Article published In: Sign Language & Linguistics: Online-First Articles
Intersubjective modulation of exophoric demonstratives in ASL
Published online: 2 December 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.24015.tan
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.24015.tan
Abstract
Demonstratives are essential for coordinating joint attention during discourse. In contrast to spoken languages
that typically distribute the work of establishing and maintaining joint attention across two or more demonstratives such as
this and that in English, American Sign Language (ASL) does not have contrasting forms. ASL relies almost exclusively
on pointing signs for the grammatical functions of demonstratives. This study investigates whether exophoric demonstrative points
are modulated with nonmanual markers (NMMs) in response to different contexts of use. 455 demonstrative points were elicited in a
puzzle completion task completed by ten ASL signers. Conditional inference trees were used to evaluate the effects of distance,
intersubjective alignment and referent specificity on the NMMs produced with the demonstrative points. The results indicate that
signers signal increasing distance from their body with an arc movement of the hand, as well as head and body leans, whereas NMMs
on the face were associated with intersubjective functions. Contrary to our hypotheses, we found no NMMs associated with the need
for greater specificity of demonstrative points when multiple potential referents were in the field of view.
Keywords: demonstratives, pointing, nonmanual markers, intersubjectivity, ASL
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Demonstratives across modalities
- 2.1Demonstratives in spoken languages
- 2.2Demonstratives in signed languages
- 3.Method
- 3.1Participants
- 3.2Materials and procedure
- 3.3Coding
- 4.Results
- 4.1Analysis
- 4.2Findings
- 4.2.1Condition #1: Distance
- 4.2.2Condition #2: Intersubjective alignment
- 4.2.3Condition #3: Specificity
- 5.Discussion
- 5.1Proximal pointing is “unmarked”
- 5.2Distal pointing profiles trajectory
- 5.3Mouth morphemes participate in negotiating intersubjective alignment
- 5.4ASL as a single-demonstrative language
- 5.5Limitations
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (53)
Anderson, Stephen R. & Edward L. Keenan. 1985. Deixis. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language
typology and syntactic
description, Vol. 31, 259–308. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bahan, Benjamin, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin & Carol Neidle. 1995. Convergent
evidence for the structure of determiner phrases in American Sign
Language. In Leslie Gabriele, Debra Hardison & Robert Westmoreland (eds.), Proceedings
of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Mid-America. Volume 2: Syntax II &
semantics/pragmatics, 1–12. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Bernaisch, Tobias, Stefan T. Gries & Joybrato Mukherjee. 2014. The
dative alternation in South Asian English(es): Modelling predictors and predicting
prototypes. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of
English 35(1). 7–31.
Bickford, J. Albert & Kathy Fraychineaud. 2008. Mouth
morphemes in ASL: A closer look. In Ronice M. de Quadros (ed.), Sign
languages: spinning and unraveling the past, present and future. Forty five papers and three posters from the 9th Theoretical
Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR) Conference, Florianopolis, Brazil, December
2006, 32–47. Petropolis, Brazil: Editora Arara Azul.
Birdsong, David, Libby M. Gertken & Mark Amengual. 2012, January 20. Bilingual
language profile: an easy-to-use instrument to assess bilingualism. ([URL]) (Accessed 2024-1-23)
Chee, Melvatha L. & Tamara Yazzie. 2023. Child-produced
demonstratives in Diné Bizaad. Paper presented at the Workshop on
American Indigenous Languages, Santa Barbara, CA.
Cooperrider, Kensy. 2016. The
co-organization of demonstratives and pointing gestures. Discourse
Processes 53(8). 632–656.
Cooperrider, Kensy & Kate Mesh. 2023. Pointing
in gesture and sign. In Aliyah Morgenstern & Susan Goldin-Meadow (eds.), Gesture
in language: development across the
lifespan, 21–46. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Cormier, Kearsy, Adam Schembri & Bencie Woll. 2013. Pronouns
and pointing in sign
languages. Lingua 1371. 230–247.
Crasborn, Onno, Els van der Kooij, Dafydd Waters, Bencie Woll & Johanna Mesch. 2008. Frequency
distribution and spreading behavior of different types of mouth actions in three sign
languages. Sign Language &
Linguistics 11(1). 45–67.
Dachkovsky, Svetlana. 2020. From
a demonstrative to a relative clause marker: Grammaticalization of pointing signs in Israeli Sign
Language. Sign Language &
Linguistics 23(1–2). 142–170.
Dachkovsky, Svetlana & Wendy Sandler. 2009. Visual
intonation in the prosody of a sign language. Language and
Speech 52(2–3). 287–314.
Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives:
Form, function, and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2006. Demonstratives,
joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive
Linguistics 17(4). 463–489.
. 2013. Distance
contrasts in demonstratives (v2020.4). In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The
world atlas of language structures online. Zenodo. Retrieved
from [URL]
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 2003. From
pointing to reference and predication: Orientation in Danish Sign
Language. In Sotaro Kita (ed.), Pointing:
Where language, culture, and cognition
meet, 269–292. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fenlon, Jordan, Kensy Cooperrider, Jon Keane, Diane Brentari & Susan Goldin-Meadow. 2019. Comparing
sign language and gesture: Insights from pointing. Glossa: A Journal of General
Linguistics 4(1).
Hochgesang, Julie A., Onno Crasborn & Diane Lillo-Martin. 2025. ASL
Signbank. New Haven, CT: Haskins Lab, Yale University. Retrieved from [URL]
Hoffmeister, Robert. 1978. The
development of demonstrative pronouns, locatives and personal pronouns in the acquisition of American Sign Language by deaf
children of deaf parents. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota PhD dissertation.
Hothorn, Torsten, Kurt Hornik & Achim Zeileis. 2006. Unbiased
recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and
Graphical
Statistics 15(3). 651–674.
Hothorn, Torsten & Achim Zeileis. 2015. partykit:
A modular toolkit for recursive partytioning in R. Journal of Machine Learning
Research 161. 3905–3909.
Hoza, Jack. 2008. Five
nonmanual modifiers that mitigate requests and rejections in American Sign Language. Sign
Language
Studies 8(3). 264–288.
Irani, Ava. 2019. On
(in)definite expressions in American Sign Language. In Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Julia Pozas Loyo & Violeta Vázquez-Rojas Maldonado (eds.), Definiteness
across languages. Zenodo.
Janzen, Terry. 1999. The
grammaticization of topics in American Sign Language. Studies in
Language 23(2). 271–306.
Koulidobrova, Elena & Diane Lillo-Martin. 2016. A
‘point’ of inquiry: The case of the (non-) pronominal ix in
ASL. In Patrick Grosz & Pritty Patel-Grosz (eds.), The
impact of pronominal form on
interpretation, 221–250. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Landis, J. Richard & Gary G. Koch. 1977. The
measurement of observer agreement for categorical
data. Biometrics 33(1). 159.
Levshina, Natalia. 2020. Conditional
inference trees and random forests. In Magali Paquot & Stefan T. Gries (eds.), A
practical handbook of corpus
linguistics, 611–643. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Liddell, Scott K. 1978. Nonmanual signals and relative
clauses in American Sign Language. In Patricia Siple (ed.), Understanding
language through sign language research, 59–90. New York: Academic Press.
1990. Four functions of a locus:
Reexamining the structure of space in ASL. In Ceil Lucas (ed.), Sign
language research: Theoretical
issues, 176–198. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Manrique, Elizabeth & Nick J. Enfield. 2015. Suspending
the next turn as a form of repair initiation: evidence from Argentine Sign Language. Frontiers
in Psychology 61. 1–21.
Meier, Richard P. & Diane Lillo-Martin. 2013. The
points of language. Humana Mente Journal of Philosophical
Studies 241. 151–176.
Morford, Jill P., Barbara Shaffer, Naomi Shin, Paul Twitchell & Bettie T. Petersen. 2019. An
exploratory study of ASL
demonstratives. Languages 4(4). 80.
Peeters, David, Zeynep Azar & Aslı Özyürek. 2014. The
interplay between joint attention, physical proximity, and pointing gesture in demonstrative
choice. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science
Society 1144–1149.
Peeters, David, Emiel Krahmer & Alfons Maes. 2021. A
conceptual framework for the study of demonstrative reference. Psychonomic Bulletin &
Review 28(2). 409–433.
Peeters, David & Aslı Özyürek. 2016. This
and that revisited: A social and multimodal approach to spatial
demonstratives. Frontiers in Psychology 71.
Pfau, Roland. 2011. A
point well taken. In Gaurav Mathur & Donna Jo Napoli (eds.), Deaf
around the
world, 144–163. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer. 2010. Nonmanuals:
Their grammatical and prosodic roles. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign
languages, 381–402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach. 2006. Modality-independent
and modality-specific aspects of grammaticalization in sign languages (Linguistics in
Potsdam
24). Potsdam: Universitäts-Verlag. Available
at [URL]
Piwek, Paul, Robbert-Jan Beun & Anita Cremers. 2008. ‘Proximal’
and ‘distal’ in language and cognition: Evidence from deictic demonstratives in Dutch. Journal
of
Pragmatics 40(4). 694–718.
Puupponen, Anna. 2019. Towards
understanding nonmanuality: A semiotic treatment of signers’ head movements. Glossa: A Journal
of General Linguistics 4(1).
Rubio-Fernandez, Paula, Madeleine Long & Aslı Özyürek. 2026. Spatial
and social cognition jointly determine multimodal demonstrative reference: Experimental evidence from Turkish and
Spanish. Cognition 2661. 106289.
Shin, Naomi, Luis Hinojosa-Cantú, Barbara Shaffer & Jill P. Morford. 2020. Demonstratives
as indicators of interactional focus: Spatial and social dimensions of Spanish esta and
esa. Cognitive
Linguistics 31(3). 485–514.
Shin, Naomi & Sarah Lease. 2025. Conceptual
transfer: The impact of addressee location on Spanish-English bilinguals’ nominal
demonstratives. Acta Linguistica
Academica 72(3). 356–385.
Siyavoshi, Sara. 2019. Hands
and faces: The expression of modality in ZEI, Iranian Sign Language. Cognitive
Linguistics 30(4). 655–686.
Skilton, Amalia. 2021. Demonstratives
and visibility: Data from Ticuna and implications for theories of
deixis. Language 97(4). 793–824.
Smith, Cheri, Ella Mae Lentz & Ken Mikos. 2008. Signing
naturally: Student workbook, units 1–6. San Diego, California: DawnSignPress.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & R. Harald Baayen. 2012. Models,
forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical
practice. Language Variation and
Change 24(2). 135–178.
Tankersley, Devin. 2018. Cross-modality
learning and pronoun interpretation: A case study of Taiwan Sign Language. Hsinchu, Taiwan: National Tsing Hua University PhD dissertation.
Twitchell, Paul. 2023. Deictic
pointing and demonstrative usage in American Sign
Language. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico PhD dissertation.
Wilcox, Sherman & Corrine Occhino. 2016. Constructing
signs: Place as a symbolic structure in signed languages. Cognitive
Linguistics 27(3). 371–404.
Zhang, Niina Ning. 2007. Universal 20 and Taiwan Sign
Language. Sign Language &
Linguistics 10(1). 55–81.