In:Grammatical Relations in Change
Edited by Jan Terje Faarlund
[Studies in Language Companion Series 56] 2001
► pp. 223–239
Subject and object in Old English and Latin copular deontics
Published online: 13 July 2001
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.56.10mil
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.56.10mil
The history of deontic expressions in several languages reveals some naturalness in (a) constructions involving BE plus infinitive/gerundial, (b) thematic object initially surfacing in the nom, (c) reanalysis via case accommodation in neuters to a structure in which the thematic object surfaces in the acc, and (d) animates being first to adopt the change obligatorily. Neuters permitted two analyses of the theme argument: (i) nom subject; (ii) acc object. BE and non-neuters of most word-classes favor the nom subject analysis. In Latin, impersonals in -um favored an object analysis. In Latin and OE the possibility of analyzing the agentive dative as a quirky subject in the (OE) type us is to ponder the word/what is us to ponder shifted the cues in favor of an analysis of the theme as structural object, whence overt acc objects.
Cited by (20)
Cited by 20 other publications
Haumann, Dagmar
2018. Active and passive tough-infinitives. In Reorganising Grammatical Variation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 203], ► pp. 269 ff.
Miller, D. Gary
Miller, D. Gary
Miller, D. Gary
Miller, D. Gary
Miller, D. Gary
Miller, D. Gary
Miller, D. Gary
Miller, D. Gary
Miller, D. Gary
Miller, D. Gary
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
