Cover not available

Article published In: Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 19:2 (2016) ► pp.197–231

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

A cross-linguistic preference for torso stability in the lexicon

Evidence from 24 sign languages

 | Department of Linguistics, Haverford College
 | Department of Linguistics, Swarthmore College
Published online: 14 April 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.19.2.02san
When the arms move in certain ways, they can cause the torso to twist or rock. Such extraneous torso movement is undesirable, especially during sign language communication, when torso position may carry linguistic significance, so we expend effort to resist it when it is not intended. This so-called “reactive effort” has only recently been identified by Sanders and Napoli (2016), but their preliminary work on three genetically unrelated languages suggests that the effects of reactive effort can be observed cross-linguistically by examination of sign language lexicons. In particular, the frequency of different kinds of manual movements in the lexicon correlates with the amount of reactive effort needed to resist movement of the torso. Following this line of research, we present evidence from 24 sign languages confirming that there is a cross-linguistic preference for minimizing the reactive effort needed to keep the torso stable.
References (62)
References
Aarons, Debra, Benjamin Bahan, Judy Kegl & Carol Neidle. 1992. Clausal structure and a tier for grammatical marking in American Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 15(2). 103–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Wendy Sandler. 2008. The roots of linguistic organization in a new language. Interaction Studies 9(1). 133–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Avery, Gayle C. & Ross Henry Day. 1969. Basis of the horizontal-vertical illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology 81(2). 376–380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bellugi, Ursula. 1980. How signs express complex meanings. In Charlotte Baker & Robbin Battison (eds.), Sign language and the Deaf community: Essays in honor of William Stokoe, 53–74. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyes-Braem, Penny. 1999. Rhythmic temporal patterns in the signing of deaf early and late learners of Swiss German Sign Language. Language and Speech 42(2-3). 177–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane. 1998. A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane & Howard Poizner. 1994. A phonological analysis of a deaf Parkinsonian signer. Language and Cognitive Processes 9(1). 69–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crasborn, Onno. 2012. Phonetics. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 4–20. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crasborn, Onno & Els van der Kooij. 2003. Base joint configuration in Sign Language of the Netherlands: Phonetic variation and phonological specification. In Jeroen van de Weijer, Vincent J. van Heuven & Harry van der Hulst (eds.), The phonological spectrum. Volume 1: Segmental structure (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 233), 257–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dively, Valery. 2001. Signs without hands: Nonhanded signs in American Sign Language. In Valery Dively, Melanie Metzger, Sarah Taub & Ann Marie Baer (eds.), Signed languages: Discoveries from international research, 62–73. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen. 2002. Language, cognition, and the brain: Insights from sign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1995. Point of view expressed through shifters. In Karen Emmorey & Judy Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 133–154. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. From pointing to reference and predication: Pointing signs, eyegaze, and head and body orientation in Danish Sign Language. In Sotaro Kita (ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet, 269–292. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fenlon, Jordan, Kearsy Cormier & Adam Schembri. 2015. Building BSL SignBank: The lemma dilemma revisited. International Journal of Lexicography 28(2). 169–206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hooker, Christine I., Ken A. Paller, Darren R. Gitelman, Todd B. Parrish, M. Marsal Mesulam & Paul J. Reber. 2003. Brain networks for analyzing eye gaze. Cognitive Brain Research 17(2). 406–418. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnston, Trevor & Adam Schembri. 1999. On defining lexeme in a signed language. Sign Language & Linguistics 2(2). 115–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kawashima, Ryuta, Motoaki Sugiura, Takashi Kato, Akinori Nakamura, Kentaro Hatano, Kengo Ito, Hiroshi Fukuda, Shozo Kojima & Katsuki Nakamura. 1999. The human amygdala plays an important role in gaze monitoring. A PET study. Brain 122(4). 779–783. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kimura, Tadanao. 2002. Composition of psoas major muscle fibers compared among humans, orangutans, and monkeys. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie 83(2-3). 305–314.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirchner, Robert. 1998. An effort-based approach to lenition. Los Angeles, CA: University of California dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Consonant lenition. In Bruce Hayes, Robert Kirchner & Donca Steriade (eds.), Phonetically based phonology, 313–345. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klima, Edward & Ursula Bellugi,Robbin Battison, Penny Boyes-Braem, Susan Fischer, Nancy Frishberg, Harlan Lane, Ella Mae Lentz, Don Newkirk, Elisa Newport, Candy Pedersen & Patricia Siple. 1979. The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kobayashi, Hiromi & Shiro Kohshima. 2001. Unique morphology of the human eye and its adaptive meaning: Comparative studies on external morphology of the primate eye. Journal of Human Evolution 40(5). 419–435. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lovejoy, C. Owen. 1988. Evolution of human walking. Scientific American 259(5). 118–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mak, Joe & Gladys Tang. 2011. Movement types, repetition, and feature organization in Hong Kong Sign Language. In Rachel Channon & Harry van der Hulst (eds.), Formational units in sign languages, 315–338. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandel, Mark. 1979. Natural constraints in sign language phonology: Data from anatomy. Sign Language Studies 241. 215–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1981. Phonotactics and morphophonology in American Sign Language. Berkeley, CA: University of California dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mather, Susan A. 1987. Eye gaze and communication in a deaf classroom. Sign Language Studies 541. 11–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mauk, Claude E. 2003. Undershoot in two modalities: Evidence from fast speech and fast signing. Austin: University of Texas at Austin PhD dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKee, David & Graeme Kennedy. 2000. Lexical comparison of signs from American, Australian, British, and New Zealand Sign Languages. In Karen Emmorey & Harlan Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 49–76. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meier, Richard, Claude Mauk, Gene Mirus & Kimberly Conlin. 1998. Motoric constraints on early sign acquisition. In Eve Clark (ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-ninth Annual Child Language Research Forum, 63–72. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meier, Richard, Claude Mauk, Adrianne Cheek & Christopher Moreland. 2008. The form of children’s early signs: Iconic or motoric determinants? Language Learning and Development 4(1). 63–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mirus, Gene, Christian Rathmann & Richard Meier. 2001. Proximalization and distalization of sign movement in adult learners. In Valerie Dively, Melanie Metzger, Sarah Taub & Anne Marie Baer (eds.), Signed languages: Discoveries from international research, 103–119. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morris, John S., Monique deBonis & Raymond J. Dolan. 2002. Human amygdala responses to fearful eyes. Neuroimage 17(1). 214–222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo, Mark Mai & Nicholas Gaw. 2011. Primary movement in sign languages: A study of six languages. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo, Nathan Sanders & Becky Wright. 2014. On the linguistic effects of articulatory ease, with a focus on sign languages. Language 90(2). 424–456. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Benjamin Bahan, Debra Aarons & Dawn MacLaughlin. 1997. Rightward WH-movement in American Sign Language. In Dorothee Beermann, David LeBlanc & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.) Rightward movement (Linguistik Aktuell / Linguistics Today 17), 247–278. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Wendy Sandler. 1999. Prosody in Israeli Sign Language. Language and Speech 42(2-3). 143–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega, Gerardo & Gary Morgan. 2010. Comparing child and adult development of a visual phonological system. Language, Interaction and Acquisition/Langage, Interaction et Acquisition 1(1). 67–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padden, Carol & David Perlmutter. 1987. American Sign Language and the architecture of phonological theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5(3). 335–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer. 2010. Nonmanuals: Their grammatical and prosodic roles. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages (Cambridge Language Surveys), 381–402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pichler, Deborah Chen. 2011. Sources of handshape error in first-time signers of ASL. In Gaurav Mathur & Donna Jo Napoli (eds.), Deaf around the world: The impact of language, 96–121. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poizner, Howard, Diane Brentari, Martha E. Tyrone & Judy Kegl. 2000. The structure of language as motor behavior: Clues from signers with Parkinson’s disease. In Karen Emmorey & Harlan Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 432–452. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poulin, Christine & Christopher Miller. 1995. On narrative discourse and point of view in Quebec Sign Language. In Karen Emmorey & Judy Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 117–131. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Regan, David, Casper J. Erkelens & Han Collewijn. 1986. Necessary conditions for the perception of motion in depth. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 27(4). 584–597.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Regan, David & Suneeti Kaushal. 1994. Monocular discrimination of the direction of motion in depth. Visual Research 34(2). 163–177.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sallandre, Marie-Anne. 2003. Les unités du discours en Langue des Signes Française. Tentative de catégorisation dans le cadre d’une grammaire de l’iconicité. Paris: University of Paris 8 PhD dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Simultaneity in French Sign Language discourse. In Myriam Vermeerbergen, Lorraine Leeson & Onno Crasborn (eds.), Simultaneity in signed languages: Form and function, 103–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanders, Nathan & Donna Jo Napoli. 2016. Reactive effort as a factor that shapes sign language lexicons. Language 92(2). 275–297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Signing Savvy. 2016. [URL] (30 September, 2016.)
Smith, Marie L., Garrison W. Cottrell, Frederic Gosselin & Philippe G. Schyns. 2005. Transmitting and decoding facial expressions. Nature Neuroscience 16(3). 184–189.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer, Rebecca M.C., Richard B. Ivry, Daniel Cattaert & Andras Semjen. 2005. Bimanual coordination during rhythmic movements in the absence of somatosensory feedback. Journal of Neurophysiology 94(4). 2901–2910. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spreadthesign. 2012. [URL] (May–July, 2015). European Sign Language Centre.
Thompson, Robin, Karen Emmorey & Robert Kluender. 2006. The relationship between eye gaze and verb agreement in American Sign Language: An eye-tracking study. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24(2). 571–604. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael, Brian Hare, Hagen Lehmann & Josep Call. 2007. Reliance on head versus eyes in the gaze following of great apes and human infants: The cooperative eye hypothesis. Journal of Human Evolution 52(3). 314–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyrone, Martha E. 2012. Phonetics of sign location in ASL: Comments on papers by Russell, Wilkinson, & Janzen and by Grosvald & Corina. Journal of Laboratory Phonology 3(1). 61–70.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyrone, Martha E. & Claude E. Mauk. 2010. Sign lowering and phonetic reduction in American Sign Language. Journal of Phonetics 38(2). 317–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. The phonetics of head and body movement in the realization of American Sign Language signs. Phonetica 73(2). 120–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whalen, Paul J., Jerome Kagan, Robert G. Cook, F. Caroline Davis, Hackjin Kim, Sara Polis, Donald G. McLaren, Leah H. Somerville, Ashly A. McLean, Jeffrey S. Maxwell & Tom Johnstone. 2004. Human amygdala responsivity to masked fearful eye whites. Science 306(5704). 2061. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Witte, Hartmut F., Holger Preuschoft & Stephan Recknagel. 1991. Human body proportions explained on the basis of biomechanical principles. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie 78(3). 407–423.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woodward, James. 1978. Historical bases of American Sign Language. In Patricia Siple (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, 333–348. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Some observations on research methodology in lexicostatistical studies of sign languages. In Gaurav Mathur & Donna Jo Napoli (eds.), Deaf around the world: The impact of language, 38–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Napoli, Donna Jo & Nathan Sanders
2024. An approach to path movement in the diachronic study of sign languages. Diachronica DOI logo
Napoli, Donna Jo & Rachel Sutton-Spence
2023. The nature of torso articulation in human expression: signing and dancing. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 7:3 ► pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Napoli, Donna Jo & Rachel Sutton-Spence
2024. Torso articulation in sign languages. Sign Language & Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ebling, Sarah, Katja Tissi, Sandra Sidler-Miserez, Cheryl Schlumpf & Penny Boyes Braem
2021. Single-parameter and parameter combination errors in L2 productions of Swiss German Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 24:2 ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Loos, Cornelia & Donna Jo Napoli
2021. Expanding Echo: Coordinated Head Articulations as Nonmanual Enhancements in Sign Language Phonology. Cognitive Science 45:5 DOI logo
Brentari, Diane
2019. Sign Language Phonology, DOI logo
Ferrara, Casey & Donna Jo Napoli
2019. Manual Movement in Sign Languages: One Hand Versus Two in Communicating Shapes. Cognitive Science 43:9 DOI logo
Tkachman, Oksana, Kathleen Currie Hall, Robert Fuhrman & Yurika Aonuki
2019. Visible amplitude: Towards quantifying prominence in sign language. Journal of Phonetics 77 ► pp. 100935 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Italian Sign Language from a Cognitive and Socio-semiotic Perspective [Gesture Studies, 9], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue