Cover not available

Article published In: Special Issue in Memory of Irit Meir
Edited by Diane Lillo-Martin, Wendy Sandler, Marie Coppola and Rose Stamp
[Sign Language & Linguistics 23:1/2] 2020
► pp. 112–141

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Spatial metaphors in antonym pairs across sign languages

 | Stockholm University
 | Gallaudet University
Published online: 30 October 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.00046.bor
Abstract
We analyze sign locations in 776 signs from 16 antonym pairs across 27 sign languages to examine metaphorical mappings of emotional valence (positive vs. negative) along different spatial axes. We conduct both an automatic and a manual analysis of sign location and movement direction, to investigate cross-linguistic patterns of spatial valence contrasts. Contrary to our hypothesis, negative valence concepts are generally articulated higher up than their positive counterparts. However, when we consider movement in space, we find that although signs generally move downward over time, positive valence concepts are associated with upward movements more often than their negative counterparts. This points to a systematic pattern for vertical valence contrasts – a known metaphor across languages – iconically mapped onto physical sign articulation. We similarly, but surprisingly, find a difference in movements along the sagittal axis, such that outward movement is associated with positive valence concepts more often than negative.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Metaphor and iconicity
  • 3.Data and methodology
    • 3.1Data
    • 3.2Coding
    • 3.3Research questions
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Sign height
    • 4.2Changes in sign height
    • 4.3Non-vertical dimensions
  • 5.Summary and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (47)
References
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boroditsky, Lera. 2000. Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75(1). 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Börstell, Carl, Ryan Lepic & Gal Belsitzman. 2016. Articulatory plurality is a property of lexical plurals in sign language. Lingvisticæ Investigationes 39(2). 391–407. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brennan, Mary. 2005. Conjoining word and image in British Sign Language (BSL): An exploration of metaphorical signs in BSL. Sign Language Studies 5(3). 360–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cao, Zhe, Gines Hidalgo, Tomas Simon, Shih-En Wei & Yaser Sheikh. 2018. OpenPose: realtime multi-person 2D pose estimation using Part Affinity Fields. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.08008.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cao, Zhe, Tomas Simon, Shih-En Wei & Yaser Sheikh. 2017. Realtime multi-person 2D pose estimation using part affinity fields. CVPR.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casasanto, Daniel & Kyle Jasmin. 2012. The hands of time: Temporal gestures in English speakers. Cognitive Linguistics 23(4). 643–674. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cienki, Alan & Cornelia Müller. 2008. Metaphor and gesture. Vol. 31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crasborn, Onno. 2011. The other hand in sign language phonology. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, vol. 11, 223–240. Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crasborn, Onno & Han Sloetjes. 2008. Enhanced ELAN functionality for sign language corpora. 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008), 3rd Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Construction and Exploitation of Sign Language Corpora, 39–43.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1978. What metaphors mean. Critical Inquiry 5(1). 31–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark, Damián E. Blasi, Gary Lupyan, Morten H. Christiansen & Padraic Monaghan. 2015. Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 191. 603–615. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elliot, Andrew J. 2006. The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation. Motivation and Emotion 30(2). 111–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
European Sign Language Center. 2012. Spread the Sign. [URL] (3 September, 2015).
Jantunen, Tommi. 2015. How long is the sign? Linguistics 53(1). 93–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kimmelman, Vadim, Maria Kyuseva, Yana Lomakina & Daria Perova. 2017. On the notion of metaphor in sign languages. Sign Language & Linguistics 20(2). 157–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klima, Edward S. & Ursula Bellugi. 1979. The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, Matti Miestamo & Carl Börstell. 2017. Impossible but not difficult: A typological study of lexical vs. derived antonyms. Paper presented at SLE 2017. University of Zürich, Switzerland.
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff & Rune H. B. Christensen. 2017. lmerTest Package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82(13). 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lepic, Ryan, Carl Börstell, Gal Belsitzman & Wendy Sandler. 2016. Taking meaning in hand: Iconic motivations for two-handed signs. Sign Language & Linguistics 19(1). 37–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meier, Brian P. & Michael D. Robinson. 2004. Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science 15(4). 243–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meir, Irit. 2010. Iconicity and metaphor: Constraints on metaphorical extension of iconic forms. Language 86(4). 865–896. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meir, Irit & Ariel Cohen. 2018. Metaphor in Sign Languages. Frontiers in Psychology 91. 1025. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meir, Irit, Carol Padden, Mark Aronoff & Wendy Sandler. 2007. Body as subject. Journal of Linguistics 431. 531–563. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Competing iconicities in the structure of languages. Cognitive Linguistics 24(2). 309–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meir, Irit & Oksana Tkachman. 2018. Iconicity. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Miozzo, Michele, Michael Villabol, Eduardo Navarrete & Francesca Peressotti. 2020. Hands show where things are: The close similarity between sign and natural space. Cognition 1961. 104106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nagy, William Elmer. 1974. Figurative patterns and redundancy in the lexicon. San Diego, CA: University of California PhD dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Núñez, Rafael E. & Kensy Cooperrider. 2013. The tangle of space and time in human cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17(5). 220–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Núñez, Rafael E. & Eve Sweetser. 2006. With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science 30(3). 401–450. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ooms, Jeroen. 2018. magick: Advanced graphics and image-processing in R. [URL]
Östling, Robert, Carl Börstell & Servane Courtaux. 2018. Visual iconicity across sign languages: Large-scale automated video analysis of iconic articulators and locations. Frontiers in Psychology 91. 725. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perniss, Pamela, Robin L. Thompson & Gabriella Vigliocco. 2010. Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology 11. 227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: [URL]
Reddy, Michael J. 1979. The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Andrew Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought, 284–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taub, Sarah F. 2001. Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in ASL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyrone, Martha E. & Claude E. Mauk. 2010. Sign lowering and phonetic reduction in American Sign Language. Journal of Phonetics 38(2). 317–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wickham, Hadley. 2009. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. [URL].
Wilcox, Phyllis Perrin. 2000. Metaphor in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winter, Bodo, Tyler Marghetis & Teenie Matlock. 2015. Of magnitudes and metaphors: Explaining cognitive interactions between space, time, and number. Cortex 641. 209–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woodin, Greg & Bodo Winter. 2018. Placing abstract concepts in space: Quantity, time and emotional valence. Frontiers in Psychology 91. 2169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yap, Defu, Laura Staum Casasanto & Daniel Casasanto. 2014. Metaphoric iconicity in signed and spoken languages. In Paul Bello, Marcello Guarini, Marjorie McShane & Brian Scassellati (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 1808–1813. [URL] (27 October, 2018).
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Bauer, Anastasia, Anna Kuder, Marc Schulder, Job Schepens & Laura Morett
2024. Phonetic differences between affirmative and feedback head nods in German Sign Language (DGS): A pose estimation study. PLOS ONE 19:5 ► pp. e0304040 ff. DOI logo
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, Matti Miestamo & Carl Börstell
2024. A cross-linguistic study of lexical and derived antonymy. Linguistics 62:6 ► pp. 1417 ff. DOI logo
Li , Yihao
2024. A Corpus-Based Study of Semantics of English and Chinese Pressure Antonyms "Light/Heavy". Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences 28 ► pp. 590 ff. DOI logo
Börstell, Carl
2023. Lexical comprehension within and across sign languages of Belgium, China and the Netherlands. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 8:1 DOI logo
Flaherty, Molly, Asha Sato & Simon Kirby
2023. Documenting a Reduction in Signing Space in Nicaraguan Sign Language Using Depth and Motion Capture. Cognitive Science 47:4 DOI logo
Keränen, Jarkko
2023. Cross-modal iconicity and indexicality in the production of lexical sensory and emotional signs in Finnish Sign Language. Cognitive Linguistics 34:3-4 ► pp. 333 ff. DOI logo
Mansoory, Bahareh & Vahid Nassiri
2022. Testing the body specificity hypothesis: A comparative study of the Persian language and the Persian Sign language. Acta Psychologica 223 ► pp. 103496 ff. DOI logo
Skorobohatova, O. О., I. I. Stepanchenko & M. V. Orobinska
2022. ПАРАДИГМАТИЧНА СИСТЕМА ГРАМАТИЧНИХ ОДИНИЦЬ (НА МАТЕРІАЛІ ПОЕТИЧНИХ ТВОРІВ). Лінгвістичні дослідження :56 ► pp. 244 ff. DOI logo
Скоробогатова, Олена Олександрівна, Іван Іванович Степанченко & Марія Володимирівна Оробінська
2022. ПАРАДИГМАТИЧНА СИСТЕМА ЛЕКСИЧНИХ ОДИНИЦЬ (НА МАТЕРІАЛІ ПОЕТИЧНИХ ТЕКСТІВ). Наукові записки Харківського національного педагогічного університету ім. Г. С. Сковороди "Літературознавство" 1:99 ► pp. 120 ff. DOI logo
Pouw, Wim, Mark Dingemanse, Yasamin Motamedi & Aslı Özyürek
2021. A Systematic Investigation of Gesture Kinematics in Evolving Manual Languages in the Lab. Cognitive Science 45:7 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue