Cover not available

Abstract published In: Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 28:1 (2025) ► pp.149162

References (35)
References
Boersma, Paul. 1997. How we learn variation, optionality, and probability. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences of the University of Amsterdam 211. 43–58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Bruce Hayes. 2001. Empirical tests of the gradual learning algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 32(1). 45–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2020. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer, version 6.1.27. URL: [URL]. Accessed 14 October 2020.
Börstell, Carl. To appear. Iconic plurality across modalities. In Olga Fischer, Kimi Akita & Pamela Perniss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of iconicity in language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Crasborn, Onno & Inge Zwitserlood. 2008. The Corpus NGT: An online corpus for professionals and laymen. In Onno Crasborn, Thomas Hanke, Eleni Efthimiou, Inge Zwitserlood & Ernst Thoutenhoofd (eds.), Construction and exploitation of sign language corpora: 3rd workshop on the representation and processing of sign languages, 44–49. Paris: ELDA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crasborn, Onno, Inge Zwitserlood & Johan Ros. 2008. The Corpus NGT: A digital open access corpus of movies and annotations of Sign Language of the Netherlands. URL: [URL]. Accessed 26 March 2020.
Dahl, Östen & Viveka Velupillai. 2013. Perfective/imperfective aspect. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. URL: [URL]. Accessed 16 March 2022.
Downing, Laura J. & Sharon Inkelas. 2015. What is reduplication? Typology and analysis part 2/2: The analysis of reduplication. Language and Linguistics Compass 9(12). 516–528. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Downing, Laura J. & Barbara Stiebels. 2012. Iconicity. In Jochen Trommer (ed.), The morphology and phonology of exponence, 379–426. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ergin, Rabia, Ann Senghas, Ray Jackendoff & Lila Gleitman. 2020. Structural cues for symmetry, asymmetry, and non-symmetry in Central Taurus Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 23(1/2). 171–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Everaert, Martin. 2000. Types of anaphoric expressions: Reflexives and reciprocals. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci S. Curl (eds.), Reciprocals: Forms and functions, 31–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harder, Rita, Corline Koolhof & Trude Schermer. 2003. Meervoud in de NGT: Verslag van een onderzoek in het kader van OCW subsidie 20031 [Plurality in NGT: Report of a study in the context of OCW subsidy 2003]. URL: [URL]. Accessed 7 July 2021.
Harley, Heidi & Maria Florez Leyva. 2009. Form and meaning in Hiaki (Yaqui) verbal reduplication. International Journal of American Linguistics 75(2). 233–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce & May Abad. 1989. Reduplication and syllabification in Ilokano. Lingua 771. 331–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoiting, Nini & Dan I. Slobin. 2001. Typological and modality constraints on borrowing: Examples from the Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign languages: A cross-linguistic investigation of word formation, 121–138. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kimmelman, Vadim. 2018. Reduplication and repetition in Russian Sign Language. In Rita Finkbeiner & Ulrike Freywald (eds.), Exact repetition in grammar and discourse, 91–109. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klima, Edward S. & Ursula Bellugi. 1979. The signs of language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klomp, Ulrika. 2021. A descriptive grammar of Sign Language of the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam PhD dissertation.
Kouwenberg, Silvia & Darlene LaCharité. 2015. Arbitrariness and iconicity in total reduplication: Evidence from Caribbean Creoles. In Daniela Rossi (ed.), The why and how of total reduplication: Current issues and new perspectives, 971–991. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nyst, Victoria, Marta Morgado, Timothy Mac Hadjah, Marco Nyarko, Mariana Martins, Lisa van der Mark, Evans Burichani, Tano Angoua, Moustapha Magassouba, Dieydi Sylla, Kidane Admasu & Anique Schüller. 2021. Object and handling handshapes in 11 sign languages: Towards a typology of the iconic use of the hands. Linguistic Typology 26(3). 573–604. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oomen, Marloes. 2016. The marking of two aspectual distinctions in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT). Linguistics in Amsterdam 9(2). 30–55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oomen, Marloes & Roland Pfau. 2017. Signing not (or not): A typological perspective on standard negation in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Linguistic Typology 21(1). 1–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palfreyman, Nick. 2019. Variation in Indonesian Sign Language: A typological and sociolinguistic analysis. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach. 2003. Optimal reciprocals in German Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 6(1). 3–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Plural formation in German Sign Language: Constraints and strategies. In Helen Leuninger & Daniela Happ (eds.), Gebärdensprachen: Struktur, Erwerb, Verwendung (Linguistische Berichte — Sonderheft 15), 111–144. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Modality and meaning: Plurality of relations in German Sign Language. Lingua 1701. 69–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. [1993] 2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers. [Technical report CU-CS-696-93, Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado at Boulder, and technical report TR-2, Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, April 1993.].
Rathmann, Christian G. 2005. Event structure in American Sign Language. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin PhD dissertation.
Rubino, Carl. 2013. Reduplication. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), WALS online, v2020.3 [Data set]. URL: [URL]. Accessed 4 October 2023. Zenodo,
Spaelti, Philip. 1997. Dimensions of variation in multi-pattern reduplication. Santa Cruz: University of California Santa Cruz PhD dissertation.
Sutton-Spence, Rachel & Bencie Woll. 1999. The linguistics of British Sign Language: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Boven, Cindy. 2020. Fill the gap: A novel test to elicit nominal plurals in NGT. FEAST. Formal and Experimental Advances in Sign language Theory 31. 56–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Boven, Cindy & Marloes Oomen. 2021. Habituals in Sign Language of the Netherlands: A corpus-based study. Linguistics in Amsterdam 14(1). 160–184.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwitserlood, Inge & Sibylla Nijhof. 1999. Pluralization in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT). In Jan Don & Ted Sanders (eds.), OTS yearbook 1998–1999, 58–78. Utrecht: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue