Cover not available

In:Imperative Turns at Talk: The design of directives in action
Edited by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 30] 2017
► pp. 299–324

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 10
Imperatives in Swedish medical consultations

 | University of Helsinki
 | University of Helsinki
 | Stockholm University
 | University of Turku
 | Swedish Institute for Language and Folklore
Published online: 18 August 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.30.10lin
Abstract
This chapter investigates the use of imperative-formatted directives in Swedish medical consultations. The specific focus of the chapter is the division of labor between straight, non-modulated imperative turns and imperative turns which are modulated with a discourse particle or some other verbal mitigating device. The results show that non-modulated imperative turns are embedded in diagnostic work, nominating subsequent actions in a series. Orientations to projected trajectories of action and the other participant’s expectations are clearly present when modulated imperative turns are produced; they are also frequent in the opening and closing routines of the consultations. Thus, there is a link between routinized and projectable actions and the use of imperatives with a pragmatic modulating element.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data and method
  • 3.Overview of imperatives in the data
  • 4.Non-modulated imperative turns: The physical examination
  • 5.Modulated imperative turns: Projected routine actions
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (31)
References
Byrne, Partick S., and Barrie E. L. Long. 1976. Doctors Talking to Patients. A Study of the Verbal Behaviour of General Practitioners Consulting in Their Surgeries. London: Dept. of Health and Social Security.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael. 1992. “Pluricentric Languages – Introduction”. In Pluricentric Languages, ed. by Michael Clyne, 1–9. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage. 1992. “Introduction”. In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan. 1976. “‘Is Sybil there?’ The Structure of Some American English Directives.” Language in Society 5: 25–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, and Mirja Saari. 1995. “Temporaalisesta adverbista diskurssipartikkeliksi [From a temporal adverb to a discourse particle].” Virittäjä 4: 481–500.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hellberg, Staffan. 1990. “Uppmaningarnas syntax och direktiva satsers betydelse [On the syntax of directives and the meaning of directive clauses].” In Svenskans beskrivning 17, ed. by Erik Andersson, and Marketta Sundman, 21–37. Åbo: Åbo Akademis förlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Douglas W. Maynard (eds). 2006. Communication in Medical Care. Interaction between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 20 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Tanya Stivers. 1999. “Online Commentary in Acute Medical Visits: A Method of Shaping Patient Expectations.” Social Science & Medicine 49: 1501–1517. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo. 2003. From Interaction to Grammar. Estonian Finite Verb Forms in Conversation. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindholm, Camilla. 2003. Frågor i praktiken. Flerledade frågeturer i läkare-patientsamtal [Questions in practice. Multi-unit question turns in doctor-patient interaction]. Helsinki: Svenska litteratursällskapet i Finland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindström, Anna. 2005. “Language as Social Action. A Study of How Senior Citizens Request Assistance with Practical Tasks in the Swedish Home Help Service.” In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation. Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-interaction, ed. by Auli Hakulinen, and Margret Selting, 209–230. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindström, Jan, Camilla Lindholm, and Ritva Laury. 2016. “The Interactional Emergence of Conditional Clauses as Directives: Constructions, Trajectories and Sequences of Actions.” Language Sciences 58: 8–21. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linell, Per. 2009. Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically. Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Samtalskulturer. Kommunikativa verksamhetstyper i samhället [Conversation cultures. Communicative activity types in society]. Linköping: Linköping University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Melander Marttala, Ulla. 1995. Innehåll och perspektiv i läkare‑ patientsamtal. En språklig och samtalsanalytisk undersökning [Content and perspective in doctor-patient conversations. A linguistic and conversation analytic investigation]. Uppsala: Uppsala University. [URL]
Mishler, Elliott G. 1984. The Discourse of Medicine: Dialectics of Medical Interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norrby, Catrin, Camilla Wide, Jan Lindström, and Jenny Nilsson. 2015a. “Interpersonal Relationships in Medical Consultations. Comparing Sweden Swedish and Finland Swedish Address Practices.” Journal of Pragmatics 84: 121–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norrby, Catrin, Camilla Wide, Jenny Nilsson, and Jan Lindström. 2015b. “Address and Interpersonal Relationships in Finland-Swedish and Sweden-Swedish Service Encounters.” In Address Practice as Social Action. European Perspectives, ed. by Catrin Norrby, and Camilla Wide, 75–96. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ottesjö, Cajsa, and Jan Lindström. 2005. “ Så som diskursmarkör [ Så as a discourse marker].” Språk och stil 15: 85–127.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reuter, Mikael. 1992. “Swedish as a Pluricentric Language.” In Pluricentric Languages. Different Norms in Different Nations, ed. by Michael Clyne, 101–116. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni. 2012. “Bilateral and Unilateral requests: The Use of Imperatives and Mi X? Interrogatives in Italian.” Discourse Processes 49: 426–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothstein, Björn. 2010. “Mood in Swedish.” In Mood in the Languages of Europe, ed. by Björn Rothstein, and Rolf Thieroff, 71–84. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruusuvuori, Johanna. 2000. Control in the Medical Consultation. Practices of Giving and Receiving the Reason for the Visit in Primary Health Care. Acta Electronica Universitatis Tamperensis 16. Tampere: University of Tampere.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saari, Mirja. 1995. “’Jo, nu kunde vi festa nog’. Synpunkter på svenskt språkbruk i Sverige och Finland [On the use of Swedish language in Sweden and Finland].” Folkmålsstudier 36: 75–108.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saari, Mirja, and Hanna Lehti-Eklund. 2016. “The Swedish Nu. A Historical Perspective.” In “Nu” and “Na”: A Family of Discourse Markers across the Languages of Europe and Beyond, ed. by Peter Auer, and Yael Maschler. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Statistics Finland. 2015. Population Structure 2014. Helsinki: Statistics Finland. ([URL])
Statistics Sweden. 2015. Population Statistics. Statistics Sweden, Stockholm. ([URL])
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig. 2011. “Knowledge, Morality and Affiliation in Social Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 3–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teleman, Ulf, Staffan Hellberg, and Erik Andersson. 1999. Svenska Akademiens grammatik. Vol. 4. Stockholm: Svenska Akademien.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wide, Camilla, and Benjamin Lyngfelt. 2009. “Svenskan i Finland, grammatiken och konstruktionerna” [Swedish in Finland, the grammar and the constructions]. In Konstruktioner i finlandssvensk syntax. Skriftspråk, samtal och dialekter, ed. by Camilla Wide, and Benjamin Lyngfelt, 11–43. Helsinki: Svenska litteratursällskapet i Finland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wirdenäs, Karolina, and Catrin Norrby. 2001. “En diskurspartikel vardande? Lite om lite [A discourse particle in the making? A bit about a bit ].” Språk & stil 11: 211–234.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Kannisto, Antti, Samu Pehkonen & Maria Frick
2025.  Ole hyvä (‘please’) + imperative. Interactional Linguistics 5:1-2 ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Barron, Anne
2021. Contrastivity and comparability: pragmatic variation across pluricentric varieties. Sociolinguistica 35:1 ► pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Lindström, Jan, Camilla Lindholm, Inga-Lill Grahn & Martina Huhtamäki
2020. Consecutive clause combinations in instructing activities. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32], ► pp. 245 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue