Cover not available

Article published In: Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 19:2 (2016) ► pp.285–291

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Motivation in morphology

Lexical patterns in ASL and English

 | University of California, San Diego
Published online: 14 April 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.19.2.08lep
References (23)
References
Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arndt-Lappe, Sabine & Ingo Plag. 2013. The role of prosodic structure in the formation of English blends. English Language and Linguistics 17(3). 537–563. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blevins, James P., Farrell Ackerman & Robert Malouf. 2016. Morphology as an adaptive discriminative system. In Heidi Harley & Daniel Siddiqi (eds.), Morphological metatheory, 271–302. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bochner, Harry. 1993. Simplicity in generative morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Morphology in construction grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 255–274. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Downing, Pamela. 1977. On the creation and use of English compound nouns. Language 53(4). 810–842. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 2013. Constructionist approaches. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 15–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization?: A look from its fringes and its components, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1975. Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language 511. 639–671. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne. 2007. Blendalicious. In Judith Manat (ed.), Lexical creativity, texts and contexts, 115–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lepic, Ryan. 2016a. The great ASL compound hoax. In Aubrey Healey, Ricardo Napoleão de Souza, Pavlína Pešková & Moses Allen (eds.), Proceedings of the 11th High Desert Linguistics Society Conference, 227–250. Available online: [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016b. Lexical blends and lexical patterns in English and in American Sign Language. In Jenny Audring, Francesca Masini & Wendy Sandler (eds.), Quo vadis morphology?: Online proceedings of the 10th Mediterranean Morphology Meeting, 98–111. Available online: [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. & Robert E. Johnson. 1989. American Sign Language: The phonological base. Sign Language Studies 1(64). 195–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padden, Carol A. 1998. The ASL lexicon. Sign Language & Linguistics 1(1). 39–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padden, Carol A. & Tom L. Humphries. 1988. Deaf in America: Voices from a culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stokoe, William. 1960. Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. Studies in Linguistics Occasional Papers 8. Buffalo: University of Buffalo Press [Re-issued 2005, Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10(1), 3-37].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Supalla, Ted. 1986. The classifier system in American Sign Language. In Colette Craig (ed.), Noun classes and categorization, 181–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tennant, Richard A. & Marianne Gluszak Brown. 2010. The American Sign Language handshape dictionary (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vercellotti, Mary Lou & David R. Mortensen. 2012. A classification of compounds in American Sign Language: An evaluation of the Bisetto and Scalise framework. Morphology 221. 545–579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilcox, Phyllis. 2000. Metaphor in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Morford, Jill P, Corrine Occhino, Megan Zirnstein, Judith F Kroll, Erin Wilkinson & Pilar Piñar
2019. What is the Source of Bilingual Cross-Language Activation in Deaf Bilinguals?. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 24:4 ► pp. 356 ff. DOI logo
Tkachman, Oksana & Irit Meir
2018. Novel compounding and the emergence of structure in two young sign languages. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue