Cover not available

Article published In: Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 28:2 (2025) ► pp.183–207

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB

Development of aspect in children’s narrations in German Sign Language

ORCiD logo with link | University of Education Freiburg
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

This article was made Open Access under a CC BY 4.0 license through payment of an APC by the Publication Fund of the University of Education Freiburg.

Published online: 8 August 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.24017.kol
Abstract
Aspectual verb modifications have hardly been considered in acquisition research of sign languages. I present new findings from German Sign Language (DGS) based on the data from the largest study to date on sign language development of children in DGS. The data consists of narrations by 72 native signing children, aged 4–11 years, elicited with the language-free stimulus video of the German Sign Language Production Test — Narrative Competences (NaKom DGS). The statistical analysis is based on a Generalized Additive Model, estimating nonlinear regression lines, which allow the visual representation of language development. In this study, aspectual verb modifications for continuatives, iteratives, and conatives are analyzed by changes in the movement parameter. Aspectual verb modifications occur in the elicited DGS narratives of children from the age of 4;8. Up to the age of 10;2 years, the data shows strong development with an increasing production frequency in the children’s narratives. The different types of aspectual verb modifications seem to develop divergingly. The results suggest that in DGS, the aspectual verb modifications conatives and iteratives are produced earlier and more frequently.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Aspectual verb modifications and their acquisition in sign languages
    • 2.1Aspectual verb modifications in sign languages
    • 2.2Aspectual verb modifications in DGS
    • 2.3Acquisition research
  • 3.Study design and focus
    • 3.1Aspectual verb modifications focused in this study
    • 3.2Data set
    • 3.3Analytical approach
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (43)
References
Barch, Deanna M. & Tal Yarkoni. 2013. Introduction to the special issue on reliability and replication in cognitive and affective neuroscience research, Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 131. 687–689.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Binnick, Robert I. 1991. Time and the verb: A guide to tense and aspect. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Da Silva, Lídia. 2010. Investigando a categoria aspectual na aquisição da língua brasileira de sinais. Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina MA thesis.
De Swart, Henriëtte. 2012. Verbal aspect. In Robert I. Binnick (ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, 752–780. Oxford: Oxford University Press..Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dikyuva, Hasan. 2011. Grammatical non-manual expressions in Turkish Sign Language. Preston, UK: University of Central Lancashire MA thesis.
Enns, Charlotte, Vera Kolbe & Claudia Becker. 2021. Challenges and solutions in test adaptation: Comparing international experiences with the British Sign Language Production Test (Narrative Skills). Sign Language & Linguistics 24(2), 226–258.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fahrmeir, Ludwig, Thomas Kneib & Stefan Lang. 2009. Regression: Modelle, Methoden und Anwendungen. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filip, Hana. 2011. Aspectual class and Aktionsart. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, 1186–1217. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Lexical aspect. In Robert I. Binnick. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, 721–751. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Finau, Rossana. 2004. Os sinais de tempo e aspecto na LIBRAS. Curitiba: Universidade Federal do Paraná PhD dissertation.
. 2020. Tense and aspect system description for Brazilian Sign Language. In Ronice Müller de Quadros (ed.), Brazilian Sign Language studies, 53–82. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gray, Michael. 2012. Aspect marking in Australian Sign Language. Sydney: Macquairie University PhD dissertation.
Happ, Daniela & Marc-Oliver Vorköper. 2006. Deutsche Gebärdensprache Ein Lehr- und Arbeitsbuch. Frankfurt: Fachhochschulverlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hastie, Trevor & Robert Tibshirani. 1990. Generalized additive models. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herman, Rosalind, Nicola Grove, Sallie Holmes, Gary Morgan, Hillary Sutherland & Bencie Woll. 2004. Assessing British Sign Language development: BSL production test (narrative skills). London: City University Publication.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirschauer, Norbert, Oliver Mußhoff, Sven Grüner, Ulrich Frey, Insa Theesfeld & Peter Wagner. 2016. Die Interpretation des p-Wertes — Grundsätzliche Missverständnisse. Journal of Economics and Statistics 236(5). 557–575.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoiting, Nini & Dan I. Slobin. 2001. Typological and modality constraints on borrowing: Examples from the Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign languages. A cross-linguistic investigation of word formation, 121–137. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnston, Trevor & Adam Schembri. 2007. Australian Sign Language. An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnston, Trevor. 2008. The AUSLAN archive and corpus. In David J. Nathan (ed.), The Endangered Languages Archive. London: University of London. Available online at [URL]
Jones, Kelvyn & Simon Almond. 1992. Moving out of the linear rut: the possibilities of Generalized Additive Models. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 171. 434–447.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karabüklü, Serpil & Ronnie B. Wilbur. 2021. Marking various aspects in Turkish Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 24(2). 182–225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klima, Edward & Ursula Bellugi. 1979. The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kolbe, Vera. 2023. Sprachproduktionstest zu narrativen Kompetenzen in Deutscher Gebärdensprache (NaKom DGS) — eine Testadaption. Berlin: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin PhD dissertatoin.
Kolbe, Vera & Claudia Becker. 2023. NaKom DGS — Sprachproduktionstest zu narrativen Kompetenzen in Deutscher Gebärdensprache. Berlin: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott. 1984. Unrealized inceptive aspect in American Sign Language: feature insertion in syllabic frames. In Joseph Drogo, Veena Mishra & David Testen (eds.), Papers from the 20th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 257–270. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oomen, Marloes. 2016. The marking of two aspectual distinctions in Sign Languages of the Netherlands (NGT). Linguistics in Amsterdam 9(2), 30–55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palfreyman, Nicholas. 2015. Sign language varieties of Indonesia: a linguistic and sociolinguistic investigation. Preston, UK: University of Central Lancashire PhD dissertation.
Papaspyrou, Chrissostomos, Alexander von Meyenn, Michaela Matthaei & Bettina Herrmann. 2008. Grammatik der Deutschen Gebärdensprache aus der Sicht gehörloser Fachleute. Seedorf: Signum Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll. 2012. Tense, aspect, and modality. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: an international handbook, 186–204. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quer, Josep, Carlo Cecchetto, Caterina Donati, Carlo Geraci, Meltem Kelepir, Pfau Roland & Markus Steinbach, (eds.) 2017. SignGram blueprint. A guide to sign language grammar writing. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statsistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rathmann, Christian. 2005. Event structure in American Sign Language. Austin, TX: University of Texas PhD dissertation.
RStudio Team. 2018. RStudio: Integrated development for R. Boston, MA: RStudio, PBC.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwager, Waldemar. 2012. Morphologie: Bildung und Modifikation von Gebärden. In Hanna Eichmann, Martje Hansen & Jens Heßmann (eds.), Handbuch Deutsche Gebärdensprache: sprachwissenschaftliche und anwendungsbezogene Perspektiven. Seedorf: Signum-Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simmons, Joseph P., Leif D. Nelson & Uri Simonsohn. 2012. A 21 word solution. In Dialogue. SSRN.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simms, Laurene, Sharon Baker & Diane M. Clark. 2013. The standardized visual communication and sign language checklist for signing children. Sign Language Studies 141. 101–124.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilbourn, Makeba Parramore & Marianella Casasola. 2007. Discriminating signs: Perceptual precursors to acquiring a visual-gestural language. Infant Behavior and Development 30(1). 153–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wood, Simon N. 2017a. Generalized Additive Models: An introduction with R. New York: Chapman and Hall. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017b. R-package mgcv. [URL]
Zeshan, Ulrike. 2003. Aspects of Türk İşaret Dili (Turkish Sign Language). Sign Language & Linguistics 6(1). 43–75.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue