Cover not available

Article published In: Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 24:2 (2021) ► pp.143–181

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Single-parameter and parameter combination errors in L2 productions of Swiss German Sign Language

 | University of Zurich
 | University of Teacher Education in Special Needs (HfH)Zurich
 | University of Teacher Education in Special Needs (HfH)Zurich
 | University of Teacher Education in Special Needs (HfH)Zurich
 | Center for Sign Language Research Basel
Published online: 2 July 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.19002.ebl
Abstract
This article presents a study of errors made by hearing adult L2 learners of Swiss German Sign Language (Deutschschweizerische Gebärdensprache, DSGS). As part of a statistical analysis of single-parameter errors, movement was found to be the parameter most susceptible to errors, followed by location, orientation, and handshape. An analysis of production errors with respect to combinations of manual parameters was also conducted, something that previously has not been undertaken. The parameter combination most frequently involved in errors was movement with location. Possible aspects contributing to the higher error rate for movement are suggested, among which are the inherent complexity of the movement parameter. Finally, the article discusses factors influencing the judgment of errors.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous work
    • 2.1Accuracy of production of phonological parameters by L2 signers
    • 2.2Definitions of error
      • 2.2.1Errors in sign languages
      • 2.2.2Errors in spoken languages
    • 2.3Erroneous features of phonological parameters by L2 signers
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Participant recruitment
    • 3.2Selection of lexical items
    • 3.3Preparation of stimulus materials
    • 3.4Testing procedure
    • 3.5Transcription and annotation
      • 3.5.1Definition of error
      • 3.5.2Category of sign produced and joint confidence in the decision
      • 3.5.3Identification of parameters contributing to phonological errors
    • 3.6Statistical analyses
      • 3.6.1Single-parameter errors
      • 3.6.2Parameter combination errors
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Statistical analyses of results
      • 4.1.1Single-parameter errors
      • 4.1.2Parameter combination errors
      • 4.1.3Degree of contribution of each parameter to the judgment of error
    • 4.2Movement errors
      • 4.2.1Phonological features involved in movement errors
      • 4.2.2Difficulties of the movement parameter
        • 4.2.2.1Complexity of the movement parameter
        • 4.2.2.2Especially marked movements
        • 4.2.2.3Direction of horizontal circling movements
        • 4.2.2.4L2 learners’ tendency to proximalize the movement
    • 4.3Movement+location errors
      • 4.3.1Perceptual salience
      • 4.3.2Adding or dropping body contact
    • 4.4Other factors influencing results
      • 4.4.1Judging L1 vs. L2 productions
      • 4.4.2Breadth of knowledge of lexical items on the part of raters
      • 4.4.3Degree of experience with teaching and/or researching sign language
  • 5.Concluding remarks and outlook
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (46)
References
Arendsen, Jeroen. 2009. Seeing signs. On the appearance of manual movements in gestures. Delft: Delft University of Technology PhD dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baus, Cristina, Eva Gutiérrez & Manuel Carreiras. 2014. The role of syllables in sign language production. Frontiers in Psychology 5(1254). 1–7. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bochner, Joseph, Karen Christie & Peter Hauser. 2011. When is a difference really different? Learners’ discrimination of linguistic contrasts in American Sign Language. Language Learning 61(4). 1328–1354. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004a,b / 2005a,b. Linguistischer Kommentar. Gebärdensprachkurs Deutschschweiz, Stufen 1, 2, 3, and 4. Zürich: SGB-FSS. CD-ROMs.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chaudron, Craig. 1988. Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen Pichler, Deborah. 2009. Sign production in first-time hearing signers: A closer look at handshape accuracy. Cadernos de Saúde 2 (Número especial: Línguas gestuais). 37–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Sources of handshape error in first-time signers of ASL. In Donna Jo Napoli & Gaurav Mathur (eds.), Deaf around the world, 96–121. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen Pichler, Deborah & Elena Koulidobrova. 2016. Acquisition of sign language as a second language (L2). In Mark Marschark & Patricia Spencer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Deaf studies in language, 218–230. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen Pichler, Deborah, Martin Watkins, Danica Dicus & Sadi Dudley. 2016. Refining coding criteria for phonological accuracy of L2 signing. TISLR12 (Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research), Melbourne, Australia, 4–7 January.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, Jacob. 1992. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112(1). 155–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conlin, Kimberly, Gene R. Mirus, Claude Mauk & Richard P. Meier. 2000. The acquisition of first signs: Place, handshape, and movement. In Charlene Chamberlain, Jill P. Morford & Rachel I. Mayberry (eds.), Language acquisition by eye, 51–69. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cormier, Kearsy, Jordan Fenlon, Trevor Johnston, Ramas Rentelis, Adam Schembri, Katherine Rowley, Robert Adam, & Bencie Woll. 2012. From Corpus to Lexical Database to Online Dictionary: Issues in Annotation of the BSL Corpus and the Development of BSL Signbank. Proceedings of the 5th LREC Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages, Istanbul, Turkey. 7–12.
Cull, Amber. 2014. Production of movement in users of American Sign Language and its influence on being identified as “non-native”. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2009. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dye, Matthew W. G. & Shui-I Shih. 2006. Phonological priming in British Sign Language. In Louis M. Goldstein, D. H. Whalen & Catherine T. Best (eds.), Laboratory phonology, 241–263. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ebling, Sarah, Necati Cihan Camgöz, Penny Boyes Braem, Katja Tissi, Sandra Sidler-Miserez, Stephanie Stoll, Simon Hadfield, Tobias Haug, Richard Bowden, Sandrine Tornay, Marzieh Razavi & Mathew Magimai-Doss. 2018. SMILE Swiss German Sign Language Dataset. Proceedings of the 11th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2018). Miyazaki, Japan. 4221–4229.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Efthimiou, Eleni, Stavroula-Evita Fotinea, Christian Vogler, Thomas Hanke, John Glauert, Richard Bowden, Annelies Braffort, Christophe Collect, Petros Maragos & Jérémie Segouat. 2009. Sign language recognition, generation and modelling: A research effort with applications in Deaf communication. In C. Stephanidis (ed.), Universal access in human-computer interaction, 21–30. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan. 2013. Statistics for linguistics with R: A practical introduction (2nd edition) Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, Matthew L., Victor S. Ferreira & Rachel I. Mayberry. 2012. Phonological similarity judgments in ASL: Evidence for maturational constraints on phonetic perception in sign. Sign Language & Linguistics 15(1). 104–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanke, Thomas. 2017. Wörterbuch ohne Wörter? Zum Entstehen eines Wörterbuches der Deutschen Gebärdensprache. In Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften (ed.), Jahrbuch der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften für 2016, 84–88. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanke, Thomas & Jakob Storz. 2008. iLex: A database tool for integrating sign language corpus linguistics and sign language lexicography. Proceedings of the 6th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC). Marrakech, Morocco. 64–67.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, Ursula & David Corina. 2002. Phonological similarity in American Sign Language. Language and Cognitive Processes 17(6). 593–612. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lupton, Linda & Howard Zelaznik. 1990. Motor learning in sign language students. Sign Language Studies 67(1). 153–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marentette, Paula F. & Rachel I. Mayberry. 2000. Principles for an emerging phonological system: A case study of early ASL acquisition. In Charlene Chamberlain, Jill P. Morford & Rachel I. Mayberry (eds.), Language acquisition by eye, 71–90. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayberry, Rachel I., Matthew L. Hall & Meghan Zvaigzne. 2014. Subjective frequency ratings for 432 ASL signs. Behavior Research Methods 46(2). 526–539. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meier, Richard, Claude Mauk, Gene Mirus & Kimberly E. Conlin. 1998. Motoric constraints on early sign acquisition. In Eve Clark (ed.), The proceedings of the 29th Annual Child Language Research Forum, 63–72. Chicago, IL: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mirus, Gene, Christian Rathmann & Richard P. Meier. 2001. Proximalization and distalization of sign movement in adult learners. In Valerie Dively, Melanie Metzger, Sarah Taub & Anne Marie Baer (eds.), Signed languages: Discoveries from international research, 103–119. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morford, Jill P. & Martina L. Carlson. 2011. Sign perception and recognition in non-native signers of ASL. Language Learning and Development 7(2). 149–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgan, Gary, Sarah Barrett-Jones & Helen Stoneham. 2007. The first signs of language: Phonological development in British Sign Language. Applied Psycholinguistics 28(1). 3–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo, Nathan C. Sanders & Rebecca Wright. 2014. On the linguistic effects of articulatory ease, with a focus on sign languages. Language 90(2). 424–456. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newell, Karl M. & P. Vernon McDonald. 1994. Learning to coordinate redundant biomechanical degrees of freedom. In Stephan Swinnen, Herbert Heuer, Jean Massion & Paul Caesar (eds.), Interlimb coordination: Neural, dynamical and cognitive constraints, 515–536. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1985. Variation and error: A sociolinguistic approach to language acquisition in Samoa. In Dan I. Slobin (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Volume 1: The data, 783–838. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega, Gerardo. 2013. Acquisition of a signed phonological system by hearing adults: The role of sign structure and iconicity. London: UCL PhD dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega, Gerardo & Gary Morgan. 2010. Comparing child and adult development of a visual phonological system. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 1(1). 67–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015a. Phonological development in hearing learners of a sign language: The influence of phonological parameters, sign complexity, and iconicity. Language Learning 65(3). 660–688. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015b. Phonological development in hearing learners of a sign language: The role of sign complexity and iconicity. Language Learning 65(3). 660–668. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prillwitz, Siegmund, Renata Leven, Horst Zienert, Thomas Hanke & Jan Henning. 1989. HamNoSys: Version 2.0: An introductory guide. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanders, Nathan & Donna Jo Napoli. 2016a. Reactive effort as a factor that shapes sign language lexicons. Language 92(2). 275–297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlehofer, Deirdre & Isaiah J. Tyler. 2016. Errors in second language learners’ production of phonological contrasts in American Sign Language. International Journal of Language and Linguistics 3(2). 30–38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siedlecki, Theodore Jr. & John D. Bonvillian. 1993. Location, handshape and movement: Young children’s acquisition of the formational aspects of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 781. 31–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vinson, David P., Kearsy Cormier, Tanja Denmark, Adam Schembri & Gabriella Vigliocco. 2008. The British Sign Language (BSL) norms for age of acquisition, familiarity, and iconicity. Behavior Research Methods 40(4). 1079–1087. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, Joshua & Sharlene Newman. 2016. Phonological substitution errors in L2 ASL sentence processing by hearing M2L2 learners. Sage Second Language Research 32(3). 347–366. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Willoughby, Louisa, Stephanie Linder, Kirsten Ellis & Julie Fisher. 2015. Errors and feedback in the beginner Auslan classroom. Sign Language Studies 15(3). 322–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Holmström, Ingela, Krister Schönström & Magnus Ryttervik
2024. Development of a Sign Repetition Task for Novice L2 Signers. Language Assessment Quarterly 21:1 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Pichler, Deborah Chen & Elena Koulidobrova
2023. The Role of Modality in L2 Learning: The Importance of Learners Acquiring a Second Sign Language (M2L2 and M1L2 Learners). Language Learning 73:S1 ► pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
Gu, Shengyun, Deborah Chen Pichler, L. Viola Kozak & Diane Lillo-Martin
2022. Phonological development in American Sign Language-signing children: Insights from pseudosign repetition tasks. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue