Implications for morphosyntax: Syntactic vs. morphological case

Spencer, Andrew

doi:10.1075/slcs.77.03spe

In:Case, Valency and Transitivity
Edited by Leonid Kulikov, Andrej L. Malchukov and Peter de Swart
[Studies in Language Companion Series 77] 2006
► pp. 3–21

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

Syntactic vs. morphological case

Implications for morphosyntax

Andrew Spencer

Published online: 15 November 2006

https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.77.03spe

Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Order by:

Šereikaitė, Milena

2026. Case and Voice properties of complex event nominalizations: A Voice-bundling approach. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 44:1

SIGURÐSSON, EINAR FREYR & MILENA ŠEREIKAITĖ

2024. The dual face of structural object case: on Lithuanian genitive of negation. Journal of Linguistics 60:1 ► pp. 161 ff.

Dalrymple, Mary, John J. Lowe & Louise Mycock

2019. The Oxford Reference Guide to Lexical Functional Grammar,

Matić, Dejan

2019. A case for syntactic case: the accusative in Tundra Yukaghir. Morphology 29:3 ► pp. 337 ff.

Arkadiev, Peter

2017. Multiple ergatives. Studies in Language 41:3 ► pp. 717 ff.

Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Demena Travis

2017. The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity,

Diewald, Gabriele

2016. Non-central usages of datives. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 69:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.