Indirect object markers in Georgian Sign Language

Makharoblidze, Tamar

doi:10.1075/sll.18.2.03mak

Article published In: Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 18:2 (2015) ► pp.238–250

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download PDF

Indirect object markers in Georgian Sign Language

Tamar Makharoblidze | Ilia State University, Tbilisi

Published online: 4 February 2016

https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.18.2.03mak

This paper presents one of the first studies on Georgian Sign Language (gesl), a sign language that has not previously been taken into consideration in typological research on sign languages. We focus on three types of indirect object markers, that is, auxiliary-like elements that introduce an additional argument. We discuss four markers in total. Interestingly, three of these markers do not only introduce an argument but also come with additional semantics, namely respect, disrespect, and causation. It will further be shown that the presence of an indirect object marker frees the word order in the sentence.

Keywords: agreement, Georgian Sign Language, causation, indirect object, auxiliary, respect

References (19)

Chikobava, Arnold. 1950. Kartuli enis zogadi daxasiateba [A general characterization of the Georgian language]. KEGL, vol. I1, Tbilisi. Ed. by A. Chikobava. Tbilisi: Sakartvelos mecnierebata gamocemebi. 018–080.

Deeters, Gerhard. 1930. Das Kharthwelische Verbum. Vergleichende Darstellung des Verbalbaus der südkaukasischen Sprachen. Leipzig: Markert & Petters.

Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kavtaradze, Ivane. 1954. Zmnis žiritadi k’at’egoreibisatvis žvel kartulši [Concerning the general verbal categories in Old Georgian]. Tbilisi.

Lillo-Martin, Diane & Richard Meier. 2011. On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign language. Theoretical Linguistics 37(3/4). 95–141.

Makharoblidze, Tamar. 2012. Kartuli jest’uri ena [Georgian Sign Language]. Tbilisi: Ministry of Education and Science, USAID, Save the Children International.

Mathur, Gaurav & Christian Rathmann. 2012. Verb agreement. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 136–157. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Meir, Irit. 2002. A cross-modality perspective on verb agreement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 201. 413–450.

Padden, Carol. 1988. Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland.

Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach. 2013. person climbing up a tree (and other adventures in sign language grammaticalization). Sign Language & Linguistics 16(2). 189–221.

Quer, Josep. 2011. When agreeing to disagree is not enough: Further arguments for the linguistic status of sign language agreement. Theoretical Linguistics 37(3-4). 189–196.

Quer, Josep & Santiago Frigola. 2006. Crosslinguistic research and particular grammars: A case study on auxiliary predicates in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Paper presented at Workshop on cross-linguistic sign language research, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, January 2006.

Sapountzaki, Galini. 2012. Agreement auxiliaries. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 204–227. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

. 2005. Free functional elements of tense, aspect, modality and agreement as possible auxiliaries in Greek Sign Language. Bristol: University of Bristol dissertation.

Shanidze, Akaki. 1926. Kartulizmnissakcevi [Version of Georgian verb]. TSU Moambe. Vol. VI1. (With an abstract in French – Versions du verbe Géorgien). Tbilisi. 312–333.

. 1980 [1953]. Txzulebani tormet’ t’omad. t’omi III. kartuli enis gramatik’is sapužvlebi. Morpologia. [Works in 12 volumes. Vol III1. Basics of Georgian Grammar. Morphology].Tbilisi: TSU Press.

Steinbach, Markus. 2011. What do agreement auxiliaries reveal about the grammar of sign language agreement. Theoretical Linguistics 37(3/4). 209–221.

Steinbach, Markus & Roland Pfau. 2007. Grammaticalization of auxiliaries in sign languages. In Pamela Perniss, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Visible variation: Cross-linguistic studies on sign language structure, 303–339. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Wilbur, Ronnie B. 2013. The point of agreement: Changing how we think about sign language, gesture, and agreement. Sign Language & Linguistics 16(2). 221–258.

Cited by (24)

Cited by 24 other publications

Order by:

Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach

2023. Morphology in Sign Languages. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology, ► pp. 1 ff.

Makharoblidze, Tamar

2022. On verbal arguments in sign languages. enadakultura

Pfau, Roland, Tamar Makharoblidze & Hedde Zeijlstra

2022. Negation and Negative Concord in Georgian Sign Language. Frontiers in Psychology 13

Börstell, Carl

2019. Differential object marking in sign languages. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1

Kimmelman, Vadim

2018. Basic argument structure in Russian Sign Language. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1

Makharoblidze, Tamar & Roland Pfau

2018. A negation-tense interaction in Georgian Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 137 ff.

Baker, Anne

2016. Sign languages as natural languages. In The Linguistics of Sign Languages, ► pp. 1 ff.

Baker, Anne & Beppie van den Bogaerde

2016. Interaction and discourse. In The Linguistics of Sign Languages, ► pp. 73 ff.

Baker, Anne & Roland Pfau

2016. Constituents and word classes. In The Linguistics of Sign Languages, ► pp. 93 ff.

Baker, Anne, Beppie van den Bogaerde & Sonja Jansma

2016. Acquisition. In The Linguistics of Sign Languages, ► pp. 51 ff.

Anne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde, Roland Pfau & Trude Schermer

2016. The Linguistics of Sign Languages,

Baker, Anne E., Trude Schermer, Roland Pfau & Beppie van den Bogaerde

2016. Foreword. In The Linguistics of Sign Languages, ► pp. xiii ff.

Bogaerde, Beppie van den, Marjolein Buré & Connie Fortgens

2016. Bilingualism and deaf education. In The Linguistics of Sign Languages, ► pp. 325 ff.

Crasborn, Onno A.

2016. Phonetics. In The Linguistics of Sign Languages, ► pp. 229 ff.

Crasborn, Onno A.

2016. Phonetics. In The Linguistics of Sign Languages, ► pp. 229 ff.

Kooij, Els van der & Onno Crasborn

2016. Phonology. In The Linguistics of Sign Languages, ► pp. 251 ff.

Pfau, Roland

2016. Syntax: complex sentences. In The Linguistics of Sign Languages, ► pp. 149 ff.

Pfau, Roland

2016. Morphology. In The Linguistics of Sign Languages, ► pp. 197 ff.

Pfau, Roland & Heleen Bos

2016. Syntax: simple sentences. In The Linguistics of Sign Languages, ► pp. 117 ff.

Schermer, Trude

2016. Language variation and standardization. In The Linguistics of Sign Languages, ► pp. 279 ff.

Schermer, Trude

2016. Lexicon. In The Linguistics of Sign Languages, ► pp. 173 ff.

Schermer, Trude & Roland Pfau

2016. Language contact and change. In The Linguistics of Sign Languages, ► pp. 299 ff.

Schermer, Trude & Roland Pfau

2016. Psycholinguistics. In The Linguistics of Sign Languages, ► pp. 25 ff.

[no author supplied]

2016. Companion site. In The Linguistics of Sign Languages,

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.