Cover not available

Article published In: Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 20:1 (2017) ► pp.1–26

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Describing spatial layouts as an L2M2 signed language learner

 | NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
 | NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Published online: 6 November 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.20.1.01fer
Abstract
This study explores the L2M2 acquisition of Norwegian Sign Language by hearing adults, with a focus on the production and use of depicting signs. A group of students and their instructors were asked to respond to prompt questions about directions and locations in Norwegian Sign Language, and their responses were then compared. An examination of the students’ depicting signs shows that they struggled more with the phonological parameters orientation and movement, rather than with handshape. In addition, they used fewer depicting signs than their instructors, and instead relied more on lexical signs. Finally, students were found to struggle with the coordination of depicting signs within the signing space and in relation to their own bodies. It is hoped that the findings from this study can be used to inform future research as well as curricula development and pedagogy.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.L2M2 signed language acquisition and depicting signs
    • 2.1L2M2 acquisition of lexical signs
    • 2.2Depicting signs
    • 2.3L2M2 acquisition of depicting signs
    • 2.4Summary of research as impetus for the current study
  • 3.Methods
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Data elicitation and collection
    • 3.3Annotation
  • 4.Depicting signs across the instructor and student data
    • 4.1General findings
      • 4.1.1Difficulty answering the questions and general indeterminacy in the student data
      • 4.1.2Distribution of sign types and depicting sign subtypes for both groups
    • 4.2Non-target phonology in the students’ depicting signs
    • 4.3Depicting signs vs. alternatives
    • 4.4The coordination of signs in the signing space and in relation to each other
      • 4.4.1Placing signs in the signing space
      • 4.4.2Coordinating and positioning the hands in relation to each other
  • 5.Learning to make sense with depicting signs during L2M2 acquisition
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (47)
References
Alberdi, Lourdes Calle, Lorraine Leeson & Marinella Salami. 2013. Learning outcomes for graduates of a three-year interpreting training programme. Bedfordshire, Great Britain: European Forum of Sign Language Interpreters & EU Lifelong Learning Programme. [URL] [accessed 23 February 2017].
Baus, Cristina, Manuel Carreiras & Karen Emmorey. 2013. When does iconicity in sign language matter? Language and Cognitive Processes 28(3). 261–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beuzeville, Louise de. 2006. Visual and linguistic representation in the acquisition of depicting verbs: a study of native signing deaf children of Auslan (Australian Sign Language). Newcastle, Australia: University of Newcastle PhD dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad. 2011. Corpus linguistics and grammar teaching. Available from [URL] [accessed 23 February 2017].
Bochner, Joseph H., Karen Christie, Peter C. Hauser & J. Matt Searls. 2011. When is a difference really different? Learners’ discrimination of linguistic contrasts in American Sign Language. Language Learning 61(4). 1302–1327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers-Visker, Eveline & Beppie van den Bogaerde. 2015. Use of space in five L2 learners of Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT). Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Sign Language Acquisition , Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bogaerde, Beppie van den & Anne Baker. 2005. Code mixing in mother-child interaction in deaf families. Sign Language & Linguistics 8(1/2). 151–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyes Braem, Penny. 1990. Acquisition of the handshape in American Sign Language: A preliminary analysis. In Virginia Volterra & Carol Erting (eds.), From gesture to language in hearing and deaf children, 107–127. Berlin: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen Pichler, Deborah. 2011. Sources of handshape error in first-time signers of ASL. In Donna Jo Napoli & Gaurav Mathur (eds.), Deaf around the world, 96–121. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cormier, Kearsy, David Quinto-Pozos, Zed Sevcikova & Adam Schembri. 2012. Lexicalisation and de-lexicalisation processes in sign languages: Comparing depicting constructions and viewpoint gestures. Language and Communication 32(4). 329–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crasborn, Onno & Han Sloetjes. 2008. Enhanced ELAN functionality for sign language corpora. In Onno Crasborn, Eleni Efthimiou, Thomas Hanke, Ernst D. Thoutenhoofd & Inge Zwitserlood (eds.), The third workshop on the representation and processing of sign languages: Construction and exploitation of sign language corpora [a workshop given at the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 26 May – 1 June 2008, Marrakech, Morocco], 39–43. Paris: European Language Resources Association. Retrieved from [URL] [accessed 23 February 2017].
Cresdee, Donovan & Trevor Johnston. 2014. Using corpus-based research to inform the teaching of Auslan (Australian Sign Language) as a second language. In David McKee, Russell S. Rosen & Rachel McKee (eds.), Teaching and learning signed languages: International perspectives and practices, 85–110. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuxac, Christian. 1999. The expression of spatial relations and the spatialization of semantic representations in French Sign Language. In Catherine Fuchs & Stéphan Robert (eds.), Language diversity and cognitive representations, 123–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen, Barbara Tversky & Holly Taylor. 2000. Using space to describe space: Perspective in speech, sign, and gesture. Spatial Cognition and Computation 2(3). 157–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferrara, Lindsay. In preparation. Multimodal coherence: Eye gaze and body orientation in the depiction of locations and spatial relations by L2M2 signers of Norwegian Sign Language.
Forus, Anne. 2012. Genetiske årsaker til medfødt døvhet (Nyheter-Doktoravhandlinger). [Genetic reasons for congenital deafness (News-PhD dissertations)]. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening 211. 132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuller, Donald R. & Ronnie B. Wilbur. 1987. The effect of visual metaphor cueing on recall of phonologically similar signs. Sign Language Studies 541(Spring). 59–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilger, Allison I., Torrey M. J. Loucks, David Quinto-Pozos & Matthew W. G. Dye. 2015. Second language acquisition across modalities: Production variability in adult L2 learners of American Sign Language. Second Language Research 31(3). 375–388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoemann, Harry W. & Linda S. Blama. 1992. Memory span for signs & digits forward & backward in beginning level ASL students. Sign Language Studies 761(Fall). 277–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoemann, Harry W. & Catherine M. Keske. 1994. Proactive interference & language change in hearing adult students of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 861(Spring). 45–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janzen, Terry. 2012. Lexicalization and grammaticalization. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign Languages: An international handbook, 816–481. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnston, Trevor. 2016. Auslan corpus annotation guidelines. Manuscript. Macquarie University. Sydney. Retrieved from [URL] [accessed 23 February 2017].
Johnston, Trevor & Lindsay Ferrara. 2012. Lexicalization in signed languages: When an idiom is not an idiom. Selected Papers from UK-CLA Meetings, 11. 229–248. [URL]
Johnston, Trevor & Adam Schembri. 1999. On defining lexeme in a signed language. Sign Language & Linguistics 2(2). 115–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Australian Sign Language: An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Variation, lexicalization and grammaticalization in signed languages. Langage et Société 1311(March). 19–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klima, Edward & Ursula Bellugi. 1979. The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leeson, Lorraine, Lourdes Calle Alberdi & Sarah Brown. 2013. Assessment guidelines for sign language interpreting training programmes. Madrid, Spain: European Forum of Sign Language Interpreters & EU Lifelong Learning Programme. [URL] [accessed 23 February 2017].
Liddell, Scott K. 2003. Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lupton, Linda K. & Macalyne Fristoe. 1992. Sign vocabulary recognition in students of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 761(Fall). 215–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marshall, Chloë R. & Gary Morgan. 2014. From gesture to sign language: Conventionalization of classifier constructions by adult hearing learners of British Sign Language. Topics in Cognitive Science. 1–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McIntire, Marina L. & Judy S. Reilly. 1988. Nonmanual behaviors in L1 & L2 learners of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 611(Winter). 351–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKee, David, Russell S. Rosen & Rachel McKee (eds.). 2014. Teaching and learning signed languages. International perspectives and practices. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mills, Carol Bergfeld. 1984. Factors influencing manual sign learning in hearing adults. Sign Language Studies 441(Fall). 261–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mills, Carol Bergfeld & Linda J. Weldon. 1983. Effects of semantic and cheremic context on acquisition of manual signs. Memory & Cognition 11(1). 93–100. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mirus, Gene, Christian Rathmann & Richard Meier. 2001. Proximilization and distalization of sign movement in adult learners. In Valerie Dively, Melanie Metzger, Sarah Taub & Anne Marie Baer (eds.), Signed languages: Discoveries from international research, 103–119. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgan, Gary & Bencie Woll (eds.). 2002. Directions in sign language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nilsson, Anna-Lena & Lindsay Ferrara. 2015. Depicting from experience: Learning to give directions in space. Paper presented at the 5th Conference of the Scandinavian Association for Language and Cognition (SALC V) , NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
. 2016. Meaningful use of space: Easy or hard for hearing L2 learners? Poster presented at Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research 12 , La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega, Gerardo & Gary Morgan. 2015. Phonological development in hearing learners of a sign language: The influence of phonological parameters, sign complexity, and iconicity. Language Learning 65(3). 660–688. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perniss, Pamela, Inge Zwitserlood & Aslı Özyürek. 2015. Does space structure spatial language?: A comparison of spatial expression across sign languages. Language 91(3), 611–641. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petitto, Laura Anne & Paula F. Marentette. 1991. Babbling in the manual mode: Evidence for the ontogeny of language. Science 2511. 1483–1496. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosen, Russell S. 2004. Beginning L2 production errors in ASL lexical phonology. Sign Language & Linguistics 7(1). 31–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schembri, Adam, Caroline Jones & Denis Burnham. 2005. Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: Evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and nonsigners’ gestures without speech. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10(3). 272–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Supalla, Ted. 2003. Revisiting visual analogy in ASL classifier predicates. In Emmorey, Karen (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages, 249–257. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Willoughby, Louisa, Stephanie Linder, Kirsten Ellis & Julie Fisher. 2015. Errors and feedback in the beginner Auslan classroom. Sign Language Studies 15(3). 322–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwitserlood, Inge, Pamela Perniss & Aslı Özyürek. 2012. An empirical investigation of the expression of multiple entities in Turkish Sign Language (TİD): Considering the effects of modality. Lingua 1221. 1636–1667. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (23)

Cited by 23 other publications

Pontecorvo, Elana, Julie Mitchiner & Amy M. Lieberman
2025. Hearing parents as sign language learners: describing and evaluating the ASL skills of parents learning ASL with their deaf children. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 46:10 ► pp. 3695 ff. DOI logo
Woll, Bencie
2025. Second Language Acquisition of Sign Language. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Boers-Visker, Eveline
2024. On the acquisition of complex classifier constructions by L2 learners of a sign language. Language Teaching Research 28:2 ► pp. 749 ff. DOI logo
Boers‐Visker, Eveline
2023. The Acquisition of Strategies to Express Plurality in Hearing Second Language Learners of Sign Language of the Netherlands. Language Learning 73:S1 ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Holmström, Ingela, Krister Schönström & Magnus Ryttervik
2024. Development of a Sign Repetition Task for Novice L2 Signers. Language Assessment Quarterly 21:1 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Nunn, Nicola
2024. Exploring positional and dimensional aspects of topographic space for advanced-level British Sign Language learners. Sign Language & Linguistics 27:2 ► pp. 168 ff. DOI logo
Ferrara, Lindsay, Benjamin Anible & Lena Mei Kalvenes Anda
2023. Exploring sign-writing contact and multilingualism in the Norwegian Deaf community. In Advances in Sign Language Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 108], ► pp. 66 ff. DOI logo
Kurz, Kim B., Geo Kartheiser & Peter C. Hauser
2023. Second language learning of depiction in a different modality: The case of sign language acquisition. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
Rosen, Russell S. & David Quinto‐Pozos
2023. Introduction to the Special Issue: Learning Sign Languages as Additional Languages: Considering Language‐ and Modality‐Specific Factors. Language Learning 73:S1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Gulamani, Sannah, Chloë Marshall & Gary Morgan
2022. The challenges of viewpoint-taking when learning a sign language: Data from the ‘frog story’ in British Sign Language. Second Language Research 38:1 ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Loos, Cornelia, Austin German & Richard P. Meier
2022. Simultaneous structures in sign languages: Acquisition and emergence. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Schönström, Krister & Ingela Holmström
2022. L2M1 and L2M2 Acquisition of Sign Lexicon: The Impact of Multimodality on the Sign Second Language Acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Schönström, Krister & Chloë Marshall
2022. SLA2. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 13:2 ► pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Schönström, Krister & Chloë Marshall
2022. « SLA2 » . Language, Interaction and Acquisition 13:2 ► pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Schönström, Krister & Johanna Mesch
2022. Second language acquisition of depicting signs. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 13:2 ► pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Frederiksen, Anne Therese
2021. Emerging ASL Distinctions in Sign-Speech Bilinguals' Signs and Co-speech Gestures in Placement Descriptions. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Mesch, Johanna & Krister Schönström
2021. Use and acquisition of mouth actions in L2 sign language learners. Sign Language & Linguistics 24:1 ► pp. 36 ff. DOI logo
Schönström, Krister
2021. Sign languages and second language acquisition research: An introduction. Journal of the European Second Language Association 5:1 ► pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
BOERS–VISKER, EVELINE & ROLAND PFAU
2020. Space Oddities: The Acquisition of Agreement Verbs by L2 Learners of Sign Language of the Netherlands. The Modern Language Journal 104:4 ► pp. 757 ff. DOI logo
Perniss, Pamela, David Vinson & Gabriella Vigliocco
2020. Making Sense of the Hands and Mouth: The Role of “Secondary” Cues to Meaning in British Sign Language and English. Cognitive Science 44:7 DOI logo
Ferrara, Lindsay
2019. Coordinating signs and eye gaze in the depiction of directions and spatial scenes by fluent and L2 signers of Norwegian Sign Language. Spatial Cognition & Computation 19:3 ► pp. 220 ff. DOI logo
Kurz, Kim B., Kellie Mullaney & Corrine Occhino
2019. Constructed Action in American Sign Language: A Look at Second Language Learners in a Second Modality. Languages 4:4 ► pp. 90 ff. DOI logo
Nilsson, Anna-Lena
2018. Expressing time through space. Translation and Interpreting Studies 13:1 ► pp. 6 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue