Review published In: Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 16:1 (2013) ► pp.91–96
Book review
. Prosodic Markers and Utterance Boundaries in American Sign Language Interpretation. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press, 2009. € 52.00 / $ 65.00162 pp. ISBN 978-1-56368-412-8
Reviewed by
Published online: 15 July 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.16.1.04dac
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.16.1.04dac
References (11)
Baker, Charlotte & Carol Padden. 1978. Focusing on the nonmanual components of ASL. In Patricia Siple (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, 27–57. New York: Academic Press.
Baker-Shenk, Charlotte. 1983. A micro-analysis of the nonmanual components of American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Boyes Braem, Penny. 1999. Rhythmic temporal patterns in the signing of deaf early and late leaners of Swiss German Sign Language. Language and Speech 421. 177–208.
Coerts, Jane. 1992. Nonmanual grammatical markers: An analysis of interrogatives, negations and topicalisations in Sign Language of the Netherlands. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Fenlon, Jordan. 2010. Seeing sentence boundaries: The production and perception of visual markers signaling boundaries in signed languages. PhD dissertation, University College London.
Nespor, Marina & Wendy Sandler. 1999. Prosody in Israeli Sign Language. Language and Speech 421. 143–176.
Sandler, Wendy. 2005. Prosodic constituency and intonation in a sign language. In Helen Leuninger & Daniela Happ (eds.), Gebärdensprachen: Struktur, Erwerb, Verwendung (Linguistische Berichte Special Issue 15), 59–86. Hamburg: Buske.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1999. A functional journey with a formal ending. What do brow raises do in American Sign Language? In Michael Darnell, Edith A. Moravcsik, Michael Noonan, Frederick J. Newmeyer & Kathleen M. Wheatly (eds.), Functionalism and formalism in linguistics, vol. 2: Case studies, 295–313. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Winston, Elisabeth & Christine Monikowski. 2003. Marking topic boundaries in signed interpretation and transliteration. In Melanie Metzger, Steven Collins, Valerie Dively & Risa Shaw (eds.), From topic boundaries to omission: New research on interpretation, 187–228. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Crezee, Ineke H. M., Johanna Hautekiet & Lidia Rura
Crezee, Ineke H.M. & Teruko Asano
Crezee, Ineke H.M., Nawar Gailani & Anna N. Gailani
Crezee, Ineke H.M. & Eva N.S. Ng
Crezee, Ineke H.M., Holly Mikkelson & Laura Monzon-Storey
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
