Cover not available

Review published In: Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 11:1 (2008) ► pp.103107

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (10)
References
Ann, Jean. 1993. A linguistic investigation of the relationship between physiology and handshape. University of Arizona dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyes Braem, Penny. 1990. Acquisition of the handshape in American Sign Language: A preliminary analysis. In V. Volterra and C. Erting (eds.), From gesture to language in hearing and deaf children, 107–127. New York: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane. 1998. A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eccarius, Petra. 2008. A constraint-based account of handshape contrast in sign languages. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flemming, Edward. 2002. Auditory representations in phonology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greftegreff, Irene. 1993. A few notes on anatomy and distinctive features in NTS handshapes. Working Papers in Linguistics, 171. 48–68. Department of Linguistics, University of Trondheim.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ito, Junko & Mester, Armin. 1995. Japanese phonology: Constraint domains and structure preservation. In J. A. Goldsmith (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory, 817–838. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandel, Mark. 1981. Phonotactics and morphophonology in American Sign Language. Berkeley, CA: University of California dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padgett, Jaye. 1997. Perceptual distance of contrast: Vowel height and nasality. In R. Walker, M. Katayama & D. Karvonen (eds.) Phonology at Santa Cruz 51, 63–78. Santa Cruz, CA: Linguistics Research Center, University of California.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul. 1993. Optimality theory. Technical Report #2 of the Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers, NJ. (ROA Version, 8/2002).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue