Cover not available

Article published In: Special Issue in Memory of Irit Meir
Edited by Diane Lillo-Martin, Wendy Sandler, Marie Coppola and Rose Stamp
[Sign Language & Linguistics 23:1/2] 2020
► pp. 96–111

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Cross-linguistic metaphor priming in ASL-English bilinguals

Effects of the Double Mapping Constraint

 | Bielefeld University
 | San Diego State University
 | San Diego State University
 | San Diego State University
 | San Diego State University
Published online: 30 October 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.00045.sch
Abstract
Meir, Irit. 2010. Iconicity and metaphor: Constraints on metaphorical extension of iconic forms. Language 861. 865–896. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar Double Mapping Constraint (DMC) states the use of iconic signs in metaphors is restricted to signs that preserve the structural correspondence between the articulators and the concrete source domain and between the concrete and metaphorical domains. We investigated ASL signers’ comprehension of English metaphors whose translations complied with the DMC (Communication collapsed during the meeting) or violated the DMC (The acid ate the metal). Metaphors were preceded by the ASL translation of the English verb, an unrelated sign, or a still video. Participants made sensibility judgments. Response times (RTs) were faster for DMC-Compliant sentences with verb primes compared to unrelated primes or the still baseline. RTs for DMC-Violation sentences were longer when preceded by verb primes. We propose the structured iconicity of the ASL verbs primed the semantic features involved in the iconic mapping and these primed semantic features facilitated comprehension of DMC-Compliant metaphors and slowed comprehension of DMC-Violation metaphors.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Stimuli
    • 2.3Procedure
  • 3.Results
  • 4.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (21)
References
Basnight-Brown, Dana & Jeanette Altarriba. 2007. Differences in semantic and translation priming across languages: The role of language direction and language dominance. Memory & Cognition 35(5). 953–965. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boroditsky, Lera. 2001. Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology 43(1). 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boroditsky, Lera & Michael Ramscar. 2002. The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science 13(2). 185–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen. 2014. Iconicity as structure-mapping. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 20130301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. & Teenie Matlock. 2008. Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. In Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 161–176. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hosemann, Jana, Nivedita Mani, Annika Herrmann, Markus Steinbach & Nicole Altvater-Mackensen. 2020. Signs activate their written word translation in deaf adults: An ERP study on cross-modal co-activation in German Sign Language. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(1). 57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jamrozik, Anja, Marguerite McQuire, Eileen R. Cardillo & Anjan Chatterjee. 2016. Metaphor: Bridging embodiment to abstraction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 23(4). 1080–1089. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kubus, Okan, Agnes Villwock, Jill P. Morford & Christian Rathmann. 2015. Word recognition in deaf readers: Cross-language activation of German Sign Language and German. Applied Psycholinguistics 361. 831–854. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Brittany, Gabriela Meade, Katherine J. Midgley, Phillip J. Holcomb & Karen Emmorey. 2019. ERP evidence for co-activation of English words during recognition of American Sign Language signs. Brain Sciences 9(6). 148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meade, Gabriela, Katherine Midgley, Zed Sevickova Sehyr, Phillip J. Holcomb & Karen Emmorey. 2017. Implicit co-activation of American Sign Language in deaf readers: An ERP study. Brain and Language 1701. 50–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meir, Irit. 2010. Iconicity and metaphor: Constraints on metaphorical extension of iconic forms. Language 861. 865–896. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Midgley, Katherine J., Phillip J. Holcomb & Jonathan Grainger. 2009. Language effects in second language learners and proficient bilinguals investigated with event-related potentials. Journal of Neurolinguistics 22(3). 281–300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morford, Jill P., Erin Wilkinson, Agnes Villwock, Pilar Piñar & Judith F. Kroll. 2011. When deaf signers read English: Do written words activate their sign translations? Cognition 118(2). 286–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mott, Megan, Katherine J. Midgley, Phillip J. Holcomb & Karen Emmorey. 2020. Cross-modal translation priming and iconicity effects in deaf signers and hearing learners of American Sign Language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1–13 (online first). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sato, Manami, Amy J. Schafer & Ben K. Bergen. 2015. Metaphor priming in sentence production: Concrete pictures affect abstract language production. Acta Psychologica 1561. 136–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taub, Sarah F. 2001. Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Hell, Janet G., Ellen Ormel, Jay van der Loop & Daan Hermans. 2009. Cross-language interaction in unimodal and bimodal bilinguals. Paper presented at the 16th Conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, Cracow, Poland.
Villameriel, Saul, Patricia Dias, Brendan Costello & Manuel Carreiras. 2016. Cross-language and cross-modal activation in hearing bimodal bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language 871. 59–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Nicole L. & Raymond W. Gibbs Jr. 2007. Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science 31(4). 721–731. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilcox, Phyllis. 2004. A cognitive key: Metonymic and metaphorical mappings in ASL. Cognitive Linguistics 15(2). 197–222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue