Cover not available

In:Mobilizing Others: Grammar and lexis within larger activities
Edited by Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm, Emma Betz and Peter Golato
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 33] 2020
► pp. 83–114

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 4
Recruitments in French

Declarative statements and accompanying actions which result in offers of assistance

 | Texas State University
Published online: 13 May 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.33.04gol
Abstract
This chapter analyzes first-person singular declarative statements and their accompanying actions in French cooking shows. These ‘what I’m doing’ action combinations (Frick 2017) include lexical verbs having to do with object seizing/manipulation and ambulatory movement in either the futur proche (the French periphrastic future) or the simple present tense. The discussion shows that these turns mobilize others. Specifically, they result in the recruitment (Kendrick and Drew 2016) of coparticipants to assist the speaker in some way. The discussion focuses on the interplay between grammatical form, embodiment, setting, and interactional achievement. It shows that ‘what I’m doing’ action combinations not only mobilize the hosts of the show, but may also mobilize non-addressable third parties such as camera operators.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Review of research on requests and recruitments
  • Data and methods
  • Declarative statements which result in recruitments: Verb in the simple present with a reference to the coparticipant and/or to a location or an object near the coparticipant
  • Declarative statements which result in recruitments: Verb in the periphrastic future with a reference to the coparticipant and/or to a location or an object near the coparticipant
  • Declarative statements which result in recruitments: Verb in the periphrastic future without a reference to the coparticipant and/or to a location or an object near the coparticipant
  • Declarative statements which do not result in recruitments: Verbs in the periphrastic future with reference to objects and with the adverb juste ‘just’
  • Declarative statements which do not result in recruitments: Verbs in the periphrastic future with reference to the coparticipant and/or to an object, and without reference to a location
  • Summary and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (44)
References
Atkinson, John Maxwell, and John Heritage (eds.). 1984. Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, John Langshaw. 1962. How to do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolden, Galina. 2017. “Requests for Here-and-Now Actions in Russian Conversation.” In Imperative Turns at Talk. The Design of Directives in Action, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Lisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 175–211. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crabtree, Andy, Peter Tolmie, and Mark Rouncefield. 2013. “Cooking for Pleasure.” In Ethnomethodology at Play, ed. by Peter Tolmie, and Mark Rouncefield, 21–51. Farnham, Surey, U.K.: Ashgate.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curl, Traci S., and Paul Drew. 2008. “Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (2): 129–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2018. “Instruction Practices in German Driving Lessons: Differential Uses of Declaratives and Imperatives.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 28: 265–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2014a. “Requesting – From Speech Act to Recruitment.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 1–34. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(eds.). 2014b. Requesting in Social Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Koben Kendrick. 2018. “Searching for Trouble: Recruiting Assistance through Embodied Action.” Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality 1 (1): 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frick, Maria. 2017. “Combining Physical Actions and Verbal Announcements as “What I’m Doing’ Combinations” in Everyday Conversation.” In Linking Clauses and Actions in Social Interaction, ed. by Ritva Laury, Marja Etelämäki, and Elizabeth Couper Kuhlen, 27–53. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society / SKS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 1997. “Alors and Donc in Spoken French: A Reanalysis.” Journal of Pragmatics 28 (2): 153–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heinemann, Trine, and Jakob Steensig. 2017. “Three Imperative Action Formats in Danish Talk-in-Interaction: The Case of Imperative + Modal Particles Bare and Lige.” In Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Lisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 139–173. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hepburn, Alexa, and Galina Bolden. 2017. Transcribing for Social Research. Los Angeles: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 2012. “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “The Recruitment Matrix.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (1): 27–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo. 2017. “Negotiating Deontic Rights in Second Position: Young Adult Daughters’ Imperatively Formatted Responses to Mothers’ Offers in Estonian.” In Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Lisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 271–295. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendrick, Koben, and Paul Drew. 2016. “Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (1): 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, David. 1987. “The Semantics of Just.” Journal of Pragmatics 11: 377–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene. 2003. “Selecting Next Speaker: The Context Sensitive Operation of a Context-Free Organization.” Language in Society 32, 177–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindström, Anna. 1997. Language as Social Action: Grammar, Prosody and Interaction in Swedish Conversation. (Vol. [Skrifter utgivna av institutionen för nordiska språk vid Uppsala universitet, 46.]). Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “Language as Social Action: A Study of How Senior Citizens Request Assistance with Practical Tasks in the Swedish Home Help Service.” In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-Interaction, ed. by Auli Hakulinen, and Margret Selting, 209–230. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2011. “The Situated Organization of Directives in French: Imperatives and Action Coordination in Video Games.” Nottingham French Studies 50 (2): 19–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Cooking Instructions and the Shaping of Things in the Kitchen.” In Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity, ed. by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann, and Mirka Rauniomaa, 199–226. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Precision Timing and Timed Embeddedness of Imperatives in Embodied Courses of Action: Examples from French.” In Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Lisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 65–101. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (1): 85–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevile, Maurice. 2006. “Making Sequentiality Salient: And-Prefacing in the Talk of Airline Pilots.” Discourse Studies 8 (2): 279–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raevaara, Liisa. 2017. “Adjusting the Design of Directives to the Activity Environment: Imperatives in Finnish Cooking Club Interaction.” In Imperative Turns at Talk. The Design of Directives in Action, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Lisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 381–410. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni. 2012. “Bilateral and Unilateral Requests: The Use of Imperatives and mi X? Interrogatives in Italian.” Discourse Processes 49: 426–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “Composite Social Actions: The Case of Factual Declaratives in Everyday Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (4): 379–397. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts. London: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena. 2017. “Imperatives and Responsiveness in Finnish Conversation.” In Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Lisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 241–270. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa. 2011. “Participants’ Deontic Rights and Action Formation: The Case of Declarative Requests for Action.” InLiSt – Interaction and Linguistic Structures 52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Managing Compliance in Violin Instruction: The Case of the Finnish Clitic Particles -pA and -pAs in Imperatives and Hortatives.” In Imperative Turns at Talk. The Design of Directives in Action, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Lisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 357–380. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa, and Anssi Peräkylä. 2012. “Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (3): 297–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa, and Chiara Monzoni. 2016. “On the Hierarchy of Interactional Resources: Embodied and Verbal Vehavior in the Management of Joint Activities with Material Objects.” Journal of Pragmatics 103: 15–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2011. “Morality and Question Design: ‘Of course’ as Contesting a Presupposition of Askability.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 82–106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen, Charles Goodwin, and Curtis LeBaron (eds.). 2011. Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ursi, Biagio. 2016. “‘Et c’est qui le chef ?’ Négociations et Manifestations du Désaccord Pendant la Préparation de Repas.” Les cahiers de praxématique. Montpellier: Presses universitaires de la Méditerranée, 2006-, 2016, Manifestations discursives du désaccord en domaine français, 67.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weidner, Beate. 2017. “Zwischen Information und Unterhaltung: Multimodale Verfahren des Bewertens im Koch-TV.” Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 18, 1–33. [URL]
Wootton, Anthony J. 1981. “Children’s Use of Address Terms”. In Adult-Child Conversations, ed. by Peter French, and Margaret MacLure, 381–410. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zinken, Jörg, and Arnulf Deppermann. 2017. “A Cline of Visible Commitment in the Situated Design of Imperative Turns. Evidence from German and Polish.” In Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Lisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 27–63. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zinken, Jörg. 2016. Requesting Responsibility. The Morality of Grammar in Polish and English Family Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zinken, Jörg, and Giovanni Rossi. 2016. “Assistance and Other Forms of Engagement.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (1): 20–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Floyd, Simeon
2021. Conversation and Culture. Annual Review of Anthropology 50:1 ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue