Cover not available

In:Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-initial particles across languages
Edited by John Heritage and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 31] 2018
► pp. 287–314

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 10
Turn design and progression

The use of aiyou in Mandarin conversation

 | San Diego State University
Published online: 19 July 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.31.10wu
Abstract
The temporal character of talk is one fundamental feature of language in situ. As interaction unfolds, participants need to not only monitor the temporal progression of talk toward completion, but also attend to how the current turn ties back to the preceding turns. Whereas such dual-directional consideration is often a latent aspect of turn construction, efforts to clear up possible ambiguity are sometimes in order. This article introduces a Mandarin practice, the aiyou-preface, which seems to be used to just this end, and demonstrates an intimate relationship between the prosodic design of aiyou-preface and the displayed orientation to the intended directionality of the talk. The analysis draws upon a corpus of 35 hours of conversations collected in China.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The Mandarin aiyou
  • 3.Directionality: backward-looking or forward-looking
  • 4.Directionality and turn design
  • 5.Concluding discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (28)
References
Auer, Peter. 2005. “Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar.” Text 25 (1):7–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Sandra A. Thompson. 2005. “A Linguistic Practice for Retracting Overstatements: Concessive Repair.” In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-interaction, ed. by Auli Hakulinen, and Margret Selting, 257–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson. 2002. “Introduction.” In The Language of Turn and Sequence, ed. by Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson, 3–13. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 2006. “Retrospective and Prospective Orientation in the Construction of Argumentative Moves.” Text & Talk 26 (4/5):443–461. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H., and Charles Goodwin. 1987. “Children’s Arguing.” In Language, Gender, and Sex in Comparative Perspective, ed. by Susan U. Philips, Susan Steele, and Christine Tanz, 200–248. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto. 2004. “Projection and Grammar: Notes on the ‘Action-projecting’ Use of the Distal Demonstrative ‘are’ in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 36:1337–1374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. “A Change of State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Action Formation and its Epistemic (and Other) Backgrounds.” Discourse Studies 15:547–574. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Assessment Sequences.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68:15–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hu, Mingyang. 1987. Beijing Hua Chu Tan [An Exploration of Beijing Mandarin]. Beijing: Commerce Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1972. “Side Sequences.” In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by David N. Sudnow, 294–338. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984. “On Stepwise Transition from Talk about a Trouble to Inappropriately Next-positioned Matters.”In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 191–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene. 1996. “On the ‘Semi-permeable’ Character of Grammatical Units in Conversation: Conditional Entry into the Turn Space of another Speaker.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 238–276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1986. “Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims.” Human Studies 9:219–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1995. Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4):696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. A. 1979. “The Relevance of Repair to Syntax-for-conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, Volume 12: Discourse and Syntax, ed. by Thomas Givón, 261–286. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Premier in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. A., and Harvey Sacks. 1973. “Opening up Closings.” Semiotica 8:289–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack. 2007. “‘Look’-prefaced Turns in First and Second Position: Launching, Interceding and Redirecting Action.” Discourse Studies 9 (3):387–408. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ten Have, Paul. 2007. Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide. Second Edition. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina. 1997. “Transforming Participation Frameworks in Multi-party Mandarin Conversation: The Use of Discourse Particles and Body Behavior.” Issues in Applied Linguistics 8 (2):97–117.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Self-praising through Reporting: Strategic Use of Two Reporting Practices in Mandarin Conversation.” Discourse Processes 49:622–659. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Managing Turn Entry: The Design of ‘EI’-prefaced Turns in Mandarin Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 66:139–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Turn Design and Progression: The Use of ‘Aiyou’ in Mandarin Conversation.” Chinese Language and Discourse 7 (2):210–236.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. "Indexing epistemic authority/primacy in Mandarin conversation: aiyou-prefacing as an interactional resource." Journal of Pragmatics.
Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina, and John Heritage. 2017. “Particles and Epistemics: Convergences and Divergences between English and Mandarin.” In Enabling Human Conduct: Naturalistic Studies of Talk-in-interaction in Honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff, ed. by Gene Lerner, Geoffrey Raymond, and John Heritage, 273–297. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Arita, Yuki
2023.  Demo “but”-prefaced responses to inquiry in Japanese . Discourse Processes 60:8 ► pp. 594 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina
2016. Turn design and progression. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 7:2 ► pp. 210 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue