An areal-typological approach: The Circum-Baltic languages

Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria; Wälchli, Bernhard

doi:10.1075/slcs.55.15kop

In:Circum-Baltic Languages: Volume 2: Grammar and Typology
Edited by Östen Dahl and Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm
[Studies in Language Companion Series 55] 2001
► pp. 615–750

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

The Circum-Baltic languages

An areal-typological approach

Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm

Bernhard Wälchli

Published online: 31 December 2001

https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.55.15kop

Cited by (63)

Cited by 63 other publications

Order by:

Anna, Malysheva & Ronko Roman

2025. 5718 Case selection for the direct object of negated verbs in Russian dialects. In Convergence and Divergence in the Eastern Circum-Baltic Area, ► pp. 571 ff.

Basile, Rodolfo

2025. The Finnish Existential Partitive Construction: Comparing Two Applications of Collostructional Analysis. In How to Do Things with Corpora [Linguistik in Empirie und Theorie/Empirical and Theoretical Linguistics, ], ► pp. 67 ff.

Blokland, Rogier

2025. 3575 Livonian. In Convergence and Divergence in the Eastern Circum-Baltic Area, ► pp. 357 ff.

Grünthal, Riho

2025. 712 Inherited features, grammatical change, and the influence of early language contacts in Finnic. In Convergence and Divergence in the Eastern Circum-Baltic Area, ► pp. 71 ff.

Kleineberg, Désirée & Wiltrud Mihatsch

2025. Diachronic evidence for Spanish object mass nouns as a peripheral category. In The Diachrony of Word Class Peripheries [Studies in Language Companion Series, 238], ► pp. 17 ff.

Lindström, Liina, Miina Norvik, Helen Plado & Petar Kehayov

2025. 2474 Estonian. In Convergence and Divergence in the Eastern Circum-Baltic Area, ► pp. 247 ff.

Peter, Arkadiev & Kozhanov Kirill

2025. 5137 Object partitive of negation: An areal perspective. In Convergence and Divergence in the Eastern Circum-Baltic Area, ► pp. 513 ff.

Seržant, Ilja A., Berfin Aktaṣ, Maria Ovsjannikova & Manfred Stede

2025. Distance-based approach reveals convergence effects in word order among the languages of the Circum-Baltic linguistic area. Studies in Language

Wiemer, Björn & Peter Arkadiev

2025. 11 Convergence and divergence in the eastern Circum-Baltic Area:A triangulation approach – Introductory Chapter. In Convergence and Divergence in the Eastern Circum-Baltic Area, ► pp. 1 ff.

Chaika, Lesia, Natalia Lehka, Anne Tamm & Natalia Vaiss

2024. Ukrainian Aspect and Object Case in ukTenTen The Partitive Genitive of Perfective Verbs and Mass Nouns . In Partitive Constructions and Partitive Elements Within and Across Language Borders in Europe ,

Zakaria, Muhammad

2024. Evidence of a contact-induced change. Asian Languages and Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 132 ff.

Acquaviva, Paolo & Laure Gardelle

2023. Pluralia tantumandsingularia tantum. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology, ► pp. 1 ff.

Bucci, Giacomo

2023. The Contribution of Germanic to the Expansion of Partitive‐Related Phenomena in the Prehistoric Circum‐Baltic Area1. Transactions of the Philological Society 121:3 ► pp. 427 ff.

Goll, Sabrina, Steffen Höder, Sarah Paetzke & Nina Sternitzke

2023. Nordisk-nordtysk kontakt i backspegeln. Nordlyd 47:2 ► pp. 91 ff.

Meyer, Robin

2023. Iranian Syntax in Classical Armenian,

Ter-Avanesova, Alexandra & Michael Daniel

2023. The second genitive in the history of Russian and across its dialects. Linguistic Variation 23:1 ► pp. 28 ff.

Norvik, Miina, Yingqi Jing, Michael Dunn, Robert Forkel, Terhi Honkola, Gerson Klumpp, Richard Kowalik, Helle Metslang, Karl Pajusalu, Minerva Piha, Eva Saar, Sirkka Saarinen & Outi Vesakoski

2022. Uralic typology in the light of a new comprehensive dataset. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 1:1 ► pp. 4 ff.

Giudici, Alberto & Chiara Zanini

2021. A plural indefinite quantifier on the Romance-Slavic border. Word Structure 14:2 ► pp. 195 ff.

Di Garbo, Francesca

2020. Plural marking on noun-associated forms. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 73:3 ► pp. 363 ff.

Fernandez-Vest, M.M. Jocelyne

2020. Chapter 12. French tense challenged by Finnish aspects. In The Expression of Tense, Aspect, Modality and Evidentiality in Albert Camus’sL'Étrangerand Its Translations /L'Étrangerde Camus et ses traductions : questions de temps, d'aspect, de modalité et d'évidentialité (TAME) [Lingvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa, 35], ► pp. 222 ff.

Liljegren, Henrik

2020. The Hindu Kush–Karakorum and linguistic areality. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 7:2 ► pp. 239 ff.

Luraghi, Silvia, Merlijn De Smit & Iván Igartua

2020. Contact-induced change in the languages of Europe: The rise and development of partitive cases and determiners in Finnic and Basque. Linguistics 58:3 ► pp. 869 ff.

Drinka, Bridget

2019. Perfecting the notion of Sprachbund. In Historical Linguistics 2015 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 348], ► pp. 319 ff.

Igartua, Iván

2019. Loss of grammatical gender and language contact. Diachronica 36:2 ► pp. 181 ff.

Panov, Vladimir

2019. Juk and gi, and “particles” in contemporary Lithuanian: Explaining language-particular elements in a cross-linguistic context. Kalbotyra 72 ► pp. 58 ff.

Urban, Matthias, Hugo Reyes-Centeno, Kate Bellamy & Matthias Pache

2019. The areal typology of western Middle and South America: Towards a comprehensive view. Linguistics 57:6 ► pp. 1403 ff.

Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald

2018. The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality,

Haig, Geoffrey

2017. Western Asia: East Anatolia as a Transition Zone. In The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics, ► pp. 396 ff.

Lindström, Liina & Kristel Uiboaed

2017. Syntactic variation in ‘need’-constructions in Estonian dialects. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 40:3 ► pp. 313 ff.

Metslang, Helle, Külli Habicht & Karl Pajusalu

2017. Where do polar question markers come from?. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 70:3 ► pp. 489 ff.

Usonienė, Aurelija & Jolanta Šinkūnienė

2017. Potential vs Use. In Evidentiality Revisited [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 271], ► pp. 171 ff.

van der Auwera, Johan & Daniël Van Olmen

2017. The Germanic Languages and Areal Linguistics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics, ► pp. 239 ff.

Viti, Carlotta

2017. Semantic and cognitive factors of argument marking in ancient Indo-European languages. Diachronica 34:3 ► pp. 368 ff.

Arkadiev, Peter M.

2016. Long-distance Genitive of Negation in Lithuanian. In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3], ► pp. 37 ff.

Miestamo, Matti, Dik Bakker & Antti Arppe

2016. Sampling for variety. Linguistic Typology 20:2 ► pp. 233 ff.

Wiemer, Björn & Vaiva Žeimantienė

2016. Contexts for the choice of genitive vs. instrumental in contemporary Lithuanian. In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3], ► pp. 259 ff.

Metslang, Helle, Karl Pajusalu & Tiit-Rein Viitso

2015. Negation in Livonian. In Negation in Uralic Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 108], ► pp. 433 ff.

Holvoet, Axel & Nicole Nau

2014. Argument marking and grammatical relations in Baltic. In Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 1], ► pp. 1 ff.

Seržant, Ilja A.

2014. The independent partitive genitive in Lithuanian. In Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 1], ► pp. 257 ff.

Seržant, Ilja A.

2015. Categorization and semantics of subject-like obliques. In Subjects in Constructions – Canonical and Non-Canonical [Constructional Approaches to Language, 16], ► pp. 175 ff.

Seržant, Ilja A.

2021. Typology of partitives. Linguistics 59:4 ► pp. 881 ff.

Meyerhoff, Miriam

2009. Replication, transfer, and calquing: Using variation as a tool in the study of language contact. Language Variation and Change 21:3 ► pp. 297 ff.

Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, Martine Vanhove & Peter Koch

2007. Typological approaches to lexical semantics. Linguistic Typology 11:1

Campbell, Lyle

2006. Areal Linguistics: A Closer Scrutiny. In Linguistic Areas, ► pp. 1 ff.

Grashchenkova, Anna & Pavel Grashchenkov

2006. Review of Hanke (2005): Bildungsweisen von Numeralia. Eine typologische Untersuchung. Studies in Language 30:4 ► pp. 812 ff.

Stolz, Thomas

2006. All or Nothing. In Linguistic Areas, ► pp. 32 ff.

Enfield, N.J.

2005. AREAL LINGUISTICS AND MAINLAND SOUTHEAST ASIA. Annual Review of Anthropology 34:1 ► pp. 181 ff.

Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva

2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change,

Hock, W.

2004. Baltoslavisch. I. Teil: Phonologie. Kratylos 49:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Kuteva, Tania & Bernd Heine

2004. On the possessive perfect in North Russian. <i>WORD</i> 55:1 ► pp. 37 ff.

Croft, William

2001. Syntactic Categories and Semantic Relativity. In Radical Construction Grammar, ► pp. 108 ff.

Croft, William

2001. A Radical Approach to Syntactic Relations. In Radical Construction Grammar, ► pp. 203 ff.

Croft, William

2001. Parts of Speech. In Radical Construction Grammar, ► pp. 63 ff.

Croft, William

2001. The Voice Continuum. In Radical Construction Grammar, ► pp. 283 ff.

Croft, William

2001. Heads, Arguments, and Adjuncts. In Radical Construction Grammar, ► pp. 241 ff.

[no author supplied]

2001. Preface. In Radical Construction Grammar, ► pp. xiii ff.

[no author supplied]

2001. Copyright Page. In Radical Construction Grammar, ► pp. ii ff.

[no author supplied]

2001. Figures. In Radical Construction Grammar, ► pp. xix ff.

[no author supplied]

2001. Endorsement. In Radical Construction Grammar, ► pp. iii ff.

[no author supplied]

2001. Tables. In Radical Construction Grammar, ► pp. xxii ff.

[no author supplied]

2001. to a lost home. In Radical Construction Grammar, ► pp. v ff.

[no author supplied]

2001. Abbreviations. In Radical Construction Grammar, ► pp. xxiv ff.

[no author supplied]

2001. Symbols. In Radical Construction Grammar, ► pp. xxviii ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.