Article published In: New Methodologies in Sign Language Phonology: Papers from TISLR 10
Edited by Diane Brentari and Ronnie B. Wilbur
[Sign Language & Linguistics 15:1] 2012
► pp. 147–174
Complexity in two-handed signs in Kenyan Sign Language
Evidence for sublexical structure in a young sign language
Published online: 20 September 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.15.1.07mor
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.15.1.07mor
This paper investigates whether two-handed signs in Kenyan Sign Language, a relatively young school-based sign language, conform to the same constraints on combinations of movement and handshape that hold in other sign languages. An analysis of 467 two-handed signs, separated into four types based on complexity, found that KSL is highly constrained, with only a few signs that violate proposed conditions. Three hypotheses to account for handshape restrictions on the non-dominant hand in highly complex signs are tested. Findings show that a universal unmarked set accounts for most of these handshapes; a language-specific unmarked set does no better; and a constraint on markedness at the featural level essentially accounts for all the signs. Further analyses discover that a preference for unmarked handshapes in the most complex signs extends to all two-handed signs to some degree. Finally, a phonotactic preference for the G/1 handshape on the dominant hand in complex signs is uncovered. Some evidence suggests that this tendency may surface in other languages as well.
Keywords: complexity, Kenyan Sign Language, symmetry, handshape, dominance, markedness
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Mayberry, Rachel I., Tristan Davenport, Austin Roth & Eric Halgren
MAYBERRY, RACHEL I. & ROBERT KLUENDER
Stoianov, Diane & Andrew Nevins
2017. The phonology of handshape distribution in Maxakalí sign. In Sonic Signatures [Language Faculty and Beyond, 14], ► pp. 232 ff.
Anne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde, Roland Pfau & Trude Schermer
Miyamoto, Ritsuko & Soya Mori
Padden, Carol A.
Börstell, Carl & Ryan Lepic
2014. Commentary on Kita, van Gijn & van der Hulst (1998). Sign Language & Linguistics 17:2 ► pp. 241 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
