In:Units of Talk – Units of Action
Edited by Beatrice Szczepek Reed and Geoffrey Raymond
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 25] 2013
► pp. 207–242
When ‘yes’ is not enough – as an answer to a yes/no question
Published online: 22 October 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.25.07ste
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.25.07ste
This article investigates confirming answers to yes/no questions that consist of more than the type-conforming ‘yes’ token. The study is based on 160 cases of question-answer sequences with confirming answers, taken from a corpus of Danish interactions. The authors claim that certain actions, which are carried out as yes/no questions, demand a response unit that consists of ‘yes’ plus an elaboration. The actions that have this far-reaching projection are: (1) expansion-eliciting questions, (2) knowledge discrepancy questions, and (3) specification requests. The authors found no simple relationship between syntax and action. Some of the actions that demand more than a ‘yes’ can be carried out with both interrogative and declarative syntax, whereas others are done only interrogatively. Keywords: yes/no questions; responses; confirmations; elaborations
Cited by (27)
Cited by 27 other publications
König, Katharina & Martin Pfeiffer
König, Katharina, Martin Pfeiffer & Kathrin Weber
Steensig, Jakob
2025. Grammatical formats of requests for immediate actions. In Grammar in Action [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 37], ► pp. 78 ff.
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice & Marina Cantarutti
2024. Turn continuation in yeah/no
responding turns. In New Perspectives in Interactional Linguistic Research [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 36], ► pp. 73 ff.
Szojka, Zsofia A. & Thomas D. Lyon
Bolden, Galina B., John Heritage & Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2023. Introduction. In Responding to Polar Questions across Languages and Contexts [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 35], ► pp. 1 ff.
Harjunpää, Katariina & Ana Cristina Ostermann
2023. Responding to polar questions in Brazilian Portuguese. In Responding to Polar Questions across Languages and Contexts [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 35], ► pp. 76 ff.
Hayano, Kaoru & Makoto Hayashi
2023. Post-confirmation modifications. In Responding to Polar Questions across Languages and Contexts [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 35], ► pp. 272 ff.
Alvanoudi, Angeliki
2022. Polar answers and epistemic stance in Greek conversation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Ozerov, Pavel
Ozerov, Pavel
Deppermann, Arnulf & Alexandra Gubina
Drake, Veronika
2021. Alternative questions and their responses in English interaction. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 31:1 ► pp. 62 ff.
Gubina, Alexandra & Emma Betz
Reddington, Elizabeth, Ignasi Clemente, Hansun Zhang Waring & Di Yu
2021. “Doing being collegial”. In Questioning and Answering Practices across Contexts and Cultures [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 323], ► pp. 257 ff.
Helmer, Henrike & Jörg Zinken
Kurhila, Salla & Inkeri Lehtimaja
Pizarro Pedraza, Andrea
Heinemann, Trine & Jakob Steensig
2018. Justifying departures from progressivity. In Between turn and sequence [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 31], ► pp. 445 ff.
Zhang Waring, Hansun, Elizabeth Reddington, Di Yu & Ignasi Clemente
Heinemann, Trine
Rasmussen, Gitte
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice & Rasmus Persson
Enfield, N. J. & Jack Sidnell
Steensig, Jakob & Trine Heinemann
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
