Evidentiality and Some Discourse Characteristics in Japanese

Kamio, Akio

doi:10.1075/slcs.36.09kam

In:Directions in Functional Linguistics
Edited by Akio Kamio
[Studies in Language Companion Series 36] 1997
► pp. 145–172

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

Evidentiality and Some Discourse Characteristics in Japanese

Akio Kamio

Published online: 20 November 1997

https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.36.09kam

Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Order by:

Riccioni, Ilaria, Andrzej Zuczkowski & Ramona Bongelli

2025. Rhetorical questions and epistemic stance in an Italian Facebook corpus during the COVID-19 pandemic. Open Linguistics 11:1

Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap

2015. Evidentiality in interaction. Studies in Language 39:1 ► pp. 46 ff.

Zuczkowski, Andrzej, Ramona Bongelli, Laura Vincze & Ilaria Riccioni

2014. Epistemic stance. In Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific Contexts [Dialogue Studies, 25], ► pp. 115 ff.

Shin Kim, Mary

2011. Negotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversation: An examination of the Korean evidential marker –tamye. Discourse Studies 13:4 ► pp. 435 ff.

Hosoda, Yuri

2006. Repair and Relevance of Differential Language Expertise in Second Language Conversations. Applied Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 25 ff.

Fox, Barbara A.

2001. Evidentiality: Authority, Responsibility, and Entitlement in English Conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11:2 ► pp. 167 ff.

[no author supplied]

2017. Epistemic Stance in Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 29],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.