Cover not available

In:Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-initial particles across languages
Edited by John Heritage and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 31] 2018
► pp. 155–190

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 6
Turn-initial particles in English

The cases of oh and well

 | UCLA
Published online: 19 July 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.31.06her
Abstract
This chapter examines the English turn-initial particles oh and well. It begins with a consideration of their distinctive usages and functions in three basic sequential positions (first, second and third), arguing that both exhibit what Schegloff (1996) terms ‘positional sensitivity’. The chapter then considers some larger contrasts between the two particles, including distinctions between epistemic (oh) and action-projecting (well) functions, forward- (well) and backward- (oh) looking orientations, and their underlying semantic characteristics.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. Oh
    • 2.1Sequential position
      • 2.1.1First position
      • 2.1.2 Third position
      • 2.1.3 Second position
        • 2.1.3.1Responses to informings
        • 2.1.3.2Responses to questions
        • 2.1.3.3Oh-prefaced second assessments
  • 3. Well
    • 3.1Sequential position
      • 3.1.1First position
      • 3.1.2 Third position
      • 3.1.3 Second position
        • 3.1.3.1Expanded and dispreferred responses
        • 3.1.3.2‘My side’ tellings
  • 4.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (88)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 1987. “ Oh and Ah in English Conversation.” In Corpus Linguistics and Beyond: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora, ed. by Willem Meijs, 61–86. Amsterdam: Rodopi Bv Editions.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Church of England. 1946. The Shorter Prayer Book According to the Use of the Church of England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aston, Guy. 1987. “ Ah: A Corpus-Based Exercise in Conversational Analysis.” In Spoken Discourse, ed. by John Morley, and Alan Partington, 123–137. Camerino, Italy: Universita di Camerino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolden, Galina. 2006. “Little Words That Matter: Discourse Markers “So” and “Oh” and the Doing of Other-Attentiveness in Social Interaction.” Journal of Communication 56:661–688. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1989. Intonation and Its Uses: Melody in Grammar and Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Button, Graham. 1990. “On Varieties of Closings.” In Interactional Competence, ed. by George Psathas, 93–148. Lanham MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlson, Lauri. 1984. Well in Dialogue Games. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carroll, Lewis. 1866. Aliceʹs Adventures in Wonderland. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. 2013. “Agency in Response: The Role of Prefatory Address Terms.” Journal of Pragmatics 57:290–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage. 2002. The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Merja Kytö. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, Judy. 1984. “Subsequent Versions of Invitations, Offers, Requests, and Proposals Dealing with Potential or Actual Rejection.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 102–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Defour, Tine, and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen. 2010. “Positive Appraisal as a Core Meaning of Well: A Corpus-Based Analysis in Middle and Early Modern English Data.” English Studies 91 (6):643–673. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dickey, Eleanor. 1996. Greek Forms of Address: From Herodotus to Lucian. Oxfrod: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Latin Forms of Address: From Plautus to Apuleius. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark, Francisco Torreira, and N. J. Enfield. 2013. “Is “Huh” A Universal Word? Conversational Infrastructure and the Convergent Evolution of Linguistic Items.” PLOS ONE 8:e78273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2016. “Polar Questions.” In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. by Matthew S. Dryer, and Martin Haspelmath, chapter 116. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. Url: [URL].
Eckert, Penelope. 2008. “Variation and the Indexical Field.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 12:453–476. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin. 2006. “Towards an Understanding of the Spectrum of Approaches to Discourse Particles.” In Approaches to Discourse Particles, ed. by Kerstin Fischer, 1–20. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1978. “Response Cries.” Language 54:787–815. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grant, John. 1823. Institutes of Latin Grammar. London: Whitakker.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1957. “Meaning.” Philosophical Review 67:53–59.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli. 1993. “The Grammar of Opening Routines.” In Sky 1993: Yearbook of the Linguistic Association of Finland 15, ed. by Susanna Shore, and Maria Vilkuna, 149–170. Helsinki.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja-Riitta Heinonen, and Irja Alho. 2004. Iso suomen kielioppi [Comprehensive Grammar of Finnish]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 1998. The Function of Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984a. “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984b. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. “ Oh-Prefaced Responses to Inquiry.” Language in Society 27 (3): 291–334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “ Oh-Prefaced Responses to Assessments: A Method of Modifying Agreement/Disagreement.” In The Language of Turn and Sequence, ed. by Cecilia Ford, Barbara Fox, and Sandra Thompson, 196–224. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Questioning in Medicine.” In “Why Do You Ask?”: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse, ed. by Alice F. Freed, and Susan Ehrlich, 42–68. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45:1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Turn-Initial Position and Some of Its Occupants.” Journal of Pragmatics 57:331–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “ Well-Prefaced Turns in English Conversation: A Conversation Analytic Perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics 88:88–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Steven E. Clayman. 2010. Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities and Institutions. Oxford: Blackwell-Wiley. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Assessment Sequences.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1):15–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Navigating Epistemic Landscapes: Acquiescence, Agency and Resistance in Responses to Polar Questions.” In Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. by Jan P. De Ruiter, 179–192. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
James, Deborah. 1972. “Some Aspects of the Syntax and Semantics of Interjections.” In Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. by Paul M. Peranteau, Judith N. Levi, and Gloria C. Phares, 162–172. Chicago: Linguistics Department, University of Chicago.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1978. “Sequential Aspects of Storytelling in Conversation.” In Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. by Jim Schenkein, 219–248. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1980. “On ‘Trouble-Premonitory’ Response to Inquiry.” Sociological Inquiry 50:153–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1981. The Abominable ‘Ne?’: A Working Paper Exploring the Phenomenon of Post-Response Pursuit of Response. Occasional Paper No.6. Manchester: Department of Sociology, University of Manchester.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 1993. “The Discourse Marker Well: A Relevance Theoretic Account.” Journal of Pragmatics 19:435–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. “The Discourse Marker Well in the History of English.” English Language and Linguistics 1 (1):91–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002. “Discourse Markers in Early Modern English.” In Alternative Histories of English, ed. by Peter Trudgill, and Richard Watts, 210–230. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendrick, Kobin, and Francisco Torreira. 2015. “The Timing and Construction of Preference: A Quantitative Study.” Discourse Processes 52:255–289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Hye Ri Stephanie. 2011. Beginning an Action in English and Korean: Turn Design and Action Projection. Doctoral dissertation. Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Retroactive Indexing of Relevance: The Use of Well in Third Position.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46 (2):125–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koivisto, Aino. 2013. “On the Preference for Remembering: Acknowledging an Answer With Finnish Ai Nii(n) (“Oh Thatʹs Right”).” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46 (3):277–297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1973. “Questionable Answers and Answerable Questions.” In Issies in Linguistics: Papers in Honor of Henry and Renée Kahane, ed. by Braj B. Kachru, Robert B. Lees, Yakov Malkiel, Angelina Pietrangeli, and Sol Saporta, 453–467. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liddell, Henry G., and Robert Scott. 1940. Liddell and Scottʹs Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Local, John. 1996. “Conversational Phonetics: Some Aspects of News Receipts in Everyday Talk.” In Prosody in Conversation, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Margret Selting, 177–230. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas. 2003. Bad News, Good News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKeown, James C. 2010. Classical Latin. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. 2009. “Interjections as Pragmatic Markers.” Journal of Pragmatics 41:866–891. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Person, Raymond F. 2009. “ Oh in Shakespeare: A Conversation Analytic Approach.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 10 (1):84–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita M. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/no Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review 68:939–967. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1987. “On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button, and John R. E. Lee, 54–69. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1979. “The Relevance of Repair for Syntax-for-Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax, ed. by Talmy Givon, 261–288. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1984. “On Some Questions and Ambiguities in Conversation.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 28–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1987. “Recycled Turn Beginnings: A Precise Repair Mechanism in Conversationʹs Turn-Taking Organisation.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button, and John R. E. Lee, 70–85. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1992. “Repair after Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided for Place for the Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation.” American Journal of Sociology 95 (5):1295–1345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996. “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Sandra Thompson, and Emanuel Schegloff, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. “On Dispensability.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 37:95–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Gene H. Lerner. 2009. “Beginning to Respond: Well-Prefaced Responses to Wh-Questions.” Research on Language and Social Interaction (42):91–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Harvey Sacks. 1973. “Opening up Closings.” Semiotica 8: 289–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence. 1985. Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation. New York: Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. “Shakespeareʹs Well .” JoshidaiBungaku 51:83–115.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. “Rethinking well .” Journal of Pragmatics 33:1025–1060. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. 2008. Complete Sonnets and Poems, ed. by Colin Burrow. Oxford: Oxford World’s Classics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack. 2007. “‘Look’-Prefaced Turns in First and Second Position: Launching, Interceding and Redirecting Action.” Discourse Studies 9:387–408. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2005. “Modified Repeats: One Method for Asserting Primary Rights from Second Position.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 38 (2): 131–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “An Overview of the Question-Response System in American English.” Journal of Pragmatics 42:2772–2781. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Makoto Hayashi. 2010. “Transformative Answers: One Way to Resist a Question’s Constraints.” Language in Society 39:1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Nicholas J. Enfield, Penelope Brown, Christina Englert, Makoto Hayashi, Trine Heinemann, Gertie Hoymann, Federico Rossano, Jan Peter De Ruiter, Kyung-Eun Yoon, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. “Universals and Cultural Variation in Turn-Taking in Conversation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (26):10587–10592. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stoele, Hildegunn. 2012. Interjections in Late Middle English Plays. Stavanger: Faculty of Arts and Education, University of Stavanger.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svartvik, Jan. 1980. “ Well in Conversation.” In Studies in English Linguistics, ed. by Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik, 167–177. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 1995. “Interjections in Early Modern English.” In Historical Pragmatics. Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, 439–465. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. “Exclamations in Late Middle English.” In Studies in Middle English Linguistics, ed. by Jacek Fisiak, 573–607. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Terasaki, Alene K. 2004. “Pre-Announcement Sequences in Conversation.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene Lerner, 171–223. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2015. Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995. “Subjectification in Grammaticalization.” In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, ed. by Dieter Stein, and Susan Wright, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C., and Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1976. “Particles and Linguistic Relativity.” International Review of Slavic Linguistics 2:251–312.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (21)

Cited by 21 other publications

Braga, Paloma Bernardino & Gustavo Ximenes Cunha
2025. As funções da expressão “acho que” na dimensão epistêmica de um debate presidencial. Domínios de Lingu at gem 19 ► pp. e019004 ff. DOI logo
Böttcher, Marlene & Martina Rossi
2025. The speaker's “okay” vs. the listener's “okay”: exploring lexical, phonetic, and multimodal variation of backchannels and fluencemes in conversation. Frontiers in Communication 10 DOI logo
Ehmer, Oliver
2025. Request for confirmation sequences in Castilian Spanish. Open Linguistics 11:1 DOI logo
Rühlemann, Christoph & Mathias Barthel
2024. Word frequency and cognitive effort in turns-at-talk: turn structure affects processing load in natural conversation. Frontiers in Psychology 15 DOI logo
Yu, Guodong, Yaxin Wu, Paul Drew & Chase Wesley Raymond
2024. The DIG Mandarin Conversations (DMC) Corpus. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 15:1 ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Bolden, Galina B., John Heritage & Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2023. Introduction. In Responding to Polar Questions across Languages and Contexts [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 35], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Humă, Bogdana, Jack B. Joyce & Geoffrey Raymond
2023. What Does “Resistance” Actually Look Like? The Respecification of Resistance as an Interactional Accomplishment. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 42:5-6 ► pp. 497 ff. DOI logo
Martínez Caro, Elena
2023. English oh as a structural and modal marker. In Discourse Phenomena in Typological Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 227], ► pp. 369 ff. DOI logo
Robinson, Jeffrey D. & John Heritage
2023. Renewing a social action in US primary care. In Responding to Polar Questions across Languages and Contexts [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 35], ► pp. 328 ff. DOI logo
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2023. On the rise of a marker of disaffiliation from Others’ discourse. In Reconnecting Form and Meaning [Studies in Language Companion Series, 230], ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2025. Afterword. In Semantic-Pragmatic Change from Intersubjective to Textual Meanings [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 353], ► pp. 272 ff. DOI logo
Clayman, Steven E. & John Heritage
2021. Conversation Analysis and the Study of Sociohistorical Change. Research on Language and Social Interaction 54:2 ► pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Clayman, Steven E. & John Heritage
2025. Coding Social Interaction: Prospects, Pitfalls, and Procedures. Research on Language and Social Interaction 58:3 ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Wilkes, Julie & Susan A. Speer
2021. Reporting Microaggressions: Kinship Carers’ Complaints about Identity Slights. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 40:3 ► pp. 303 ff. DOI logo
Wilkes, Julie & Susan A. Speer
2021. Conversation Analysis and Ethnomethodology: Identity at Stake in a Kinship Carers’ Support Group. In The Cambridge Handbook of Identity, ► pp. 262 ff. DOI logo
Humă, Bogdana & Elizabeth Stokoe
2020. The Anatomy of First-Time and Subsequent Business-to-Business “Cold” Calls. Research on Language and Social Interaction 53:2 ► pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
Rühlemann, Christoph
2020. Turn structure and inserts. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 25:2 ► pp. 186 ff. DOI logo
Rühlemann, Christoph
2020. Visual Linguistics with R, DOI logo
Humă, Bogdana, Elizabeth Stokoe & Rein Ove Sikveland
2019. Persuasive Conduct: Alignment and Resistance in Prospecting “Cold” Calls. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 38:1 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Methodological Approaches. In The Cambridge Handbook of Identity, ► pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. OKAY across Languages [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 34], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue