Cover not available

Article published In: Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 27:2 (2024) ► pp.209–239

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Syntax and semantics of Role Shift in Japanese Sign Language

ORCiD logo with link | Tokyo Women’s Christian University
Published online: 10 October 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.22008.kaw
Abstract
This article argues that Role Shift in Japanese Sign Language involves a mechanism that is different in two respects from indexical shift observed in some spoken languages. First, its domain is not a clausal domain (CP or IP), but the thematic (propositional) domain, in which thematic roles are assigned. Second, what is shifted by this mechanism is not indexicals, but the objective Point-of-View from which the reported event is perceived. These characteristics apply to both Action Role Shift and Quotational Role Shift. It is claimed that Quotational Role Shift is a subcase of Action Role Shift where the thematic domain contains a predicate of propositional attitude. The attitude predicate takes a CP complement which in turn contains another operator. This second operator is the same as that found in some spoken languages, and it shifts the context for the interpretation of indexicals. The proposed analysis thus employs two types of operators, one taking the thematic domain as its scope and the other operating on the clausal domain. The analysis can be extended to account for crosslinguistic variation reported on the shifted interpretation of locative/temporal expressions in sign languages.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Two domains of syntactic structure of sentences
    • 2.2Simplex sentences in NS
    • 2.3The signer’s gaze
  • 3.Syntactic domain of Role Shift
  • 4.Indexicals vs. POV
  • 5.Inside the domain of Role Shift
    • 5.1Possible values of the Point-of-View
    • 5.2De se expressions in Action Role Shift
  • 6.Indexical shift in Quotational Role Shift
    • 6.1Indexicals in NS
    • 6.2Indexicals that do not shift
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (42)
References
Anand, Pranav & Andrew Nevins. 2004. Shifty operators in changing contexts. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) XIV1. 20–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aristodemo, Valentina, Beatrice Giustolisi, Giorgia Zorzi, Doriane Gras, Charlotte Hauser, Rita Sala, Jordina Sánchez Amat, Caterina Donati & Carlo Cecchetto. 2022. On the nature of role shift: Insights from a comprehension study in different populations of LIS, LSC and LSF signers. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 411. 459–500. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, T. Daniel Seely, Robert C. Berwick, Sandiway Fong, M. A. C. Huybregts, Hisatsugu Kitahara, Andrew McInnerney & Yushi Sugimoto. 2023. Merge and the Strong Minimalist Thesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Published online: . Accessed on November 25, 2023].
Davidson, Donald. 1967. The logical form of action sentences. In Donald Davidson. 2001. Essays on actions and events (2nd edition), 105–122. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, Kathryn. 2015. Quotation, demonstration, and iconicity. Linguistics and Philosophy 38(6). 477–520. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deal, Amy Rose. 2020. Theory of indexical shift. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1995. Point of view expressed through shifters. In Karen Emmorey & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 133–154. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Perspective in signed discourse: The privileged status of the signer’s locus and gaze. Open Linguistics 2015(1). 411–431. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farkas, Donka. 1992. On the semantics of subjunctive complements. In Paul Hirschbühler & Konrad Koerner (eds.), Romance languages and modern linguistic theory, 69–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gan, Linghui Eva. 2021. Shifted indexicals in Hong Kong Sign Language with(-out) role shift. Formal and Experimental Advances in Sign Language Theory (FEAST) 51. 74–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herrmann, Annika & Markus Steinbach. 2012. Quotation in sign languages: A visible context shift. In Isabelle Buchstaller & Ingrid van Alphen (eds.), Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives, 203–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Higginbotham, James. 1985. On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16(4). 547–593.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. On events in linguistic semantics. In James Higginbotham, Fabio Pianesi & Achille C. Varzi (eds.), Speaking of events, 49–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ichida, Yasuhiro. 2005. Shuwa-no gengogaku 7. Hanashite-no shintai-to shisen. (Linguistics of sign language 7. The signer’s body and gaze). Gekkan Gengo 34(7). 92–99.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1979. Attitudes de dicto and de se. The Philosophical Review 88(4). 513–543. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1995. The point of view predicate in American Sign Language. In Karen Emmorey & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 155–170. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Utterance reports and constructed action. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 365–387. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane & Ronice Müller de Quadros. 2011. Acquisition of syntax-discourse interface: The expression of point of view. Lingua 1211. 623–636. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandel, Mark. 1977. Iconic devices in American Sign Language. In Lynn A. Friedman (ed.), On the other hand: New perspectives on American Sign Language, 57–107. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maier, Emar. 2018. Quotation, demonstration, and attraction in sign language role shift. Theoretical Linguistics 44(3–4). 265–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meier, Richard P. 1990. Person deixis in American Sign Language. In Susan D. Fischer & Patricia Siple (eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research, Volume 1: Linguistics, 175–190. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll. 2012. Tense, aspect, and modality. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 186–204. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poulin, Christine & Christopher Miller. 1995. On narrative discourse and point of view in Quebec Sign Language. In Karen Emmorey & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 117–131. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pyers, Jennie E. & Ann Senghas. 2007. Reported action in Nicaraguan and American Sign Languages: Emerging versus established systems. In Pamela M. Perniss, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Visible variation: Comparative studies on sign language structure, 279–302. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quer, Josep. 2005. Context shift and indexical variables in sign languages. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) XV1. 152–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Reporting and quoting in signed discourse. In Elke Brendel, Jörg Meibauer & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Understanding quotation, 277–302. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. On categorizing types of role shift in sign languages. Theoretical Linguistics 441. 277–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quer, Josep, Carlo Cecchetto, Caterina Donati, Carlo Geraci, Meltem Kelepir, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach (eds.) 2017. SignGram blueprint: A guide to sign language grammar writing. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton (open access at [URL]).
Ross, John Robert. 1970. On declarative sentences. In Roderic A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, 222–277. Waltham, MA: Ginn and Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin. 2006. Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe. 2003. A plea for monsters. Linguistics & Philosophy 261. 29–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Super monsters I: Attitude and action role shift in sign language. Semantics and Pragmatics 101 (Article 9).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sells, Peter. 1987. Aspects of logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry 18(3). 445–479.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret. 2004. Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features. Lingua 1141. 255–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret & Carol Tenny. 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Anna Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), Asymmetry in grammar: Volume 1: Syntax and semantics, 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 1999. Context and content. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steinbach, Markus. 2021. Role shift: Theoretical perspectives. In Josep Quer, Roland Pfau & Annika Herrmann (eds.), The Routledge handbook of theoretical and experimental sign language research, 351–377. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sudo, Yasutada. 2012. On the semantics of phi features on pronouns. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD dissertation.
Sutton-Spence, Rachel & Bencie Woll. 1999. The linguistics of British Sign Language: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wechsler, Stephen. 2010. What ‘you’ and ‘I’ mean to each other: Person indexicals, self-ascription, and theory of mind. Language 86(2). 332–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zucchi, Sandro. 2004. Monsters in the visual mode? Manuscript, Università degli Studi di Milano.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
video

Video - Example 1

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue