Article published In: Investigating Understudied Sign Languages - Croatian SL and Austrian SL, with comparison to American SL
Edited by Ronnie B. Wilbur
[Sign Language & Linguistics 9:1/2] 2006
► pp. 5–32
What does the study of signed languages tell us about ‘language’?
Published online: 25 April 2007
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.9.1.04wil
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.9.1.04wil
Linguists focusing on what all languages have in common seek to identify universals, tendencies, and other patterns to construct a general model of human language, Universal Grammar (UG). The design features of this model are that it must account for linguistic universals, account for linguistic diversity, and account for language learnability.
Sign languages contribute to the construction of this model by providing a new source of data, permitting the claims and assumptions of UG to be rigorously tested and modified. One result of this research has been that the notion of ‘language’ itself has been clarified, clearly separating it from speech. It has also been possible to identify the design features of ‘natural languages’ themselves, and then to explain why pedagogical signing systems are not natural languages. This paper provides an overview of these issues.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Othman, Achraf
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.