Cover not available

Review published In: Identifying sentences in signed languages
Edited by Onno A. Crasborn
[Sign Language & Linguistics 10:2] 2007
► pp. 223–231

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Book review

Raum als kommunikative Ressource — eine handlungstheoretische Analyse visueller Sprachen

[Space as a communicative resource — a functional-pragmatic approach to visual languages]

Reviewed by
 | University of Hamburg
Published online: 1 October 2008
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.10.2.10wro
References (14)
References
Bühler, Karl. [1934], 1999 3. Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart: Lucius und Lucius.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeMatteo, Asa. 1977. Visual imagery and visual analogues in American Sign Language. In L. A. Friedman (ed.), On the other hand, 109–137. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehlich, Konrad. 1979. Verwendungen der Deixis beim sprachlichen Handeln. Linguistisch-philologische Untersuchungen zum hebräischen deiktischen System. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen. 1996. The confluence of space and language in signed languages. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel & M. F. Garrett (eds.), Language and space, 171–211. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 3. The exact number of parameters can be disregarded for this argument.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Language, cognition and the brain. Insights from sign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1993. Space in Danish Sign Language. The semantics and morphosyntax of the use of space in a visual language. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedman, Lynn Alice. 1975. Space, time and person reference in American Sign Language. Language 511, 940–961. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hillenmeyer, Margit. 1996 3. DGS. Deutsche Gebärdensprache III. Aufbaukurs für Fortgeschrittene 2. Bayern. München: Margit Hillenmeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. 1995. Real, surrogate and token space: Grammatical consequences in ASL. In K. Emmorey & J. S. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture and space, 19–41. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996. Spatial representations in discourse: Comparing spoken and signed languages. Lingua 981, 145–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mally, Gertrud. 1993. Redewendungen in der Deutschen Gebärdensprache. Münchner Dialekt. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandel, Mark. 1977. Iconic devices in American Sign Language. In L. A. Friedman (ed.), On the other hand, 57–109. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Redder, Angelika. 1998. Sprachwissen als handlungspraktisches Bewusstsein  – eine funktional-pragmatische Diskussion. Didaktik Deutsch 51, 60–75.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue