In:Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English
Edited by Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach and Dieter Stein
[Studies in Language Companion Series 53] 2000
► pp. 111–147
Combining English auxiliaries
Published online: 13 November 2000
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.53.07den
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.53.07den
Cited by (12)
Cited by 12 other publications
Carlucci, Alessandro & Jerzy Nykiel
2025. Introduction. In The Progressive Revisited [Studies in Language Companion Series, 236], ► pp. 1 ff.
Nordenlöw, Rebecka
2025. The rise of the progressive passive and the loss of the non-finite participial progressive being
Ving
. In The Progressive Revisited [Studies in Language Companion Series, 236], ► pp. 47 ff.
Eide, Kristin Melum & Marc Fryd
2021. The perfect volume. In The Perfect Volume [Studies in Language Companion Series, 217], ► pp. 1 ff.
Fryd, Marc
2021. From have-omission to supercompounds. In The Perfect Volume [Studies in Language Companion Series, 217], ► pp. 397 ff.
van Trijp, Remi
2017. How a Construction Grammar account solves the auxiliary
controversy. Constructions and Frames 9:2 ► pp. 251 ff.
van Trijp, Remi
2019. How a Construction Grammar account solves the auxiliary controversy. In Case Studies in Fluid Construction Grammar [Benjamins Current Topics, 106], ► pp. 79 ff.
Killie, Kristin
2015. The grammaticalization of progressive constructions with a focus on the English progressive. In Historical Linguistics 2013 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 334], ► pp. 213 ff.
Bentein, Klaas
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.