Cover not available

Abstract published In: Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 28:2 (2025) ► pp.299308

References (17)
References
Armstrong, David F. 1983. Iconicity, Arbitrariness, & Duality of Patterning in Signed & Spoken Language: Perspectives on Language Evolution. Sign Language Studies 38(1). 51–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun & Dan Zahavi. 2012. The phenomenological mind. 2nd ed. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutmacher, Fabian. 2019. Why Is There So Much More Research on Vision Than on Any Other Sensory Modality? Frontiers in Psychology 101. 2246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mesch, Johanna, Eli Raanes & Lindsay Ferrara. 2015. Co-forming real space blends in tactile signed language dialogues. Cognitive Linguistics 26(2). 261–287. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo. 2017. Iconicity Chains In Sign Languages. In Claire Bowern, Laurence Horn & Raffaella Zanuttini (eds.), On Looking Into Words (And Beyond): Structures, Relations, Analyses (Empirically Oriented Theoretical Morphology And Syntax 3). Berlin: Language Science Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perniss, Pamela, Robin L. Thompson & Gabriella Vigliocco. 2010. Iconicity as a General Property of Language: Evidence from Spoken and Signed Languages. Frontiers in Psychology 11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plato. 2000. Cratylus. (Trans.) Benjamin Jowett. Infomotions, Inc..Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slonimska, Anita. 2022. The role of iconicity and simultaneity in efficient communication in the visual modality. NL: LOT. . (20 May, 2024).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sonesson, Göran. 2012. The Phenomenological Road to Cognitive Semiotics. In Pilar Couto Cantero, Gonzalo Enríquez Veloso, Alberta Passeri & José María Paz Gago (eds.), Languages and Literature, 855–866. La Coruña, Spain: Universidade de Coruña.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. Iconicity and Semiosis. In Jamin Pelkey (ed.), Bloomsbury Semiotics Volume 1: History and Semiosis (Bloomsbury Semiotics), 193–214. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stokoe, William C. 1980. Sign Language Structure. Annual Review of Anthropology. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sutton-Spence, Rachel & Michiko Kaneko. 2016. Introducing sign language literature: folklore and creativity (Macmillan Education). London: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
The University of Jyväskylä, Sign Language Centre. 2018. Finnish Signbank. Language Bank of Finland (Kielipankki). [URL]. (9 October, 2024).
Winter, Bodo. 2019. Sensory linguistics: language, perception and metaphor (Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research (CELCR) volume 20). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winter, Bodo, Greg Woodin & Marcus Perlman. in press. Defining iconicity for the cognitive sciences. In Olga Fischer, Kimi Akita & Pamela Perniss (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Iconicity in Language. Oxford University Press. [URL]. (6 June, 2024).
Zlatev, Jordan. 2015. Cognitive Semiotics. In Peter Pericles Trifonas (ed.), International Handbook of Semiotics, 1043–1067. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Meaning making from life to language:The Semiotic Hierarchy and phenomenology. Cognitive Semiotics 11(1). 20180001. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue