Cover not available

Article published In: Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 17:2 (2014) ► pp.181–212

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Prosody in a communication system developed without a language model

 | University of Chicago
 | University of Connecticut
Published online: 24 November 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.17.2.02app
Prosody, the “music” of language, is an important aspect of all natural languages, spoken and signed. We ask here whether prosody is also robust across learning conditions. If a child were not exposed to a conventional language and had to construct his own communication system, would that system contain prosodic structure? We address this question by observing a deaf child who received no sign language input and whose hearing loss prevented him from acquiring spoken language. Despite his lack of a conventional language model, this child developed his own gestural system. In this system, features known to mark phrase and utterance boundaries in established sign languages were used to consistently mark the ends of utterances, but not to mark phrase or utterance internal boundaries. A single child can thus develop the seeds of a prosodic system, but full elaboration may require more time, more users, or even more generations to blossom.
References (79)
Alibali, Martha W., Sotaro Kita & Amanda J. Young. 2000. Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes 15(6). 593–613. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Wendy Sandler. 2008. The roots of linguistic organization in a new language. Interaction Studies 9(1). 133–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Charlotte & Carol Padden. 1978. Focusing on the non-manual components of American Sign Language. In Patricia Siple (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, 27–58. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balog, Heather L. & Diane Brentari. 2008. The relationship between early gestures and intonation. First Language 28(2). 141–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary. E. & Janet B. Pierrehumbert. 1986. Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook 31. 255–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benitez-Quiroz, C. Fabian, Kadir Gökgöz, Ronnie B. Wilbur & Aleix M. Martinez. 2014. Discriminant features and temporal structure of nonmanuals in American Sign Language. PLoS ONE 9(2): E86268. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1983. Intonation and gesture. American Speech 58(2). 156–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane, Marie Coppola, Laura Mazzoni & Susan Goldin-Meadow. 2012. When does a system become phonological? Handshape production in gesturers, signers, and homesigners. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30(1). 1–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane & Laurinda Crossley. 2002. Prosody on the hands and face: Evidence from American Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 5(2). 105–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane, Carolina González, Amanda Seidl & Ronnie Wilbur. 2011. Sensitivity to visual prosodic cues in signers and nonsigners. Language and Speech 54(1). 49–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butcher, Cynthia, Carolyn Mylander & Susan Goldin-Meadow. 1991. Displaced communication in a self styled gesture system: Pointing at the nonpresent. Cognitive Development 6(3). 315–342. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conrad, Reuben. 1977. Lip-reading by deaf and hearing children. British Journal of Educational Psychology 471. 60–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1979. The deaf child. London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coppola, Marie & Elissa L. Newport. 2005. Grammatical Subjects in home sign: Abstract linguistic structure in adult primary gesture systems without linguistic input. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102(52), 19249–19253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coppola, Marie & Ann Senghas. 2010. Deixis in an emerging sign language. In D. Brentari (ed.), Sign languages: A Cambridge language survey, 543–569. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cutler, Anne, Delphine Dahan & Wilma van Donselaar. 1997. Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech 40(2). 141–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dachkovsky, Svetlana, Christina Healy & Wendy Sandler. 2013. Visual intonation in two sign languages. Phonology 30(2). 211–252. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dachkovsky, Svetlana & Wendy Sandler. 2009. Visual intonation in the prosody of a sign language. Language and Speech 52(2-3). 287–314. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farwell, Roberta M. 1976. Speech reading: A research review. American Annals of the Deaf 1211. 19–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feldman, Heidi, Susan Goldin-Meadow & Lila Gleitman. 1978. Beyond Herodotus: The creation of language by linguistically deprived deaf children. In Andrew Lock (ed.), Action, gesture and symbol: The emergence of language, 351–414. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fenlon, Jordan, Tanya Denmark, Ruth Campbell & Bencie Woll. 2007. Seeing sentence boundaries. Sign Language & Linguistics 10(2). 177–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Franklin, Amy, Anastasia Giannakidou & Susan Goldin-Meadow. 2011. Negation, questions, and structure building in a homesign system. Cognition 1181. 398–416. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graf, Hans Peter, Eric Cosatto, Volker Strom & Fu Jie Huang. 2002. Visual prosody: Facial movement accompanying speech. Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition . 381–386.
Goldin-Meadow, Susan. 1979. Structure in a manual communication system developed without a conventional language model: Language without a helping hand. In Haiganoosh Whitaker & Harry Whitaker (eds.), Studies in neurolinguistics, Vol. 41, 125–209. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1982. The resilience of recursion: A study of a communication system developed without a conventional language model. In Eric Wanner & Lila R. Gleitman (eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art, 51–77. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. Language development under atypical learning conditions: Replication and implications of a study of deaf children of hearing parents. In Keith E. Nelson (ed.), Children’s language, Vol. 51, 197–245. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. Underlying redundancy and its reduction in a language developed without a language model: Constraints imposed by conventional linguistic input. In Barbara Lust (ed.), Studies in the acquisition of anaphora: Vol. II, applying the constraints, 105–133. Boston, MA: D. Reidel Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. The resilience of language. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan & Heidi Feldman. 1977. The development of language-like communication without a language model. Science 197(4301). 401–403. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan & Carolyn Mylander. 1983. Gestural communications in deaf children: The non effect of parental input on language development. Science 2211. 372–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984. Gestural communication in deaf children: The effects and non effects of parental input in early language development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 49(3). No. 207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. Beyond the input given: The child’s role in the acquisition of language. Language 661. 323–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Spontaneous sign systems created by deaf children in two cultures. Nature 3911. 279–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan, Cynthia Butcher, Carolyn Mylander & Mark Dodge. 1994. Nouns and verbs in a self styled gesture system: What’s in a name? Cognitive Psychology 271. 259–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan, Carolyn Mylander & Cynthia Butcher. 1995. The resilience of combinatorial structure at the word level: Morphology in self-styled gesture systems. Cognition 56(3). 195–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan, Carolyn Mylander & Amy Franklin. 2007. How children make language out of gesture: Morphological structure in gesture systems developed by American and Chinese deaf children. Cognitive psychology 55(2). 87–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen, Martje & Jens Heßmann. 2007. Matching propositional content and formal markers. Sign Language & Linguistics, 10(2). 145–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herrmann, Annika & Markus Steinbach. 2011. Nonmanuals in sign languages. Sign Language & Linguistics 14(1). 3–8. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmeister, Robert. 1978. The development of demonstrative pronouns, locatives and personal pronouns in the acquisition of American Sign Language by deaf children of deaf parents. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Hunsicker, Dea & Susan Goldin-Meadow. 2012. Hierarchical structure in a self-created communication system: Building nominal constituents in homesign. Language 88(4). 732–763. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo. 1989. The mora and syllable structure in Japanese: Evidence from speech errors. Language and Speech 32(3). 249–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert. 1992. An introduction to intonational phonology. In Gerard J. Docherty & Robert Ladd (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology II: Gesture, segment, prosody, 321–334. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lausberg, Hedda & Han Sloetjes. 2009. Coding gestural behavior with the NEUROGES ELAN system. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 41(3). 841–849. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott. 1978. Nonmanual signals and relative clauses in American Sign Language. In Patricia Siple (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, 59–90. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1980. American Sign Language syntax. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malaia, Evie & Ronnie B. Wilbur. 2011. Kinematic signatures of telic and atelic events in ASL predicates. Language and Speech 55(3). 407–421. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, David. 1979. The conceptual basis of language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. Hand and mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mindel, Eugene D. & McCay Vernon. 1971. They grow in silence: The deaf child and his family. Silver Springs, MD: National Association of the Deaf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moores, Donald F. 1982. Educating the deaf: psychology, principles and practices (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morford, Jill P. & Susan Goldin-Meadow. 1997. From here and now to there and then: The development of displaced reference in homesign and English. Child Development 68(3). 420–435. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Wendy Sandler. 1999. Prosody in Israeli Sign Language. Language and Speech 42(2-3). 143–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Prosodic phonology. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina, Mohinish Shukla, Ruben van de Vijver, Cinzia Avesani, Hanna Schraudolf & Caterina Donati. 2008. Different phrasal prominence realizations in VO and OV languages. Lingue e Linguaggio 21. 1–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newport, Elissa L. & Ted Supalla. 2000. Sign language research at the millennium. In Karen Emmorey & Harlan L. Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 103–114. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pyers, Jennie E. & Karen Emmorey. 2008. The face of bimodal bilingualism: Grammatical markers in American Sign Language are produced when bilinguals speak to English monolinguals. Psychological Science 19(6). 531–536. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 2010. Prosody and syntax in sign languages. Transactions of the Philological Society 108(3). 298–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin. 2006. Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy, Irit Meir, Svetlana Dachkovsky, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff. 2011. The emergence of complexity in prosody and syntax. Lingua 121(13). 2014–2033. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff. 2005. The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102(7). 2661–2665. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1994. Approaches to discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth. 1984. Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Senghas, Ann. 1995. Children’s contribution to the birth of Nicaraguan Sign Language. PhD dissertation,Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Distributed by MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Singleton, Jenny L., Jill P. Morford & Susan Goldin-Meadow. 1993. Once is not enough: Standards of well-formedness in manual communication created over three different timespans, Language 691. 683–715. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Summerfield, A. Quentin. 1983. Audio-visual speech perception, lipreading and artificial stimulation. In M.E. Lutman & M.P. Haggard (eds.), Hearing science and hearing disorders, 132–179. New York, NY: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Supalla, Ted. 2008. Sign language archeology: Integrating historical linguistics with fieldwork on young sign languages. In Ronice de Quadros (ed.), Sign languages: Spinning and unraveling the past, present and future, 574–583. Petrópolis, Brazil: Editora Arara.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swisher, M. Virginia. 1989. The language-learning situation of deaf students. Teachers of English to Speakers Other Languages Quarterly 231. 239–257.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tang, Gladys, Diane Brentari, Carolina González & Felix Sze. 2010. Crosslinguistic variation in prosodic cues. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages, 519–542. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Kooij, Els & Onno Crasborn. 2008. Syllables and the word-prosodic system in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Lingua 1181. 1307–1327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Kooij, Els, Onno Crasborn & Wim Emmerik. 2006. Explaining prosodic body leans in Sign Language of the Netherlands: Pragmatics required. Journal of Pragmatics 38(10). 1598–1614. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1994. Eyeblinks and ASL phrase structure. Sign Language Studies 841. 221–240. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Stress in ASL: Empirical evidence and linguistic issues. Language and Speech 2-31. 229–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Phonological and prosodic layering of nonmanuals in American Sign Language. In Karen Emmorey & Harlan L. Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 213–244. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Productive reduplication in a fundamentally monosyllabic language. Language Sciences 311. 325–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. & Aleix Martínez. 2002. Physical correlates of prosodic structure in American Sign Language. Chicago Linguistic Society 381. 693–704.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. & Cynthia G. Patschke. 1998. Body leans and the marking of contrast in ASL. Journal of Pragmatics 301. 275–303. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Syntactic correlates of brow raise in ASL. Sign Language & Linguistics 21. 3–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolford, George. 2012. Acquisition of prosody in American Sign Language. Master’s thesis, Purdue University. West LaFayette, IN.
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Coppola, Marie
2025. Homesign Research, Gesture Studies, and Sign Language Linguistics: The Bigger Picture of Homesign and Homesigners. Topics in Cognitive Science 17:3 ► pp. 492 ff. DOI logo
Olszanowski, Michal, Natalia Frankowska & Aleksandra Tołopiło
2023. “Rear bias” in spatial auditory perception: Attentional and affective vigilance to sounds occurring outside the visual field. Psychophysiology 60:11 DOI logo
LeBaron, Virginia, Mehdi Boukhechba, James Edwards, Tabor Flickinger, David Ling & Laura E Barnes
2022. Exploring the Use of Wearable Sensors and Natural Language Processing Technology to Improve Patient-Clinician Communication: Protocol for a Feasibility Study. JMIR Research Protocols 11:5 ► pp. e37975 ff. DOI logo
Kelty-Stephen, Damian G., Erik P. Raymakers & Krista M. Matthews-Saugstad
2018. Prosody Improves Detection of Spoonerisms Versus Both Sensible and Nonsense Phrases. Language and Speech 61:1 ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Brentari, Diane & Susan Goldin-Meadow
2017. Language Emergence. Annual Review of Linguistics 3:1 ► pp. 363 ff. DOI logo
Goldin-Meadow, Susan & Diane Brentari
2017. Gesture, sign, and language: The coming of age of sign language and gesture studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40 DOI logo
Goldin-Meadow, S., D. Brentari, M. Coppola, L. Horton & A. Senghas
2015. Watching language grow in the manual modality: Nominals, predicates, and handshapes. Cognition 136 ► pp. 381 ff. DOI logo
Goldin-Meadow, Susan
2015. Studying the mechanisms of language learning by varying the learning environment and the learner. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30:8 ► pp. 899 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Establishing Relationship between Emotional Prosody and Affective Pragmatics. International Journal online of Humanities 9:4 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue