman. 2010. Talk
in Action: Interactions, Identities, and
Institutions. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond. 2012. “Navigating
Epistemic Landscapes: Acquiesence, Agency and Resistance in Responses to
Polar
Questions.” In Questions:
Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed.
by Jan P. de Ruiter, 179–192. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, John, and Andrew Roth. 1995. “Grammar
and Institution: Questions and Questioning in the Broadcast News
Interview.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 28: 1–60.
Heritage, John, and Sue Sefi. 1992. “Dilemmas
of Advice: Aspects of the Delivery and Reception of Advice in Interactions
Between Health Visitors and First Time
Mothers.” In Talk
at work: Interaction in institutional settings, ed.
by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 359–419. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, John, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 1994. “Constituting
and Maintaining Activities Across Sequences: And-Prefacing
as a Feature of Question Design.” Language in
Society 23 (1): 1–29.
Heritage, John, and D. Rod Watson. 1979. “Formulations
as Conversational
Objects.” In Everyday
Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed.
by George Psathas, 123–162. New York: Irvington.
Hockey, Beth Ann. 1993. “Prosody
and the Role of Okay and Uh-Huh in
Discourse.” In ESCOL
’92: Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on
Linguistics, ed. by Michael Bernstein, 128–136. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
Honeman, Diane E. 1995. “Simultaneous
Functions of the Discourse Marker Ok in Daytime Television Talk
Shows.” PhD
diss., Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
Hotten, John Camden (ed.). 1864. The
Slang Dictionary; or, The Vulgar Words, Street Phrases, and “Fast”
Expressions of High and Low Society: Many with their Etymology, and a Few
with their History
Traced. London: John Camden Hotten, Piccadilly.
(ed.). 1874. The
Slang Dictionary: Etymological, Historical, and
Anecdotal. London: Chatto and Windus Publishers.
House, Juliane. 2013. “Developing
Pragmatic Competence in English as a Lingua Franca: Using Discourse Markers
to Express (Inter)subjectivity and
Connectivity.” Journal of
Pragmatics 59 (Part
A): 57–67.
Huddlestone, Kate, and Melanie Fairhurst. 2013. “The
Pragmatic Markers anyway, okay, and shame:
A South African English Corpus
Study.” Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics
Plus 42: 93–110.
Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1836. Über
die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die
geistige Entwickelung des
Menschengeschlechts. Berlin: Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften. Trans.
by Hans Aarsleff as On
Language: The Diversity of Human Language-Structure and its Influence on the
Mental Development of Mankind (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1988).
Hutchby, Ian, and Robin Wooffitt. 1998. Conversation
Analysis: Principles, Practices and
Applications. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Hymes, Dell. 1972. “Models
of the Interaction of Language and Social
Life.” In Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of
Communication, ed. by John J. Gumperz, and Dell Hymes, 35–71. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Imo, Wolfgang. 2009. “Konstruktion oder Funktion? Erkenntnisprozessmarker
(‘change-of-state-tokens’) im Deutschen [Construction or function? Change-of-state-tokens in
German].” In Grammatik
im Gespräch, ed. by Susanne Günthner, and Jörg Bücker, 57–86. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Jacknis, Ira. 1988. “Margaret
Mead and Gregory Bateson in Bali: Their Use of Photography and
Film.” Cultural
Anthropology 3 (2): 160–177.
Jefferson, Gail. 1978. “Sequential
Aspects of Storytelling in
Conversation.” In Studies
in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed.
by Jim Schenkein, 219–248. New York: Academic Press.
. 1981a. The
Abominable ‘Ne?’: A Working Paper Exploring the Phenomenon of Post-Response
Pursuit of Response. Occasional Paper No.
6, Department of Sociology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
. 1981b. “Caveat
Speaker: A Preliminary Exploration of Shift Implicative Recipiency in the
Articulation of Topic.” Final report to the British Social Science Research Council.
. [1983a]
1993. “Caveat Speaker: Preliminary Notes on
Recipient Topic-Shift Implicature.” Research
on Language and Social
Interaction 16 (l): l–30. Previously published in Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature 30, 1983.
. [1983b]
1984. “Notes on a Systematic Deployment of the
Acknowledgement Tokens ‘Yeah’ and ‘Mm
Hm’.” Paper in
Linguistics 17 (2): 197–216. Previously
published in Tilburg Papers in Language and
Literature 30, 1983.
. 1984a. “Notes
on Some Orderlinesses of Overlap
Onset.” In Discourse
Analysis and Natural Rhetoric, ed.
by Valentina D’Urso, 11–38. Padua: Cleup.
. 1984b. “On
Stepwise Transition from Talk about a Trouble to Inappropriately
Next-Positioned
Matters.” In Structures
of Social Action: Studies in Conversation
Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 191–222. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
. 1984c. “On
the Organization of Laughter in Talk about
Troubles.” In Structures
of Social Action: Studies in Conversation
Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 346–369. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
. 1988. “On
the Sequential Organization of Troubles Talk in Ordinary
Conversation.” Social
Problems 35 (4): 418–442.
. 2004. “Glossary
of Transcript Symbols with an
Introduction.” In Conversation
Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed.
by Gene H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jefferson, Gail, and John R. E. Lee. 1981. “The
Rejection of Advice: Managing the Problematic Convergence of a ‘Troubles
Telling’ and a ‘Service Encounter’.” Journal
of
Pragmatics 5 (5): 399–422.
Jensen, N. M. 1987. “Topic
Management in Doctor-Patient Conversations: An Exploratory Analysis of the
Use of the Speech Particle ‘OK’.” Master’s
thesis, University of Wisconsin.
Johansson, Maria. 2016. “Positive
assessments as resources for affiliation and learning during handicraft
meetings.” Master’s
thesis, Department of Scandinavian
Languages, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Johnson, Sharon E. 2016. “Book
Clubs in the ESL Classroom: A Microinteractional Analysis of Literacy
Development in Adult ESL Students.” Master’s
thesis, Department of English, University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Jones, Charlotte M. 2001. “Missing
Assessments: Lay and Professional Orientations in Medical
Interviews.” Text 21 (1–2): 113–150.
Kaiser, Julia. 2011. “Okay in ärztlichen Gesprächen – eine linguistische
Gesprächsanalyse [Okay in
doctor-patient conversations – a linguistic conversation
analysis].” Master’s
thesis, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg.
Karlina, Yeni. 2015. “The
Little Words that Matter: Discourse Markers in Teacher
Talk.” Journal
Paedagogia 18 (2): 81–89.
Kastari, Anna. 2006. “Dialogipartikkelien aha(a) ja ai
jaa tehtävistä
keskustelussa [Usages of
the dialogue particles aha(a) and ai jaa
in conversation].” Master’s
thesis, University of Helsinki.
Kato, Michio. 2001. Nijusseeki no kotoba no
nenpyo [The history of
Japanese language in the 20th
century]. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.
Kaukomaa, Timo, Anssi Peräkylä, and Johanna Ruusuvuori. 2015. “How
Listeners Use Facial Expression to Shift the Emotional Stance of the
Speaker’s Utterance.” Research on Language
and Social
Interaction 48 (3): 319–341.
Keevallik, Leelo. 2003. “Terminally
Rising Pitch Contours of Response Tokens in
Estonian.” Crossroads of Language,
Interaction, and
Culture 5: 49–65.
. 2006. “Pragmaatiliste partiklite laenutüübid rootsieesti
keeles [Types of borrowed
pragmatic particles in Swedish
Estonian].” In Mitmekeelsus
ja keelevahetus läänemeresoome piirkonnas, ed.
by Helen Koks, and Jand Rahman, 116–133. Võro: Võro Instituudi toimõndusõq 18.
. 2010a. “Marking
Boundaries Between Activities: The Particle nii in
Estonian.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 43 (2): 157–182.
. 2010b. “Pro-adverbs
of Manner as Markers of Activity
Transition.” Studies in
Language 34 (2): 350–381.
. 2012. “Pragmatics
of the Estonian Heritage Speakers in
Sweden.” Finnisch-Ugrische
Mitteilungen 35: 1–22.
. 2013. “Mundane
Reaction Words in Swedish
Estonian.” In Keelemees
Raimo Raag 60, ed.
by T. Söderman, 50–65. Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.
. 2017. “Negotiating
Deontic Rights in Second Position: Young Adult Daughters’ Imperatively
Formatted Responses to Mothers’ Offers in
Estonian.” In Imperative
Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed.
by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 271–295. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2018a. “Making
up One’s Mind in Second Position: Estonian No-preface in
Action
Plans.” In Between
Turn and Sequence: Turn-Initial Particles Across
Languages, ed. by John Heritage, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 309–331. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2018b. “The
Temporal Organization of Conversation While Mucking out a Sheep
Stable.” In Time in
Embodied Interaction: Synchronicity and Sequentiality of Multimodal
Resources, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Jürgen Streeck, 97–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Keisanen, Tiina, Mirka Rauniomaa, and Pentti Haddington. 2014. “Suspending
Action: From Simultaneous to Consecutive Ordering of Multiple Courses of
Action.” In Multiactivity
in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking, ed.
by Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 109–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Keisanen, Tiina, Mirka Rauniomaa, and Pauliina Siitonen. 2017. “Transitions
as Sites of Socialization in Family Interaction
Outdoors.” Learning, Culture and Social
Interaction 14: 24–37.
Kelly, Ann. 2010. “Explicating
Literacy Activities at Work: The Use of ‘Okay’ as an Effective
Topic-Changing Device in Service Request
Calls.” Literacy & Numeracy
Studies 18 (1): 19–34.
Kendon, Adam. 1967. “Some
Functions of Gaze-Direction in Social
Interaction.” Acta
Psychologica 26: 22–63.
. 1990. Conducting
Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused
Encounters. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kendrick, Kobin H. 2010. “Epistemics
and Action Formation in Mandarin
Chinese.” PhD
diss., University of California.
Kendrick, Kobin H., and Francisco Torreira. 2015. “The
Timing and Construction of Preference: A Quantitative
Study.” Discourse
Processes 52 (4): 255–289.
Kent, Alexandra. 2012a. “Responding
to Directives: What Can Children Do When a Parent Tells Them What to
Do?” In Disputes in
Everyday Life: Social and Moral Orders of Children and Young
People, ed. by Maryanne Theobald, and Susan Danby, 57–84. Bingley, England: Emerald Books.
. 2012b. “Compliance,
Resistance and Incipient Compliance when Responding to
Directives.” Discourse
Studies 14 (6): 711–730.
Kessler, Christine. 2010. “Okay – Die Bedeutung eines Wortes zwischen Schriftlichkeit und
Mündlichkeit [The meaning
of a word between writing and
speaking].” In Semantische
Unbestimmtheit im Lexikon, ed.
by Inge Pohl, 151–166. Frankfurt a. M.: Lang.
Kielitoimiston
sanakirja [New dictionary of
modern
Finnish]. 2012. Helsinki:
Kotimaisten kielten
tutkimuskeskus. Accessed May 30, 2018. [URL]
Kim, Kyu-hyun, and Kyung-Hee Suh. 1996. “Dealing
with Prior Talk: Discourse Connectives in Korean
Conversation.” In Japanese/Korean
Linguistics 5, ed. by Noriko Akatsuka, Shoichi Iwasaki, and Susan Strauss, 83–99. Stanford, CA: SCLI.
. 2004. “An
Analysis of Korean Sentence-ending Suffixes in Caregiver-child
Interaction.” Language
Research 40 (4): 923–950.
Knudsen, Anette Dahl. 2003. “Prosodi som resurse til at udføre positiv
vurderingsaktivitet – Et studie af
okay2-respons” [Prosody as
a resource for performing positive assessment activities: A study of okay2
responses]. Unpublished. Aarhus: Institut for Lingvistik.
. 2015. “’O(↑)kay(?), ↑Ohkay’ – En Prosodiafhængig
ytringspartikel? [“O(↑)kay(?), ↑Ohkay” – A prosody dependent discourse
particle?].” Skrifter om
Samtalegrammatik 2 (1). [URL]
Knutsen, Dominique, Gilles Col, and Ludovic Le Bigot. 2018. “An
Investigation of the Determinants of Dialogue Navigation in Joint
Activities.” Applied
Psycholinguistics 39 (6): 1345–1371.
Koiso, Hanae, Yasuharu Den, Yuriko Iseki, Wakako Kashino, Yoshiko Kawabata, Ken’ya Nishikawa, Yayoi Tanaka, and Yasuyuki Usuda. 2018. “Construction
of the Corpus of Everyday Japanese Conversation: An Interim
Report.” Proceedings of the 11th Edition of
the Language Resources and Evaluation
Conference, 4259–4264.
Koivisto, Aino. 2013. “On
the Preference for Remembering: Acknowledging an Answer With Finnish
Ai Nii(n) (‘Oh That’s
Right’)”. Research on Language and Social
Interaction 46 (3): 277–297.
. 2015a. “Dealing
with Ambiguities in Informings: Finnish Aijaa as a
“Neutral” News Receipt.” Research on Language
and Social
Interaction 48 (4): 365–387.
. 2015b. “Displaying
Now-Understanding: The Finnish Change-of-State Token
Aa
.” Discourse
Processes 52 (2): 111–148.
. 2016. “Receipting
Information as Newsworthy vs. Responding to Redirection: Finnish News
Particles Aijaa and
Aha(a)
.” Journal of
Pragmatics 104: 163–179.
. 2019. “Repair
Receipts: On their Motivation and Interactional
Import.” Discourse
Studies 21 (4): 398–420.
Kovarsky, Dana. 1989. “On
the Occurrence of Okay in Therapy.” Child
Language Teaching and
Therapy 5 (2): 137–145.
Kubozono, Haruo. 1996. “Syllable
and Accent in Japanese: Evidence from Loanword
Accentuation.” The
Bulletin (Phonetic Society of
Japan) 211: 71–82.
. 2006. “Where
Does Loanword Prosody Come From?: A Case Study of Japanese Loanword
Accent.” Lingua 116 (7): 1140–1170.
Kunnari, Miia. 2011. “Kahdentunut dialogipartikkeli joojoo
keskustelussa [The
reduplicated dialogue particle joojoo in
conversation].” Master’s
thesis, Finnish
language, University of Helsinki. [URL]
Kyratzis, Amy, and Ervin-Tripp, Susan. 1999. “The
Development of Discourse Markers in Peer
Interaction.” Journal of
Pragmatics 31 (10): 1321–1338.
Labov, William, and David Fanshel. 1977. Therapeutic
Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.
Laforest, Marty. 1992. “Le back-channel en situation d’entrevue
sociolinguistique [Backchannels in sociolinguistic interview
situations].” PhD
diss., Faculté des Lettres, L’Université Laval.
Landmann-Szwarcwald, Celia, and James Macinko. 2016. “A
Panorama of Health Inequalities in
Brazil.” International Journal for Equity in
Health 15: 174.
Landqvist, Håkan. 2005. “Constructing
and Negotiating Advice in Calls to a Poison Information
Center.” In Calling
for Help: Language and Social Interaction in Telephone
Helplines, ed. by Carolyn Baker, Michael Emmison, and Alan Firth, 207–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Laurier, Eric. 2001. “Why
People Say Where They Are During Mobile Phone
Calls.” Environment and Planning D: Society
and
Space 19 (4): 485–504.
Lee, Jong Kuk. 1937. The
New Dictionary of Foreign Words in Modern
Korean. Kyungsung: Hansung Publisher.
Lee, Jong-Mi. 2017. “The
Multifunctional Use of a Discourse Marker Okay by Korean
EFL teachers.” Foreign Language Education
Research 21: 41–65.
Lee, Mwu Yeong. 1932. Cichwukul tollinun salamtul [The people who spin Earth on its
axis]. Donga
Newspaper.
Lee, Seung-Hee. 2011. “Responding
at a Higher Level: Activity Progressivity in Calls for
Service.” Journal of
Pragmatics 43 (3): 904–917.
Lehmann, Christian. 1982. “Directions
for Interlinear Morphemic
Translations.” Folia
Linguistica 16 (1–4): 199–224.
Leskelä, Satu. 1999. “Koripalloharjoitusten kielestä ja
vuorovaikutuksesta [On
language and interaction in basketball
practice].” Master’s
thesis, Finnish language, University of Helsinki.
Leydon, Geraldine M., Katie Ekberg, Moira Kelly, and Paul Drew. 2013. “Improving
Ethnic Monitoring for Telephone-Based Healthcare: A Conversation Analytic
Study.” BMJ
Open 28;3(6): e002676.
Liao, Silvie. 2009. “Variation
in the Use of Discourse Markers by Chinese Teaching Assistants in the
US.” Journal of
Pragmatics 41 (7): 1313–1328.
Lindström, Anna. 1997. “Designing
Social Actions: Grammar, Prosody, and Interaction in Swedish
Conversation.” PhD
diss., University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA).
. 1999. “Language
as Social Action: Grammar, Prosody, and Interaction in Swedish
Conversation.” PhD
diss., Department of Scandinavian languages, Uppsala University.
. 2017. “Accepting
Remote
Proposals.” In Enabling
Human Conduct: Naturalistic Studies of Talk-in-Interaction in Honor of
Emanuel A. Schegloff, ed.
by Geoffrey Raymond, Gene H. Lerner, and John Heritage, 125–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2018. “Calibrating
an Agnostic Epistemic Stance in Swedish Conversation: The Case of
Okej-Prefacing in Calls to the Swedish Board for Study
Support.” In Between
Turn and Sequence: Turn-Initial Particles across
Languages, ed. by John Heritage, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 339–370. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Local, John. 1996. “Conversational
Phonetics: Some Aspects of News Receipts in Everyday
Conversation.” In Prosody
in Conversation, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Margret Selting, 177–230. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Looney, Stephen Daniel, Dingding Jia, and Daisuke Kimura. 2017. “Self-Directed
Okay in Mathematics
Lectures.” Journal of
Pragmatics 107: 46–59.
Lopriore, Stefanie, Amanda LeCouteur, Stuart Ekberg, and Katie Ekberg. 2017. “Delivering
Healthcare at a Distance: Exploring the Organisation of Calls to a Health
Helpline.” International Journal of Medical
Informatics 104: 45–55.
MacWhinney, Brian. 2007. “The
Talkbank
Project.” In Creating
and Digitizing Language Corpora: Synchronic
Database, vol. 1, ed.
by Joan C. Beal, Karen P. Corrigan, Hermann L. Moisl, 163–180. Houndmills: Palgrave-Macmillan.
MacWhinney, Brian, and Johannes Wagner. 2010. “Transcribing,
Searching and Data Sharing: The CLAN Software and the TalkBank Data
Repository.” Gesprächsforschung 11: 154–173.
Malaska, Jonna. 2017. “Välitöntä toimintaa vaativat direktiivit
teatteriharjoituksissa [Directives requiring immediate action in theatre
rehearsals].” Master’s
thesis, Finnish language, University of Helsinki. [URL]
Mańczak-Wohlfeld, Elżbieta. 2006. Angielsko-polskie kontakty
językowe [English-Polish
Language
Contacts]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Margutti, Piera, Liisa Tainio, Paul Drew, and Véronique Traverso (eds). 2018. “Inviting
in Telephone Calls: A Cross-Linguistic Study of Social Actions in
Interaction.” Special
section, Journal of
Pragmatics 125: 52–199.
Martini, Leonardo F. 2020. “Grammar
in Interaction: Polar Interrogative Sequences in Syrian Arabic
Talk-in-Interaction.” Doctoral
diss., University of Essex.
Maschler, Yael. 2002. ”The
Role of Discourse Markers in the Construction of Multivocality in Israeli
Hebrew Talk in Interaction.” Research on
Language and Social
Interaction 35 (1): 1–38.
Maynard, Douglas W. 1997. “The
News Delivery Sequence: Bad News and Good News in Conversational
Interaction.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 30 (2): 93–130.
2003. Bad
News, Good News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical
Settings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McCarthy, Michael. 2003. “Talking
Back. ‘Small’ Interactional Response Tokens in Everyday
Conversation.” Research on Language and
Social
Interaction 36 (1): 33–63.
McClave, Evelyn Z. 2000. “Linguistic
Functions of Head Movements in the Context of
Speech.” Journal of
Pragmatics 32 (7): 855–878.
Mead, George H. 1934. Mind,
Self, and Society. Works of George Herbert
Mead. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mehan, Hugh. 1979. Learning
lessons: Social organization in the
classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Meier, Christoph. 2002. Arbeitsbesprechungen: Interaktionsstruktur,
Interaktionsdynamik und Konsequenzen einer sozialen
Form [Work meetings:
Interactional structure, interactional dynamics, and consequences of a
social
form]. Radolfzell: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung. [URL]
Meillet, Alphonse. 1903. Introduction a l’Étude comparative des langues
Indo-Européennes [Introduction
to the comparative study of Indo-European
languages]. Paris: Hachette.
Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, s.v. OK. Accessed April 4, 2020. [URL]
Merritt, Marilyn. 1976. “On
Questions Following Questions in Service
Encounters.” Language in
Society 5 (3): 315–357.
. 1978. “On
the Use of ‘O.K.’ in Service
Encounters.” Working Papers in
Sociolinguistics 42: 6–17. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, Austin, TX. Reprinted
in Language in Use: Readings in
Sociolinguistics, ed. by John Baugh, and Joel Sherzer, 1984, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
. 1980. “On
the Use of OK in Service
Encounters.” In Language
Use and Uses of Language, ed.
by Roger W. Shuy, and Anna Shnukal, 162–172. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Metcalf, Allan. 2010. OK:
The Improbable Story of America’s Greatest
Word. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ministério da
Saúde. 2014. Manual das
Ouvidorias do SUS [Manual for the Unified Health System Ombudsman Departments]. Brasília, DF: Secretaria de Gestão Estratégica e Participativa, Departamento de Ouvidoria-Geral do SUS. [URL]
Modaff, Daniel P. 2003. “Body
Movement in the Transition from Opening to Task in Doctor-Patient
Interviews.” In Studies
in Language and Social Interaction, ed.
by Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, and Jenny Mandelbaum, 411–422. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Moerman, Michael. 1977. “The
Preference for Self-Correction in a Tai Conversational
Corpus.” Language 53 (4): 872–882.
. 1988. Talking
Culture: Ethnography and Conversational
Analysis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Mortensen, Janus, and Sune Sønderberg Mortensen. 2009. “
Okay i engelsk og
dansk” [
Okay in English and
Danish]. In Dramatikken
i grammatikken. Festskrift til Lars Heltoft, ed.
by Rita Therkelsen, and Eva Skafte Jensen, 281–304. Roskilde: Institut for Kultur og Identitet, Roskilde Universitet.
Mondada, Lorenza. 2005. “L’analyse de corpus en linguistique interactionnelle: de
l’étude de cas singuliers à l’étude de
collections [The analysis
of corpora in interactional linguistics: From single-case analysis to the
study of
collections].” In Sémantique
et corpus, ed. by Anne Condamines, 97–108. Paris: Hermès.
. 2007. “Multimodal
Resources for Turn-Taking: Pointing and the Emergence of Possible Next
Speakers.” Discourse
Studies 9 (2): 194–225.
. 2008. “Using
Video for a Sequential and Multimodal Analysis of Social Interaction:
Videotaping Institutional Telephone
Calls.” Forum: Qualitative Social
Research 9 (3), Art.
39. [URL]
. 2011. “Understanding
as an Embodied, Situated and Sequential Achievement in
Interaction.” Journal of
Pragmatics 43: 542–552.
. 2013. “Embodied
and Spatial Resources for Turn-Taking in Institutional Multi-party
Interactions: The Example of Participatory Democracy
Debates.” Journal of
Pragmatics 46: 39–68.
. 2014a. “The
Local Constitution of Multimodal Resources for Social
Interaction.” Journal of
Pragmatics 65: 137–156.
. 2014b. “The
Temporal Orders of Multiactivity: Operating and Demonstrating in the
Surgical
Theatre.” In Multiactivity
in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking, ed.
by Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 33–75. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2015. “Multimodal
Completions.” In Temporality
in Interaction, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Susanne Günthner, 267–308. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
. 2016. “Challenges
of Multimodality: Language and the Body in Social
Interaction.” Journal of
Sociolinguistics 20 (3): 336–366.
. 2018a. “Multiple
Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for
Transcribing Multimodality.” Research on
Language and Social
Interaction 51 (1): 85–106.
. 2018b. “Turn-Initial
Voilà in Closings in French: Reaffirming Authority and
Responsibility over the
Sequence. In Between
Turn and Sequence: Turn-Initial Particles Across
Languages, ed. by John Heritage, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 371–411. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mondada, Lorenza, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 2016. “Making
Multiple Requests in French and Finnish Convenience
Stores.” Language in
Society 45 (5): 733–765.
Müller, Cornelia. 2004. “Forms
and Uses of the Palm Up Open Hand: A Case of a Gesture
Family?” In The
Semantics and Pragmatics of Everyday Gestures, ed.
by Cornelia Müller, and Roland Posner, 233–256. Berlin: Weidler.
Murdoch, Jamie, Rebecca Barnes, Jillian Pooler, Valerie Lattimer, Emily Fletcher, and John L. Campbell. 2015. “The
Impact of Using Computer Decision-Support Software in Primary Care Nurse-Led
Telephone Triage: Interactional Dilemmas and Conversational
Consequences.” Social Science &
Medicine 126: 36–47.
Näslund, Shirley. 2016. “Tacit
Tango: The Social Framework of Screen-Focused Silence in Institutional
Telephone Calls.” Journal of
Pragmatics 91: 60–79.
Nattrass, Rhona, Jennifer Watermeyer, Catherine Robson, and Claire Penn. 2017. “Local
Expertise and Landmarks in Place Reformulations During Emergency Medical
Calls.” Journal of
Pragmatics 120: 73–87.
Nevile, Maurice. 2004. Beyond
the Black Box: Talk-in-Interaction in the Airline
Cockpit. Ashgate: Aldershot.
. 2007. “Action
in Time: Ensuring Timeliness for Collaborative Work in the Airline
Cockpit.” Language in
Society 36 (2): 233–257.
Ogden, Richard. 2001. “Turn
Transition, Creak and Glottal Stop in Finnish
Talk-in-Interaction.” Journal of the
International Phonetic
Association 43 (3): 299–320.
Ogden, Richard, Auli Hakulinen, and Liisa Tainio. 2004. “Indexing
’No News’ with Stylization in
Finnish.” In Sound
Patterns in Interaction: Cross-linguistic Studies from
Conversation, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Cecilia Ford, 299–334. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Oh, Sun-Young, and Yong-Yae Park. 2017. “Interactional
Uses of Acknowledgment Tokens: ‘ung’ and ‘e’ as Responses to Multi-Unit
Turns in Korean
Conversation.” In Enabling
Human Conduct: Studies of Talk-in-Interaction in Honor of Emanuel A.
Schegloff, ed. by Geoffrey Raymond, Gene H. Lerner, and John Heritage, 145–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Oloff, Florence. 2018. “Emploi du marqueur OK en allemand et en tchèque
parlés [Use of the marker
OK in spoken German and Czech].” Paper
presented at ‘OK’ Workshop, research group
Discourse and Cognition, theme
‘OK’ (June 21–22,
2018, Salerno,
Italy).
Onysko, Alexander, and Esme Winter-Froemel. 2011. “Necessary
Loans – Luxury Loans? Exploring the Pragmatic Dimension of
Borrowing.” Journal of
Pragmatics, 43 (6): 1550–1567.
Ordbog over Dansk
Talesprog (ODT) [Dictionary of Spoken
Danish]. n.d.
s.v. okay. Accessed [URL]. [URL]
Ordbog over det danske
Sprog [Dictionary of the Danish
Language]. n.d.
s.v. okay. Accessed June 16, 2018. [URL]
Ostermann, Ana Cristina. 2005. Gênero,
sexualidade e violência: uma investigação sociolinguística interacional de
atendimentos à saúde da mulher [Gender, sexuality, and violence: an interactional sociolinguistic investigation of women's health care]. Projeto
0000001036. Brasília: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações.
Othman, Zarina. 2010. “The
Use of Okay, Right and Yeah in Academic
Lectures by Native Speaker Lecturers: Their ‘Anticipated’ and ‘Real’
Meanings.” Discourse
Studies 12 (5): 665–681.
Oxford English Dictionary Online, s.v. OK, adj., int.1, n.2, and adv. Oxford University Press. Accessed April 4, 2020. [URL]
Pak, Maria, Richard Sprott, and Elena Escalera. 1996. “Little
Words, Big Deal: The Development of Discourse and Syntax in Child
Language.” In Social
Interaction, Social Context, and Language: Essays in Honor of Susan
Ervin-Tripp, ed. by Dan Slobin, Julie Gerhardt, Amy Kyratzis and Jiansheng Guo, 287–308. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pärnu
Postimees. 2019. “Ajakirjanikud otse-eetris: kas ’olgu’ või
’okei’? [Journalists in
the studio: is it ‘olgu’ (approx. let it be like that) or
‘okay’?]”. March 15, 2019. [URL]
Paunonen, Heikki, and Marjatta Paunonen. 2000. Tsennaaks stadii, bonjaaks slangii – Stadin slangin
suursanakirja [Dictionary of
Helsinki
slang]. Helsinki: WSOY.
Pavlidou, Theodossia. 1998. “Greek
and German Telephone Closings: Patterns of Confirmation and
Agreement.” Pragmatics 8 (1): 79–94.
Pedersen, Henriette Folkmann. 2015. “
Jamen som svarindleder efter
hv-spørgsmål [
Jamen as a response-initiator after
wh-questions].” Skrifter om
Samtalegrammatik 2 (2). [URL]
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, Johannes Wagner, and Esther Gonzalez-Martinez (eds). 2018. Longitudinal
Studies on the Organization of Social
Interaction. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pekkanen, Niina. 2017. “
Okei-dialogipartikkelin käyttötavoista
keskustelussa [On usages
of the dialogue particle okei in
conversation].” Master’s
thesis, University of Helsinki.
Persson, Rasmus. 2015. “Indexing
One’s Own Previous Action as Inadequate: On ah-Prefaced
Repeats as Receipt Tokens in French
Talk-in-Interaction.” Language in
Society 44 (4): 497–524.
Pfeifer, Wolfgang et al. 1993. Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Deutschen, digitalisierte und
von Wolfgang Pfeifer überarbeitete Version im Digitalen Wörterbuch der
deutschen Sprache [Etymological Dictionary of German, Wolfgang Pfeifer’s digitized and revised
version in the Digital Dictionary of the German
Language], s.v. okay. Accessed November 22, 2019. [URL]
Pillet-Shore, Danielle. 2003. “Doing
Okay: On the Multiple Metrics of an
Assessment.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 36 (3): 285–319.
Pomerantz, Anita. 1986. “Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims.” Human Studies 9 (2–3): 219–229.
Pulkkinen, Paavo. 1984. Lokarista sponsoriin: Englantilaisia lainoja suomen
kielessä [From lokari to
sponsori: English loanwords in the Finnish
language]. Keuruu: Otava.
Querol-Julián, Mercedes, and Begoña Bellés-Fortuño. 2010. “The
Use of Pragmatic Discourse Markers And, So, and
Okay in Academic Conference
Presentations.” Language
Forum 36 (1–2): 81–94.
Råman, Joonas. 2018. “The
Organization of Transitions between Observing and Teaching the Budo
Class.” Forum Qualitative
Sozialforschung 19 (1): Art.
5.
Rauniomaa, Mirka, and Tiina Keisanen. 2012. “Two
Multimodal Formats for Responding to
Requests.” Journal of
Pragmatics 44 (6–7): 829–842.
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2004. “Prompting
Action: The Stand-Alone so in Ordinary
Conversation.” Research on Language and
Social
Interaction 37: 185–218.
Read, Allen Walker. 1963a. “The
First Stage in the History of
‘O.K.’.” American
Speech 38 (1): 5–27.
Reichert, Tetyana, and Grit Liebscher. 2018. “Transitions with “Okay”: Managing Language Alternation in Role-Play Preparations.” In Conversation
Analysis and Language Alternation: Capturing Transitions in the
Classroom, ed. by Anna Filipi and Numa Markee, 129–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rendle-Short, Johanna. 2000. “When
‘Okay’ is Okay in Computer Science Seminar
Talk.” Australian Review of Applied
Linguistics 22 (2): 19–33.
Robinson, Jeffrey D. 2009. “Managing
Counterinformings: An Interactional Practice for Soliciting Information that
Facilitates Reconciliation of Speakers’ Incompatible
Positions.” Human Communication
Research 35 (4): 561–587.
2013. “Overall
Structural
Organization.” In The
Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed.
by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 257–280. West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
2014. “What
‘What?’ Tells us About How Conversationalists Manage
Intersubjectivity.” Research on Language and
Social
Interaction 47 (2): 109–129.
Robinson, Jeffrey D., and John Heritage. 2005. “The
Structure of Patients’ Presenting Concerns: The Completion Relevance of
Current Symptoms.” Social Science and
Medicine 61 (2): 481–493.
Robinson, Jeffrey D., and Tanya Stivers. 2001. “Achieving
Activity Transitions in Primary-Care Encounters: From History Taking to
Physical Examination.” Human Communication
Research 27 (2): 253–298.
Rosaldo, Michelle Z. 1982. “The
Things We Do with Words: Ilongot Speech Acts and Speech Act Theory in
Philosophy.” Language in
Society 11 (2): 203–37.
Rossano, Federico. 2012. “Gaze
Behavior in Face-to-Face Interaction.” PhD
diss., Radboud University Nijmegen.
. 2013. “Gaze
in
Conversation.” In The
Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed.
by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 308–329. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Rossano, Federico, Penelope Brown, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. “Gaze,
Questioning, and
Culture.” In Conversation
Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, ed.
by Jack Sidnell, 187–249. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Rossi, Giovanni. 2012. “Bilateral
and Unilateral Requests: The Use of Imperatives and Mi X?
Interrogatives in Italian.” Discourse
Processes 49 (5): 426–458.
(ed). 2020. “Other-Repetition in Conversation
Across Languages: Bringing Prosody into Pragmatic
Typology.” Special
issue, Language in
Society 49 (4): 495–687.
Sacks, Harvey. 1967. “The
Search for Help: No One to Turn
to.” In Essays in
Self-Destruction, ed. by Edwin S. Shneidman, 203–223. New York: Science House.
Sacks, Harvey, and Emanuel A. Schegloff. 2002. “Home
Position.” Gesture 2 (2): 133–146. Originally
presented orally at the American Anthropological
Association, 1975.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A
Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for
Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735.
Samtalegrammatik.dk. 2018. “Data.” Accessed June 17, 2018. [URL]
. 2019a. “Nå (stigende kontur) [Oh (rising
intonation)].” Accessed May 31, 2019. [URL]
. 2019b. “Nå (jævn kontur) [Oh (level
intonation)].” Accessed May 31, 2019. [URL]
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1968. “Sequencing
in Conversational Openings.” American
Anthropologist 70 (6): 1075–1095.
1979. “Identification
and Recognition in Telephone Conversation
Openings.” In Everyday
Language: Studies in Ethnomethodoiogy, ed.
by George Psathas, 23–78. New York: Irvington.
Schegloff, Emanuel. 1982. “Discourse
as an Interactional Achievement: Some Uses of ‘Uh Huh’ and Other Things that
Come between
Sentences.” In Analyzing
Discourse: Text and Talk, ed.
by Deborah Tannen, 71–93. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1984. “On
Some Gestures’ Relation to
Talk.” In Structures
of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 266–296. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
1989. “Reflections
on Language, Development, and the Interactional Character of
Talk-in-Interaction.” In Interaction
in Human Development, ed.
by Marc H. Bornstein, and Jerome S. Bruner, 139–152. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
1990. “On
the Organization of Sequence as a Source of ‘Coherence’ in
Talk-in-Interaction.” In Conversational
Organization and Its Development, ed.
by Bruce Dorval, 51–77. Norwood: Ablex.
1991. “Conversation
Analysis and Socially Shared
Cognition.” In Perspectives
on Socially Shared Cognition, ed.
by Lauren B. Resnick, John M. Levine, and Stephanie D. Teasley, 150–171. Washington, DC: APA.
1996. “Turn
Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and
Interaction.” In Interaction
and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 52–133. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1997. “Practices and Actions: Boundary Cases of Other-Initiated Repair.” Discourse Processes 23: 499–545.
2007. Sequence
Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation
Analysis, vol. 1. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2009. “One
Perspective on Conversation Analysis: Comparative
Perspectives.” In Conversation
Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, ed.
by Jack Sidnell, 357–406. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Gene H. Lerner. 2009. “Beginning
to Respond: Well-Prefaced Responses to
Wh-Questions.” Research on
Language and Social
Interaction 42 (2): 91–115.
Schleef, Erik. 2005. “Navigating
Joint Activities in English and German Academic Discourse: Forms, Functions,
and Sociolinguistic Distribution of Discourse Markers and Question
Tags.” PhD
diss., University of Michigan.
. 2008. “The
‘Lecturer’s OK’ Revisited: Changing Discourse Conventions and the Influence
of Academic Division.” American
Speech 83 (1): 62–84.
Schubert, Christoph. 2019. “‘OK,
Well, First of All, Let Me Say …’: Discursive Uses of Response Initiators in
US Presidential Primary Debates.” Discourse
Studies 21 (4): 438–457.
Selting, Margret. 1987. “Reparaturen und lokale Verstehensprobleme, oder: Zur
Binnenstruktur von Reparatursequenzen. [Repair and local problems in understanding, or: On the
internal structure of repair
sequences.]” Linguistische
Berichte 108, 128–149.
. 1988. “The
Role of Intonation in the Organization of Repair and Problem-Handling
Sequences in Conversation.” Journal of
Pragmatics 12 (3): 293–323.
. 1996. “Prosody
as an Activity-Type Distinctive Cue in Conversation: The Case of So-Called
‘Astonished’ Questions in Repair
Initiation.” In Prosody
in Conversation, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Margret Selting, 231–270. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
. 2016. “Praktiken des Sprechens und Interagierens im Gespräch aus der
Sicht von Konversationsanalyse und Interaktionaler
Linguistik [Practices of
speaking and interacting in conversation from the prespective of
conversation analysis and interactional
linguistics].” In Sprachliche
und kommunikative Praktiken, Jahrbuch 2015 des
IDS, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, Helmuth Feilke and Angelika Linke, 27–56. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Selting, Margret, Peter Auer, Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Jörg Bergmann, Pia Bergmann, Karin Birkner, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen et al. 2009. “Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT
2) [Conversation analytic
transcription system
2].” Gesprächsforschung 10: 353–402. [URL]
2011. “A
System for Transcribing Talk-in-Interaction: GAT 2; Translated and Adapted
for English by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Dagmar
Barth-Weingarten.” Gesprächsforschung 12: 1–51. [URL]. Translation
and adaptation of “Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)”
by Margret Selting et al., Gesprächsforschung 10: 353–402, 2009.
Seuren, Lucas M. 2018. “Assessing
Answers: Action Ascription in Third
Position.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 51 (1): 33–51.
Seuren, Lucas, Mike Huiskes, and Tom Koole. 2016. “Remembering
and Understanding with Oh-prefaced Yes/No Declaratives in
Dutch.” Journal of
Pragmatics 104: 180–192.
. 2018. “Resolving
Knowledge Discrepancies in Informing
Sequences.” Language in
Society 47 (3): 409–434.
Sharp, Harriet. 2001. English
in Spoken Swedish. A Corpus Study of Two Discourse
Domains. Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis: Stockholm Studies in English XCV.
Shaw, Rebecca, and Celia Kitzinger. 2007. “Memory
in Interaction: An Analysis of Repeat Calls to a Home Birth
Helpline. Research on Language and Social
Interaction 40 (1): 117–144.
Sidnell, Jack. 2009. “Comparative
Perspectives in Conversation
Analysis.” In Conversation
Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, ed.
by Jack Sidnell, 3–28. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
. 2013. “Basic
Conversation Analytic
Methods.” In The
Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed.
by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 77–99. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
. 2014. “The
Architecture of Intersubjectivity
Revisited.” In Cambridge
Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, ed.
by Nick J. Enfield, Paul Kockelman, and Jack Sidnell, 364–399. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
. 2016. “A
Conversation Analytic Approach to Research on Early
Childhood”. In SAGE
Handbook of Early Childhood Research, ed.
by Ann Farrell, Sharon Lynn Kagan, and E. Kay, M. Tisdall, 255–276. London: Sage.
Sidnell, Jack, and N. J. Enfield. 2012. “Language
Diversity and Social Action: A Third Locus of Linguistic
Relativity.” Current
Anthropology 53 (3): 302–333.
Sinclair, John M., and Malcolm Coulthard. 1975. Towards
an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and
Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena. 2001. Responding
in Conversation: A Study of Response Particles in
Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2002. “Recipient
Activities: The Particle “no” as a Go-Ahead Response in Finnish
Conversations.” In The
Language of Turn and Sequence, ed.
by Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson, 165–195. New York: Oxford University Press.
. 2017. “Imperatives and Responsiveness in Finnish Conversation.” In Imperative
Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed.
by Liisa Raevaara, Marja-Leena Sorjonen, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 241–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2018. “Reformulating
Prior Speaker’s Turn in Finnish: Turn-Initial siis,
eli(kkä) and nii(n)
et(tä)
.” In Between
Turn and Sequence: Turn-Initial Particles Across
Languages, ed. by John Heritage, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 251–286. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds). 2017. Imperative
Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in
Action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Steensig, Jakob, and Birte Asmuß. 2005. “Notes
on Disaligning ‘Yes But’-Initiated Utterances in Danish and German
Conversations: Two Construction Types for Dispreferred
Responses.” In Syntax
and Lexis in Conversation, ed.
by Auli Hakulinen, and Margret Selting, 349–373. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Steensig, Jakob, and Paul Drew (eds). 2008. “Questioning
and Affiliation/Disaffiliation in
Interaction.” Special
issue, Discourse
Studies 10 (1).
Steensig, Jakob, and Trine Heinemann. 2013. “When
‘Yes’ Is Not Enough – as an Answer to a Yes/No
Question.” In Units
of Talk – Units of Action, ed.
by Beatrice Szczepek Reed, and Geoffrey Raymond, 207–241. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2014. Teenage
Talk: From General Characteristics to the Use of Pragmatic Markers in a
Contrastive
Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stevanovic, Melisa. 2011. “Participants’
Deontic Rights and Action Formation: The Case of Declarative Requests for
Action.” Interaction and Linguistic
Structures 52.
Stevanovic, Melisa, and Anssi Peräkylä. 2012. “Deontic
Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and
Decide.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 45 (3): 297–321.
Stivers, Tanya. 2004. “’No
no no’ and Other Types of Multiple Sayings in Social
Interaction.” Human Communication
Research 30 (2): 260–293.
. 2006. “Treatment
Decisions: Negotiations Between Doctors and Parents in Acute Care
Encounters.” In Communication
in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and
Patients, ed. by John Heritage, and Doug W. Maynard, 279–312. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
. 2007. Prescribing
under Pressure. Parent-Physician Conversations and
Antibiotics. New York: Oxford University Press.
. 2008. “Stance,
Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding Is a Token of
Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 41 (5): 31–57.
. 2010. “An
Overview of the Question-Response System in American English
Conversation.” Journal of
Pragmatics 42 (10): 2772–2781.
. 2018. “How
We Manage Social Relationships Through Answers to Questions: The Case of
Interjections.” Discourse
Processes 56 (3): 191–209.
Stivers, Tanya, N. J. Enfield, Penelope Brown, Christina Englert, Makoto Hayashi, Trine Heinemann, Gertie Hoymann et al. 2009. “Universals
and Cultural Variation in Turn-Taking in
Conversation.” Proceedings of the National
Academy of
Sciences 106 (26), 10587–10592.
Stivers, Tanya, and Makoto Hayashi. 2010. “Transformative
Answers: One Way to Resist a Question’s
Constraints.” Language in
Society 39 (1): 1–25.
Stivers, Tanya and John Heritage. 2001. “Breaking
the Sequential Mold: Answering ‘More Than the Question’ during Comprehensive
History
Taking.” Text 21 (1–2): 151–185.
Stivers, Tanya, John Heritage, Rebecca K. Barnes, Rose McCabe, Laura Thompson, and Merran Toerien. 2017. “Treatment
Recommendations as Actions.” Health
Communication 33 (11): 1335–1344.
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig. 2011. “Knowledge,
Morality and Affiliation in Social
Interaction.” In The
Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed.
by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 3–24. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Stivers, Tanya, and Jeffrey D. Robinson. 2006. “A
Preference for Progressivity in
Interaction.” Language in
Society 35 (3): 367–392.
Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano. 2010. “Mobilizing
Response.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 43 (1): 3–31.
Stivers, Tanya, Jack Sidnell, and Clara Bergen. 2018. “Children’s
Responses to Questions in Peer Interaction: A Window into the Ontogenesis of
Interactional Competence.” Journal of
Pragmatics 124: 14–30.
Streeck, Jürgen. 2008. “Gesture
in Political Communication. A Case Study of the Democratic Presidential
Candidates during the 2004 Primary
Campaign.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 41 (1): 154–186.
Svennevig, Jan. 2004. “Other-Repetition
as Display of Hearing, Understanding and Emotional
Stance.” Discourse
Studies 6 (4): 589–516.
. 2018. “Decomposing
Turns to Enhance Understanding by L2
Speakers. Research on Language and Social
Interaction 51 (4): 398–416.
Svensk ordbok
(NE’s ordbok) [Dictionary of
Swedish]. n.d.
s.v. okay. Accessed August 1, 2020. [URL]
Svinhufvud, Kimmo. 2016. “Nodding
and Note-Taking. Multimodal Analysis of Writing and Nodding in Student
Counseling Interaction.” Language and
Dialogue 6 (1): 81–109.
Swales, John M., and Bonnie Malczewski. 2001. “Discourse
Management and New-Episode Flags in
MICASE.” In Corpus
Linguistics in North America: Selections from the 1999
Symposium, ed. by Rita C. Simpson, and John M. Swales, 145–164. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Szatrowski, Polly. 2000. “Relation
between Gaze, Head Nodding and aizuti ‘Back Channel’ at a
Japanese Company Meeting.” Berkeley
Linguistics
Society 26: 283–294.
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice. 2006. Prosodic
Orientation in English
Conversation. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
. 2011. Analyzing
Conversation: An Introduction to
Prosody. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Talkbank. 2018. “SamtaleBank.” Accessed June 16, 2018. [URL]
Tekin, Burak S. 2019. “Bodies
at Play: Exploring Participation, Spectatorship, and Morality in Videogaming
Activities.” PhD
diss., University of Basel.
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2015. Grammar
in Everyday Talk: Building Responsive
Actions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Turner, Kimberley. 1999. Functional
Variation of Okay/Alright Usage in Spoken
Discourse. MA Special Project. UNSW, Sydney.
Turner, Roy. 1972. “Some
Formal Properties of Therapy
Talk.” In Studies
in Social Interaction, ed.
by David Sudnow, 367–396. New York, NY: Free Press.
Tyagunova, Tanya, and Christian Greiffenhagen. 2017. “Closing
Seminars and Lectures: The Work That Lecturers and Students
Do.” Discourse
Studies 19 (3): 314–340.
Urbaani
Sanakirja [Urban
dictionary]. Accessed August 9, 2018. [URL]
Urbandictionary.com, s.v. Rules, OK? Accessed April 4, 2020. [URL]
van Zyl, Marianne, and Johan J. Hanekom. 2013. “When
‘Okay’ is not Okay: Acoustic Characteristics of Single-Word Prosody
Conveying Reluctance.” Journal of the
Acoustical Society of
America 133 (1): EL13.
Vepsäläinen, Heidi. 2019. ”Suomen no-partikkeli ja kysymyksiin
vastaaminen keskustelussa [The Finnish particle no and answering
questions].” PhD
diss., University of Helsinki. [URL]
Verby, J. E. 1991. “OK
is Sometimes Not Ok.” Learning Resources
Journal/University of Minnesota Health
Sciences.
Vilkuna, Maria. 1993. “Finnish
Juuri and Just: Varieties of
Contextual
Uniqueness.” In Yearbook
of the Linguistic Association of
Finland 6, ed.
by Maria Vilkuna, and Susanna Shore, 97–122.
Walker, Gareth. 2017. “Visual
Representations of Acoustic Data: A Survey and
Suggestions.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 50 (4): 363–387.
Wang, Yu-Fang, Pi-Hua Tsai, David Goodman, and Meng-Ying Lin. 2010. “Agreement,
Acknowledgment, and Alignment: The Discourse-Pragmatic Functions of
Hao and Dui in Taiwan Mandarin
Conversation.” Discourse
Studies 12 (2): 241–267.
Waring, Hansun J. 2008. “Using
Explicit Positive Assessment in the Language Classroom: IRF, Feedback, and
Learning Opportunities.” The Modern Language
Journal 92 (4): 577–594.
Waris, Tuula. 2006. “
Just
keskustelussa [
Just in
conversation].” Master’s
thesis, Finnish language, University of Helsinki.
Weidner, Matylda. 2016. “The Particle no in Polish Talk-in-Interaction.” In NU
/ NÅ: A Family of Discourse Markers Across the Languages of Europe and
Beyond, ed. by Yael Maschler, and Peter Auer, 104–131. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Weilenmann, Alexandra. 2003. “’I
Can’t Talk Now, I’m in a Fitting Room’: Formulating Availability and
Location in Mobile-Phone
Conversations.” Environment and Planning
A 35 (9): 1589–1605.
Wennerstrom, Ann, and Andrew F. Siegel. 2003. “Keeping
the Floor in Multiparty Conversations: Intonation, Syntax, and
Pause.” Discourse
Processes 36 (2): 77–107.
Werlen, Iwar. 1984. Ritual und Sprache. Zum Verhältnis von Sprechen und Handeln
in Ritualen [Ritual and
language. On the relationship of language and action in
rituals]. Tübingen: Narr.
Werth, Alexander. 2016. “Artikel
bei Rufnamen [Articles used with first
names].” In SyHD-atlas. Accessed February 2, 2019. [URL]
Whitehead, Kevin A. 2011. “Some
Uses of Head Nods in ‘Third Position’ in
Talk-in-Interaction.” Gesture 11 (2): 103–122.
Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1956. Language,
Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee
Whorf, ed. by John B. Carroll. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wierzbicka, Anna. 2003. Cross-Cultural
Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human
Interaction. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, s.v. OK. Accessed April 5, 2020. [URL]
Woods, Catherine J., Paul Drew, and Geraldine M. Leydon. 2015. “Closing
Calls to a Cancer Helpline: Expressions of Caller
Satisfaction.” Patient Education and
Counseling 98 (8): 943–953.
Wootton, Anthony J. 1981. “Two
Request Forms for Four Year Olds.” Journal of
Pragmatics 5 (6): 511–523.
World Health Organization
(WHO). 2006. “Health
Inequities in Brazil: Our most serious disease.” [URL]
Wright, Melissa. 2011. “The
Phonetics–Interaction Interface in the Initiation of Closings in Everyday
English Telephone Calls.” Journal of
Pragmatics, 43 (4): 1080–1099.
Xian, Li-Xia. 2007. “A
Pragmatic Analysis of the Marker
Hao
.” Journal of Xichang
College 19 (3): 1–5.
Yeh, Kanyu, and Chiung-chih Huang. 2016. “Mandarin-Speaking
Children’s Use of the Discourse Markers Hao ‘Okay’ and
Dui ‘Right’ in Peer
Interaction. Language
Sciences 57: 1–20.
Yngve, Victor. 1970. “On
Getting a Word in
Edgewise.” In Papers
from the Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic
Society, 567–577. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Zimmerman, Don H. 1992. “The
Interactional Organization of Calls for Emergency
Assistance.” In Talk
at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed.
by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 418–469. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Zinken, Jörg. 2016. Requesting
Responsibility. The Morality of Grammar in Polish and English Family
Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zinken, Jörg, and Arnulf Deppermann. 2017. “A
Cline of Visible Commitment in the Situated Design of Imperative Turns:
Evidence from German and
Polish.” In Imperative
Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed.
by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 27–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.