Cover not available

Article published In: Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 17:1 (2014) ► pp.82–101

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

A quantitative analysis of sign lengthening in American Sign Language

 | University of Manitoba
Published online: 6 June 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.17.1.04ste
In spoken languages, disfluent speech, narrative effects, discourse information, and phrase position may influence the lengthening of segments beyond their typical duration. In sign languages, however, the primary use of the visual-gestural modality results in articulatory differences not expressed in spoken languages. This paper looks at sign lengthening in American Sign Language (ASL). Comparing two retellings of the Pear Story narrative from five signers, three primary lengthening mechanisms were identified: elongation, repetition, and deceleration. These mechanisms allow signers to incorporate lengthening into signs which may benefit from decelerated language production due to high information load or complex articulatory processes. Using a mixed effects model, significant differences in duration were found between (i) non-conventionalized forms vs. lexical signs, (ii) signs produced during role shift vs. non-role shift, (iii) signs in phrase-final/initial vs. phrase-medial position, (iv) new vs. given information, and (v) (non-disordered) disfluent signing vs. non-disfluent signing. These results provide insights into duration effects caused by information load and articulatory processes in ASL.
References (73)
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Wendy Sandler. 2003. Classifier constructions and morphology in two sign languages. In Karen Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifiers in sign languages, 53-84. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bortfeld, Heather, Silvia D. Leon, Jonathan E. Bloom, Michael F. Schober & Susan E. Brennan. 2001. Disfluency rates in conversation: Effects of age, relationship, topic, role and gender. Language and Speech 44(2). 123-147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane & Carol Padden. 2001. Native and foreign vocabulary in American Sign Language: A lexicon with multiple origins. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign languages, 87-119. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1980. The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crasborn, Onno & Els van der Kooij. 2013. The phonology of focus in sign language of the Netherlands. Journal of Linguistics 49(3). 515-565. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuxac, Christian. 1985. Esquisse d’une typologie des langues des signes. In Christian Cuxac (ed.), Autour de la langue des signes – Journée d’études, 35-60. Paris: Université René Descartes.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. La Langue des Signes Française (LSF): Les voies de l’iconicité. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. Les langues des signes: Analyseurs de la faculté de langage. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 151. 11-36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dachkovsky, Svetlana, Christina Healy & Wendy Sandler. 2013. Visual intonation in two sign languages. Phonology 30(2). 211-252. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1980. Beyond definiteness: The trace of identity in discourse. In Wallace Chafe (ed.), The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production, 203-274. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63(4). 805-855. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dudis, Paul. 2004. Body partitioning and real-space blends. Cognitive Linguistics 15(2). 223-238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eijk, Jan van. 1997. The Lillooet language: Phonology, morphology, syntax. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen. 2003. Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1993. Space in Danish Sign Language: The semantics and morphosyntax of the use of space in a visual language. Hamburg: Signum Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1995. Point of view expressed through shifters. In Karen Emmorey & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 133-154. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fowler, Carol A. & Jonathan Housum. 1987. Talkers’ signalling of “new” and “old” words in speech and listeners’ perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language 261. 489-504. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedman, Lynn. 1976. The manifestation of subject, object and topic in American Sign Language. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 125-148. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frishberg, Nancy. 1975. Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American Sign Language. Language 511. 696-719. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, Kerry. 1984. Sign boundaries in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 421. 65-91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K. 1988. Universals of topic-comment structure. In Michael Hammond, Edith A. Moravcsik & Jessica Wirth (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology, 209-242. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ingram, Robert M. 1978. Theme, rheme, topic, and comment in the syntax of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 201. 193-218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janzen, Terry. 1998. Topicality in ASL: Information ordering, constituent structure, and the function of topic marking. PhD dissertation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. Topic marking and a topicality hierarchy in ASL. Peikoff Chair Advanced Research Lecture Series: Deafness Studies Lecture. Faculty of Education, University of Alberta, February 2003.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Space rotation, perspective shift, and verb morphology in ASL. Cognitive Linguistics 15(2). 149-174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. The expression of grammatical categories in signed languages. In Elena Pizzuto, Paola Pietrandrea & Raffaele Simone (eds.), Verbal and signed languages: Comparing structures, constructs, and methodologies, 171-197. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnston, Trevor & Adam Schembri. 2007. Australian Sign Language: An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah. 1993. The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody. PhD dissertation, Ohio State University. [Published 1996, New York: Garland Publishing].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kegl, Judy. 1986. Clitics in American Sign Language. In Hagit Borer (ed.), Syntax and semantics. Vol. 19: The syntax of pronominal clitics, 285-365. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kegl, Judy & Ronnie B. Wilbur. 1976. Where does structure stop and style begin? Syntax, morphology, and phonology vs. stylistic variation in American Sign Language. Chicago Linguistic Society 121. 376-397.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klatt, Dennis H. 1975. Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in a connected discourse. Journal of Phonetics 31. 129-140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1976. Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59(50). 1208-1221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lentz, Ella. 1986. Teaching role shifting. In Carol A. Padden (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth National Symposium on Sign Language Research and Teaching , 58-69. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. 1978. Nonmanual signals and relative clauses in American Sign Language. In Patricia Siple (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, 59-90. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1984. Think and believe: Sequentiality in American Sign Language. Language 601. 372-399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1990. Four functions of a locus: Re-examining the structure of space in ASL. In Ceil Lucas (ed.), Sign language research, theoretical issues, 176-198. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. & Robert E. Johnson. 1989. American Sign Language: The phonological base. Sign Language Studies 641. 195-277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1995. The point of view predicate in American Sign Language. In Karen Emmorey & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 155-170. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane & Edward S. Klima. 1990. Pointing out differences: ASL pronouns in syntactic theory. In Susan D. Fischer & Patricia Siple (eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research. Vol. 1: Linguistics, 191-210. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loew, Ruth. 1984. Roles and reference in American Sign Language: A developmental perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McAllister, Jan & Mary M. Kingston. 2005. Word-final and word-medial disfluencies in school-age children: Two case studies. Journal of Fluency Disorders 30(3). 255-267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDowell, John H. 1994. “So wise were our elders” Mythic narratives of the Kamsá. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meier, Richard P. 1990. Person deixis in American Sign Language. In Susan D. Fischer & Patricia Siple (eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research. Vol. 1: Linguistics, 175-190. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nakai, Satsuki, Sari Kunnari, Alice Turk, Kari Suomi & Riikka Ylitalo. 2009. Utterance-final lengthening and quantity in Northern Finnish. Journal of Phonetics 371. 29-45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Wendy Sandler. 1999. Prosody in Israeli Sign Language. Language and Speech 42(2-3). 143-176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olawsky, Knut J. 2006. A grammar of Urarina. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oltean, Stefan. 1993. A survey of the pragmatic and referential functions of free indirect discourse. Poetics Today 14(4). 691-714. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padden, Carol. 1986. Verbs and role-shifting in American Sign Language. In Carol Padden (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth National Symposium on Sign Language Research and Teaching , 44-57. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David. 1992. Sonority and syllable structure in American Sign Language. Linguistic Inquiry 231. 407-442.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet & Mary Beckman. 1988. Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poulin, Christine & Christopher Miller. 1995. On narrative discourse and point of view in Quebec Sign Language. In Karen Emmorey & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 117-131. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F. 1981. Towards a taxonomy of given-new information. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 223-255. New York: Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rao, Rajiv. 2010. Final lengthening and pause duration in three dialects of Spanish. In Marta Ortega-Llebaria (ed.), Selected proceedings of the 4th Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology , 69-82. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 1986. The spreading hand autosegment of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 501. 1-28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1989. Phonological representation of the sign. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schembri, Adam. 2001. Issues in the analysis of polycomponential verbs in Australian Sign Language (Auslan). PhD dissertation, University of Sydney.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shriberg, Elizabeth E. 1996. Disfluencies in SWITCHBOARD. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, addendum , 11-14. Philadelphia, PA.
Sloetjes, Han & Peter Wittenburg. 2008. Annotation by category – ELAN and ISO DCR. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008) .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Supalla, Ted. 1986. The classifier system in American Sign Language. In Colette Craig (ed.), Noun classification and categorization, 181-214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tang, Gladys, Diane Brentari, Carolina González & Felix Sze. 2010. Crosslinguistic variation in prosodic cues. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages (Cambridge Language Surveys), 519-542. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Coquelle & Elizabeth Derr Jacobs. 2007. Pitch woman and other stories: The oral traditions of Coquelle Thompson, Upper Coquille Athabascan Indian. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turk, Alice E. & Stephanie Shattuck-Hufnagel. 2007. Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words. Journal of Phonetics 35(4). 445-472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watkins, Laurel J. 1984. A grammar of Kiowa. Lincoln: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whitebread, Geoff. 2004. Stuck on the tip of my thumb: Stuttering in American Sign Language. Undergraduate honours thesis, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wightman, Colin W., Stephanie Shattuck-Hufnagel, Mari Ostendorf & Pattie J. Price. 1992. Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91(3). 1707-1717. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1985. Towards a theory of “syllable” in signed languages: Evidence from the numbers of Italian Sign Language. In William Stokoe & Virginia Volterra (eds.), SLR ‘83: Sign language research, 160-174. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1990. Why syllables? What the notion means for ASL research. In Susan D. Fischer & Patricia Siple (eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research. Vol. 1: Linguistics, 81-108. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1993. Segments and syllables in ASL phonology. In: Geoffrey R. Coulter (ed.), Current issues in ASL phonology (Phonetics and Phonology Vol. 31), 135-168. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999. Stress in ASL: Empirical evidence and linguistic issues. Language and Speech 42(2-3). 229-250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. Sign syllables. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Karen Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 1309-1335. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. & Susan Nolen. 1986. Duration of syllables in American Sign Language. Language and Speech 291. 263-280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Andres, Jan, Martina Benešová, Eva Fišerová & Jiří Langer
2024. Are there fractals in sign language?. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 187 ► pp. 115420 ff. DOI logo
Lombart, Clara
2022. Prosodic marking of contrast in LSFB (French Belgian Sign Language). Belgian Journal of Linguistics 36 ► pp. 108 ff. DOI logo
Andres, Jan, Martina Benešová & Jiří Langer
2021. Towards a Fractal Analysis of the Sign Language. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 28:1 ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Langer, Jiří, Jan Andres, Martina Benešová & Dan Faltýnek
2020. Quantitative lingustic analysis of Czech sign language, DOI logo
Lewicka-Mroczek, Ewa, Edyta Wajda & Daniel Karczewski
2018. Ewaluacja seminarium dyplomowego opartego na metodologii „pear story”. Linguodidactica 22 ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
de Vos, Connie, Francisco Torreira & Stephen C. Levinson
2015. Turn-timing in signed conversations: coordinating stroke-to-stroke turn boundaries. Frontiers in Psychology 6 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue