Review published In: Special Issue in Memory of Irit Meir
Edited by Diane Lillo-Martin, Wendy Sandler, Marie Coppola and Rose Stamp
[Sign Language & Linguistics 23:1/2] 2020
► pp. 280–285
Book review
. Information structure in sign languages: Evidence from Russian Sign Language and Sign Language of Netherlands. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton & Ishara Press, 2019. xxiii + 284 pp. ISBN 987-1-5015-1004-5(hardcover) 978-1-5015-1686-3(ebook) € 99.95 / USD 114.99
Reviewed by
Published online: 30 October 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.00053.nuh
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.00053.nuh
References (9)
Büring, Daniel. 2016. (Contrastive) topic. In Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of information structure, 64–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crasborn, Onno & Els van der Kooij. 2013. The phonology of focus in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Journal of Linguistics 49(3). 515–565.
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1976. Subject and topic: a new typology of language. In Charles N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic, 457–490. New York: Academic Press.
Kimmelman, Vadim. 2015. Topics and topic prominence in two sign languages. Journal of Pragmatics 871. 156–170.
Kimmelman, Vadim & Lianne Vink. 2017. Question-answer pairs in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Sign Language Studies 17(4). 417–449.
Reinhart, Tanja. 1982. Pragmatics and linguistics. An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27(1). 53–94.
Skopeteas, Stavros, Ines Fiedler, Sam Hellmuth, Anne Schwarz, Rubin Stoel, Gisbert Fanselow, Caroline Féry & Manfred Krifka. 2006. Questionnaire on Information Structure (QUIS): Reference Manual. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag.
