In:Grammatical Relations in Change
Edited by Jan Terje Faarlund
[Studies in Language Companion Series 56] 2001
► pp. 99–135
The notion of oblique subject and its status in the history of Icelandic
Published online: 13 July 2001
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.56.05faa
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.56.05faa
The term ‘oblique subject’ is used in recent descriptions of Icelandic about NPs that behave syntactically like subjects without having nominative case. Data in support of such an analysis can easily be found in Modern Icelandic. Various linguists have assumed that also Old Icelandic has oblique subjects. In this paper I first discuss the notion of oblique subject on a metatheoretical basis. My claim is that oblique subject is not an empirical entity, it is a result of a decision to use it as a descriptive device because it may yield a more economical or elegant description of certain facts about the language. The main body of the paper is a thorough examination of the kinds of data that have been used in support of an oblique subject analysis for Old Icelandic, supplemented by some of my own additional data. It turns out that the set of subject properties of Old Icelandic is different (smaller) than that of Modern Icelandic, and the result of this examination is that Old Icelandic does not exhibit data that call for an oblique subject analysis. The final section of the paper offers an account of the diachronic process that may have led to the kind of structure that justifies an oblique subject analysis of Modern Icelandic. This process is a reanalysis leading to a change in the possible content of the Specifier position of IP, whereby it has become an exclusive subject position. Non-nominative NPs in that position may have kept their oblique case, and become oblique subjects.
Cited by (50)
Cited by 50 other publications
Papazian, Eric
Bacskai-Atkari, Julia
Danckaert, Lieven
Dragomirescu, Adina & Virginia Hill
Egedi, Barbara & Veronika Hegedűs
Haeberli, Eric & Tabea Ihsane
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli & Brynhildur Stefánsdóttir
Larsson, Ida & Ellen Brandner
Martins, Ana Maria, Sandra Pereira & Clara Pinto
Sanfelici, Emanuela, Jacopo Garzonio & Cecilia Poletto
Viðarsson, Heimir F.
Heltoft, Lars
2021. The typology of Old Norse revisited. NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 74:2 ► pp. 242 ff.
Heltoft, Lars
Barđdal, Jóhanna, Leonid Kulikov, Roland Pooth & Peter Alexander Kerkhof
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Thórhallur Eythórsson & Tonya Kim Dewey
Barðdal, Jóhanna
2018. Introduction. In Non-canonically case-marked subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series, 200], ► pp. 1 ff.
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Thórhallur Eythórsson
2018. What is a subject. In Non-canonically case-marked subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series, 200], ► pp. 257 ff.
Jónsson, Jóhannes G.
2018. Word order as a subject test in Old Icelandic. In Non-canonically case-marked subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series, 200], ► pp. 135 ff.
Zinchenko, H.
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Carlee Arnett, Stephen Mark Carey, Thórhallur Eythórsson, Gard B. Jenset, Guus Kroonen & Adam Oberlin
Kinn, Kari
Kinn, Kari
Kinn, Kari, Kristian A. Rusten & George Walkden
Seržant, Ilja A.
2015. An approach to syntactic reconstruction. In Perspectives on Historical Syntax [Studies in Language Companion Series, 169], ► pp. 117 ff.
Faarlund, Jan Terje & Kristin Hagemann
2014. Subjects and objects in Germanic and Romance. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in Germanic and Romance Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 213], ► pp. 295 ff.
Barđdal, Jóhanna & Thórhallur Eythórsson
Miller, D. Gary
Miller, D. Gary
Miller, D. Gary
Miller, D. Gary
Miller, D. Gary
Miller, D. Gary
Miller, D. Gary
Miller, D. Gary
Miller, D. Gary
Miller, D. Gary
Eythórsson, Thórhallur
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
