Cover not available

Article published In: Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 25:1 (2022) ► pp.58–91

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

On question words in Czech Sign Language

 | Masaryk UniversityBrno | Charles UniversityPrague
Published online: 10 May 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.21001.str
Abstract
This paper investigates content questions and the paradigm of question words in Czech Sign Language (český znakový jazyk – ČZJ). While this topic has been investigated for a fair number of other sign languages, a comprehensive study for ČZJ is still missing. Our aim is to fill this gap. In the absence of a representative corpus for ČZJ, we use data from the most extensive electronic dictionary database (Dictio), developed at the Masaryk University. 2020. Dictio: Multilingual online dictionary. Available at [URL] in Brno. We offer a basic description of the ČZJ interrogative strategies for content questions. In doing so, we also situate the language within the typology of sign language interrogatives: we classify ČZJ as a language with a rich paradigm of question words, and we identify the basic syntactic position of question words as sentence-final. Furthermore, we outline three morphological types of ČZJ question words: simple, complex, and derived.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data and methodology
    • 2.1The Dictio platform
    • 2.2Sessions with the consultant
  • 3.Basic facts about content questions in ČZJ
    • 3.1Sentential position of question words
    • 3.2Question word paradigm
  • 4.Morphological types of ČZJ question words
    • 4.1Simple question words
    • 4.2Complex question words
    • 4.3Derived question words
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (44)
References
Abner, Natasha. 2011. Wh-words that go bump in the right. In Mary Byram Washburn, Katherine McKinney Bock, Erika Varis, Ann Sawyer & Barbara Tomaszewicz (eds.), Proceedings of West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 281, 24–32. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aboh, Enoch, Roland Pfau & Ulrike Zeshan. 2005. When a wh-word is not a wh-word: The case of Indian Sign Language. In Tanmoy Bhattacharya (ed.), The yearbook of South Asian languages and linguistics, 11–43. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir & Wendy Sandler. 2005. The paradox of sign language morphology. Language 81(2). 301–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Wendy Sandler. 2004. Morphological universals and the sign language type. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology, 19–39. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Battison, Robin. 1978. Lexical borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring: Linstok Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brennan, Mary. 1990. Word formation in British Sign Language. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane & Carol Padden. 2001. Native and foreign vocabulary in American Sign Language: A language with multiple origins. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign languages: A cross-linguistic investigation of word formation, 87–119. Mehwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane & Petra Eccarius. 2010. Handshape contrasts in sign language phonology. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages, 284–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo. 2012. Sentence types. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 292–315. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Position of interrogative phrases in content questions. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at [URL], accessed on 2021-08-10.
Feist, Timothy Richard. 2011. A grammar of Skolt Saami. Manchester: University of Manchester PhD dissertation.
Fischer, Susan & Yutaka Osugi. 1998. Feature movement in wh-questions: Evidence from sign languages. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Washington, DC.
Fischer, Susan. 2006. Questions and negation in American Sign Language. In Ulrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 70–90. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Galloway, Teresa. 2012. Distinguishing correlatives from internally headed relative clauses in ASL. Paper presented at Semantics of Under-represented Languages 7, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Hronová, Anna. 2002. Poznáváme český znakový jazyk 3 (tázací věty). Specialní pedagogika 12(2). 113–123.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karlík, Petr & Roland Meyer. 2017. Tázací zájmeno. In Petr Karlík, Marek Nekula & Jana Pleskalová (eds.), CzechEncy – Nový encyklopedický slovník češtiny. Brno: Masaryk University. Available at [URL], accessed on 2021-8-27.
Klima, Edward & Ursula Bellugi. 1979. The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kubuş, Okan. 2010. Relative clause constructions in Turkish Sign Language. Poster presented at Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Lepic, Ryan. 2015. Motivation in morphology: Lexical patterns in ASL and English. San Diego, CA: University of California PhD dissertation.
Liddell, Scott & Robert Johnson. 1986. American Sign Language compound formation processes, lexicalization, and phonological remnants. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 4(4). 445–513. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandel, Mark. 1981. Phonotactics and morphophonology in American Sign Language. Berkeley, CA: University of California PhD dissertation.
Masaryk University. 2020. Dictio: Multilingual online dictionary. Available at [URL]
McKee, Rachel. 2006. Aspects of interrogatives and negation in New Zealand Sign Language. In Ulrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 70–90. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meir, Irit, Mark Aronoff, Wendy Sandler & Carol Padden. 2010. Sign languages and compounding. In Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding, 301–322. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgan, Michael. 2006. Interrogatives and negatives in Japanese Sign Language (JSL). In Ulrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 91–127. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padden, Carol. 1998. The ASL lexicon. Sign Language & Linguistics, 1(1). 39–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petronio, Karen & Diane Lillo-Martin. 1997. Wh-movement and the position of Spec CP: evidence from American Sign Language. Language 731. 18–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland, & Josep Quer. 2010. Nonmanuals: their grammatical and prosodic roles. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages, 381–402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland. 2016. Morphology. In Anne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde, Roland Pfau & Trude Schermer (eds.), The linguistics of sign languages. An introduction, 197–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pospíšilová, Marie. 2012. Tázací výrazy v českém znakovém jazyce. Prague: Charles University BA thesis.
Quadros, Ronice Müller de. 2003. Phrase structure of Brazilian Sign Language. In Anne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde & Onno Crasborn (eds.), Crosslinguistic perspectives in sign language research. Selected papers from TISLR 2000, 141–162. Hamburg: Signum Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Questions in Brazilian Sign Language (LSB). In Ulrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 270–283. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quer, Josep, Carlo Cecchetto, Caterina Donati, Carlo Geraci, Meltem Kelepir, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach (eds.). 2017. SignGram blueprint: A guide to sign language grammar writing. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin. 2006. Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 1989. Phonological representation of the sign: linearity and non-linearity in American Sign Language. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Santoro, Mirko. 2018. Compounds in sign languages: The case of Italian and French Sign Language. Paris: School of Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences PhD dissertation.
Spencer, Andrew. 2016. Two morphologies or one?: Inflection versus word-formation. In Andrew Hippisley & Gregory Stump (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology, 27–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Herreweghe, Mieke & Myriam Vermeerbergen. 2006. Interrogatives and negatives in Flemish Sign Language. In Ulrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 70–90. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vlášková, Lucia & Hana Strachoňová. 2021. Sign language lexicography: a case study of an online dictionary. Slovenščina 2.0: Empirical, Applied and Interdisciplinary Research 9(1). 90–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1996. Evidence for the function and structure of wh-clefts in American Sign Language. In William H. Edmondson & Ronnie B. Wilbur (eds.), International review of sign linguistics, 209–256. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike. 2002. Towards a notion of ‘word’ in sign languages. In Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Word: A cross-linguistic typology, 153–179. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Interrogative constructions in signed languages: Crosslinguistic perspectives. Language 80(1). 7–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (ed.) 2006a. Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages. Nijmegen: Ishara Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006b. Negative and interrogative structures in Turkish Sign Language (TİD). In Ulrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 128–164. Nijmegen: Ishara Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue