Cover not available

In:Temporality in Interaction
Edited by Arnulf Deppermann and Susanne Günthner
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 27] 2015
► pp. 173–200

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Grammar, projection and turn-organization

il y a NP ‘there is NP’ as project construction in French talk-in-interaction

ORCiD logo with link
Published online: 20 March 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.27.06pek
This paper contributes to the debate over the temporal and emergent nature of grammar. Focusing on projection as a basis for clause-combining and the organization of actions, the paper explores speakers’ use of the French construction il y a NP ‘there is NP’, commonly considered to be part of a presentational cleft. The analysis of audio and video recorded social interactions provides evidence for the routinization of the il y a NP piece as a projector construction and documents its involvement in the management of multi-unit turns, turn-taking and sequence organization. Multimodal analysis shows how the projection emanating from the grammatical construction is prolonged by means of gesture. Results are discussed in the light of the emergent character of grammar.
References (52)
Auer, Peter. 2005. “Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar.” Text 25 (1): 7–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Syntax als Prozess.” In Gespräch als Prozess. Linguistische Aspekte der Zeitlichkeit verbaler Interaktion, ed. by Heiko Hausendorf, 95–142. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Online Syntax: Thoughts on the Temporality of Spoken Language.” Language Sciences 31: 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Avanzi, Mathieu. 2011. L’interface prosodie/syntaxe en Français. Dislocations, incises et asyndètes. Neuchâtel University: Unpublished PhD Thesis .
Berrendonner, Alain. 2003. “Grammaire de l’écrit vs. grammaire de l’oral: le jeu des composantes micro- et macro-syntaxiques.” In Interactions orales et contexte didactique, ed. by Alain Rabatel, 249–264. Lyon: Presses Universitaires.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “L’alternance que / #. Subordination sans marqueur ou structure périodique?” In Modèles syntaxiques, ed. by Dan Van Raemdonck, 279–298. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire. 1989. “Constructions verbales ‘en incise’ et rection faible des verbes.” RSFP 9: 53–73.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste Claire, et al. 1990. Le Français parlé. Études grammaticales. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire. 2000. Approches de la langue parlée en Français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cappeau, Paul and Deulofeu, José. 2001. “Partition et topicalisation: il y en a ‘stabilisateur’ de sujets et de topiques indéfinis.” Cahiers de Praxématique 37: 45–82.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Sandra A. Thompson. 2008. “On Assessing Situations and Events in Conversation: ‘Extraposition’ and its Relatives.” Discourse Studies 10 (4): 443–467. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delahunty, Gerald S. 2012. “An Analysis of the thing is that S Sentences”. Pragmatics 22.1: 41–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1996. “Interactional Units in Conversation: Syntactic, Intonational and Pragmatic Resources for the Projection of Turn Completon.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 135–184. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gadet, Françoise. 1992. Le Français populaire. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne. 2006. “‘Was ihn trieb, war vor allem Wanderlust’ (Hesse: Narziss und Goldmund): Pseudocleft-Konstruktionen im Deutschen.” In Konstruktionen in der Interaktion, ed. by Susanne Günthner and Wolfgang Imo, 59–90. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008a. “Projektorkonstruktionen im Gespräch: Pseudoclefts, die Sache ist-Konstruktionen und Extrapositionen mit es .” Gesprächsforschung 9, 86–114. URL: [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008b. “Die ‘die Sache/das Ding ist’ – Konstruktion im gesprochenen Deutsch – eine interaktionale Perspektive auf Konstruktionen im Gebrauch.” In Konstruktionsgrammatik II. Von der Konstruktion zur Grammatik, ed. by Anatol Stefanowitsch and Kerstin Fischer, 157–178. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne and Paul J. Hopper. 2010. “Zeitlichkeit und sprachliche Strukturen: Pseudoclefts im Englischen und Deutschen.” Gesprächsforschung 11: 1–28. URL: [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne. 2011. “Between Emergence and Sedimentation. Projecting Constructions in German Interactions.” In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, ed. by Peter Auer and Stephan Pfänder, 156–185. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1979. “The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 97–121. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. “Transparent Vision.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 370–404. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “Time in Action.” Current Anthropology 43, Supplement, Aug.–Oct. 2002, 19–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto. 2004. “Projection and Grammar: Notes on the ‘Action-Projecting’ Use of the Distal Demonstrative are in Japanese.” Journal of Pragmatics 36 (8): 1337–1374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1987. “Emergent Grammar.” Berkeley Linguistics Society 13: 139–157.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. “Grammatical Constructions and their Discourse Origins: Prototype or Family Resemblance?” In Applied Cognitive Linguistics I: Theory and Language Acquisition, ed. by Martin Pütz, Susanne Niemeier, and René Dirven, 109–129. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Emergent Grammar and Temporality in Interactional Linguistics.” In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, ed. by Peter Auer and Stephan Pfänder, 22–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “The Openness of Grammatical Constructions.” Chicago Linguistic Society 40: 153–175.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. and Sandra A. Thompson. 2008. “Projectability and Clause Combining in Interaction.” In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining, ed. by Ritva Laury, 99–123. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003 [1993]. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horlacher, Anne-Sylvie and Simona Pekarek Doehler. 2014. “‘Pivotage’ in French Talk-in-Interaction: On the Emergent Nature of [Clause-NP-Clause] Pivots.” Pragmatics 24 (3): 593–622. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1972. “Side Sequences.” In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow, 294–338. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jullien, Stéphane. 2007. “Prosodic, Syntactic and Semantico-Pragmatic Parameters as Clues for Projection: the Case of «il y a».” Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française 28: 283–297.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Syntaxe et dialogue. Les configurations syntaxiques en ‘il y a’. Neuchâtel University: Unpublished PhD thesis.
Lambrecht, Knud. 1986. “Pragmatically Motivated Syntax: Presentational Cleft Constructions in Spoken French.” Chicago Linguistic Society 22 (2): 115–126.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene H. 1991. “On the Syntax of Sentences-in-Progress.” Language in Society 20: 441–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas. 1997. “News Delivery Sequences: Good News and Bad News in Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 30 (2): 93–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2007. “Multimodal Resources for Turn-Taking: Pointing and the Emergence of Possible next Speakers.” Discourse Studies 9 (2): 194–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona. 2011a. “Clause-Combining and the Sequencing of Actions: Projector Constructions in French Conversation.” In Subordination in Conversation: a Crosslinguistic Perspective, ed. by Ritva Laury and Royko Suzuki, 103–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. “Emergent Grammar for all Practical Purposes: The Online Formating of Dislocated Constructions in French Conversation.” In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, ed. by Peter Auer and Stephan Pfänder, 46–88. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona and Anne-Sylvie Horlacher. 2013. “The Patching Together of Pivot-Patterns in Talk-in-Interaction: On ‘Double Dislocations’ in French.” Journal of Pragmatics 53: 92–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2004. “Prompting Action: The Stand-Alone ‘so’ in Ordinary Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 37 (2): 185–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. 2 vols. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emmanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking in Conversation.” Language 50: 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1984. “On Some Gestures’ Relation to Talk.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 266–298. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Harvey Sacks. 1973. “Opening up Closings.” Semiotica 8 (3): 289–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen. 1995. “‘On projection’.” In Social Intelligence and Interaction, ed. by Esther N. Goody, 87–110. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2005. “The Clause as a Locus of Grammar and Interaction.” Discourse Studies 7 (4–5): 481–505. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2015. Grammar and Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions. Cambridge: CUP.
Valli, André. 1981. “Note sur les Constructions Dites ‘Pseudo-Clivées’ en Français.” Recherches sur le Français Parlé 3: 195–211.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Deppermann, Arnulf, Lorenza Mondada & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2021. Early Responses: An Introduction. Discourse Processes 58:4 ► pp. 293 ff. DOI logo
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, Yael Maschler, Leelo Keevallik & Jan Lindström
2020. Complex syntax-in-interaction. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Polak-Yitzhaki, Hilla
2020. Emergent patterns of predicative clauses in spoken Hebrew discourse. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32], ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2015. Time and Emergence in Grammar [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 28], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue